Description
Forty-two stories. In The Bloody Chamber, a bride discovers she married a sadist, The Quilt Maker is on aging, and Our Lady of the Massacres is on the destruction of Indians.
Genres
Collection
Publication
Vintage Books (2010)
User reviews
LibraryThing member veranasi
If she were alive today, they would say, "Bad woman! Bad!" because of her lack of compromise on textual aesthetics. When she was alive, they said, "Bad woman! Bad!" because aesthetics of her characters. You can't just like Angela Carter. You can't say, "Oh! this was a good book..." You have say,
Show More
"Even though I oppose the idea of marriage, I would wed this collection." Show Less
LibraryThing member DawnFinley
Tired of the usual pomo bad boys? Read Angela Carter. Now. Carolyn See said in the Washington Post that it is "a treasure chest of literary and aesthetic experience . . . mysterious, glamorous, beautiful." One of my professors described the quality of her prose by likening it to eating frosting
If you need linear plots and are bothered by ornate or baroque use of language, this may not work for you. But if you're willing to go wherever Carter takes you, you won't be let down. I've had this book since it came out and still haven't finished with it.
Show More
right out of a can. Carter's imaginative powers are fully her own; her work is unlike anything else you'll encounter. Her novels are dense, rich, hugely inventive and unconventional. The stories are too, but you can take them in smaller doses, which can be a big advantage. Some of the most popular are reworkings of folklore or fairy tales, recast with uncanny magic. Carter's work is deeply feminist, but in a way that goes beyond the usual boundaries of empowerment and liberation. If I had to make comparisons, I might describe it as a cocktail of Kathy Acker, Italo Calvino and Roald Dahl.If you need linear plots and are bothered by ornate or baroque use of language, this may not work for you. But if you're willing to go wherever Carter takes you, you won't be let down. I've had this book since it came out and still haven't finished with it.
Show Less
LibraryThing member eilonwy_anne
If I had only one word to describe Angela Carter, I think I might go with "audacious". One lonely adjective, however, never satisfied Carter or me.
Carter's imagination is dark, elemental and disturbing, and it wends its way through a rich intellectual landscape. I happen to share Carter's interests
Carter's prose does tend towards the purple, and while on the one hand it is an essential part of her charming audacity, on the other hand it can be excessive. It can even tire the eye so that it may miss or fail to appreciate inspired images like a tumbledown house "with a look of oracular blindness", a child with "a whim of iron", or Autumn giving the forest "a sickroom hush". Sometimes, Carter indulges her purple tendencies under the auspices of a believably pompous or flowery narrator, but different readers may find that mechanism more or less effective. Some stories are not so hothouse lush in their verbiage, so I'd encourage a first-time Carter reader to flip past any stories that bother them, rather than putting the book down.
Some of her revised fairy tales from The Bloody Chamber, as has been noted elsewhere, are more amusing than insightful in the light of further developments in the genre. At their best, however, her work, mythic and everyday alike, exposes and owns human ugliness and opens the door briefly to primal beauties. My favorite is "Ashputtle, or the Mother's Ghost: three versions of one story", which first analyzes, then strips and distills the Cinderella myth to its haunting bones.
Nota bene: Carter's stories are sometimes gory, and several include scenes of sexual violence.
Carter's imagination is dark, elemental and disturbing, and it wends its way through a rich intellectual landscape. I happen to share Carter's interests
Show More
in certain motifs, themes and tropes -- fairy tales, folklore, the ocean and forest in myth, and others -- and the rich variety of topics, settings and structures in the collection was engaging.Carter's prose does tend towards the purple, and while on the one hand it is an essential part of her charming audacity, on the other hand it can be excessive. It can even tire the eye so that it may miss or fail to appreciate inspired images like a tumbledown house "with a look of oracular blindness", a child with "a whim of iron", or Autumn giving the forest "a sickroom hush". Sometimes, Carter indulges her purple tendencies under the auspices of a believably pompous or flowery narrator, but different readers may find that mechanism more or less effective. Some stories are not so hothouse lush in their verbiage, so I'd encourage a first-time Carter reader to flip past any stories that bother them, rather than putting the book down.
