Status
Available
Description
The first "common man" to rise to the presidency, Jackson embodied the spirit and the vision of the emerging American nation; the term "Jacksonian democracy" is embedded in our national lexicon. Historian Brands follows Jackson from his days as rebellious youth, risking execution to free the Carolinas during the Revolutionary War, to his years as a young lawyer and congressman from the newly settled frontier state of Tennessee. As general of the Tennessee militia, his famous rout of the British at the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812 made him a national hero. But it is Jackson's presidency that won him a place among America's greatest leaders. A man of the people, he sought to make the country a genuine democracy, governed by and for the people. Although respectful of states' rights, when his home state threatened to secede, he promised to march down with 100,000 federal soldiers should it dare.--From publisher description.… (more)
User reviews
LibraryThing member drneutron
In the course of reading biographies for the US Presidents Challenge, I made it to Andrew Jackson this month. My first instinct was to read American Lion, since a new release of a softbound version is being marketed right now and like David McCullough's biography of John Adams, that's the one
I hadn't realized how driven Jackson was. At least as portrayed by Brands, he was completely focused on preserving the Union in his career, as a politician early in life, as a military commander and as President. He gave fits to those above him in the hierarchy because his focus (and the inability to easily communicate across distances at the time) led him to risk war with Spain in invading Florida, antagonize Britain by executing agents he believed were stirring the Indians to war against the United States, etc. He knew he was right and those who disagreed were his enemies. But his decisions also made him very popular with the common man - and he rode this wave of popularity into the White House and changed the way the US is governed to something much more like a true democracy.
Brands' portrayal of Jackson makes him come alive. His love of and devotion to his wife and family shine throughout the book. But Jackson's a tough character to write about. He was a product of his times - slave owner, military man, Indian fighter. He believed that the native population should be relocated west of the Mississippi, but he honestly believed it was for their own safety in avoiding conflict with white settlers. His scorched-earth tactics wiped out entire native towns and Spanish or British encampments. And yet he adopted children orphaned by his battles on two separate occasions. I can't imagine trying to figure out how to present what from our viewpoint seems so contradictory in a way that gives a full picture of the man. Brands does this remarkably well.
My biggest issue with Brands' book is that he spends lots of time with Jackson's military years, but seems to skim through the Presidency. Jackson took on the national bank, the Mexican government over Texas, and relocation of the native population to reservations across the Mississippi River, but these events only take up two or three chapters in the whole work. The Trail of Tears relocation only took up a few paragraphs. The fight over the structure of the US banking system brought about significant economic crisis, yet the discussion felt very shallow. Another 50 or so pages to allow more detailed discussion of some of these major issues would have been better, I think. Still, it's a very good introduction to the life of this very interesting, very dificult man.
Show More
people seem to be reading. But I decided to look into other options, since I had read it a few years back when originally released in hardback. And I'm glad I did. As good as American Lion is, H. W. Brands' Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times also fills the bill for a highly readable, thoroughly enjoyable biography of one of our most interesting presidents.I hadn't realized how driven Jackson was. At least as portrayed by Brands, he was completely focused on preserving the Union in his career, as a politician early in life, as a military commander and as President. He gave fits to those above him in the hierarchy because his focus (and the inability to easily communicate across distances at the time) led him to risk war with Spain in invading Florida, antagonize Britain by executing agents he believed were stirring the Indians to war against the United States, etc. He knew he was right and those who disagreed were his enemies. But his decisions also made him very popular with the common man - and he rode this wave of popularity into the White House and changed the way the US is governed to something much more like a true democracy.
Brands' portrayal of Jackson makes him come alive. His love of and devotion to his wife and family shine throughout the book. But Jackson's a tough character to write about. He was a product of his times - slave owner, military man, Indian fighter. He believed that the native population should be relocated west of the Mississippi, but he honestly believed it was for their own safety in avoiding conflict with white settlers. His scorched-earth tactics wiped out entire native towns and Spanish or British encampments. And yet he adopted children orphaned by his battles on two separate occasions. I can't imagine trying to figure out how to present what from our viewpoint seems so contradictory in a way that gives a full picture of the man. Brands does this remarkably well.
