Status
Genres
Publication
Description
"The Door is an unsettling exploration of the relationship between two very different women. Magda is a writer, educated, married to an academic, public-spirited, with an on-again-off-again relationship with Hungary's Communist authorities. Emerence is a peasant, illiterate, impassive, abrupt, seemingly ageless. She lives alone in a house that no one else may enter, not even her closest relatives. She is Magda's housekeeper and she has taken control over Magda's household, becoming indispensable to her. And Emerence, in her way, has come to depend on Magda. They share a kind of love--at least until Magda's long-sought success as a writer leads to a devastating revelation. Len Rix's prizewinning translation of The Door at last makes it possible for American readers to appreciate the masterwork of a major modern European writer"--… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
“She gave none of us the full picture of herself. Once among the dead, she must have enjoyed a quiet smile at our expense as we struggled to work out the full story, as each of us tried to match his own allotted pieces of information with those granted to the others. At least three vital facts went with her to the grave, and it must have been a source of satisfaction to her to look back and see that we still didn’t have a full account of her actions, and never would.”
The narrator, called by her name, Magda, only at one critical moment, is clearly a semi-autobiographical portrait of the author. Events in the life of the narrator echo Szabó’s biography – a writer, was banned from publishing under the Communist government, won a major Hungarian award. However, the history of Hungary in the 20th c. is only lightly alluded to – likely because of Emerence’s firm rejection of all sorts of prattling politicians, whatever government is in charge, do-gooders and the religious, lawyers and doctors, and meddling bureaucrats. In the opening chapter, the narrator describes her recurring nightmare after Emerence’s death – a death for which she blames herself. In the end, her betrayal of Emerence is not related to Emerence’s actions under the Nazis and Communists, her fraught family history, or her unsuccessful love but something altogether more ordinary.
The book is also an indictment of the narrator who, for all her concern with niceness and friendship and her later guilt, shame and anger, can’t act at crucial moments or guess how her actions – or lack of action – will lead to disaster. Perhaps she unwittingly fulfills Emerence’s judgment of writers being useless and indeed Emerence’s criticism of the narrator – that she is petty, hypocritical, dense and often more concerned with appearances than meaning – hits home. The narrator is operating in the everyday rushed world of work, dentists, and deadlines while Emerence is in another one entirely. The author nicely conveys this mismatch by showing the narrator’s side of the story and her interpretations – which many would agree with – as well as clearly conveying Emerence’s take on events. Her writing sharply depicts the narrator’s changing feelings towards her housekeeper as well as the odd world of Emerence. A very involving book. However, one would hope for the author’s sake that rather more of it was fiction than autobiographical.
This is about a friendship between two women but it is not "chick lit." It is a beautiful and tragic story of love, attachment, contempt, admiration, fierce self-determination, and the tension among them. On the back of my copy, a reviewer for the *Scotsman* writes about The Door: "I finished it and straightaway started to read it again." I rarely have such an impulse and would not, while reading, have thought this would be my own reaction. But the ending is so exquisite that I felt as that reviewer had felt. I know there are allusions I missed and re-reading would not illuminate them for me, given my lack of solid knowledge of scripture and Greek mythology. But re-reading would give me another several hours with Emerence, Viola, and the narrator of this novel. That would be worth it.
The story is simple and the author tries to make us understand that as a writer, following intellectual pursuits that demand staring for hours into the trees beyond the balcony which for Magda and the academic husband constitute work, but for Emerence is a useless exercise since she only recognises work that demand the use of hands and brute force, somebody like Emerence is needed in their daily lives. Someone who cooks the meals, takes the dog out for a walk, shovels the snow on the sidewalk, in short, someone who makes the house liveable in order for them to concentrate on their higher and loftier pursuits. Easy enough to understand so there really was no need, I think, for Szabo to keep hammering on about this. I would have been happier if she had portrayed how the author in the story matured as a writer (given that she was all those years, free from housekeeping duties because of Emerence - she recognises this, even including a special thanks in her award speech) but Szabo’s writer is uninteresting. We don’t know how she got from one point to the other — was being a writer essential to understanding what lay behind doors and to open doors? Szabo’s telling of the story does not make any connection, and it’s where I think this book fails. I also found slightly irritating the repetitions — of the two women always getting into each other’s way (why are they always “flying into rages” — wondering if it’s the translation — I’m imagining flying dishes every time as each seemed capable of doing) — and Magda’s rather sanctimonious Catholicism, and didn’t like the ending, which I found rather weak. A shorter book also would have helped. In any case, it didn’t leave me thinking about the book afterwards.