Some of her revised fairy tales from The Bloody Chamber, as has been noted elsewhere, are more amusing than insightful in the light of further developments in the genre. At their best, however, her work, mythic and everyday alike, exposes and owns human ugliness and opens the door briefly to primal beauties. My favorite is "Ashputtle, or the Mother's Ghost: three versions of one story", which first analyzes, then strips and distills the Cinderella myth to its haunting bones.
Nota bene: Carter's stories are sometimes gory, and several include scenes of sexual violence.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Poquette
My first exposure to Angela Carter was through her short story collection called Saints and Strangers. These stories were just brilliant and did not expose some of Carter's darker preoccupations. Since I have not read any of her longer fiction, I was quite unprepared for the amount of
Show More
unpleasantness that appears in many of her stories. Burning Your Boats includes all of Angela Carter's short story output. Some of it I wish I had not read. Carter is well known for her unique use of language, and I grant that she is an amazing stylist when she wants to be. I confess to being very enthusiastic about some stories and absolutely hating others. The experience of reading her is like riding a roller coaster. I cannot think of another writer who engenders such a wide emotional swing. On balance, I cannot recommend this book. Too much of it is filled with a kind of perverseness that I do not enjoy. Show Less
LibraryThing member elenchus
In the Afterword to Fireworks, published here in an appendix, Carter writes of her distinction between a tale and a short story. The former eschews character development, a tale aims for something closer to fable or archetype. "Formally the tale differs from the short story in that it makes few
Carter isn't coy with her symbolism or allegory, but it's not immediately clear to me what she is saying in each story. All nine tales in Fireworks involve sexual energy and violence, but how precisely does this imagery link up with her themes of identity, signification, borders? Perhaps the latter are indirect means for exploring the former? Or better yet: the other way round.
Carter's tales feature the way things were done in other times or other places, imagined or real. It's clear she's talking about how we do things today, everyday. The stories are like Kafka's in that they seem simple, and perhaps their overall gist is simple, but the specifics are intriguingly evasive.
//
The subtitle is The Collected Short Stories, unclear how complete is this edition. I looked specifically for the stories first published in 1974 as Fireworks: Nine Profane Pieces, and so appreciated that as republished here, the stories retain their published chronology as distinct & titled parts. Of the stories I read, only the Victorian fable wasn't originally part of Fireworks, and it was a treat for the demimonde slang.
My reading was prompted by a Deep Ones nomination of "Reflections" for a Fall 2014 group read, though it ended up not being selected.
Show More
pretences at the imitation of life." [459] (Carter later calls the tale "subliterary".) The shadow motives or impulses at the heart of so much human interaction is evident in these stories, whether overt as in "Loves of the Lady Purple" or half-hidden "in the heart of the forest" as in the story of that name. There are many significant boundaries crossed or feared, boundaries of identity as well as of language or of landscape; mirrors and masks appear repeatedly; and Carter seems to be playing with various specie of simulacra and performance. Carter isn't coy with her symbolism or allegory, but it's not immediately clear to me what she is saying in each story. All nine tales in Fireworks involve sexual energy and violence, but how precisely does this imagery link up with her themes of identity, signification, borders? Perhaps the latter are indirect means for exploring the former? Or better yet: the other way round.
Carter's tales feature the way things were done in other times or other places, imagined or real. It's clear she's talking about how we do things today, everyday. The stories are like Kafka's in that they seem simple, and perhaps their overall gist is simple, but the specifics are intriguingly evasive.
//
The subtitle is The Collected Short Stories, unclear how complete is this edition. I looked specifically for the stories first published in 1974 as Fireworks: Nine Profane Pieces, and so appreciated that as republished here, the stories retain their published chronology as distinct & titled parts. Of the stories I read, only the Victorian fable wasn't originally part of Fireworks, and it was a treat for the demimonde slang.