My biggest issue with Brands' book is that he spends lots of time with Jackson's military years, but seems to skim through the Presidency. Jackson took on the national bank, the Mexican government over Texas, and relocation of the native population to reservations across the Mississippi River, but these events only take up two or three chapters in the whole work. The Trail of Tears relocation only took up a few paragraphs. The fight over the structure of the US banking system brought about significant economic crisis, yet the discussion felt very shallow. Another 50 or so pages to allow more detailed discussion of some of these major issues would have been better, I think. Still, it's a very good introduction to the life of this very interesting, very dificult man.
Show Less
LibraryThing member cyderry
Andrew Jackson had an impressive résumé - he fought in the Revolutionary War, was an explorer, frontiersman, lawyer, judge, duelist, congressman, planter, military leader (Battle of New Orleans), President.
Yet with all his accomplishments, I'm not sure that he was a great man. He was extremely
He was, however, always extremely honest in business and even though he was a slave holder, he endeavored to keep negro families together and rarely mistreated his slaves. Jackson early in his business life rather than go into debt sold most of his property to pay his debtors.
Jackson, who rode the wave of his popularity from the Battle of New Orleans for the remainder of his life, was the first "people's President. "Like most of his predecessors, Jackson was extremely aware of the need to neutralize threats to the ongoing existence of the new United States but he also saw the need to protect the interest and liberties of the common man of which he was one. His devotion to his family and their peace of mind was always foremost in his thoughts.
Jackson, frustrated by his loss to JQA in 1824, after his election in 1828 recommended eliminating the Electoral College. His major term events surrounded nullification in SC and the battle he waged with Nicholas Biddle about the Bank of the United States. He also worked on expansion of the nation in Florida, Texas, and the Louisiana.
The book lack details of the controversial decisions that were made during his presidency or were lost in all the details that it did cover. The Trail of Tears and the Petticoat Affair got very little coverage.
I think that this was a good book for details of his life but found it lacking in certain areas. Maybe less time devoted to the duels he fought and more to issues during his presidency could have made it great.
Yet with all his accomplishments, I'm not sure that he was a great man. He was extremely
Show More
flawed. His quickness to anger and take offense, on many occasions threatened his life and propelled him into numerous duels one of which he carried the bullet close to his heart for most of his life. He was definitely not ambivalent, rarely considering anyone else viewpoint but his own.He was, however, always extremely honest in business and even though he was a slave holder, he endeavored to keep negro families together and rarely mistreated his slaves. Jackson early in his business life rather than go into debt sold most of his property to pay his debtors.
Jackson, who rode the wave of his popularity from the Battle of New Orleans for the remainder of his life, was the first "people's President. "Like most of his predecessors, Jackson was extremely aware of the need to neutralize threats to the ongoing existence of the new United States but he also saw the need to protect the interest and liberties of the common man of which he was one. His devotion to his family and their peace of mind was always foremost in his thoughts.
Jackson, frustrated by his loss to JQA in 1824, after his election in 1828 recommended eliminating the Electoral College. His major term events surrounded nullification in SC and the battle he waged with Nicholas Biddle about the Bank of the United States. He also worked on expansion of the nation in Florida, Texas, and the Louisiana.
The book lack details of the controversial decisions that were made during his presidency or were lost in all the details that it did cover. The Trail of Tears and the Petticoat Affair got very little coverage.
I think that this was a good book for details of his life but found it lacking in certain areas. Maybe less time devoted to the duels he fought and more to issues during his presidency could have made it great.
Show Less
LibraryThing member edwin.gleaves
Highly readable biography of Old Hickory, strong on his times as well as his life.
LibraryThing member oddvark59
Good read, but a little soft on some of Jackson's more controversial decisions.