The relationship between Magda and Emerence is the centrepiece of the novel, yet it is neither comfortable nor particularly exemplary. It is typified by long periods of indifference punctuated by shrill, seething rage (felt by one or the other or both). The spikes in their relationship are nearly inexplicable since they are brought on by seemingly minor actions or events. (And why does the emotional level always jump to seething rage?) But equally hard to fathom is the repeated return to their more standard state of modest indifference that follows each crisis. I felt that perhaps Szabó thought more was being conveyed through these episodes than reached me through this translation. The extremity of Emerence’s psychological makeup undermines any hope for a universal message that the author might be seeking. I ended up not understanding Emerence but also not understanding Magda herself, who apparently has learned so much from her long relationship with Emerence.
Set in post-war Hungary, a period of significant political upheaval, the novel undoubtedly will carry more weight for those steeped in the political history of the state, nuances that I suspect passed by me unnoticed. However, since Szabó makes no effort to contextualize these political layers of meaning, she must intend for the novel to work regardless of access to them. Although there are moments when I’m sure she succeeds, overall I would have to say that it doesn’t really work. Regrettably, not recommended.
Although Magda clearly has a lot in common with her creator, Szabó takes care to undermine her authority as narrator here and there to prevent us from simply identifying with one side of the story. We go backwards and forwards in our understanding of the two central characters, and every time we think we're getting there Emerence tosses in a brick and undermines it all again.
Elegant, restrained, poetical, but ultimately quite a devastating book.
I see a film is being made and Helen Mirren is to be Emerence - a little hard for me to imagine as I formed the impression from the book that Emerence was a short, solid, chunky, weathered, plain woman...but then Mirren is the ultimate shape-shifter!
Don't miss this book.
Emerence is robust with a headstrong personality and Magda struggles to establish a relationship with her. She is given to bouts of quietness and is often evasive. She doesn't allow anyone beyond her front door – even visitors have to stay outside. This gives rise to numerous questions and theories about what lies behind The Door.
When Magda and her husband reluctantly adopt a dog, Viola, the dog takes to Emerence more readily than to her own family. Viola has a personality of her own, and dog lovers will probably enjoy this character.
Gradually the two women develop a friendship, and Emerence comes to share her life-story with Magda. An understanding emerges of this strong, giving but ultimately private woman. This is a quiet story, of the struggle to understand and accept a woman on her own terms.
Although the writer, Magda, is the narrator, the star is clearly Emerence, the housekeeper. She is an enigmatic figure with almost inexhaustible energy, fixed iconoclastic ideas, affection for and expertise with animals and an intense need to protect her privacy. As the title suggests, Emerence keeps her door locked to outsiders both figuratively and literally. Szabo masterfully reveals her backstory and nature through her relationship with Magda. She captures the essence of how many close friendships evolve—they are never direct but instead characterized by cycles of misunderstanding and argument followed by reconciliation—peaks and valleys. For Emerence, the ultimate symbol of her trust in Magda comes when she eventually permits her to enter her home. “I’m going to give you the only thing I have.” This level of intimacy has never been shared with anyone else, with the possible exception of the Lieutenant Colonel who gains access in an official capacity.
Szabo cleverly highlights the relationship between the two women by using a very minimal plot. Magda is recovering from the state sanctioning of her work. She and her husband hire Emerence—although Emerence behaves like she is hiring them. They rescue a dog from the snow and Emerence encourages them to keep him. Emerence names him Viola and trains him. Szabo bestows many endearing qualities on Viola and eventually he arises to the level of another character in the book. A friendship blossoms between Emerence and Magda. Emerence becomes ill but refuses to leave her house or allow anyone entrance to tend her. This culminates in events that harm their relationship and create intense feelings of guilt for Magda.
Most of the action in the novel comes from what Emerence eventually reveals to Magda about her past. This parallels much of the misery experienced by Hungary in the 20th century—war, Nazi and Communist occupations and revolution. Her personal story also is marked by love, loss and tragedy. These events not only forge her personality and belief system, but also her intense need for privacy. Moreover, she displays little need for material wealth, organized religion or politics. Instead, she has only a small group of friends, but none are as close as Magda.
