Status
Available
Call number
Collection
Publication
Publisher Unknown
Description
Nearly everyone is familiar with holograms-three-dimensional images projected into space with the aid of a laser. Two of the world's most eminent thinkers believe that the universe itself may be a giant hologram, quite literally a kind of image or construct created, at least in part, by the human mind. University of London physicist David Bohm, a prot�g� of Einstein and one of the world's most respected quantum physicists, and Stanford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram, an architect of our modern understanding of the brain, have developed a remarkable new way of looking at the universe. Their theory explains not only many of the unsolved puzzles of physics but also such mysterious occurrences as telepathy, out-of-body and near-death experiences, lucid dreams, and even religious and mystical experiences, such as feelings of cosmic unity and miraculous healings. Now featuring a foreword by Lynne McTaggart, The Holographic Universe is a landmark work with exciting conclusions that continue to be proven true by today's most advanced physics, cosmology, and string theory.… (more)
User reviews
LibraryThing member CosmicBullet
I know intellectually that quantum physics is the domain of some of the strangest phenomena imaginable. I know it may be possible to create a sub-atomic particle merely by searching for it, and that two particles separated by many miles can apparently influence each others behavior in ways that
We live in an age of cynicism, rationality, and materialism. Simply by virtue of being alive in the 21st century, it is both normal and easy to participate in the hard-edged thinking that characterizes modern thought. So, on one hand, my responsibility as a rational human is to dismiss the ideas of writers like Talbot, who take cutting edge physics as a point of departure and spin it into parallel universes, telepathic and clairvoyant explanations, and into all manner of strange and wonderful possibilities. Like the other books I have mentioned, 'The Holographic Universe' suggests that mysticism and spirituality in fact provide appropriate metaphors for processes that scientific investigation is only beginning to sense the existence of, processes which lie well beyond our normal perceptions. Apparently, these implications remain largely ignored by mainstream physics. They fall too far outside the known. With one or two exceptions, it is not comfortable for a professional to publicly hold them; espousing these ideas encourages ostracism. It is always safer in the short term to reject an idea than to allow it.
On the other hand, there is something that rings so true concerning the idea that mind determines its reality. Is it possible that perception and creation are two sides of one coin? Are we so in charge of our world that it is exactly as we have judged? And then, is it possible that rejecting spiritual ideas entirely becomes a self-reinforcing position? Perhaps James Randi's skeptical challenge to 'prove it,' in fact insures the very outcome that he expects. I wonder. Talbot's observations about the way in which quantum particles appear to behave according to how the observer thinks about them certainly provokes some thought along these lines. There is in cosmology a dividing line, which separates individuals by the way they choose to think about reality. Either 1) we populate a mechanistic universe in which consciousness has arisen out of matter, or 2) the universe as we know it is a property of mind, and matter arises from consciousness. Which of these is the fundamental property of reality? It is not provable, one way or the other. As an adult, I have tended to oscillate back and forth on that question.
Indeed, reading Talbot's book and writing this review marks my most recent return from the atheistic, existential domain. Shall I embrace the possibility once again that something unimaginably wonderful is going on? Some of the new science begins to point that way. But as yet, in order to accept the possibility of the miraculous, of alternate dimensions and the validity of near-death experiences, a rational thinker must make a decision to accept an argument which is based on circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is the stock-in-trade of 'The Holographic Universe,' if not most calls for acceptance of the numinous. Talbot cites volumes of near-death accounts in which the experiencer corroborates exact operating room procedures; countless telepathic and clairvoyant 'coincidences'; accounts of past-lives remembered under hypnosis in which buildings and geographical layouts are later supported by visits to actual locations. Investigating the sheer volume of notes and references Talbot cites causes that evidence to become weighty indeed. But is it sufficient?
Finally, one must decide for oneself. And continue the search.
Show More
suggest faster-than-light interaction. I know intellectually that space as we know it may be illusory, that time as a linear process may also be an illusion. All of these things fascinate me, and I find myself wondering: can such knowledge make a difference in how I live? Books like 'The Dancing Wu-Li Masters,' The Tao of Physics,' and 'The Holographic Universe' by Michael Talbot feed that fascination. These works are challenging, exciting and, by their extraordinary nature, suspect. We live in an age of cynicism, rationality, and materialism. Simply by virtue of being alive in the 21st century, it is both normal and easy to participate in the hard-edged thinking that characterizes modern thought. So, on one hand, my responsibility as a rational human is to dismiss the ideas of writers like Talbot, who take cutting edge physics as a point of departure and spin it into parallel universes, telepathic and clairvoyant explanations, and into all manner of strange and wonderful possibilities. Like the other books I have mentioned, 'The Holographic Universe' suggests that mysticism and spirituality in fact provide appropriate metaphors for processes that scientific investigation is only beginning to sense the existence of, processes which lie well beyond our normal perceptions. Apparently, these implications remain largely ignored by mainstream physics. They fall too far outside the known. With one or two exceptions, it is not comfortable for a professional to publicly hold them; espousing these ideas encourages ostracism. It is always safer in the short term to reject an idea than to allow it.