LibraryThing member twatson79
Brands proves to be an excellent creator of prose, but the biography falls short of a thorough retelling of Jackson's life. It devotes more attention to his military career than his presidency. The description of Jackson's temperament in his early life is very engaging. The major decisions of his
Show More
presidency are never fully discussed -- I know that Jackson was against a national bank, but Brands never tells us why. This is a sad aspect since Brands wants to paint Jackson as one of the most influential executives the US has ever known. Also, the conclusion linking Jackson to Lincoln seems specious. Show Less
LibraryThing member derekstaff
Brands does a fantastic job enlightening on a president who had previously been for me a rather mysterious and ambiguous character. This study reveals him to be a much more sympathetic, if still rough and flawed, character. Brands presents him as a man whose public life was relentlessly dedicated
Show More
to two central goals; protecting the interest and liberty of the common man, and neutralizing any potential threat to the nation which made that liberty possible, whether that threat come from Indians, foreign nations (ie, Britain), or secession. Brands reveals the private Jackson as well, and the man's devotion to his family and wife in particular was especially revealing, surprising and touching. A worthy biography. Show Less
LibraryThing member lyzadanger
Brands' biography makes it possible both to feel taken aback by Jackson's intense and often brutal decisions, while still glimpsing humanity through the cracks.
That is what made this book readable: humanity. The first two-thirds of the book are a challenging but entertaining read about the sinews
Jackson is not a subtle man, shaped by his rough-and-ready upbringing. Nor is he particularly introspective or reflective. His executive actions are one-sided, simple and blunt. This is not a man plagued by ambivalence.
I don't have a strong interest in political science, so the last third of the book, when Jackson had gained national office, was not my favorite, especially the long section about the struggles with the National Bank. But the first two-thirds really helped to fill in my history gaps with some nice, thick brushwork.
Brands has a nice habit, for the most part, of selecting quotes from sources that are interesting and illustrative. He does fall in the trap occasionally of sounding as if he is defending or glossing over Jackson's missteps (The Trail of Tears gets but short shrift, for example). There are some side trips, but mostly interesting ones, like Sam Houston's Texas.
Overall, a good read for those trying to learn the basics about Old Hickory.
That is what made this book readable: humanity. The first two-thirds of the book are a challenging but entertaining read about the sinews
Show More
of early American politics. For someone as ignorant of 19th-century American history as I am, there was a lot to learn. The boyhood saga of Jackson is readable and evocative.Jackson is not a subtle man, shaped by his rough-and-ready upbringing. Nor is he particularly introspective or reflective. His executive actions are one-sided, simple and blunt. This is not a man plagued by ambivalence.
I don't have a strong interest in political science, so the last third of the book, when Jackson had gained national office, was not my favorite, especially the long section about the struggles with the National Bank. But the first two-thirds really helped to fill in my history gaps with some nice, thick brushwork.
Brands has a nice habit, for the most part, of selecting quotes from sources that are interesting and illustrative. He does fall in the trap occasionally of sounding as if he is defending or glossing over Jackson's missteps (The Trail of Tears gets but short shrift, for example). There are some side trips, but mostly interesting ones, like Sam Houston's Texas.
Overall, a good read for those trying to learn the basics about Old Hickory.
Show Less
LibraryThing member santhony
Andrew Jackson is one of the most important and influential of our pre-20th century Presidents. In fact, if at the time of its construction, Mount Rushmore had room for five Presidential profiles, Andrew Jackson would have almost certainly been the one added. Youthful participant in the
As Brands so ably points out, Jackson was the first "people's President". Following Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Adams, Jackson was arguably the first "outsider" to be elected to the White House, largely on the wave of public adulation, support which he never relinquished.
Such was the life of Jackson, that despite covering almost 600 pages, this book almost seems cursory in its handling of the many aspects of his full and varied life. While his monumental and epic battle with Nicholas Biddle and the Bank of the United States is covered at length, and his expansionist pursuits with respect to Louisiana, Florida and Texas are well documented, most other aspects of his presidency are glossed over almost completely. The details of his feuds with many of his contemporaries are fascinating, but in my opinion not extensively covered and analyzed.
