Status
Publication
Description
In 1930 a plucky girl detective stepped out of her shiny blue roadster, dressed in a smart tweed suit. Eighty million books later, Nancy Drew has survived the Depression, World War II, and the sixties, and emerged as beloved by girls today as by their grandmothers. Rehak tells the behind-the-scenes history of Nancy and her groundbreaking creators. Both Nancy and her "author," Carolyn Keene, were invented by Edward Stratemeyer, who also created the Bobbsey Twins and the Hardy Boys. But Nancy Drew was brought to life by two remarkable women: original author Mildred Wirt Benson, a convention-flouting Midwestern journalist, and Harriet Stratemeyer Adams, a wife and mother who ran her father's company after he died. Together, Benson and Adams created a character that has inspired generations of girls to be as strong-willed and as bold as they were.--From publisher description.… (more)
User reviews
The Book Description: A plucky "titian-haired" sleuth solved her first mystery in 1930. Eighty million books later, Nancy Drew has survived the Depression, World War II, and the Sixties (when she was taken up with a vengeance by women's libbers) to enter the pantheon of American
Who created Nancy Drew? And how did she go from pulp heroine to icon?
The brainchild of children's book mogul Edward Stratemeyer, Nancy was brought to life by two women: Mildred Wirt Benson, a pioneering journalist from Iowa, and Harriet Stratemeyer Adams, a well-bred wife and mother who took over as CEO of the pioneering Stratemeyer Syndicate after her father died. In a century-spanning story Rehak traces their roles--and Nancy's--in forging the modern American woman. With ebullience, wit, and a wealth of little-known source material, Rehak celebrates our unstoppable girl detective.
My Review: When I was about nine, I went through a Hardy Boys phase. My mother, who went from buying Oldsmobile-priced cocktail dresses at Henri Bendel and Chevrolet-priced suits at Bonwit Teller to working three jobs to support us, never said no when it came to buying me a book. So I read my way through the catalog, and looked around for more. Mama somewhat diffidently pointed out the Nancy Drew books. I asked if she solved crimes. “Yes, and drives a blue roadster,” said the wily old girl, and I had another school year's reading at a quarter a book. (Used. We most often bought used...Mama said the words didn't wear out and who cared about the cover anyway?)
Ever after, I've had a “thing” for All-American boys and girls who just damn well do it for themselves. From such acorns....
Mystery-reading pleasure was a given. Mother and sister were big consumers of the genre. I got my own books, and they were not mysteries, but good heavens a boy can't survive on a book a week! I mean really! So I read their mysteries. I checked mysteries out of the liberry. I read all the Hardy Boys (always preferred Joe to Frank, Iola be hanged) and Nancy Drew (what a maroon Ned Nickerson was!) a couple times each. They lost their luster about the time I found good SF.
But do you ever forget that first kiss? I know I haven't. Nancy, Frank, and Joe...oh my how I treasured their orderly world. No one behaved badly (my narcissistic parents were astonishingly insensitive and ill-mannered in their divorcing) without consequences, and crimes were punished. I liked that a lot! And I still do.
Melanie Rehak apparently did, too. She set out to tell the story, public since the 1970s at least, of the origins of Nancy Drew, Girl Sleuth. All the ookie bleccchhhy part about families in conflict over Smothers-Brothers-y “dad always liked you best” and “I sit here with mom and you swan about” and so on; all the fish-out-of-water growing up of a major tomboy with a ginormous brain, in a rinky dink dink little wide spot in the road, leading to Iowa State and college degree in the 1920s; all the nasty mean greedy behind-the-scenes moneygrubbing everyone seems to have thought nothing of.
It's as good as a novel. It's as much fun as a Nancy Drew story to unravel. It's not perfect, but it's got a lot of story and it tells the story concisely, yet without leaving annoying holes or piling numbing crap all over the reader.
The focus is on Nancy, her “father” Edward Stratemeyer, her “mother” Midred Wirt, and wicked stepmother Harriet Stratemeyer Adams. That's enough for a 600pp doorstopper, let me assure you! Author Rehak got out her laser, finely cut and carefully etched the truly important bits from these three peoples' lives and then soldered and electroplated the whole thing into a lovely, solid bracelet shaped like Nancy Drew.