On the other hand, there is something that rings so true concerning the idea that mind determines its reality. Is it possible that perception and creation are two sides of one coin? Are we so in charge of our world that it is exactly as we have judged? And then, is it possible that rejecting spiritual ideas entirely becomes a self-reinforcing position? Perhaps James Randi's skeptical challenge to 'prove it,' in fact insures the very outcome that he expects. I wonder. Talbot's observations about the way in which quantum particles appear to behave according to how the observer thinks about them certainly provokes some thought along these lines. There is in cosmology a dividing line, which separates individuals by the way they choose to think about reality. Either 1) we populate a mechanistic universe in which consciousness has arisen out of matter, or 2) the universe as we know it is a property of mind, and matter arises from consciousness. Which of these is the fundamental property of reality? It is not provable, one way or the other. As an adult, I have tended to oscillate back and forth on that question.
Indeed, reading Talbot's book and writing this review marks my most recent return from the atheistic, existential domain. Shall I embrace the possibility once again that something unimaginably wonderful is going on? Some of the new science begins to point that way. But as yet, in order to accept the possibility of the miraculous, of alternate dimensions and the validity of near-death experiences, a rational thinker must make a decision to accept an argument which is based on circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is the stock-in-trade of 'The Holographic Universe,' if not most calls for acceptance of the numinous. Talbot cites volumes of near-death accounts in which the experiencer corroborates exact operating room procedures; countless telepathic and clairvoyant 'coincidences'; accounts of past-lives remembered under hypnosis in which buildings and geographical layouts are later supported by visits to actual locations. Investigating the sheer volume of notes and references Talbot cites causes that evidence to become weighty indeed. But is it sufficient?
Finally, one must decide for oneself. And continue the search.
Show Less
LibraryThing member RobertDay
This book was a huge disappointment to me, and a rare instance of a book I did not finish. It dates from 1991, so I expected it not to represent the latest thinking on the subject; but I'm afraid that I found it increasingly rejecting any sort of serious science from about a third of the way in.
The
After which, Talbot begins to look at "the brain as hologram", taking as a starting point the fact that our senses are interpreted only within the brain and what we think of as an external reality is actually an internal construction. Again, so far, so good; and the arguments are backed up with what appears to be reasonable expositions of the work of published scientists.
But as the book progresses, the discussion veers further away from science and down the path of anecdote. Michael Talbot has written a number of works on psychic experiences, and he dips more and more into that territory than into verifiable or reasoned scientific discussion. Any further discussion on cosmological matters disappears and we concentrate entirely on psychology and (increasingly) parapsychology When we got onto regression into past lives, auras and chakras, my patience began to give out. And from about half-way through the book, the style turned into pure Readers' Digest and Talbot began to cite his own psychic experiences. At which point, I gave up, exasperated.
The concept of the holographic universe is important and fascinating. This book should not be your entry point to discussion of the subject.
The
Show More
idea of the holographic universe - that what we experience as 'reality' is actually a consensual illusion that we construct on a minute-by-minute basis - is a controversial idea for which there continues to be evidence found and new interpretations offered. So far, so good. And the idea is sufficiently strange that it might indeed explain much that is currently unexplainable. Talbot starts off reasonably well, outlining the careers of David Bohm (a physicist) and Karl Pribram (a neurophysiologist) and their thinking on the question of the nature of physical reality. These first chapters are fairly sound (though it has to be said that an internet search does not turn up much on either scientist that could be considered controversial).After which, Talbot begins to look at "the brain as hologram", taking as a starting point the fact that our senses are interpreted only within the brain and what we think of as an external reality is actually an internal construction. Again, so far, so good; and the arguments are backed up with what appears to be reasonable expositions of the work of published scientists.
But as the book progresses, the discussion veers further away from science and down the path of anecdote. Michael Talbot has written a number of works on psychic experiences, and he dips more and more into that territory than into verifiable or reasoned scientific discussion. Any further discussion on cosmological matters disappears and we concentrate entirely on psychology and (increasingly) parapsychology When we got onto regression into past lives, auras and chakras, my patience began to give out. And from about half-way through the book, the style turned into pure Readers' Digest and Talbot began to cite his own psychic experiences. At which point, I gave up, exasperated.