If ever there was a need for a multi-volume biography, the life and times of Andrew Jackson would be the case. Along with Benjamin Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt, Jackson would be well deserving of the title "An American Original".
Show More
Revolutionary War, explorer, frontiersman, duelist, congressman, gentleman planter, Hero of the Battle of New Orleans in the War of 1812 and ultimately multi-term President; that's quite a resume. As Brands so ably points out, Jackson was the first "people's President". Following Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Adams, Jackson was arguably the first "outsider" to be elected to the White House, largely on the wave of public adulation, support which he never relinquished.
Such was the life of Jackson, that despite covering almost 600 pages, this book almost seems cursory in its handling of the many aspects of his full and varied life. While his monumental and epic battle with Nicholas Biddle and the Bank of the United States is covered at length, and his expansionist pursuits with respect to Louisiana, Florida and Texas are well documented, most other aspects of his presidency are glossed over almost completely. The details of his feuds with many of his contemporaries are fascinating, but in my opinion not extensively covered and analyzed.
If ever there was a need for a multi-volume biography, the life and times of Andrew Jackson would be the case. Along with Benjamin Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt, Jackson would be well deserving of the title "An American Original".
Show Less
LibraryThing member auntmarge64
Andrew Jackson was a destitute frontier orphan at the age of 14, an Indian fighter, reluctant politician, enthusiastic and hugely successful general, and two-term President late in life during the tumultuous 1830s, when the boundaries between Texas and Mexico were in flux and Texas declared
Brands' book is quite long (650+ pages) and seemed to take me forever to read it, but none of it is wasted space. Jackson is used to link our earliest history as a nation and the war that almost tore us apart, and Brands does a good job of explaining how important Jackson was in simultaneously expanding and protecting our borders and encouraging some policies, such as slavery, which led to the Civil War. Jackson could be brutal, especially in his treatment of Indians, whom he felt should get out of the way of the conquerors or face extinction. He seemed to feel badly about the possibility of wiping them out, but he felt they were responsible for their own safety and should stay out of the way of the settlers, whom he didn't expect to take the high road. (Isn't this the argument made by apologists in societies that keep women hidden away: the dominant group can't be trusted so rather than police them, the powerless group should in effect be punished?)
The book is very readable, with a good mix of anecdotes, discussion of policy and politics, and quotes from letters and documents. There were some topics which could have been treated in more depth, and I'd have liked to hear more of what happened to the various native children Jackson fostered (one apparently died of TB at the age of 16, but that isn't mentioned). But Jackson was an important participant in so many pivotal events that to do them all justice would have been impossible without a multi-volume treatment. Extensive source notes and a bibliography provide ideas for expanded reading. In the Kindle edition there was no index (although Kindle searching is much more comprehensive than with a print index), and I don't know if there is an index in the print volume. Highly recommended.
Show More
independence. He was also a farmer, slave holder, dedicated duelist, loyal husband, father of an adopted son and of several foster Indian children, and devoted to preserving and expanding the Union against foreign incursions and internal strife. He was an errand boy during the Revolution yet lived long enough to be photographed. He believed that the people (i.e., white males) were able to make the best decisions for themselves, an issue which divided early leaders, many of whom thought the uneducated were not knowledgeable enough to make informed decisions. (I can't imagine what he and other leaders would make of the ability of today's talk media to sway the masses.) When Jackson died, arguments over states' rights and the issue of slavery in new states was heating up towards what astute observers realized would be a war. Jackson feared for the future of the Union, not foreseeing a Lincoln to save it.Brands' book is quite long (650+ pages) and seemed to take me forever to read it, but none of it is wasted space. Jackson is used to link our earliest history as a nation and the war that almost tore us apart, and Brands does a good job of explaining how important Jackson was in simultaneously expanding and protecting our borders and encouraging some policies, such as slavery, which led to the Civil War. Jackson could be brutal, especially in his treatment of Indians, whom he felt should get out of the way of the conquerors or face extinction. He seemed to feel badly about the possibility of wiping them out, but he felt they were responsible for their own safety and should stay out of the way of the settlers, whom he didn't expect to take the high road. (Isn't this the argument made by apologists in societies that keep women hidden away: the dominant group can't be trusted so rather than police them, the powerless group should in effect be punished?)
