The journals of Sylvia Plath, 1950-1962

by Sylvia Plath

Other authorsKaren V. Kukil (Editor)
Hardcover, 2000




London : Faber, 2000.


Fiction. Literary Anthologies. HTML:A major literary event´┐Ż??the complete, uncensored journals of Sylvia Plath, published in their entirety for the first time. Sylvia Plath's journals were originally published in 1982 in a heavily abridged version authorized by Plath's husband, Ted Hughes. This new edition is an exact and complete transcription of the diaries Plath kept during the last twelve years of her life. Sixty percent of the book is material that has never before been made public, more fully revealing the intensity of the poet's personal and literary struggles, and providing fresh insight into both her frequent desperation and the bravery with which she faced down her demons. The Unabridged Journals of Sylvia Plath is essential reading for all who have been moved and fascinated by Plath's life and wo… (more)

Media reviews

Dit morrelen aan de mogelijkheden van het bestaan maakt Plaths proza zeer de moeite waard. Ze raakt algemene levenswetten, waar iedereen mee worstelt. Ze graait naar de onbekende toekomst en dat is tragisch en vervreemdend, omdat wij lezers precies weten hoeveel dagen ze nog heeft. Plath weet
Show More
alleen dat ze ontelbare mogelijkheden heeft om haar leven richting te geven, maar ze wil de verantwoordelijkheid van het kiezen niet aan, dat beknot haar te veel. Daarom blikt ze op een dwangmatig bestraffende manier vooruit ('I must' en 'I shall' zijn een repeterend refrein) en vergeet zo de zachte blos op de zure goudrenet van haar leven.
Show Less

User reviews

LibraryThing member pivic
As journals go, this is a very open one; even so, this version, erupted slightly before Ted Hughes' death in 1998, does not contain much after 1961, which is sad. Even if Hughes destroyed those journals, this book is a genuine treasury.

These journals contain what Plath wrote from 1950 to 1962. As
Show More
such, it contains notes on her growing up; dating, life, death, school-work, her future, travelling, and very notably her success as a poet, her mood-swings and what struck me the most, her innermost thoughts on a variety of subjects.

Plath was seldom vulgar in her journals. Neither does she seem anything other than honest.

What she writes on love is intricate and vulnerable, especially when dating, from 1950 to the moment when she meets Hughes and later marries him.

Their togetherness and love seems so strong, especially her devotion to him, which does sadly, not in the slightest, explain most of her poems (e.g. "The Jailor") in the unabridged version of "Ariel", her last batch of poems, previously abridged by Hughes.

This is genuinely a real experience and is recommendable to everybody. It is little wonder that Plath liked J.D. Salinger, adored Virginia Woolf and loved James Joyce. Read this and do yourself a favour.

I've cobbled up samples from the book here.
Show Less
LibraryThing member a211423
I made this "biography" instead of autobiographical because it is edited by Ted Hughes in which he removed at will a large part of the journal. I would recommend reading the unabridged version, not this one unless you want to compare the two.
LibraryThing member sadiebooks
beautifully written. i wish my diaries were so deep and philosophical....although on the other hand, maybe im glad they have their bright nonsensical moments.
LibraryThing member donp
Yet another impulse buy at the used bookstore. I've not read any Plath; probably won't either--just not my thing. But, I'm in a voyeuristic phase where I'm dying to see what writers put into their notebooks and journals.
LibraryThing member the.ken.petersen
The terrible thing is, that I have lived with a lady like this: just when you decide that she is utterly impossible, she does something so kind that it takes your breath away.

Sylvia seems to have been well aware of her faults and was, undoubtedly her own hardest critic. I can still appreciate how
Show More
difficult the relationship must have been for Ted Hughes.

Journals and diaries are difficult because, if one notes down one's thoughts almost without review, they can seem harsh to the reader who has time to reflect. Sylvia is, almost without exception, hard on the people she meets. Ted seems to be the only one to consistently get the benefit of the doubt and, even there, he is sometimes bemused by an air of disapproval for which he has no explanation. Oft times, it seems Sylvia doesn't either. It definitely was not a good idea for Sylvia to live with a successful poet. She believed that Ted's lead in the writing stakes would prevent competition but, it is apparent that Sylvia did take her rejections very personally.

This is a book which asks more questions than it answers and I must soon try a biography of Sylvia to see whether someone else's perspective gives a better light on the lady's history, which is rarely mentioned in this book.
Show Less
LibraryThing member HadriantheBlind
I feel like an intruder reading this.

Incredibly vast and intricate, even her ordinary accounts of days are almost as eloquent and forceful as her poetry.
LibraryThing member viviennestrauss
At times I felt as if I would never finish though it only took approximately two weeks for me to read. It sat on my nightstand for nearly a year before I actually felt ready to tackle it. Lots of underlining and dog ears just reaffirming how difficult life is in general and how much harder to be
Show More
true to your art.
Show Less
LibraryThing member amerynth
Like many girls of my day, I was obsessed with Sylvia Plath back in my high school years-- I read everything I could get my hands on by her, as well as the Ted Hughes edit of her journals (in which her talented, scoundrel of a husband left out pretty much anything critical of himself.)

I've long
Show More
wanted to read the "unabridged version" which still seems to be missing a lot. Hughes burned Plath's final journal after his estranged wife's suicide... there are also big gaps in this book, which seems odd for such a meticulous note taker.

Plath's journals are an interesting read-- she struggled so much with wanting and despairing of the conventional role for women of her time. She reminded me so much of Virginia Woolf-- I wondered how both of these ladies would have fared in a times where a woman's sexuality does not need to be repressed.

I found the journals reminded me how brilliant Plath was, even as an 18-year-old college freshman. She write a lot about the process of writing in them, which drags a bit after a while, but overall, these journals were an interesting read.
Show Less
LibraryThing member lindsaydiffee
I love her.
LibraryThing member brakketh
Amazing insight into the life of Plath from her viewpoint.
LibraryThing member jwhenderson
The complete journals of one of the more interesting authors of the twentieth century. Praised by no less than Joyce Carol Oates, I found that dipping into these journals was both entertaining and informative. They provide a sort of memoir for a life that had more pain in it than the author
Show More
Show Less
LibraryThing member sylvarum
best enjoyed over a lifetime: will return to frequently. plath's mastery of the poetic and prose form are really highlighted here, where vignettes of life are as vivid as if you were placed directly next to her. her philosophical examination of her own character is excruciatingly raw - in many
Show More
ways, she embodies the 'everywoman' so many try to reach. note i read the 'unabridged' version (though sections were removed by the editor) - i would hazard a guess this comes through far less in the edition edited by hughes.
Show Less



Page: 0.2283 seconds