Status
Checked out
Collection
Publication
London : Arrow, 1997.
Description
This "terrific" novel of alternate history asks: What if Hitler had never been born? (The Washington Post) Michael Young is a graduate student at Cambridge who is completing his dissertation on the early life of Adolf Hitler. Leo Zuckermann is an aging German physicist haunted by the Holocaust. Together, they idealistically embark on an experiment to change the course of history. And with their success is launched a brave new world that is in some ways better than ours--but in most ways even worse.
User reviews
LibraryThing member Eruntane
This was not the kind of book I expected Stephen Fry to write - somehow I never saw anything so close to sci fi as his style - but it was as brilliantly executed as you would expect from him. Very readable, and I loved his way of using screenplay style to capture the more cinematic passages. (If
Show More
I'd thought of it first I'd do it myself, but I suppose now it would be copying.) The only thing I would say against the novel is that you wonder about Michael's motives - the suspicion crept into my mind that he really only makes so much effort to put things right so that he can get laid legally. The fact that in alternate reality the Jewish people have been completely wiped out of Europe, and that racial segregation in the US hasn't progressed beyond the 1930s gets very little "screen time" by comparison. But I suppose it's only fair for writers to get to air their own particular hang-ups in their own work. Show Less
LibraryThing member FranTatt
Very gripping - couldn't put it down. Read it all morning. Liked the plot, hated the bits written as film script. Also the occasional flights of fancy bits. However his prose is awesome. 'The strip light spanked itself awake'
LibraryThing member BenDV
Having become quite the fan of Stephen Fry, thanks largely to QI, I became rather interested when I heard he'd also written a few novels. The plot of Making History only intrigued me more. It's basically this: Michael Young, a history PhD student at Cambridge writing a thesis on Adolf Hitler's
Making History is an extremely impressive novel. I was expecting something with a lot of humour, this being Stephen Fry, and while there are some humorous moments, especially at the beginning of the novel, Fry does not let humour triumph over the plot, which is very strong. Though the novel comes in at nearly 600 pages, it's paced very well for the most part. The start was perhaps a tad slow, but it was beneficial because it established the characters well, making me care much more about their fate. Interspersed with the chapters from Michael's perspective (making up much of the book) are chapters in third person considering the early life of Adolf Hitler, particularly during his time in World War One. Fry portrays the characters well, and gives a surprisingly sympathetic portrayal of Hitler, without making us like him.
On the strength of this work, I'll probably be picking up at least one of Fry's other three novels. His passionate concern for the subject matter, combined with the strength of his characters and plot, make for a highly entertaining read.
Show More
childhood, meets an aging German scientist named Leo Zuckermann, seemingly a Jew whose father died at Auschwitz. Zuckermann passionately hates Adolf Hitler, and has created a machine that allows him to see into the past, and, it turns out, transport materials there as well (though not actually travel back in time). Young, a painfully awkward nerdy type, worried about taking his final step out of the world of education into the real world, convinces Zuckermann, overwhelmed with emotion due to his past (revealed in detail toward the end of Book One, I won't give it away), to use his machine to prevent the birth of Adolf Hitler. Both assume they are going to create a better world. As I'm sure you can guess, things don't turn out as planned, since it is not just the 'great men' of history that determine its course. Making History is an extremely impressive novel. I was expecting something with a lot of humour, this being Stephen Fry, and while there are some humorous moments, especially at the beginning of the novel, Fry does not let humour triumph over the plot, which is very strong. Though the novel comes in at nearly 600 pages, it's paced very well for the most part. The start was perhaps a tad slow, but it was beneficial because it established the characters well, making me care much more about their fate. Interspersed with the chapters from Michael's perspective (making up much of the book) are chapters in third person considering the early life of Adolf Hitler, particularly during his time in World War One. Fry portrays the characters well, and gives a surprisingly sympathetic portrayal of Hitler, without making us like him.
On the strength of this work, I'll probably be picking up at least one of Fry's other three novels. His passionate concern for the subject matter, combined with the strength of his characters and plot, make for a highly entertaining read.
