Status
Publication
Description
Fiction. Romance. Humor (Fiction.) HTML: A sublime comedy of contemporary manners, this is the novel Jane Austen might well have written had she lived in twenty-first century California. Nothing ever moves in a straight line in Karen Joy Fowler's fiction, and in her latest, the complex dance of modern love has never been so devious or so much fun. Six Californians join to discuss Jane Austen's novels. Over the six months they meet, marriages are tested, affairs begin, unsuitable arrangements become suitable, and love happens. With her finely sighted eye for the frailties of human behavior and her finely tuned ear for the absurdities of social intercourse, Fowler has never been wittier nor her characters more appealing. The result is a delicious dissection of modern relationships. Dedicated Austenites will delight in unearthing the echoes of Austen that run through the novel, but most readers will simply enjoy the vision and voice that, despite two centuries of separation, unite two great writers of brilliant....… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
It wasn’t. But I think I might have preferred it if it was.
For one thing, romantic fluff generally doesn’t include attempted rape in the first chapter. This is a profoundly disturbing scene, and I’m
Unresolved sexual issues left over from childhood and adolescence seems to be the one thing the otherwise diverse members of the book club have in common. Okay, I guess I can kind of see how that might happen, but the whole think just smacks of pop psychology as far as I’m concerned. I suppose in this post-Freudian age almost everybody has unresolved childhood issues, and pretty much everything should be interpreted as sexual. *sigh*
I must admit that I really liked and connected to Grigg, the only male member of the book club, and not only because I myself was in a similar situation. (I read this book as part of a seminar entitled “Jane Austen and the Popular Imagination,” and was one of only two men in the class.) I think a lot of studious and/or nerdy guys could sympathize with his character; I certainly remember being made fun of when I was younger for being sensitive and bookish, as he was. Also, I found the discussion he leads on Northanger Abbey absolutely hilarious, especially when he admits that he read Udolpho, and many of the ladies disclose they didn’t even know it was a real book!
Overall, though, I really disliked this book, and for me this summary quote (from the epilogue) was the last straw: “We’d let Austen into our lives, and now we were all either married or dating.” When I first read that, I did a double-take. No! The image of Auntie Jane as some sort of good fairy, who brings romantic fulfillment to people who read her novels, is truly banal. I deplore it.
The Jane Austen Book Club proves that a book doesn’t have to be fluff to be cheap and vulgar. Not recommended.
The premise is simple but original. A group of friends
As well as showcasing Austen's novels, this is very much a character piece. Each of the six book club members are entirely individual and it makes for much more interesting and amusing reading. Bernadette is a serial wife, rather eccentric and flamboyant, with a liking for yoga and Pride and Prejudice. Loyal Sylvia works at the library and has just had her life shattered by her husband Daniel's confession that he is leaving her for another woman. Her beautiful daughter Allegra is constantly doing daring things - not always without paying the price - and is getting over a devastating betrayal by her ex-girlfriend Corinne. Jocelyn is a dominant terminal singleton, afraid of being hurt and making up for it by matchmaking everyone else. Prudie is a rather artificial, self-conscious young French teacher who doesn't quite know how to interact with other people without coming across all wrong. And Grigg, poor Grigg, a sci-fi fan and Austen virgin brought into the group by Jocelyn as a distraction for Sylvia, entirely out of his depth and trying not to make an idiot of himself. The novel is narrated by a kind of all-seeing other, one who describes each character in the third person but frequently mentions 'us' and 'we'; part of the fun of the reading is trying to work out which of the six, if any, might be telling the story.
Thus characters are deepened, love blossoms and dies and blooms again, and the story goes on. Of course it ends with optimism, hope and a well-timed bit of Austen wisdom. To my surprise, at the end of the book Fowler has also added some little extras which add to the reading experience - some contemporary and modern literary criticism of Austen and her novels, a brief summary of each of the books (handy for those not familiar with all of the works, or those who might want a quick refresher on characters and plots), and at the VERY end, a funny set of 'Questions for Discussion' on Austen AND Fowler presented by each of the six book club members.
Clearly a liking for Jane Austen helps when reading this novel, but ultimately there is nothing in here that should put off a less knowledgeable reader, particularly given the handy summaries at the back (which I wish I'd noticed earlier, I must admit). It is a scrumptious book - funny, romantic, inspiring and positive - and definitely one I'll be keeping to read again.
I'd also highly recommend the recent movie of the book (starring Maria Bello, Maggie Grace and Hugh Dancy), which is surprisingly faithful to the book in spite of its challenging structure, and just as sparkling!
I initially liked this book very much. I found it very readable, and I appreciated the structure. It's well-paced, and Fowler presents some lovely character studies as she moves through the months, (and the Jane Austen
As the book progressed, though, I felt my interest wane. Each character receives very little attention after her or his chapter is over. There's almost no further growth. The parallels wane somewhat, too, and the Jane Austen discussion fades into the background. I found it rather unsatisfying.
In the end, this was a mildly entertaining book, but certainly nothing special. I felt okay about passing along to someone else.