The book is very readable, with a good mix of anecdotes, discussion of policy and politics, and quotes from letters and documents. There were some topics which could have been treated in more depth, and I'd have liked to hear more of what happened to the various native children Jackson fostered (one apparently died of TB at the age of 16, but that isn't mentioned). But Jackson was an important participant in so many pivotal events that to do them all justice would have been impossible without a multi-volume treatment. Extensive source notes and a bibliography provide ideas for expanded reading. In the Kindle edition there was no index (although Kindle searching is much more comprehensive than with a print index), and I don't know if there is an index in the print volume. Highly recommended.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Jiggarelli
As a reader of presidential biographies, frontiersmen biographies, and a student of early American history in general, I found this book great. I like bio's in general, and this book is a nice start to finish Andrew Jackson book. Mr. Brands does an excellent job at making a 650+ page book a real
A few things left me wishing they were covered a little more in depth, but not many. Of those things that I needed or wanted more info on were all covered in the second and third books on A.J. that I have since read. No one I have loaned the book to has not enjoyed it throughly, and I'm sure you will as well.
Full of anecdotal phases, some light humor between frontier heavyweights, a chance to see the softer side of such a hard man, and very graceful with it's presentation of timeline, merit reading on their own.
Show More
page turner. Some aspects I feel could have been covered a little more, but all in all a job well done, and none of the 650 pages are wasted. Because I have pretty terrible eyesight at just 30 years old ( and I refuse to get glasses, yet! ) I try to purchase large print, and Random House LP is excellent. 860 + pages and worth every turn!A few things left me wishing they were covered a little more in depth, but not many. Of those things that I needed or wanted more info on were all covered in the second and third books on A.J. that I have since read. No one I have loaned the book to has not enjoyed it throughly, and I'm sure you will as well.
Full of anecdotal phases, some light humor between frontier heavyweights, a chance to see the softer side of such a hard man, and very graceful with it's presentation of timeline, merit reading on their own.
Show Less
LibraryThing member everfresh1
Excellent, almost ideal, historical biography. The author manages to give all the background material that is necessary, without compromising reader's interest in the character of Andrew Jackson. Very few biographers manage to do that. Of course, interesting times and interesting characters help.
LibraryThing member kaulsu
I did really enjoy this book. What little I "knew" about Jackson was incomplete and biased.
As always, when rating biographies, I struggle with remaining objective. How do I keep the "writing" of the book neutral in the face of personality traits to which I object?
This book gave a good grounding to
As always, when rating biographies, I struggle with remaining objective. How do I keep the "writing" of the book neutral in the face of personality traits to which I object?
This book gave a good grounding to
Show More
Jackson. The title is very appropriate: "his life and times," indeed. Now to read a couple more to smooth out the biases! Show Less
LibraryThing member majackson
Andrew Jackson, His Life and Times by H.W. Brands 2005
The primary reason I bought this book was to compare the only other "populist" president I knew of, with the current one. I know Jackson did some nasty things in his life--but was he as despised and loved in his time as "the current president"?
In the Introduction we see Jackson's life summarized: "He had been fighting for the people's right to direct their own affairs since the Revolutionary War, when, as a mere boy, he took up arms against Britain. A gash to the head from a British sword left him with a permanent crease in his skull and an abiding hostility to all things British; smallpox contracted in a British prison marked the beginning of a lifetime of compromised health. The war also cost him his mother and brothers, throwing him orphaned upon a turbulent, threatening world."
