Status
Available
Genres
Publication
London : Allen Lane, 2000
Description
The military genius of his age, Frederick the Great has always aroused extreme opinions. Some saw him as the greatest man who has ever lived, while others have accused him of creating the Prussio ultra-nationalism which culminated in Hitler. But this paternalistic ruler, who once said he wanted nothign more than to be remembered as Le Rois des greux, the king of the beggars, was also a polymath whose artistic and intellectual abilities amazed 18th-century Europe. David Fraser's biography presents a rounded portrait of this extraordinary man.
User reviews
LibraryThing member TomVeal
A lucid account of Frederick's campaigns is uneasily yoked to a worshipful apologia for his domestic and foreign policies. The title really ought to have been Frederick the Good.
LibraryThing member gregdehler
Frederick the Great transformed Germany and hence Europe during his reign, 1740-1786. When he assumed the throne, Prussia was a regional power with little influence in Germany. After a reign of over forty years, and through several wars, he greatly weakened the power of Austria in Germany,
Fraser paints Frederick as an enlightened ruler who was genuinely interested in the latest science and ideas. Frederick was a committed autocrat, yet he was, according to Fraser, the most tolerant of all his contemporary monarchs. He accepted greater degrees of dissent in the press and was more open on questions of religion, for example.
Most of the book focuses on military history, which should not be surprising considering that Frederick was considered one of the great captains of history and Fraser was a British general himself. This is not a a hagiography.Frederick made plenty of strategic and tactical mistakes. Yet, he admitted his mistakes and own failings and rarely searched for scapegoats.
Show More
transformed Prussia into a significant continental power, significantly added to the territorial holdings of his kingdom, and set the stage (although he did not foresee it) for German unification through conquest by Prussia.Fraser paints Frederick as an enlightened ruler who was genuinely interested in the latest science and ideas. Frederick was a committed autocrat, yet he was, according to Fraser, the most tolerant of all his contemporary monarchs. He accepted greater degrees of dissent in the press and was more open on questions of religion, for example.
Most of the book focuses on military history, which should not be surprising considering that Frederick was considered one of the great captains of history and Fraser was a British general himself. This is not a a hagiography.Frederick made plenty of strategic and tactical mistakes. Yet, he admitted his mistakes and own failings and rarely searched for scapegoats.
Show Less
Subjects
Awards
The Economist Best Books (2000.21)