Show Less
LibraryThing member TheCriticalTimes
We all know what happens when characters in a novel mess with history, but try they must, especially when they have a chance to prevent Hitler from being born, and so they shall. This is what the protagonists of Making History think and who can argue with such an obvious course of action. Stephen
Without giving too much away, the hero and his sidekick Darwnin-esque-action-professor manage to first screw up history big time and then put things back in place with many personal lessons learned concerning life, love and the pursuit of alternate realities.
Does it all work well together? Surely the novel is a great read and highly entertaining, but a there is also a persistent sense that Fry is trying to make a point he can't quite get across. Unfortunately the one obvious message can't be accurate since the reader might have to conclude at the end that we should be glad we had a Hitler because the most likely alternative would have been much worse. Certainly it is arguable that only one possible outcome is presented from a range of historical possibilities. However, other collaborating details, for example the personalities of the other soldiers waiting in the wings besides Hitler in the trenches of World War 1, can not give the reader any other options for seeing how things might have turned out for the better.
Although this novel is written much later than The Liar, it uses surprisingly more primitive narrative constructs, something I wasn't expecting. For example Stephen Fry uses a lot of lists and litanies to get a point across, which is something the Victorians loved to do but which has run its course. Even Helprin in his novel Freddy and Fredericka discovered it doesn't work anymore and has since abandoned it. Fry shows off not only his deep knowledge of World War 2 but also flaunts his linguistic skill by subtly playing with English-isms vs American-isms. A clearer case of temporal plot for occurs when the author clearly points out when we should remember something for later usage. A box of bright orange pills spills on the ground and the owner starts screaming that these are highly dangerous. Surely these pills must be useful for something later in the book. And they are.
It's hard not to like a Fry novel, the man is a really good writer and his plots are quite refreshing, not to mention that his stories are quite entertaining. Making History is an odd one however, it is a quick read of something that felt like it was meant to be something bigger. A recommended read but also pick up some of the author's other novels.
Show More
Fry in his third novel comes up with a remarkable narrative construction, which is clever, endearing, smart, intelligent, amazing, and unfortunately grossly under appreciated. Us readers don't remember a novel for its clockwork plot precision, we remember it because we relate to people and the events happening to them.Without giving too much away, the hero and his sidekick Darwnin-esque-action-professor manage to first screw up history big time and then put things back in place with many personal lessons learned concerning life, love and the pursuit of alternate realities.
Does it all work well together? Surely the novel is a great read and highly entertaining, but a there is also a persistent sense that Fry is trying to make a point he can't quite get across. Unfortunately the one obvious message can't be accurate since the reader might have to conclude at the end that we should be glad we had a Hitler because the most likely alternative would have been much worse. Certainly it is arguable that only one possible outcome is presented from a range of historical possibilities. However, other collaborating details, for example the personalities of the other soldiers waiting in the wings besides Hitler in the trenches of World War 1, can not give the reader any other options for seeing how things might have turned out for the better.
Although this novel is written much later than The Liar, it uses surprisingly more primitive narrative constructs, something I wasn't expecting. For example Stephen Fry uses a lot of lists and litanies to get a point across, which is something the Victorians loved to do but which has run its course. Even Helprin in his novel Freddy and Fredericka discovered it doesn't work anymore and has since abandoned it. Fry shows off not only his deep knowledge of World War 2 but also flaunts his linguistic skill by subtly playing with English-isms vs American-isms. A clearer case of temporal plot for occurs when the author clearly points out when we should remember something for later usage. A box of bright orange pills spills on the ground and the owner starts screaming that these are highly dangerous. Surely these pills must be useful for something later in the book. And they are.
It's hard not to like a Fry novel, the man is a really good writer and his plots are quite refreshing, not to mention that his stories are quite entertaining. Making History is an odd one however, it is a quick read of something that felt like it was meant to be something bigger. A recommended read but also pick up some of the author's other novels.
Show Less
LibraryThing member BrokenTune
Can you have a mid-life crisis at twenty-four? Or is it just the usual crisis of adulthood, something I was going to have to get used to until I doddered into oblivion? For the past year, I realised, I had been suffering from this pain, this leaking of hot lead in my stomach. Every morning when I
Even tho I love Stephen Fry's books (and pretty much everything else he shares with the world), Making History has been lingering on my kindle without even tempting me to start this. Why is that?
