Status
Description
"1952. Twelve years have passed since Churchill lost to the appeasers and Britain surrendered to Nazi Germany. The global economy strains against the weight of the long German war against Russia still raging in the east. The British people find themselves under increasingly authoritarian rule--the press, radio, and television tightly controlled, the British Jews facing ever greater constraints. But Churchill's Resistance soldiers on. As defiance grows, whispers circulate of a secret that could forever alter the balance of the global struggle. The keeper of that secret? Scientist Frank Muncaster, who languishes in a Birmingham mental hospital. Civil Servant David Fitzgerald, a spy for the Resistance and University friend of Frank's, is given the mission to rescue Frank and get him out of the country. Hard on his heels is Gestapo agent Gunther Hoth, a brilliant, implacable hunter of men, who soon has Frank and David's innocent wife, Sarah, directly in his sights."-- From dust jacket flap.… (more)
User reviews
Dominion doesn't deviate from Sansom's norm. It is a "what if" story of Britain slowly becoming a quasi Nazi state following a peace treaty with Hitler in 1940. Sansom unerringly explores the fears, hopes and motivations of the key characters, from the British civil servant who joins the resistance, to the German detective relentlessly pursing an important secret and his British police counterpart, who gets carried away in supporting his Nazi colleague. Being Sansom, the book subtly lays bare fears about those perceived as "different" and the ease with which such emotions develop into prejudice and - if compounded by indifference - allow persecution. If this all sounds serious, it is, but Sansom's gift is to combine substantial themes with a fast moving, absorbing story. To say much more would risk spoiling the plot, but this novel is well worth reading.
This is a spy thriller of the highest order set in an alternate Britain, following the individual narrative threads of David, his wife Sarah, Frank and Gunther, the German. Sansom masterly increases the tension by setting the individual timelines slightly out of sync, thereby letting the reader move backwards and then forwards in time and allowing them to anticipate a moment when the individual strands inevitably converge. As ever, he is a master in conveying the atmosphere of a place, in this case 1950s Britain ruled by an authoritarian regime with close links to Nazi Germany. It is brimful with authentic cultural references of the period and manages to impart a sense of fear and suspicion, yet also the cold, dampness and smog-covered streets of a London autumn. It is heartbreaking and harrowing in places, making for uncomfortable reading at times as it questions the reader’s own beliefs. Despite its setting in 1952, Sansom shows us that he’s an immensely talented writer by making some of the themes covered in the novel as topical and relevant as ever: newspaper magnates dabbling in politics and influencing government policy, nationalism and fascism, the importance of standing up for one’s beliefs and not looking away when atrocities are committed on citizens by those in power. He describes how fascism can arise in any country when the circumstances are right, and in the novel (as in reality) Britain, France and Slovakia quickly followed in Germany’s footsteps in producing their own versions of it, yet he is also at pains to point out that, despite the fascists’ brash arguments, a lot of them are simply motivated by greed and self-preservation. With fifteen pages of historical notes, this feels like an intensely personal and political book, with Sansom almost going so far as to call on his readership to fight the rise of nationalism wherever it is encountered. It is a thought-provoking and important work and deserves all the critical acclaim that has been heaped on it so far.
Perhaps I am being rather harsh. The plot premise was certainly
However, Sansom seems to have an incurable tendency towards turgidity and he still seems incapable of creating a character who can evoke any empathy at all.
Such is the premise of CJ Sansom’s latest book: having mastered the art of
Civil servant David Fitzgerald has a deadly secret – his mother was Jewish and English Jews are being sent to camps: David, as a member of the Resistance led by Churchill, has to get out of the country.
Spies are everywhere and a choking fog hampers movement of Gestapo and freedom fighter alike in this evocative and convincing story of what might have been.
Sansom’s got a lot to say about the concept of the political narrative being driven by narrow nationalist agendas, which sweep people along on a seductive tide of rhetoric, but which are ultimately at best vacuous, and at worst dangerous in providing a fertile breeding ground for fascist, brutalising and xenophobic behaviour and attitudes. I read his essay on this in contemporary British politics with interest.
