Status
Description
Fiction. Literature. Thriller. Historical Fiction. HTML:In 1865 Boston, the members of the Dante Club -- poets and Harvard professors Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, and James Russell Lowell, along with publisher J.T. Fields -- are finishing America's first translation of The Divine Comedy and preparing to unveil Dante's remarkable visions to the New World. The powerful Boston Brahmins at Harvard College are fighting to keep Dante in obscurity, believing that the infiltration of foreign superstitions onto American bookshelves will prove as corrupting as the immigrants living in Boston Harbor. As they struggle to keep their sacred literary cause alive, the plans of the Dante Club are put in further jeopardy when a serial killer unleashes his terror on the city. Only the scholars realize that the gruesome murders are modeled on the descriptions from Dante's Inferno and its account of Hell's torturous punishments. With the lives of the Boston elite and Dante's literary future in America at stake, the Dante Club must find the killer before the authorities discover their secret. The Dante Club is a magnificent blend of fact and fiction, a brilliantly realized paean to Dante, his mythic genius, and his continued grip on our imaginations..… (more)
User reviews
However, the ending is not horrible or so badly fit as to leave a stain on my overall impression of the book. It was excellent, and without a doubt one of my new favorite novels. I enjoyed it so thoroughly that I even bought it as a Christmas present for my friend Morgan before I even finished it (she is a fan of Dante and this was one of the first conversations we had about literature, so after the first 20 or 30 pages I knew she'd appreciate its literary and historical value).
Richard and I were having a discussion about similarly written books and movies; I don't recall which movie we were specifically talking about, but the annoyance at taking "real-life" people and creating characters and stories around them was mentioned. For example, the main characters in this book were existing authors (and well-known), and so was their "Dante Club" and translation of the poem. However, the murders never happened and certainly neither did their detective work in relation to those murders. I think a lot of people have a problem with this kind of writing, how these books are written so close to the truth that they almost seem true (and, indeed, some people think them so). Now that I've thought that, I believe it was The Da Vinci Code we were talking about, because I'd seen the movie that night (not as bad as I expected, though still not recommended). Jesus, presumably, existed, as did Mary Magdalene and the other religious figures involved. The Knights Templar legends exist, and the Opus Dei as well. I haven't read the book so I only have the movie to go on, but it seems that Dan Brown took all these things and wrote an historical novel from them, right? Well, then, why is it that I've had several people ask me to take them to The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown, and then complain that where I lead them is the section labeled "Fiction/Literature"? Why do people expect this book to be in "World History" or "History/Theology"? I think that is why people dislike this method of historical writing - as I said, taking real elements and rewriting them in a fictional world.
Personally, I can discern a line between fact and fiction and enjoy a book that is written so well that it even has me questioning history. I almost wanted to Google search the occurrence of these murders, because they were so involved in these authors' lives that "True Crime" seemed a more appropriate section. Outside of the book, though, I know I'm reading fiction, and the only "truth" is the truth of the world which I am visiting when I open that book. This is a world in which authors become detectives and Civil War veterans become murderers.
I think it's not the authors and the books that should be frustrating - rather, the readers. Anyone who believes The Da Vinci Code really happened should be shot, and I mean that in the nicest way possible. I think if an author can write historical fiction so well that it seems to be true, he or she deserves some kind of award. They've obviously done their research efficiently and thoroughly.
Knowing that there are only a handful of people aware of Dante's work, the Dante Club realizes that if a connection is made, they would be the prime (and maybe the only) suspects for the police. Also, any public connection of Dante to these murders would doom the translation project that they have devoted themselves to. Therefore, the Dante Club decides to not tell the police of the literary connection and begins its own investigation. Thus begins the story.
While the summary appears to be that of a mystery book, the focus of the story is the work and translation of Dante. The book is more of a love-letter to Dante than a thriller, and it succeeds in that respect. When I was less that half way through the book, I was already trying to find a good translation of Dante. Allen Mandelbaum's translation is now on the top of my "books to be purchased" list.