The concept of the holographic universe is important and fascinating. This book should not be your entry point to discussion of the subject.
Show Less
LibraryThing member eumin
This is a fascinating and frustrating book. The author has some genuinely interesting ideas about the nature of reality. On the other hand, there is also a great deal of weird paranormal stuff, including a passage about how the author was able to conjure cold spaghetti out of thin air, that almost
Show More
made me throw the book away. The book is still worth reading, though, because of its many interesting ideas and insights - just read it with a grain of salt. Show Less
LibraryThing member helenaharper
This must be one of the most fascinating, if not the most fascinating book I have ever read, and it is a must-read for anyone who is even remotely curious about who and what we really are or who wants to see spirituality meeting science. The claims that are made are backed up by numerous scientific
Show More
studies, but it doesn't blow you away with scientific jargon. It's written in an easy-to-read style and the different chapters are split up into subsections, which also helps. Michael Talbot explains what a hologram is and then goes on to argue that the holographic model can be used to explain multiple personality disorders (extraordinary! - if you know nothing about MPD, then you absolutely must read this section), psychokinesis, miracles, the human energy field (or energy bodies), past/present/future existing seemlessly together, near death experiences (NDEs), UFO sightings and much more. Whether you accept the holographic theory or not, just reading the results of the various scientific studies mentioned in the book is fascinating and for me, personally, as a poet and author, it was also inspiring. The idea that everything is interconnected in this holographic universe of ours and is part of the same continuum inspired me, for example, to write a poem called 'My Life' to try and make sense of it ('...all that I see and don't see, hear and don't hear, touch and don't touch, smell and don't smell, taste and don't taste I am - I am the eternal energy of everything...'), whilst the story of the woman in the NDE chapter who said that 'she hadn't danced enough yet', making the being of light she was talking to laugh heartily and enabling her to return to physical life, gave me an idea for a children's story. In short, I found the book riveting and inspirational - jam-packed full of extraordinary scientific fact way more mind-blowing and thrilling than any science fiction I've ever read - and I am now reading it for a second time and will probably read it a third and fourth time as well! Show Less
LibraryThing member edwbaker
Well written, but pure nonsense.
LibraryThing member jeffreybrayne
A truly interesting theory about the energy that comprises life.
LibraryThing member talltrickster
Well-written, comprehensive overview of metaphysics. I hadn't read much about Stanislav Grof until this book, and Talbot's description of Grof's work prompted me to read Grof's book, "The Holotropic Mind." Consciousness appears to be not only located in our mind, but is connected throughout the
Show More
universe. Show Less
LibraryThing member co_coyote
One of my favorite physics books, I first read this in a period of time when I was (for whatever reason!) interested in shamans and altered states of reality. I've read it since then, and it is still as good as I remember it. It just goes to show that some very serious people think the Universe is
Show More
stranger than we sometimes make it out to be. And with recent reports of tangled photons and spooky action at a distance, who knows what will actually will turn out to be the case.. Show Less
LibraryThing member PurpleV
Think you know what reality is? Think again. If you have ever questioned the power of the mind and that relationship to reality, this is a must read.
LibraryThing member V1LL1N
A MUST READ!
LibraryThing member antao
Some say there exists only one interpretation of quantum mechanics, and that is the many-worlds interpretation. But there exists another explanation as described by Michael Talbot in his book “Holographic Universe”; here is an excerpt where he writes of Karl Pribram a neurophysiologist at
'... Pribam realised that the objective world does not exist, at least not in the way we are accustomed to believing. What is 'out there' is a vast ocean of waves and frequencies and reality looks concrete to us only because our brains are able to take this holographic blur and convert it into sticks and stones and other familiar objects that make up our world...'
'...In other words, the smoothness of a piece of fine china and the feel of beach sand beneath our feet are really just elaborate versions of the phantom limb syndrome (when amputees 'feel' a limb long after it has been removed)..'
'According to Pribram, this does not mean there aren't china cups and grains of sand out there. It simply means that a china cup has two very different aspects to its reality. When it is filtered through the lens of our brains it manifests as a cup. But if we could get rid of our lenses, we'd experience it as an interference pattern. Which is real and which is illusion? "Both are real to me," says Pribham, "or, if you want to say, neither of them are real".
Also look up the research by Russian biophysicist Pjotr Garjajev, and his colleagues known as the phantom DNA effect. The Russian scientists irradiated DNA samples with laser light, on screen, a typical wave pattern was formed. When they removed the DNA sample, the wave pattern did not disappear, it remained. Many control experiments showed that the pattern still came from the removed sample, whose energy field apparently remained by itself.