Even if you've never read one of these books, THIS book is a very good read, and an intriguing side window onto American culture in the mid-20th century.
Rehak recreates the turn-of-the-last century world that produced the children’s serial industry in a most entertaining and engrossing manner. Harriet Stratemeyer Adams and Mildred Wirt Benson, two women who left indelible marks on Nancy, had fascinating lives of their own. Some reviewers felt too much was made of their histories, but I found their stories wonderfully told. I wanted to be at Wellelsey with Harriet, or flying planes in my 80s with Mildred.
I read my Nancy Drews fifty years ago, and was lucky enough to have a couple of the original 1930s versions, courtesy of aunts and older cousins. I knew they’d been periodically updated, but was underwhelmed by Rehak’s examples of the ways the character had been modernized in the last few decades. Apparently, making things “relevant” to children has come to mean oversimplifying and conventionalizing. Are children dumber than they used to be? I doubt it. Hey, I had no idea what a “roadster” was, but that didn’t put me off. I think the words and cultural references I didn’t fully understand added an exotic feel to the stories. What a disservice we do to children when we talk down to them. And how interesting to learn that the later, over-consumerist, over-simplified Nancy series have had a shorter run, while facsimile editions and 1950s revisions are still selling.
Rehak also discusses the failure of Nancy to successfully transition to film or TV. I saw the 2007 Nancy Drew movie, (see excellent review by Lance Mannion here ) and just recently, one of the late 1930s black and white films. In both cases, it was not “my” Nancy being portrayed. She was too flakey, or too conventionally girly, or too dorky, not the strong, competent, natural leader that Mildred and Harriet created and nurtured. (If I wanted to be entertained by dorky outsiders, I didn’t need to read a book, I could just look at myself and my friends.) Nancy was a vision of what we wanted to be, living a life we would have loved to live. Girls (and boys) need something to which they can aspire, not just something with which they can identify.
Bravo to Melanie Rehak for giving us the real lives of Nancy’s creators, both of whom give me something to which I could aspire.
Originally envisioned by Edward Stratemeyer, it was actually two women who breathed life into Nancy Drew. Edward Stratemeyer ran a publishing syndicate that also was responsible for the serials The Bobbsey Twins and The Hardy Boys. The acknowledged author, Carolyn Keene, was also invented by Mr. Stratemeyer and, in fact, the women whom credit is due is both his own daughter Harriet and the free spirited Mildred Wirt Benson.
Originally appearing in 1930, and selling for 50 cents a copy, Nancy stepped right into the hearts and minds of young girls everywhere. By December, 1933, the Nancy Drew books were outselling all other series books.
Girl Sleuth: Nancy Drew and the Women Who Created Her is extensively researched, entertainingly written and her take on this amazingly long-lived franchise is definitely attention holding. I admit that although I was more of a Trixie Belden fan, I read more than my fair share of Nancy Drew books in my youth, and this look at her development over the years is well worth investigating.
I can’t remember when I realized that Carolyn Keene wasn’t a real person, but a pseudonym, but I did already know and that’s what this book explores; the women who created and kept Nancy alive during hard times like the depression and the 60s and 70s when cultural change threatened to sink our titian-haired heroine. While both of the principal women involved (Mildred Wirt and Harriet Stratemeyer) ended their relationship with each other on somewhat bad terms, neither is vilified nor lionized in the book. Each brought her strength of character and personal vision to the mystique of Nancy Drew and it was fascinating to see who got the upper hand and for how long. I also enjoyed the chapters that talked about how and why the books got updated over the decades.
One thing that hasn’t been updated in the 85 years since Nancy made her debut is that while girls will readily read “boys books”, boys still won’t read “girls books”. Fully ½ of the human race still isn’t part of the human story, instead sidelined into “women’s fiction” or even worse, “chick lit”. Can you imagine J.K. Rowling would have been the same raging success she is had she chosen to use her full name on her books instead of initials? Or if her main character was Hermione instead of Harry? That glaring fact is the very reason the Nancy Drew books exist. That a white man woke up to the fact that girls were reading “boys books” and gee, couldn’t we make some money off them. Sadly, Nancy lost a lot of her independence and smarts and the modern novels are about boys, clothes and the latest styles.