Matthew Pearl clearly did his research -- Longfellow, Holmes, Lowell, Fields, and Greene are all well-developed, as is the Boston setting. However, Pearl's writing style is abrupt, almost choppy and therefore makes it difficult for the reader to ever get completely immersed in the story or into the book. But even with the flow of the story handicapped, Pearl manages to make the members of the Dante Club inspiring.
(Spoilers follow regarding deaths, but not the killer…)
The book takes place in 1865 Boston. The Civil War is only months over – Abraham Lincoln is only months dead; the city is filled with returning soldiers in all conditions. And in the heart of the city, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow is translating Dante. There never has been an American edition of The Divine Comedy, and any British ones have been (for kind of obvious reasons) unavailable. The translation was something Longfellow worked on periodically – until his wife, Fanny, died in a terrible accident, and it became almost a therapy for him; he has worked on the translations solely for years. One of his friends speculates that if he were to return to his own poetry, he would not be able to not write about Fanny, and she would become just a word.
As the translation has progressed, Longfellow has formed a Dante Club, along with George Washington Greene, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Russell Lowell, and their publisher, James Thomas Fields (also a poet). At meetings each Wednesday a canto of the piece is discussed, and the translation is perfected, and then dinner.
Holmes, as a professor of medicine at Harvard, is tangentially involved when the body of a murdered man is brought in. It is that of a chief justice, who was supposed to be away and therefore had not been missed for several days, and was at the last found naked under a blank white flag by a servant out in the house’s grounds – still, if her testimony was to be believed, alive, though barely. No, say all of the pathologists – impossible, for he was the one who was horrifyingly infested with flies and maggots and wasps – these only eat dead flesh, so therefore he must not have been alive.
Except he was.
The lives of the men of the Dante Club incorporate and move past this murder of a man of their set, but with whom none of them were particularly close. And then there comes word of a second death – this one of a minister, who was found in the crypt of his church, buried naked upside-down up to his waist … with his feet on fire.
Again Holmes is one of the first to see the body – and it strikes him in a horrible blow that this death, and in fact that first one, bear a very strong resemblance to punishments meted out in Dante’s Inferno. He flies back to his Dante Club to discuss this, and the first impulse is to take it to the police – but they are stopped by the fact that Longfellow’s translation is already meeting with opposition. It’s too Catholic a poem, it’s too graphic, it’s not fitting for a Protestant country or state or – most importantly – city or college. There are those who feel it their duty to fight Dante – along with other heretics like Darwin – tooth and nail. And any adverse publicity – such as “Dante inspired horrid murders” – would be the end of the project. This isn’t, to their credit, important because of the potential lost investment (though that’s never so far from Fields’s mind), but for Dante’s sake: they want him to be known. Shakespeare lets men know themselves; Dante lets men know each other.
At that point it becomes a four-way race – among the Dante Club; the police, who are a new body and not exactly Boston’s Finest at this point; Nicholas Rey, a mulatto police patrolman, the first black cop in Boston (at least), who is not exactly having an easy time of it among much the rest of the police force or the criminal element; and, of course, the killer, whose timeline seems to be connected to the Dante Club’s: the murders seem to be taking place just days before the cantos to which they pay tribute.
I knew little about any of the poets involved; Longfellow’s work, of course, is an old friend, but I knew nothing about the poet. I don’t think I knew Oliver Wendell Holmes was a poet; I have his Autocrat of the Breakfast Table on hand (though I have not yet read it), and honestly I think I thought he was a lawyer – which is a little ironic. I wasn’t at all familiar with Lowell, or with Fields, their publisher – and this was a fascinating look at poetry and publishing in 19th century Boston. I’ve said before that real persons’ appearances in fiction make me a little uneasy, but in truly well done historical fiction – when the people themselves are gone and hopefully their heirs are on board – isn’t objectionable. (Although there was one centering on Poe – oh, and P.T. Barnum, I believe? – which I did not enjoy at all … Can’t remember title or author.) In fact, I enjoyed this a great deal. I believed the author’s depictions of the characters, both real and fictional, and believed the weaving together of real and fictional. And the mystery was lurid and intriguing: I guessed the killer, but only by using the old “which named character in the cast could be the one” method; there was no way for the reader to deduce the killer’s identity logically, nor his motivation, not all of it, but this is never a great priority with me. Also, of course, the chapter which takes us inside his head was powerful – all else is forgiven after that.