It’s a very different type of book from his excellent Shardlake series, and I admired his bravery in tackling the constraints of a re-imagined Britain with a still fanatical Nazi Germany ruling Europe. Sansom clearly did loads of research (which he gives us lots of details about at the end of the book), and there was an authentic feel to the depressed and depressing London backdrop. But as I was reading, I kept wishing for it to be just a bit better than it was...some sharper editing, fewer page-wasting back stories, and a bit less clunky dialogue would have made this an oh-so-much-better reading experience. I am sure it would lend itself to a TV mini-series/film adaptation, which may actually work better on screen than on the page, but as a novel there was just too much missing for me to rate it any higher than three stars.
© Koplowitz 2013
Quite often in the Shardlake books Sansom uses a
Which brings me on to my second point. Obviously a lot has happened since the signing of the treaty with Germany in 1940 and here we are in Berlin. How do you fill the reader in? Well you get characters to have discussions about their feelings on the events of the last 10 years or so. Fine , no problem apart from the fact that these tend to happen at quite inappropriate times so that you have situations where people are running away from gunmen or having to escape from somewhere and they decide during their flight to have a discussion about the past elections of British PMs. Not sure I would be doing that while being chased by the SS.
These two points aside, the novel does have a decent if slightly overblown plot. Oh and Sansom definitely does not like the SNP so if you are all for Scottish independence you may want to give this book a bit of a miss.
This book follows a couple different characters, most of them British (but there is also a German character and one from Slovakia). Usually I don't really like when a book switches point-of-view between more than two or three characters but this time I feel like it really enhanced the story. The switching of point-of-view really allowed readers to see how all the characters were connected.
The way that Sansom portrays England if they had surrendered to Germany was horrifying yet fascinating. I really enjoyed that he took some time in the back of the book to really explain his reasoning for it.
This book is more than 600 pages but it didn't seem like it at all. I was so focused in on this book that time and the pages just flew by. I really enjoyed all the suspense and twists and turns in this book. I was on the edge of my seat while reading the ending of this book. I didn't want it to end yet I loved the way that Sansom ended it.
I would highly recommend this book to people who like WWII historical fiction, even if you aren't too sure about the whole alternate history thing, this book won't let you down.
Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for allowing me the chance to read this book.
This is a sombre story, sombrely told, using the historic London smogs as a metaphor for the propagandist ways that governments and authorities can use hatred of others to keep a population starved of knowledge, of being able to see the whole picture and to make judgements of their own.
This is why I love Library Thing - I was thinking about books that I have loved, and remembered reading Fatherland by Robert Harris whilst at university and wondered if there was anymore good alternative history books out there.
2 minutes on LT, a member recommended this and it did not
I took it to pass the time during a long weekend away. I've never been so happy to have a holiday ruined by constant rain. I was engrossed from start to finish. The author has done his research and also let his imagination take flight.
If you are interested in WWII history then this is a must!
The plot is well paced and
Not quite as good as the Shardlake series, but still recommended.
The heroes of the story are an unlikely set of people: David, a middle ranking civil servant who has become disillusioned with government policy and who is secretly Jewish (even his wife Sarah is unaware); Frank, a reclusive scientist committed to a mental hospital; Ben, his attendant at the hospital and a militant Glaswegian communist; and Natalia, an enigmatic Slovak émigrée. The plot revolves around some "secret" military knowledge of which Frank has inadvertently been made aware and which is sought by the Germans among others. The plot is mostly gripping and contains numerous twists and turns as our heroes attempt to flee Britain. I thought it was a little overlong, but definitely packed with interesting incidents reflecting the nature of what such an alternate Britain might have been like, and how it might have affected the lives and attitudes of its inhabitants. There are some shocking incidents and scenes along the way and some tragic and unexpected deaths. The German characters and their British collaborators are also well drawn and believable. All in all, a great read. The author finishes with a historical note in which he sets out how he thinks his scenario could have arisen, and the dangers of nationalism and blaming of the "other" for all that is wrong in society that is frequently nationalism's concomitant. 4.5/5
The book is set twelve years after Churchill lost to the appeasers and Britain negotiated a peace treaty with Nazi Germany after Dunkirk. As the German war against Russia continues in the east, the British people are under the authoritarian rule of a government that is subservient to Berlin. The resistance, led by Churchill and Attlee, are increasingly active and have spies in the civil service. A scientist imprisoned in a mental hospital may hold a secret that could change the balance of power for ever.