I recommend this book for a short, light read. I got through it in one day, and I didn't have to stay up very late.
I found
I was disappointed in this book. I heard so many good things and the little critique quotes on the book made me anticipate a funny and wise read.
The first thing that threw me was the weird use of a collective "we" as the narrator's voice. Either all of the women speak in unison the whole time (Grigg, as the male, wasn't included in the "we" IMO) or there is in fact a seventh memeber of the bookclub. This device so didn't work for me!
To me the characters stayed flat throughout, little anecdotes of their younger selfs didn't help to establish a feeling for them today - there's a lot of telling instead of showing going on. I always felt like being led to the point where I would be able to understand the reasons for their reactions and decision in events to come - but when those events finally came around - a Magic-8-Ball made all the decisions for the characters. No kidding. *seethes*
Weird shifts of POV made it hard to read at times, again especially in regard to the male character. His chapter mainly consists of Jocelyn's POV and what was up with that? Why include a male if his only reason to be there is to bring in the unworthy science fiction geek factor? Oh, and to be part of the "Emma"-Jocelyn comparison? And to hammer down the point that men won't function w/o women in their lives?(which is why Grigg needs one of his sisters to make everything right for him.)
Every other male is perfect in his own faulty husband-y way, by the way. Even the sinner is forgiven.
In the end I also felt like there were many plot ends still floating about: like why the hell didn't Allegra, the open lesbian who tells everyone about her sexuality, tell Grigg about it? There is much ado about that in the novel, (so that I believed she was interested in Grigg) but this was obviously only a lead on as the question is never answered.
Fan that I am: Buffy the Vampire Slayer referencing, yay!
So, on the whole, a light read, and good if one (me!) doesn't start to think too hard about what is being said. Or doesn't over analyze everything, I guess.
There are also some other neat touches, such as the conflict (?) between reading science fiction and Austen. We see the rise and fall of several relationships along the way, as well.
As a crowning touch, the book ends with some background material on Austen (notably a long series of quotes from her family and friends as well as critics and contemporary authors about her books) and, last but not least, a series of questions for discussion in a book club setting from each of the main characters.
Wonderful fun!
My real gripe, though, was the connection between the characters' stories and the Austen novels. I caught some general similarities between the characters here and in Austen’s books, but I do not know if the stories of these six characters were supposed to parallel the plots of Austen’s novels. I consider myself a big Austen fan. Just last year I read all six of the novels, most for the second, some for the third time. Still, I don't have instant recall of the plots and characters in each novel, and this book does not give many clues that would connect the Austen novels to the story.
In fact, the author barely mentions the storylines of the Austen novels at all. References to the novels usually concern comments about the personalities of various characters, but with so little context that they could have been comments about anyone. "Mr. Parsons had a cutting wit" or "Lucy was too prissy" are meaningless without a little reminder of Austen's plot to tie everything together.
This is a pretty short book. It would have been fairly easy to pull in more details from Austen's novels without bogging down the story or condescending to the readers.
Austen wrote six mature novels and this book deals with a book club made up of six characters each with their own chapter--there's Bernadette the oldest at 67; Prudie the youngest in her twenties; Jocelyn and Sylvia, best friends in their fifties who have known each other since they were eleven; Sylvia's 30-year-old lesbian daughter Allegra and the token male Grigg who is in his forties. The first line is, "Each of us has a private Austen." Each section focuses on a member of the book club as they meet to discuss one of the books. For instance the first book is Emma and in between the discussion we learn the story of Jocelyn, a dog breeder who like Austen's heroine could be described as handsome, clever and rich. The second section and book is the turn of Sense and Sensibility and we focus on Allegra who, like Marianne, is convinced passion should be the focus of life and is something of a drama queen. At that point I was already wondering what role each would take on as the book proceeded. Would the token male be identified with Darcy, the most famous of Austen's male characters? Would Sylvie, going through a difficult divorce, the quiet caregiver, get a second chance at love like Anne Eliot?
I think poor Grigg was my favorite. I felt almost embarrassed for my gender at the way the others treated him in the novel. Bernadette thought he shouldn't have been included in the club, Allegra is rudely challenging to his first remarks and Jocelyn is condescending and dismissive about his love of science fiction. At the end, when he suggests they read Patrick O'Brien's nautical adventures next, the collective reaction is that you could go from O'Brien to Austen, but you can't stoop from Austen to O'Brien. I find that bit of book snobbishness a shame. Great literature should broaden, not narrow, and ironically O'Brien was himself a fan of Austen, and it shows in his style. There's also this odd use of first person plural--use of "we," "us" and "our" that didn't work for me. Yet at the end I did feel affection for all the characters, and I admit I got a geeky enjoyment in wallowing at all the Austen lore. (Including my silent, "You tell them, sister" at complaints of the Mansfield Park film adaptation.) So, not sure if this is for Austen lovers only, but as one that qualifies as a fan, yes, I did enjoy it.
And I liked the Patrick O'Brian references. But, I swear, you can fall in love over a plate of toasted cheese!