This was a rich book, deeply enjoyable on many levels – biography, history – of Boston, of Harvard, of publishing; mystery, thriller, literary pastiche … It was dark chocolate: a bit decadent, but – anti-oxidants! Good for you!
The end result of a book like this, blending fact and imagination, is always that I want more – I want to know more about the real people involved, and I want to (in this case) read their poetry. I never knew Longfellow translated Dante, and I want it. (Also, I find, he translated Michelangelo – I want that too.) And does it need saying I want the rest of Matthew Pearl’s books – and that I hope he writes many more?
Along with everything else, I love the jacket of the book: an etching of Harvard University, dotted with droplets of blood …
The story is well written, entertaining, and grotesque in a strangely fascinating way. The prose is solid, with that sort of dated feel to it that suits the time period. The author doesn't shy away from race issues, including the troubles of a mullato policeman in as part of the subplot.
Two points-- neither of which I would consider negative, just some small things of note that I found interesting: the author occasionally has an interesting and odd turn of phrase, that's at times dramatic and other times sends my brain screaming in a fit of, "Did he really need to quite go there?" For example, rather than describing that a corpse is naked, he inserted a memorable phrase about, "Pillowy white buttocks." that became increasingly poetic. Having read so many murder mysteries, I have become used to a particularly sparse style of corpse description. Bodies are bodies and the people finding them tended to be jaded and deliberately understated. In the case of this book, even the police are not emotionally removed and the poetry resembled a sort of disgusted fascination -- of the sort one gets when the brain makes all sorts of inappropriate analogies when you least want it to, and your eyes can't tear itself away. It's very effective. I know that there were a number of scenes that certain was trapped in my brain...
The other involved the literary politics of the time. Dante was and is such an "old classic" book in my mind that I found it difficult at first to buy into the idea that there would be such an outcry against his works. Especially in a time period that was, in some ways, more brutal than today, and certainly enjoyed the idea of a very physical Hell in its religion.
Still, quite engaging, if almost, almost too descriptively violent for my tastes. Well written.
The story takes place in 1865. The famous poet,
I thoroughly loved this book. I was transfixed by its gorgeous and vivid reconstruction of mid-19th century Boston life, culture, customs, and language. I was delighted with the way the author was able to bring to life three giants of American literature. Finally, I was astonished with the depth, breadth, and scope of the work. It was obvious that Pearl had thoroughly researched his subject and had a great deal to convey to the reader. I found the book very educational. I learned a great deal including: the structure, theme, and significance of Dante’s Divine Comedy; the importance of poetry to all classes of people in the mid-19th-century America; the after-effects of the Civil War on a major northern city; the existence of rampant mid-19th-century class and racial conflicts; and the existence of internal political conflicts at what was then the Harvard Corporation concerning important issues of academic freedom, censorship, and freedom of the press, to name but a few.
Reading this book was a pure intellectual delight—a treat for the mind. I would not be honest if I did not note that the book does have some serious flaws, but overall, its brilliance outshines and overwhelms. Be forewarned: chief among the flaws is that the book is very difficult to get into. It took me many hours; I almost gave up, finding it all too gruesome and plodding. But finally, I was trapped—no, thoroughly enchanted, completely wrapped up in the suspense, and head-over-heels in love with the unequaled opportunity to become intimately acquainted with Longfellow, Holmes, and Lowell.