What made this book stand out for me was the attention to detail and the evident research that must have been needed to get the period details right. The end result is that he brings all the separate threads within the story together convincingly and the alternate 1950s feels all too plausible for comfort. Sometimes the attention to detail works well (such as Lyons Corner Houses becoming British Corner Houses) but at times early in the book are a little too jarring and interrupt the narrative. I imagine it’s a difficult balance to get right but overall it works well. In my view it is undoubtably a story that would work well as a film or television drama.
Notes:
1. Although not part of the novel, I also enjoyed the chapter of historical notes and the author’s rant against the current nationalism of the SNP in Scotland. His bias against the SNP does come across throughout the book but his views on the way independence is being promoted at the moment are quite similar to my own.
2. Sansom’s portrayal of the politician Enoch Powell is particularly unflattering, portraying him as the most pro-Nazi of the imagined British government. Perhaps because he is one of the few characters in the book we may still remember, this seems to have caused some controversy. It’s worth highlighting that in the ‘real world’ he did enlist in the army as early as October 1939, before the events set out in this book.
I don't know if I was expecting too much of the author, as I loved the
The Characters were boring and predictable, the story just didn't grab my interest at all, the whole thing was just not for me!
I love his historical novels but this one leaves me rather underwhelmed. A struggle to finish in fact. (but I did) I have to say in fairness that my wife loved it.
Some of the characters felt a little unreal, and the dialogue was also a bit wooden and felt contrived. I appreciate the setting was historical, but I don't believe that people spoke like clichés back then either. One character in particular which I found ill conceived was Sarah Fitzgerald, she read a little bit like a cut out and keep character from a book of stereotypical women. In general I just didn't really care what happened to the majority of the characters.
The world was well imagined and the smog part of the final half was an interesting element to the story. I don't think I would be looking at any more books from this author.
So the book is mostly told in three different character narratives. David, Frank, or Sarah.
David would be my least favorite character - but a step above Syme and Natalia (oh goodness, yes I put Syme and Natalia in the same boat here). He was okay until this thing with Natalia come up and he suddenly became a likeable very helpful and loyal character to a lovesick poor twit who behaved like a dumb cow. Get over it buddy. You have much more IMPORTANT things to do but noooooooo you got the one track mind going on here (the scene with saying goodbye on the boat just about had me wanting to push David off of it. Seriously!?! your wife is looking at you and while she’s surviving on her own without any help from you, you’re too busy looking for Natalia arrghhh!!! You don’t deserve Sarah!!!!!!)
The plot overall was excellent and well written. It gives a good alternate history of a ‘what if’ scenario and does it well. It nice both sides (German and Resistance) are portrayed here. I sort of felt sorry for Gunther, but on the other hand I didn’t because he was your typical Nazi with those silly political views which induces eye rolling throughout certain parts of the book but you can also feel a sort of weariness in him as if he’s really tired of it all.
The author’s note in the back provides good insight and information that deserves a walk through. Overall I was very pleased and happy with the book and am glad I had the opportunity to read and review it. Greatly recommended and I’m definitely going to check out C J Sansom’s other works.
It seems some reviewers have got a bit exercised over historical "accuracy" - and it may well be that if you have in-depth knowledge of the period, certain aspects of the book are bound to rankle (so perhaps a certain level of ignorance is bliss - I'm sure it was in my case!). But it's important to remember we're dealing with a counterfactual here - so who's to say how certain historical figures would've behaved given different circumstances/pressures.