Also see their work known as wave genetics, they found that living DNA will always react to language-modulated laser rays, and even to radio waves, if the proper frequencies are used. They succeeded in repairing chromosomes damaged by X-rays, they even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, so reprogramming cells to another genome. They successfully transformed for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns. This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects involved when western researchers cut out and insert DNA.
If you fall into a black hole, nothing happens to you, by the equivalence principle you cannot know you are falling into a black hole. You carry on happy as Larry. To us outside, looking at you falling into a black hole, you slow down, your time seen by us gets slower and slower and slower and you never fall into the hole. You get stuck at the horizon. (look at the Penrose diagram, the event horizon can never be in an outside observer's past) But, eons later, you come back out by hawking radiation and say hi! I was in a black hole! We say, no you weren't; you got close then you were radiated back out. Who's right? Smeared over the surface, or inside, it's the same, it's just your point of view. As a member of the general public that is exactly how I feel now. I feel smeared! There are too many theories describing the universe and many of them seem to be correct. There is still no universal equation combining all four forces. Is the physics we know correct, or is it only sufficient approximation to satisfy our senses? Will our intelligence ever allow us to understand it or are we just fooking dumb? We do not have a vantage point to be objective on that matter. Cosmic man. But whoosh. I'm blown away that there are people who genuinely understand this Holographic and Black Hole stuff. Respect.
Show More
Stanford:'... Pribam realised that the objective world does not exist, at least not in the way we are accustomed to believing. What is 'out there' is a vast ocean of waves and frequencies and reality looks concrete to us only because our brains are able to take this holographic blur and convert it into sticks and stones and other familiar objects that make up our world...'
'...In other words, the smoothness of a piece of fine china and the feel of beach sand beneath our feet are really just elaborate versions of the phantom limb syndrome (when amputees 'feel' a limb long after it has been removed)..'
'According to Pribram, this does not mean there aren't china cups and grains of sand out there. It simply means that a china cup has two very different aspects to its reality. When it is filtered through the lens of our brains it manifests as a cup. But if we could get rid of our lenses, we'd experience it as an interference pattern. Which is real and which is illusion? "Both are real to me," says Pribham, "or, if you want to say, neither of them are real".
Also look up the research by Russian biophysicist Pjotr Garjajev, and his colleagues known as the phantom DNA effect. The Russian scientists irradiated DNA samples with laser light, on screen, a typical wave pattern was formed. When they removed the DNA sample, the wave pattern did not disappear, it remained. Many control experiments showed that the pattern still came from the removed sample, whose energy field apparently remained by itself.
Also see their work known as wave genetics, they found that living DNA will always react to language-modulated laser rays, and even to radio waves, if the proper frequencies are used. They succeeded in repairing chromosomes damaged by X-rays, they even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, so reprogramming cells to another genome. They successfully transformed for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns. This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects involved when western researchers cut out and insert DNA.
If you fall into a black hole, nothing happens to you, by the equivalence principle you cannot know you are falling into a black hole. You carry on happy as Larry. To us outside, looking at you falling into a black hole, you slow down, your time seen by us gets slower and slower and slower and you never fall into the hole. You get stuck at the horizon. (look at the Penrose diagram, the event horizon can never be in an outside observer's past) But, eons later, you come back out by hawking radiation and say hi! I was in a black hole! We say, no you weren't; you got close then you were radiated back out. Who's right? Smeared over the surface, or inside, it's the same, it's just your point of view. As a member of the general public that is exactly how I feel now. I feel smeared! There are too many theories describing the universe and many of them seem to be correct. There is still no universal equation combining all four forces. Is the physics we know correct, or is it only sufficient approximation to satisfy our senses? Will our intelligence ever allow us to understand it or are we just fooking dumb? We do not have a vantage point to be objective on that matter. Cosmic man. But whoosh. I'm blown away that there are people who genuinely understand this Holographic and Black Hole stuff. Respect.
Show Less
Original publication date
1991
Other editions
The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot (Paperback)
The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot (Paperback)
The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot (Paperback)
Similar in this library
The Holotropic Mind: The Three Levels of Human Consciousness and How They Shape Our Lives by Stanislav Grof
Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension by Michio Kaku
The Biology Of Belief: Unleashing The Power Of Consciousness, Matter And Miracles by Bruce H. Lipton
The Dreaming Universe: A Mind-Expanding Journey Into the Realm Where Psyche and Physics Meet by Fred Alan Wolf
The Archaic Revival: Speculations on Psychedelic Mushrooms, the Amazon, Virtual Reality, UFOs, Evolution, Shamanism, the Rebirth of the Goddess, and the End of History by Terence McKenna