Don’t read this book if you are an avid mystery reader looking for another good historical who-done-it—you’ll probably be disappointed. Do read this book if you enjoy historical fiction with a thorough dose of thought-provoking intellectual fodder, especially if you have a fondness for the beauty of great 19th-century prose and dialogue.
More disturbingly, although I usually enjoy the borrow-a-sleuth-from-real-history murder mystery subgenre, I thought Matthew Pearl was in danger of prostituting his literary forefather and better -- not his reconstituted protagonists, i.e. Longfellow, Oliver Wendell Holmes and Robert Lowell, but rather Dante himself. Pearl seems unable to convey the real heft and power of Dante other than by having his characters assert constantly that Dante is hefty and powerful. Pearl's grasp of theology is weak; he seems desperately to want Dante's import to rest on the expression of his literary gifts and personality, not the real substance of his poems. Perhaps Pearl inserts one too many filters between Dante and us -- i.e. he might have written a better book with Dante himself as the main character!
Finally, on a related note, I found Pearl's treatment of his Boston Brahmins mildly hagiographic, and hence off-putting. When I had to read them in school and as an undergrad, I found them a pompous bunch, and I fear Pearl has done little to counter that impression here.
Having said all this, though, I will have a go at Pearl's next book, in which he takes up the much more inherently interesting character of Edgar Allen Poe.
“He told me that when a Boston man reaches the pearly gates, an angel comes out to warn him: ‘You won’t like it here, for it is not Boston.’” (p. 50)
But I think the author has real problems with the omniscient narration. I am not an inexperienced reader, and I had difficulty following the thread of the narration at times, especially when exciting events were taking place. It is not always clear whose eyes we are viewing a scene through, or even what is actually happening.
It’s still an entertaining read though, and the literary allusions are very well done.
Title: The Dante Club
Author: Matthew Pearl
The Dante Club it is an extremely captivating mystery story with an all-star cast of characters. The setting is Boston, principally Cambridge, in 1886, just after the Civil War. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow is in the process of translating Dante
Assisting Longfellow in his endeavor are his close friends, “the poets of Cambridge”, James Russell Lowell, Oliver Wendell Holmes, (“the Autocrat Of The Breakfast Table”), J. T. Fields. Other historical persons also participated.
The plot revolves around the epic poem The Inferno. Dante, with Virgil as his guide, visits the various precincts of Hell. Matthew Pearl, a first-time author, began his novel while in Yale Law School. He relates his interest in law to Dante’s treatise on crime and punishment.
I found myself comparing The Dante Club to Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons as they both involve a series of murders having a common theme. The “Club” members find themselves embroiled in attempting to solve the murders when they become aware that their work at translating Dante’s Italian poem is the template guiding the killer.
The murders in Boston did increase markedly after the Civil War however the novel’s murders are fictional. Otherwise the settings are historically accurate.
“The Dante Club” inspired a renewed interest In Dante’s work and although there were many English translations after Longfellow’s, his is still considered the best. It has recently been republished after being out of print for many years.
The book contains historical notes and an interview with the author, both of which are very interesting. I enjoyed the book immensely and highly recommend it.
I feel the author did a good job making the historical
Overall not a horrible book, just a flat one and one that could have done so much more.
The plot is preposterous, but somewhat fun. Longfellow is leading an effort to translate The Divine Comedy for the 600th annivesary of Dante's birth, but the Harvard corporation opposes the effort because it would dilute the study of Greek and Latin and possibly influence the young students with Roman Catholic ideas!!
A series of grizly murders takes place in which the victims share some of the punishments meted out by Dante to some of the residents of the Inferno. The literati not only solve the mysteries by identifying the perpetrator, but also apprehend him. James Russell Lowell is the most physically fit of the geniuses, but little O.W.H, Sr. saves the day.
The writing is a little precious, but it mimics my impression of the diction of the Autocrat of the Breakfast Table [O.W.H.]. As a thriller, it doesn't have much to offer: the stilted speech of protagonists tends to dilute the inherent drama of the events described.