My reading was prompted by a Deep Ones nomination of "Reflections" for a Fall 2014 group read, though it ended up not being selected.
Show Less
LibraryThing member grahzny
I love these stories. She writes like, I dunno, a raunchy and giddy Robert Aickman? I want to be friends with her as teenagers and wear capes to school. But more, her stories feel genuinely dangerous.
LibraryThing member caerulius
Contains the Bloody Chamber stories, as well as so many others. Check out the Lizzie Borden stories- they're lovely.
LibraryThing member allyshaw
I reread this constantly, whenever I feel I am faltering in my love of fiction and what it can do. I don't know what I would do without Carter's stories. I would be completely lost.
LibraryThing member questbird
Angela Carter writes disturbingly excellent gothic/erotic/fairy tales like Edgar Allan Poe or H.P. Lovecraft.
LibraryThing member BayardUS
I sometimes have trouble unravelling exactly how I feel about a short story collection: individual stories in isolation are one thing, but a story that might normally knock my socks off doesn't always strike me as so impressive when I'm reading it after having read thirty other stories by the same
Carter belongs to the group that writes in varying styles, but who tends to explore the same themes and topics over and over again. The large majority of Carter's stories feature taboo or strange sexual escapades, many of them tell the tale of a transformation or descent into savagery, and Carter often likes to reimagine fairy tales or other communal stories in a darker and more sexualized way. Credit where credit is due, Burning Your Boats shows that Carter wasn't merely writing about taboo sex for its shock value, but was genuinely fascinated by the topic, as she tried to explore the subject from multiple angles. Unfortunately it's a topic that loses its emotional impact when it is brought up over and over again, and Carter has some instance of it in almost every story in this collection.
The fact that Carter writes in a variety of styles helps make the collection more readable despite the frequently reoccurring themes and topics, since it made each story different through unique stylistic choices. That said, some of the experiments with format, concept, writing style, etc. worked better than others. The snarky tone of Puss-in-Boots works, as does the idea of writing a prequel of sorts to set the stage for A Midsummer Night's Dream, but the overly surreal Reflections and the disjointed and unexplained nature of The Merchant of Shadows left me unengaged, not intrigued. Carter does some very interesting things in her early writing, like using the entire first three pages of a six page story just to establish the setting, but later in her career her narrative technique moved toward writing about some relatively obscure topic without giving the reader any frame of reference. I'm not a fan of this technique, at least not how Carter uses it here. Overall, therefore, I'd say that the literary experimentation that worked balanced out the experimentation that doesn't, plus at least Carter was trying new things instead of writing the exact same story in the exact same style every time.
Despite the themes and topics of Carter's story being repetitive and her literary experimentation being hit-or-miss, there are certainly some first-class stories here. I loved The Executioner's Beautiful Daughter and the desolate setting Carter painted. I also very much liked The Bloody Chamber, which in my opinion is Carter's best reimagining of a fairy tale. Finally, The Ghost Ships was a lot of fun to read and its subject matter isn't too obscure. Unfortunately, besides the occasional standout, most of the stories in this collection didn't strike home for me. All of them, however, were interesting in at least some way. I'd definitely recommend checking out a couple of her stories so that you can tell if she's your kind of author, but I'd only recommend reading the entirety of Burning Your Boats straight through if you are interested in observing her progression as an author (not in skill, but in the topics she continuously explores). At the end of the day, my opinion is that Angela Carter is a talented short story writer that wrote some very good stories, but that as a collection Burning Your Boats doesn't work very well.