Well, I unfortunately was put of by the premise that promised time travel that would culminate in the prevention of Hitler, two subjects that really don't intrigue me at all.
When I started the book, the misgivings I had with the premise continued: I liked Fry's writing but I still couldn't get to grips with reading what was in part a biography of Hitler, which, well, I had not planned on ever reading. I even found myself skimming some of those parts. It was written really well, but not something I would have engaged with if it had been by any other author.
However, I knew enough about Stephen Fry to be intrigued as to how he would handle the subject and how he would tie up the various parallel story lines.
And of course the second story line about a history student who has just submitted his PhD thesis, was quirky enough and contained all the good parts, the parts where Fry questions things like the relationship between science and art, and how society attributes more importance to one rather than the other.
But then it happened: At about the half-way point, two things happened:
For one, I realised how unusual it is to read a WWI account (even tho fiction) from a German perspective. What is more, Fry did this rather well and without resorting to a lot of stereotyping or using cliches.
The second change was that the story suddenly changed a gear when the two plots crossed, and when we get to read Fry's conjectured alternate reality, which is not as, erm, peachy as the simple solution erasing Hitler's existence from the 20th century may seem.
The second half of the book had me gripped. If I had not arranged to meet with a friend for lunch, I would have read this book straight through all morning.
What I loved about Fry's story is that he did not rely on a naive plot, but actually put a lot of thought into his conjectures, where one change effects so many things that outcomes are not predictable. And, yet, despite the sensitive subjects that Fry brought up, there is an overarching tone of hope for humankind, even if the book focuses on the balance between the good and the bad that comes with every action.
I absolutely loved it.
Unfortunately, this is the last of Fry's novels that I hadn't read, yet, so I can only hope that he will at some point write another one. I love his other books (the non-fiction ones), but his fiction work is rather special to me.
Show More
awoke and stared at the ceiling and listened to Jane’s gentle snoring it flooded my gut, a dark swell of recognition that here was another pissing day to be got through as me. How can you tell if that’s freakish or usual? No one ever says. The ceaselessly expanding Christian Societies in the university would tell you that it was a sign that you needed room for Christ in your life. That your ache was a vacuum in the soul. Yeah, right. Sure. It was the same void that drugs filled, I supposed. I had thought too that maybe this was what Jane was for. No, not what Jane was for, what Love was for. Then either I didn’t love Jane as I should or this was another blown theory. The longings of a creative spirit then? Maybe my soul craved expression in Art? But: can’t draw, can’t write, can’t sing, can’t play. Great. Where does that leave me? A kind of Salieri deal perhaps. Cursed with enough of divine fire to recognise it in others, but not enough to create anything myself. Aw, rats . . .Even tho I love Stephen Fry's books (and pretty much everything else he shares with the world), Making History has been lingering on my kindle without even tempting me to start this. Why is that?
Well, I unfortunately was put of by the premise that promised time travel that would culminate in the prevention of Hitler, two subjects that really don't intrigue me at all.
When I started the book, the misgivings I had with the premise continued: I liked Fry's writing but I still couldn't get to grips with reading what was in part a biography of Hitler, which, well, I had not planned on ever reading. I even found myself skimming some of those parts. It was written really well, but not something I would have engaged with if it had been by any other author.
However, I knew enough about Stephen Fry to be intrigued as to how he would handle the subject and how he would tie up the various parallel story lines.
And of course the second story line about a history student who has just submitted his PhD thesis, was quirky enough and contained all the good parts, the parts where Fry questions things like the relationship between science and art, and how society attributes more importance to one rather than the other.
But then it happened: At about the half-way point, two things happened:
For one, I realised how unusual it is to read a WWI account (even tho fiction) from a German perspective. What is more, Fry did this rather well and without resorting to a lot of stereotyping or using cliches.
The second change was that the story suddenly changed a gear when the two plots crossed, and when we get to read Fry's conjectured alternate reality, which is not as, erm, peachy as the simple solution erasing Hitler's existence from the 20th century may seem.