The main theme of the novel is the limitations of human communication. Szabo skillfully explores this using the metaphor of the locked door. This represents the barriers that some erect to exclude pain but unintentionally also frustrate communication and caring. Emerence tries her damnedest to keep people out while expressing caring in all kinds of covert ways—sweeping the snow from neighborhood sidewalks, having tea parties on her porch, providing soup to the sick in a christening bowl, adopting stray animals and sheltering people in need. Much like an animal who might bring “treasures” to beloved humans, Emerence rescues all kinds of useless items from the trash and brings them to Magda. These symbolize a level of caring that Magda and her husband cannot appreciate and offer one of the few humorous notes in the novel. Szabo exquisitely captures just how hard it was for Emerence to give and receive help when she describes her borrowing Magda’s flat to entertain a special visitor. Her reaction to being stood-up by this person is surprising in the extreme but characterizes Emerence’s difficulty with openly giving and receiving favors.
Szabo embellishes her main theme with multiple minor elements that are relevant and add to the richness of her narrative. The two women evoke the class struggle between intellectuals and the working class; one lives the life of the mind while the other has trouble seeing that as actual work. Giving and receiving favors is often fraught with a sense of quid pro quo and failing to honor these basic courtesies is often misconstrued. Some people feel uncomfortable openly expressing caring and, instead adopt a tactic of “tough love.” Finally, and probably most importantly for Szabo, a writer struggle to understand and adequately depict reality as she perceives it.
Unfortunately, it worked out just as I had feared (of course). The central character, Emerence, is an old woman whose life story stands for the recent history of Hungary. She is an extremely resilient, peculiar and capricious person, the kind of person people would wrinkle their nose at and describe as "a character", in real life. The reader's sympathy for her, at least mine, swung from dislike, to sympathy, and back to strong dislike. The name "Emerence" means "worthy of merit", and that is what she would deserve. However, the reader gradually finds out how she was mangled through Hungarian history. The equilibrium which she had achieved towards the end of her life, the dignity she commands through strict privacy, is eventually ruthlessly destroyed, and the story end with her ultimate humiliation.
The difficulty in understanding the novel, lies in the difficulty of understanding Hungarian life, history and the likelihood of encountering a woman like Emerence.
This review is from: The Door (NYRB Classics) (Paperback)
After loving Magda Szabo's "Iza's Ballad", I ordered this work on the strength of it, but didn't quite enjoy it as much.
Like the other,
Well written but I was glad to get to the end.
The title has many different meanings in this book, the literal door and other doors, internal and psychological. This book raised so many questions. What does friendship mean? How much of how a person sees themselves should be taken into consideration when the person needs help. How much do you owe a person when you are the only one they let behind the barriers and the secrets they have constructed in order to keep their past and present private? I have thought of this book on and off for the last few days, it is brilliantly written and packs a powerful punch. I loved Viola the dog and how attuned he was to the wants and need of Emerence and she to him.
This is not a happy little story but it is a thought provoking one, a book that will not be easily forgotten.
The aspect which I disliked the most was what I might call magical realism. A dog enters the story early. It lives with the writer but is in love with Emerence. The dog ("Viola") behaves like an intelligent human with magical powers of perception.
Thinking back over it, I wonder how I finished it. The answer is that it's only a reasonably short book.
A writer
I hated Emerence and didn’t see how there was any kind of friendship on either side. I would, in fact, call Emerence a crazy old b**** - seriously crazy. She had temper tantrums that she took out on everyone around her, including the narrator’s dog, Viola. Not sure why Viola liked Emerence so much, when Emerence periodically beat Viola for no reason to do with the dog. Emerence also had cats and I worried for their safety, in addition to Viola’s. Though the book was pretty slow-moving, it did pick up a bit toward the end. But, I still hated Emerence and didn’t “get” the friendship, at all.
I found this novel to be strangely compelling. There really is not much to it, just the relationship between two women who are unlike each other, and the fascinating portrait of working class intransigence. But the development of the central friendship is captivating in a way I find hard to express in words. Much of the novel’s hypnotizing force, I think, rests on it feeling more like an autobiography or a character study than narrative fiction -- perhaps even a confession and a meditation on shame.
The door is not my usual cup of tea, but I’m glad I got to read it. It’s a book I’ll be turning over in my head from time to time.