Show More
author immediately prior. I tend to think that the short stories of most authors simply don't work well in large collections, since most authors don't have the range in writing style to keep such collections interesting for me (Alice Munro), and even those that do write in a variety of styles oftentimes focus on the same themes or ideas repeatedly (Borges [who I love in a moderate length collection like Ficciones, but who I don't think comes off nearly as well if you try to read his complete collected fictions straight through]).Carter belongs to the group that writes in varying styles, but who tends to explore the same themes and topics over and over again. The large majority of Carter's stories feature taboo or strange sexual escapades, many of them tell the tale of a transformation or descent into savagery, and Carter often likes to reimagine fairy tales or other communal stories in a darker and more sexualized way. Credit where credit is due, Burning Your Boats shows that Carter wasn't merely writing about taboo sex for its shock value, but was genuinely fascinated by the topic, as she tried to explore the subject from multiple angles. Unfortunately it's a topic that loses its emotional impact when it is brought up over and over again, and Carter has some instance of it in almost every story in this collection.
The fact that Carter writes in a variety of styles helps make the collection more readable despite the frequently reoccurring themes and topics, since it made each story different through unique stylistic choices. That said, some of the experiments with format, concept, writing style, etc. worked better than others. The snarky tone of Puss-in-Boots works, as does the idea of writing a prequel of sorts to set the stage for A Midsummer Night's Dream, but the overly surreal Reflections and the disjointed and unexplained nature of The Merchant of Shadows left me unengaged, not intrigued. Carter does some very interesting things in her early writing, like using the entire first three pages of a six page story just to establish the setting, but later in her career her narrative technique moved toward writing about some relatively obscure topic without giving the reader any frame of reference. I'm not a fan of this technique, at least not how Carter uses it here. Overall, therefore, I'd say that the literary experimentation that worked balanced out the experimentation that doesn't, plus at least Carter was trying new things instead of writing the exact same story in the exact same style every time.
Despite the themes and topics of Carter's story being repetitive and her literary experimentation being hit-or-miss, there are certainly some first-class stories here. I loved The Executioner's Beautiful Daughter and the desolate setting Carter painted. I also very much liked The Bloody Chamber, which in my opinion is Carter's best reimagining of a fairy tale. Finally, The Ghost Ships was a lot of fun to read and its subject matter isn't too obscure. Unfortunately, besides the occasional standout, most of the stories in this collection didn't strike home for me. All of them, however, were interesting in at least some way. I'd definitely recommend checking out a couple of her stories so that you can tell if she's your kind of author, but I'd only recommend reading the entirety of Burning Your Boats straight through if you are interested in observing her progression as an author (not in skill, but in the topics she continuously explores). At the end of the day, my opinion is that Angela Carter is a talented short story writer that wrote some very good stories, but that as a collection Burning Your Boats doesn't work very well.
Show Less
LibraryThing member quondame
Not much plot among a great bouquet of atmosphere. Plot is taken up if it lying around handy and not even much turned about and only upended for Little Red in her forest. It is decorated with old seaweed and menstrual rags, dusted with spangles and faux pearls.
LibraryThing member mmtrick
I feel like Angela Carter's stories are a bit like really rich chocolate truffles. One or two at a time are wonderful but eating thirty in a row will just make you sick. I made the mistake of reading straight through these stories and I just got sick of them by the end. Some of them were good,
Show More
others not really at all. And some I'm not sure should really be qualified as stories since they seemed to be more thoughts or essays. There was also a lot of sex which got to be ridiculous (with people, with animals, with fruit...). Ultimately, I wasn't that impressed with Carter as a writer. Show Less
LibraryThing member JulieStielstra
With a lifelong fascination with and love for fairy tales, I kept reading mentions of Angela Carter as a prime modern practitioner of the art, so I figured it was time I gave her a look. Lush, ornamental, even purple prose - which is fine with me - but it was a bit like having double chocolate
Show More
raspberry cheesecake three times a day for a week. After a while... you need to cleanse your palate. Some smooth, sly retellings of classic fairy tales; some try too hard and lose the suspension of belief. I confess I didn't finish - a little Carter goes a long way. Once you see what she's up to, that's about all you need. Show Less
Subjects
Original publication date
1995