The book gives us a little flavor of the Inferno, which is by far the most interesting of the Comedie's Canticles. [Dante's Purgatorio is not that interesting and the Paradiso is boring enough to induce the reader to avoid salvation.]
The book is worth reading, but I was a bit disappointed because it was so favorably reviewed. [JAB]
It took a while for me to be drawn into this novel--and in fact, in the first 40 pages I thought this might be one I left unfinished. Pearl writes using an omniscient narrative, switching points of view within scenes frequently and I find such "head hopping" disorienting unless its accompanied by a strong narrative voice. Also, Lowell and Holmes in the beginning struck me as unlikable pompous blowhards. Around page fifty though, when the Dante angle and actual investigations started to kick in, I began to get absorbed, and by page 100 I found this a page-turner--I was completely engrossed from there on end, and by the end felt affection even for Holmes. It probably helps I am a Dante fan--I count The Divine Comedy as among my favorite works, and enjoyed the various references and allusions, even insights. Even though I've read more than one annotated translation, for instance, it never hit me that Dante was--or at least might have been--modeling his hell on war. Nor did I have any idea it was once so controversial among American scholars and not well known by Americans before Longfellow's translation.
In the end I'd say I'd say I enjoyed this as much as The Alienist, although I don't consider it the equal of The Name of the Rose. Without getting into spoilers for either book, I found the way the themes of the book that inspired the murders, the motives of the murderer and climax of all the novel was brought off brilliantly in Eco's novel. In comparison I thought the resolution in The Dante Club is weaker in plot and theme--the motives too serial killer pot-boiler and less unified and inspired.
Not sure. Still, not happy with this one. It was rather like
It's a shame that this quartet of fascinating men is only accessible in a fictional setting that has fiendish murders in it. I rack my brain for some other genre to explore their relationship so I don't have to read about blowflies etc. Nope, nothin' in my noggin. It will have to be this. Along with the gruesome details and the lovely historical setting in a familiar locale (I lived in Boston and Cambridge for six years) there is humor. There is also a mulatto detective, Nicholas Rey, which for me starts pushing it over the top again - not because I don't believe in mulatto detectives in the 1860s, but because it was just Too Much. I would prefer a story about the Dante Club members or a mulatto detective, but to heap them together seemed excessive and gave short shrift to Rey.
As much as I loved the scene where a seemingly clean sword is taken out into the street and gnats congregate on it (oh! very clever!), however, it is winter in Boston (or at least Boston during a hard freeze, which could be any 8 month stretch). Not being a natural historian, I can't say for certain that gnats would not be up and about in freezing temperatures, but it just seemed wrong in the circumstances.
I'm also hard-pressed to separate the personalities of the club members. Holmes comes off as dithering, but I am unable to distinguish Lowell and Longfellow. This might be a personal failing on my own part. I don't even remember who held whom upsidedown in the grave, which was quite amusing.
In any case, at least we didn't have the murderer gloating and telling his/her (heh) life story, which annoys me in all mysteries. The author kindly explains it all in a chapter aside. I did not guess who dunnit, so that's all to the positive.
It is a fun read with intellectual overtones. I used to own Longfellow's translation of Dante (well, all but Paradiso during my misspent youth in foreign language acquisition, and this almost made me download the translation from Project Gutenberg to my Kindle and then I reminded my atheist self that I wasn't that interested. Well ... maybe I will. We'll see.
I have to say, I had a lot of ideas about who the killer was, but I never had the right one. I kicked myself in the butt for that. I *should* have figured it out. But then, the author went out of his way to make us NOT suspect him, and since it wasn't done at all heavy handedly, bells didn't start ringing in my head to see the killer as a suspect at all. Enjoyable, if you like American poets, gory mysteries, and/or Dante.
I'm also impressed that this book managed to bring Longfellow's translation of Dante back into print after forty years.