The second half of the book had me gripped. If I had not arranged to meet with a friend for lunch, I would have read this book straight through all morning.
What I loved about Fry's story is that he did not rely on a naive plot, but actually put a lot of thought into his conjectures, where one change effects so many things that outcomes are not predictable. And, yet, despite the sensitive subjects that Fry brought up, there is an overarching tone of hope for humankind, even if the book focuses on the balance between the good and the bad that comes with every action.
I absolutely loved it.
Unfortunately, this is the last of Fry's novels that I hadn't read, yet, so I can only hope that he will at some point write another one. I love his other books (the non-fiction ones), but his fiction work is rather special to me.
Show Less
LibraryThing member booklove2
I think that this book should considered a classic. I absolutely loved it. One of my favorite books ever. The concept is intriguing.. a world without Hitler.. but I wish that the results would have been more pleasant. I guess it goes to show that ANYTHING could be worse.. even without having Adolf
Show More
Hitler in the world (And I can't believe I'm typing this right now, however if you read the book, you would see what I mean). Show Less
LibraryThing member lizzybeans11
An amazing work of fiction if there ever was! I had no idea what to expect when I first picked up this book, but I have to say I was more than pleasantly surprised. The whole plot of the book is so unique and cutting edge and I love that it was well thought out through to the end.
If you like
If you like
Show More
Stephen Fry and British humour you will love this book. Show Less
LibraryThing member jaygheiser
With a witty and even profound beginning, and an interesting premise for an alternate history, the story becomes increasingly tenuous and trivial as it accelerates towards its fairy tale ending.
LibraryThing member judithann
I'm not one for stories about Hitler, Nazis and the second world war, but I like Stephen Fry's writings- well, it turned out this was about time travel, not war! A fantastic book, very engaging.
After making sure Hitler does not get born, a student, Michael, ends up in a different country, with
After making sure Hitler does not get born, a student, Michael, ends up in a different country, with
Show More
different friends, and a different course of study, because history has changed, and so has his past. He of course does not "remember" anything in this new life, so does not know who his friends are, where the library is and where his parents live. The world does not seem a better place, and in the end, he goes back to his original life. But it is not quite the same as before! Show Less
LibraryThing member Fledgist
This asks the interesting question: What if Hitler had never been born, and explores that possibility in a comic thriller. But what but a comic thriller would one expect from a poetic comedian like Fry?
LibraryThing member TLievens
Although I admired and loved Fry's stylistically superb and witty writing, I was a bit disappointed by the simplistic plot of the book and its twists. Especially, towards the end of the book seemed to be finalised hastily and all loose ends were tied together loosely.
But as said, I did very much
But as said, I did very much
Show More
enjoy the creativity and love with which Fry handle the English language. It made the book very much worth finishing. Show Less
LibraryThing member patrickdjoyce
Unfortunately mundane title for an engaging time travel story whose alternative-history fulcrum is somewhat guessable (although that doesn't lessen the suspense); a couple of surprises besides.
LibraryThing member pauliharman
A highly readable, entertaining alternate history novel. What if Hitler was never born? That's the question that Fry asks in this novel. A standard trope of time travel - be careful what you wish for; this novel paints a picture of a future world which is, in many ways, much worse than ours. The
Show More
ending is highly satisfying. Show Less
LibraryThing member trinityofone
This was such a blast. Fry has a lot of fun with the "what if you could go back in time and kill Hitler?"—or in this case, go back in time and prevent Hitler from ever being born—plot. The alternate universe he creates is pretty cleverly developed and suitably creepy; it's also incredibly
Show More
amusing that Michael's meddling has the first troublesome result of making him AMERICAN, oh noes. I wish there'd been a bit more about Michael and Steve's developing relationship, but mostly this was a romp in the best sense of the word, with a good dose of underlying scariness. Recommended. Show Less
LibraryThing member heymanp
Witty, insightful, clever, and a riveting read. Must-read!
LibraryThing member bunwat
Hmmm well this was clever, and I love Stephen Fry's authorial voice, but somehow it ended up making me sad. Then again I wasn't in the best mood to start with so it may be I would have been more amused if I'd been in a better mood to begin with.
