Status
Genres
Description
An old man awakens, disoriented, in an unfamiliar chamber. With no memory of who he is or how he has arrived there, he pores over the relics on the desk, examining the circumstances of his confinement and searching his own hazy mind for clues. Determining that he is locked in, the man--identified only as Mr. Blank--begins reading a manuscript he finds on the desk, the story of another prisoner, set in an alternate world the man doesn't recognize. Nevertheless, the pages seem to have been left for him, along with a haunting set of photographs. As the day passes, various characters call on the man in his cell--vaguely familiar people, some who seem to resent him for crimes he can't remember--and each brings frustrating hints of his identity and his past. All the while an overhead camera clicks and clicks, recording his movements, and a microphone records every sound in the room. Someone is watching. Both chilling and poignant, Travels in the Scriptorium is vintage Paul Auster: mysterious texts, fluid identities, a hidden past, and, somewhere, an obscure tormentor. And yet, as we discover during one day in the life of Mr. Blank, his world is not so different from our own.… (more)
User reviews
As the story begins, we encounter an unidentified man, whom we shall call Mr. Blank, waking up in a room containing the bed on
As the story progresses, we readers, along with Mr. Blank himself, attempt to discover his identity and the context of the environment in which he finds himself. He peruses the contents of the typewritten pages on the desk for clues to his own history or where he might be.
If this sounds intriguing to you, then grab this quick and engrossing read. If postmodern fiction is not your thing, you might want to skip it. For me, the bizarre ending of this book has me very much wanting to read more of Paul Auster’s works.
"Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be."
An old man wakes up to find himself alone in a small room with complete amnesia. The only clues are stickers conveniently labeling "wall", "lamp", "desk"; and a pile of photographs and several manuscripts on the desk.
"He can't remember how long he has been here or the nature of the circumstances that precipitated his removal to this place. Perhaps he has always been here; perhaps this is where he has lived since the day he was born. What he knows is that his heart is filled with an implacable sense of guilt. At the same time, he can't escape the feeling that he is the victim of a terrible injustice."
In an existential kind of way, the old man begins to explore his physical and psychological boundaries. I don't want to give away too much, so I'll just say it's a fun read.
I'll also say that the conceit, which I twigged to gratifyingly early on, is one that appealed to me, and that in the end the whole thing worked for me, in its own strange way. Whether it should have worked quite that well, I'm not at all sure. As soon as I finished it, I started thinking back on specific details, wondering exactly what they might mean or if they actually meant anything at all.
Basically, it's an odd little literary experiment of a book, but an interesting and I think a worthwhile one. And it's short enough that it can (and probably should) be read in one sitting.
At a certain moment Mr Blank reads a story and is later asked to complete it. He completes it in his mind with great ingenuity and imagination. How the story is related to mr Blank's past is left in the open. The second story he reads, consists of the first paragraphs of this book itself. It describes Mr Blank sitting in his room (or cell), wondering what he is doing there. He does not however complete that story.
So far so good, the book is engaging, with a few nice twists, and very well written. It has a nice theme, namely writing and the life of fictional characters.
Only the ending I found annoying. I don't understand why Auster includes the last paragraphs in which he makes it explicit that Mr Blank is a fictional character and where he adds some terrible cliches on the nature of the fictional character (mr Blank in this case).
Mr. Blank is locked in, and the description in the novel makes it into a physical reality. But
The novel can also be seen as commentary on what happens to older people. How they can't function like their younger years, how fleeting memory is, how to fathom the strangers about. How angry one can be when the body doesn't function correctly. But the midrange of the body has its own functioning, including sex.
Not entirely satisfying novel, but a good cause to ponder.
But what is it about, actually? Who is Mr Black? How come one recognises the names of so many of the characters? I’m still not sure, but I have theories. The good Paus really has twisted my mind. And it feels good.
---
Auster kan vara mystisk. Många av hans tidigare alster har visat prov på det - egentligen de flesta (med undantag av "Dårskaper i Brooklyn, kanske). "Travels in the Scriptorium" är mystisk från början till slut. Författaren briljerar i lätt språk som ger en dunkel mening. Och "Historien i historien" som AUster är fenomenal på.
Men vad handlar det om? Vem är mr Blank? Hur kommer det sig att man känner igen namnen på så många figurer i historien? Jag är fortfarande inte säker, men jag har mina teorier. Den gode Paul har verkligen satt griller i huvet på mig. Och det känns bra.
