Keeping Land in Capital Theory: Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George

by Mason Gaffney

Scholarly article, 2008

Local notes

Disclaimer:
This article was published in the American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES), a Wiley publication, and the intellectual property rights contained therein are protected by law. Patrons of the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation's Engel Geogist Library, however, may view, download, store or print out single copies of individual articles for their own personal, scholarly, educational, scientific research or internal business use. If you would like a copy of this article, please contact [email protected] to become a library patron.

Citation:
Gaffney, Mason. “Keeping Land in Capital Theory: Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 67, no. 1, 2008, pp. 119–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00562.x.

Actions

Library's review

Abstract supplied by Wiley Publishing: Most economists today live in a two-factor world: There is just labor and capital. Land, so central to classical political economy, has been swallowed into capital and “disappeared.” This paper surveys some of the better historical treatments of land and
Show More
capital, their interrelations, and how they support modern Georgists and Greens who want land to reappear.

This paper was originally written for the annual meeting of the History of Economics Society (HES), Grinnell College, June 25, 2006. The writer thanks Robert Dimand for generous references to the literature; Mary M. Cleveland for editorial advice; and Marianne Johnson for insightful suggestions about integrating the materials.
Show Less

Publication

[ ]: American Journal of Economics and Sociology

Original language

English

Language

Page: 0.2408 seconds