MINOR SPOILERS - Nothing you wouldn't get from
I liked the premise quite a lot, that preventing the birth of Hitler might not produce a better world after all. Because yeah, Hitler was an evil man but he didn't invent and prosecute WWII all by himself.
But somehow the working out of the premise was a little bit flawed. There was a lot of time spent on the lead up to preventing the birth of Hitler. But once the protagonist finds himself in this new world where Hitler was never born, he just looks up some stuff in the library and says oh I don't like this, and races to get home again.
Which all falls together pretty fast - given that he's stranded in a strange world he sure figures out how to turn it around without much difficulty. It felt a bit uneven. Still, I liked it enough I'll probably read something else by Fry at some point.
MINOR SPOILERS - Nothing you wouldn't get from
Show More
reading the blurb. I liked the premise quite a lot, that preventing the birth of Hitler might not produce a better world after all. Because yeah, Hitler was an evil man but he didn't invent and prosecute WWII all by himself.
But somehow the working out of the premise was a little bit flawed. There was a lot of time spent on the lead up to preventing the birth of Hitler. But once the protagonist finds himself in this new world where Hitler was never born, he just looks up some stuff in the library and says oh I don't like this, and races to get home again.
Which all falls together pretty fast - given that he's stranded in a strange world he sure figures out how to turn it around without much difficulty. It felt a bit uneven. Still, I liked it enough I'll probably read something else by Fry at some point.
Show Less
LibraryThing member isabelx
A science-fiction, alternate history, comedy novel. I loved Pup, who was a very realistic student (I thought it was very funny how he got that nickname). The way history was changed by what he and Leo did was believable but there were places where the story dragged and I was waiting impatiently for
Show More
something to happen. So it was good, but not as good as Fry's "The Liar". Show Less
LibraryThing member john257hopper
A very humorously written story about the very darkest of events, the attempt by history student Michael Young and scientist Professor Leo Zuckermann, to change history by ensuring that Hitler was never born. Of course, things go wrong and in the alternate world an equally ghastly turn of events
Show More
has taken place, surrounding an alternative and more rational and successful Nazi Leader, Gloder. It all comes right in the end and history is set back on its proper course. The central characters are believable and likeable. My only criticism would be that it does drag a little in places and perhaps takes too long to get really started. Also, it wasn't clear why some sections were written in film script rather than normal prose. A good read overall, though. Show Less
LibraryThing member polarbear123
Pacy and witty with the usual word smithery and magical turns of phrases you would expect from Fry. The only issue I have with this enjoyable story is that at times it gets overly sentimental. You'll know the bits I am talking about.
LibraryThing member MiaCulpa
Stephen Fry can be very funny but not in this book. "Making History" is an odd book; it swaps between novel and screenplay and tries to argue that if the Germans had won WWII then the US would be an authoritarian state.
A bit of a disappointment, really.
A bit of a disappointment, really.
LibraryThing member AaronP
A cracking read. Really recommended.
LibraryThing member TheCrow2
Can Stephen Fry write a SF? If we define the alternative histories as a subgenre of SF (and we do) then the answer is yes. It`s an entertaining, thought-provokingly clever book about one (or two) alternative worlds and the consequences of seemingly positive deeds.
LibraryThing member paulmorriss
This time travel story had a guessable plot, which I correctly guessed. However it sets it up so logically, and there are unexpected twists so I didn't feel disappointed by my great perception.
LibraryThing member Balthazar-Lawson
I'm in mixed minds about this book, mainly because it's a mixed up book. Parts of it are written like a novel and parts like the script for a movie. There was also the jumping backwards and forwards in alternating chapters, a writing style I'm not particularly happy with. It was a slow start but it
Overall it was only a so-so book.
Show More
pick up towards the end and become a more interesting.Overall it was only a so-so book.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Anome
The weakest of Fry's novels in my opinion. While it explores interesting themes, and proposes an interesting and all too believable alternative history of the 20th Century, there's something unsatisfying about the story.
Subjects
Awards
Sidewise Award (Winner — 1998)
Language
Original publication date
1996
Physical description
556 p.; 18 cm
ISBN
9780099464815