The concept is great and I enjoyed the initial waking up in a room not knowing what was going on etc. This is what I
The writing style would get a 1 star. I don't enjoy writers who stray from the conventions of syntax and unfortunately Auster didn't use speech marks, a particular bug bear of mine. It was therefore difficult to ascertain on occasions whether we were reading the present day narrative or one of the many stories. Auster has tried to be clever but has seemingly failed. There are other authors out there who can pull off this concept very well. If you've got a few hours spare give it a go but really, I'd recommend trying something else.
It's a great little mystery that doesn't conform to reality. It's imagination perfectly blended with a multidimensional maze. Of the 145 pages, you'll probably start piecing some things together (slowly) at 100 but your reading will only speed up to see if you're correct in your analysis. It's an enjoyable story and it's of a style that I gravitate to frequently. I'd say that I wish the book was longer but then it would have likely have contained unnecessary fluff. My gratitude Mr. Auster!
**SPOILER ALERT (Highlight)**
The book is about an old man, Mr. Blank, who awakens to find himself in a sparsely furnished room and has no idea what's going on. He doesn't know why he's there, who his captors are (or if he's being held), what occurred in his past, etc. The story is largely his interaction with people who come to visit him - physician, lawyer, caretakers, etc. - and his attempts to learn more about them and his past through them. His female caretakers are giving him pills ("per his prior instructions") to keep him on his "treatment" which seems to be an effort to remain on a permanent mental vacation.
On a desk in the room, he has photos of the people who come to visit and stacks of paper which appear to be unfinished manuscripts. He reads these stories periodically and discussions about them are held with Mr. Blank's guests. The only thing he really learns from his visitors is that he sent them "on various missions over the years, and, ...perhaps some of them, or many of them, or all of them, did not fare so terribly well, even to the point of being subjected to unbearable suffering and/or death."
He has different connections with some of the people. For example, Anna is someone that he knows he loves beyond explanation but he does not know why. One of the people, an inspector, asks him to remember details about a book that Mr. Blank read many years before. He indicates that his very existence may depend on it. The relationships add to the mystery of Mr. Blank's situation and surroundings.
Beginning at around page 140, Mr. Blank picks up one of the manuscripts on the desk that is titled Travels in the Scriptorium and is roughly 140 pages in length. He begins to read it and we (I/you) as the reader learn that it's the same book that you hold in your hand - it's the same text as the first 3 or 4 pages of this book. Then we come to the last two pages of the book where it begins:
"It will never end. For Mr. Blank is one of us now, and struggle though he might to understand his predicament, he will always be lost. I believe I speak for all his charges when I say he is getting what he deserves - no more, no less. Not as a form of punishment, but as an act of supreme justice and compassion. Without him, we are nothing, but the paradox is that we, the figments of another mind, will outlive the mind that made us, for once we are thrown into the world, we continue to exist forever, and our stories go on being told, even after we are dead...Mr. Blank is old and enfeebled, but as long as he remains in the room with the shuttered window and the locked door, he can never die, never disappear, never be anything but the words I am writing on this page..."
So, we learn that these are the characters in his book who are making him immortal along with them. Or has he written himself into this room? Or is this Mr. Auster looking into a reflection of a reflection of a reflection ad infinitum?
*****END OF SPOILERS*****
Well done Mr. Auster. I look forward to your next episode.
QUOTES I ENJOYED:
"...for in that was the first time he ever held a girl's hand, what he remembers most keenly now is the sensation of having entered a new world, a world in which holding a girl's hand was a good to be desired above all others..."
"...passion is and always will be blind to all but one thing..."
This isn’t a book you can come to cold. The characters who visit Mr Blank in his room are all drawn from Auster’s previous books, and we are being invited into a philosophical deconstruction on fiction, language and imagination that takes a bit of work to puzzle through (well, it took me a bit of work to puzzle through). It’s difficult to say how much I enjoyed it; Auster’s style is deceptively simple, but as ever, he is clearly skilled. When IU puzzled out a bit of it, I felt rewarded – but I left with a feeling that there were probably further layers that I still wasn’t getting, so there’s a vague dissatisfaction to it too.
On the plus side, this is a quirky, clever story which simply presents a series of facts and leaves the reader to gradually draw their own conclusions. Although I might have found the knowing conceit a bit trying if it had lasted throughout a full-length novel, Auster gets away with it here. His blend of playfulness and pathos reminded me a bit of Borges, although I suspect that comparison also sprang to mind because of the themes of reading and reality that underpin Mr Blank's existence. In the long run, this book probably won't stick in my mind, but it provided a welcome diversion, and I'll certainly be more likely now to give the rest of Auster's novels a try.