Before his mother went off to try to save their cousins from British prisons (and died in the attempt) she told him:
"In this world you will have to make your own way. To do that you must have friends. You can make friends by being honest, and you can keep them by being steadfast. You must keep in mind that friends worth having will in the long run expect as much from you as they give to you. To forget an obligation or be ungrateful for a kindness is a base crime—not merely a fault or a sin, but an actual crime. Men guilty of it sooner or later must suffer the penalty. In personal conduct be polite, but never obsequious. No one will respect you more than you esteem yourself. Avoid quarrels as long as you can without yielding to imposition. But sustain your manhood always. Never bring a suit at law for assault and battery of for defamation. The law affords no remedy for such outrages that can satisfy the feelings of a true man. Never wound the feeling of others. Never brook wanton outrage upon your own feelings. If you ever have to vindicate your feelings or defend your honor, do it calmly. If angry at first, wait till your wrath cools before you proceed."
Brands says "the memory of his mother—whether accurate or embellished—became his guiding star.
"…her last words have been the law of my life… " Jackson said. "I might about as well have been penniless, as I already was homeless and friendless. The memory of my mother and her teachings were after all the only capital I had to start in life, and on that capital I have made my way."
So, in the first 40 pages of this biography I find the defining difference between the two "populist" presidents over a century apart.
"After three months in the House and another three in the Senate, Jackson discovered he wasn't cut out for politics, at least not legislative politics. He could make decisions far more easily than he could make compromises. He had much greater confidence in his own judgment than in that of others. He was a born leader who couldn't make himself into a follower."
Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying "I feel much alarmed at the prospect of seeing General Jackson President. He is one of the most unfit men I know of for such a place. He has very little respect for law or constitutions….He is a dangerous man."
"…a lesson [Jackson] had learned in the Revolutionary War, one that would inform his military policy—and in fact his whole political philosophy—for the rest of his life. 'The poor always make the best soldiers,' he said. The rich were unreliable."
Sam Houston: "Nearly every young man who served under Jackson came to view the general as a second father, but for none did the paternal element matter more than for Houston….Andrew Jackson—now there was a model for any lad. He was fearless as Houston hoped he himself would be, as principled, as devoted to cause and country. From the moment they were introduced, during that difficult winter of the campaign against the Creeks, the young lieutenant sought to attract the general's attention and win his favor."
In general, I find that this book gives a good overview of Jackson's actions; but much less of his thoughts and feelings. For that I recommend "American Lion" by Jon Meacham. In both books I've found some intriguing comparisons with a modern President.
The primary reason I bought this book was to compare the only other "populist" president I knew of, with the current one. I know Jackson did some nasty things in his life--but was he as despised and loved in his time as "the current president"?
Show More
Are there any lessons to be made from the comparison?In the Introduction we see Jackson's life summarized: "He had been fighting for the people's right to direct their own affairs since the Revolutionary War, when, as a mere boy, he took up arms against Britain. A gash to the head from a British sword left him with a permanent crease in his skull and an abiding hostility to all things British; smallpox contracted in a British prison marked the beginning of a lifetime of compromised health. The war also cost him his mother and brothers, throwing him orphaned upon a turbulent, threatening world."
Before his mother went off to try to save their cousins from British prisons (and died in the attempt) she told him:
"In this world you will have to make your own way. To do that you must have friends. You can make friends by being honest, and you can keep them by being steadfast. You must keep in mind that friends worth having will in the long run expect as much from you as they give to you. To forget an obligation or be ungrateful for a kindness is a base crime—not merely a fault or a sin, but an actual crime. Men guilty of it sooner or later must suffer the penalty. In personal conduct be polite, but never obsequious. No one will respect you more than you esteem yourself. Avoid quarrels as long as you can without yielding to imposition. But sustain your manhood always. Never bring a suit at law for assault and battery of for defamation. The law affords no remedy for such outrages that can satisfy the feelings of a true man. Never wound the feeling of others. Never brook wanton outrage upon your own feelings. If you ever have to vindicate your feelings or defend your honor, do it calmly. If angry at first, wait till your wrath cools before you proceed."
Brands says "the memory of his mother—whether accurate or embellished—became his guiding star.
