Publication
Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, c2011.
Call number
Commentary / Ernst
ISBN
9780807835166
Collections
CSS Library Notes
Named Work: Koran : Quran : Qur'an .
Physical description
x, 273 p.; 25 cm
Description
For anyone, non-Muslim or Muslim, who wants to know how to approach, read, and understand the text of the Qur'an, How to Read the Qur'an offers a compact introduction and reader's guide. Using a chronological reading of the text according to the conclusions of modern scholarship, Carl W. Ernst offers a nontheological approach that treats the Qur'an as a historical text that unfolded over time, in dialogue with its audience, during the career of the Prophet Muhammad.
Original language
English
Similar in this library
Misquoting Muhammad : the challenge and choices of interpreting the Prophet's legacy by Jonathan A. C. Brown
The way of Abū Madyan : doctrinal and poetic works of Abū Madyan Shuʻayb ibn al-Ḥusayn al-Anṣārī (c. 509/1115-16-594/1198) by Abū Madyan,
The essential Koran the heart of Islam : an introductory selection of readings from the Qur'an by Thomas Cleary
Sufism for non-sufis? : Ibn ʻAṭāʾ Allāh al-Sakandarî's Tâj al-'arûs by Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Ibn ʻAṭāʼ Allāh
User reviews
LibraryThing member JDHomrighausen
After reading Michael Sells’ Approaching the Qur’an: The Early Revelations, I wanted another book that would help me understand the Qur’an from a literary-historical perspective. Ernst, a scholar of Islam at UNC, made headlines in 2002 when (under his recommendation) the university assigned
In that spirit, he has written this book, a kind of “Qur’an as literature” book explaining the genesis of the text and outlining what he calls a “post-Orientalist” approach to the text. Ernst wants to use the historical and literary tools of European Enlightenment scholarship while still respecting traditional Islamic modes of reading the Qur’an. This book is an argument for that fusion and a look at some of the scholars, such as Fred Donner, Andrew Rippin, Michel Cuypers, and Jane Dammen McAuliffe, who are doing so.
Muslims believe that the Qur’an was revealed verbatim to Muhammad from 610 to 632. Yet Muslims acknowledge that the surahs (chapters) of the Qur’an can be categorized by the period in which they were revealed during the prophet’s life. Generally there are three main categories: the early Meccan surahs, the middle and later Meccan surahs, and the Medinan surahs. These three categories of surahs differ in length, structure, and main themes. The early Meccan surahs, written when Muhammad was just beginning his prophetic ministry, tend to be short and highly apocalyptic. Later surahs expanded and focused more on the revelation’s legitimacy and on retellings of biblical narratives. By the Medinan period, when Muhammad was the leader of a powerful political-religious movement, surahs grew even longer and began to include rules for the newly formed religion.
Can you tell that I enjoyed this book?
But there are loose ends in Ernst. For example — one traditional Muslim hermeneutic for the Qur’an is called the doctrine of abrogation. This is how Muslims harmonize verses in the Qur’an that appear to contradict. The verse revealed later takes precedent and supersedes the earlier one. Ernst argues that this approach to the text is too propositional — it takes verses out of context, piecemeal, like a fundamentalist Christian reads the Bible. He argues instead that when read in context, many of these supposedly contradictory verses are in fact just parts of a multifaceted tapestry. Is he right? I am not sure. I do not know enough to assess. But this book has given me a lot to think about!
Show More
Sells’ book as required reading for all freshman students. Ernst held the audacious belief that students should understand the religion of the terrorists America was fighting against — that we should learn something about Islam beyond the headlines about al Qaeda.In that spirit, he has written this book, a kind of “Qur’an as literature” book explaining the genesis of the text and outlining what he calls a “post-Orientalist” approach to the text. Ernst wants to use the historical and literary tools of European Enlightenment scholarship while still respecting traditional Islamic modes of reading the Qur’an. This book is an argument for that fusion and a look at some of the scholars, such as Fred Donner, Andrew Rippin, Michel Cuypers, and Jane Dammen McAuliffe, who are doing so.
Muslims believe that the Qur’an was revealed verbatim to Muhammad from 610 to 632. Yet Muslims acknowledge that the surahs (chapters) of the Qur’an can be categorized by the period in which they were revealed during the prophet’s life. Generally there are three main categories: the early Meccan surahs, the middle and later Meccan surahs, and the Medinan surahs. These three categories of surahs differ in length, structure, and main themes. The early Meccan surahs, written when Muhammad was just beginning his prophetic ministry, tend to be short and highly apocalyptic. Later surahs expanded and focused more on the revelation’s legitimacy and on retellings of biblical narratives. By the Medinan period, when Muhammad was the leader of a powerful political-religious movement, surahs grew even longer and began to include rules for the newly formed religion.
Can you tell that I enjoyed this book?
But there are loose ends in Ernst. For example — one traditional Muslim hermeneutic for the Qur’an is called the doctrine of abrogation. This is how Muslims harmonize verses in the Qur’an that appear to contradict. The verse revealed later takes precedent and supersedes the earlier one. Ernst argues that this approach to the text is too propositional — it takes verses out of context, piecemeal, like a fundamentalist Christian reads the Bible. He argues instead that when read in context, many of these supposedly contradictory verses are in fact just parts of a multifaceted tapestry. Is he right? I am not sure. I do not know enough to assess. But this book has given me a lot to think about!
Show Less