Producing these and many other titles including The Hardy Boys was complex (it’s run by a big eastern syndicate you know) and it was fascinating to see how a book went from concept to manuscript to bound edition. Also the struggles each woman had in making her way in the worlds of publishing and journalism. Harriet Stratemeyer inherited (along with her sister, Edna) her father Edward’s syndicate that produced dozens of children's’ serial books. A woman running a large and successful business is still somewhat of an anomaly today, but in 1930 it was unheard of. Despite some bad decisions made from sheer inexperience, Harriet is successful and fights off the urge to get mad at the people who write to her and her sister as “Gentlemen”.
While the sisters sometimes disagreed about continuing to use the principal writer for the Nancy Drew series, Mildred Wirt, they kept coming back to her until eventually Harriet herself took over writing the books (and much of the rest of the business since Edna basically walked away only communicating to criticize, accuse and collect her share of the profits). Mildred was an awesome person and how I would have liked to have met her. She had her share of heartache and trouble (burying 2 husbands), but never despaired and always kept writing (and flying, she became a pilot when she was something like 60, you go girl!). Harriet, too, is a woman to be admired and one I would also liked to have met if only to thank her for saving Nancy Drew from oblivion so that I could enjoy the books over and over again.
I first learned the secret of the Stratemeyer Syndicate from Carole Kismaric's The Mysterious Case of Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys, and got the nitty-gritty background details from Diedre Johnson's Edward Stratemeyer and the Stratemeyer Syndicate, but Girl Sleuth is by far the most thorough and engaging history of Nancy and her creators thus far. Melanie Rehak does a great job of outlining the pertinent historical framework and relating it back to the specific stories of individual women and men involved with Nancy's story. This is especially true when relating the history of feminism and anti-feminism in America to the evolution of Nancy Drew and her creators. Overall, very interesting and well-written.
I'd recommend this for any fan of the intrepid Nancy Drew, and also to those interested in writing and publishing.
A personal note: I was a huge Nancy Drew fan from the time I was eight until I was nearly thirteen, reading and rereading the 32 books I had collected during that time. The summer before I was to enter high school my Dad got transferred from California to Oregon and my folks did the packing while I was at summer camp. When we unpacked in Oregon I was horrified to find out Mom had given away my Nancy Drew books because she thought I had outgrown them. At the very end of this book I discovered I wasn’t alone in this tragedy. …as a Washington, D.C., rock band called Tuscadero made clear in a 1995 song called “Nancy Drew.” Its lyrics recounted “horror of discovering your mother threw out your collection of the teenage sleuth’s books.” (p. 310)
This book was that and even more. U.S. history, women's history, world history, film and
The author seems to have done some outstanding research, and written so well and with passion about her subject. What a great treat and a thorough pleasure this was to read!
However,
If you were never a fan, I'm not sure how much this volume can
My only complaint was that the book started slowly, and didn't really address Nancy Drew as a topic until page 92 or so. The chapter on Harriet's college years at Wellesley was particularly excruciating, aside from an entertaining bit where Harriet, in a Nancy-like turn, exhibits bravery under pressure when a fire hits an important building at Wellesley. Other than the slow beginning, however, the book was perfect -- and may even spike Nancy Drew sales.
I also enjoyed how Rehak showed how much
As a kid, I found the Hardy Boys more interesting, and couldn't stand Nancy Drew--perhaps because my first of her books was on of the Nancy Drew Notebooks, which, according to this book, were written to make her more 'girly-girly': boy and makeup obsessed.
But because I knew the
Several chapters focused on women's history, which seemed tedious, but only because I am fairly familiar with the subject. I didn't always agree with Rehak--she has some clear bias--but she presented a clear and thorough history of Nancy Drew and how she's effected our culture throughout the years.