"…her last words have been the law of my life… " Jackson said. "I might about as well have been penniless, as I already was homeless and friendless. The memory of my mother and her teachings were after all the only capital I had to start in life, and on that capital I have made my way."
So, in the first 40 pages of this biography I find the defining difference between the two "populist" presidents over a century apart.
"After three months in the House and another three in the Senate, Jackson discovered he wasn't cut out for politics, at least not legislative politics. He could make decisions far more easily than he could make compromises. He had much greater confidence in his own judgment than in that of others. He was a born leader who couldn't make himself into a follower."
Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying "I feel much alarmed at the prospect of seeing General Jackson President. He is one of the most unfit men I know of for such a place. He has very little respect for law or constitutions….He is a dangerous man."
"…a lesson [Jackson] had learned in the Revolutionary War, one that would inform his military policy—and in fact his whole political philosophy—for the rest of his life. 'The poor always make the best soldiers,' he said. The rich were unreliable."
Sam Houston: "Nearly every young man who served under Jackson came to view the general as a second father, but for none did the paternal element matter more than for Houston….Andrew Jackson—now there was a model for any lad. He was fearless as Houston hoped he himself would be, as principled, as devoted to cause and country. From the moment they were introduced, during that difficult winter of the campaign against the Creeks, the young lieutenant sought to attract the general's attention and win his favor."
In general, I find that this book gives a good overview of Jackson's actions; but much less of his thoughts and feelings. For that I recommend "American Lion" by Jon Meacham. In both books I've found some intriguing comparisons with a modern President.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mattries37315
Considered by some the most dangerous man to be President and others as one of their own that deserved the office, he ushered in a sea change in Washington and American politics. Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times by H.W. Brands follows the future President of the United States from his birth in
Brands begins with a Jackson family history first from Scotland to Ulster then to the Piedmont region of the Carolina where his aunts and uncles had pioneered before his own parents immigrated. Fatherless from birth, Jackson’s childhood was intertwined with issues between the American colonies and Britain then eventually the Revolutionary War that the 13-year old Jackson participated in as a militia scout and guerilla fighter before his capture and illness while a POW. After the death of the rest of his family at the end of the war through illness, a young Jackson eventually went into law becoming one of the few “backcountry” lawyers in western North Carolina—including Tennessee which was claimed by North Carolina—before moving to Nashville and eventually becoming one of the founders of the state of Tennessee and become one of it’s most important military and political figures especially with his marriage to Rachel Donelson. Eventually Jackson’s status as the major general of the Tennessee militia led him to first fight the Creek War—part of the overall War of 1812—then after the successful conclusion of the campaign was made a major general of the regular army in charge of the defending New Orleans from British attack which ultimately culminated in the famous 1815 battle that occurred after the signing of the peace treaty in Ghent. As “the” military hero of the war, Jackson’s political capital grew throughout the Monroe administration even with his controversial invasion of Florida against the Seminole. After becoming the first U.S. Governor of Florida, Jackson left the army and eventually saw his prospects rise for the Presidency to succeed Monroe leading to the four-way Presidential contest of 1824 which saw Jackson win both the popular vote and plurality of electoral college votes but lose in the House to John Quincy Adams. The campaign for 1828 began almost immediately and by the time of the vote the result wasn’t in doubt. Jackson’s time in the White House was focused on the Peggy Eaton affair, the battle over Bank of the United States, the Nullification Crisis with South Carolina, Indian relations, and finally what was happening in Texas. After his time in office, Jackson struggled keeping his estate out of debt and kept up with the events of around the country until his death.
In addition to focusing on Jackson’s life, Brands make sure to give background to the events that he would eventually be crucial part of. Throughout the book Brands keeps three issues prominent: Unionism, slavery, and Indian relations that dominated Jackson’s life and/or political thoughts. While Brands hits hard Jackson’s belief in the Union and is nuanced when it comes with slavery, the relations with Indians is well done in some areas and fails in some (most notably the “Trail of Tears”). This is not a biography focused primarily on Jackson’s time in the White House and thus Brands only focused on the big issues that is primarily focused on schools instead of an intense dive into his eight years.
Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times is a informative look into the life of the seventh President of the United States and what was happening in the United States throughout his nearly eight decades of life. H.W. Brands’ writing style is given to very easy reading and his research provides very good information for both general and history specific readers, though he does hedge in some areas. Overall a very good biography.
Show More
the South Carolina backcountry to frontier town of Nashville to the battlefields of the Old Southwest then finally to the White House and how he gave his name to an era of American history.Brands begins with a Jackson family history first from Scotland to Ulster then to the Piedmont region of the Carolina where his aunts and uncles had pioneered before his own parents immigrated. Fatherless from birth, Jackson’s childhood was intertwined with issues between the American colonies and Britain then eventually the Revolutionary War that the 13-year old Jackson participated in as a militia scout and guerilla fighter before his capture and illness while a POW. After the death of the rest of his family at the end of the war through illness, a young Jackson eventually went into law becoming one of the few “backcountry” lawyers in western North Carolina—including Tennessee which was claimed by North Carolina—before moving to Nashville and eventually becoming one of the founders of the state of Tennessee and become one of it’s most important military and political figures especially with his marriage to Rachel Donelson. Eventually Jackson’s status as the major general of the Tennessee militia led him to first fight the Creek War—part of the overall War of 1812—then after the successful conclusion of the campaign was made a major general of the regular army in charge of the defending New Orleans from British attack which ultimately culminated in the famous 1815 battle that occurred after the signing of the peace treaty in Ghent. As “the” military hero of the war, Jackson’s political capital grew throughout the Monroe administration even with his controversial invasion of Florida against the Seminole. After becoming the first U.S. Governor of Florida, Jackson left the army and eventually saw his prospects rise for the Presidency to succeed Monroe leading to the four-way Presidential contest of 1824 which saw Jackson win both the popular vote and plurality of electoral college votes but lose in the House to John Quincy Adams. The campaign for 1828 began almost immediately and by the time of the vote the result wasn’t in doubt. Jackson’s time in the White House was focused on the Peggy Eaton affair, the battle over Bank of the United States, the Nullification Crisis with South Carolina, Indian relations, and finally what was happening in Texas. After his time in office, Jackson struggled keeping his estate out of debt and kept up with the events of around the country until his death.
In addition to focusing on Jackson’s life, Brands make sure to give background to the events that he would eventually be crucial part of. Throughout the book Brands keeps three issues prominent: Unionism, slavery, and Indian relations that dominated Jackson’s life and/or political thoughts. While Brands hits hard Jackson’s belief in the Union and is nuanced when it comes with slavery, the relations with Indians is well done in some areas and fails in some (most notably the “Trail of Tears”). This is not a biography focused primarily on Jackson’s time in the White House and thus Brands only focused on the big issues that is primarily focused on schools instead of an intense dive into his eight years.
Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times is a informative look into the life of the seventh President of the United States and what was happening in the United States throughout his nearly eight decades of life. H.W. Brands’ writing style is given to very easy reading and his research provides very good information for both general and history specific readers, though he does hedge in some areas. Overall a very good biography.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Schmerguls
5678.Andrew Jackson His Life and Times, by H.W. Brands (read 24 Feb 2020) I read Remini's three-volume biography of Jackson (volume one on 27 Jan 1978, volumes two and three in September of 1984). and Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s The Age of Jackson on 15 Oct 1987, and Jon Meacham's book on Jackson
Show More
on 23 May 2009. So I probably need not have read this book but I have read six books by Brands, most of them with appreciation, so it was well to read this book. Brands says lots of good things about Jackson and paints his character well and one has to admire much of Jackson's behavior--especially how intense was his devotion to the Union--one wonders what he would have thought of the bigots who in 1860 destroyed the Union in order to keep slavery, even though Jackson was a big slave owner. I found the book good reading and a good refresher for me on the events of that ante-bellum time. Show Less