The long divergence : how Islamic law held back the Middle East

by Timur Kuran

Paper Book, 2011

Status

Available

Publication

Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2011.

Description

In the year 1000, the economy of the Middle East was at least as advanced as that of Europe. But by 1800, the region had fallen dramatically behind--in living standards, technology, and economic institutions. In short, the Middle East had failed to modernize economically as the West surged ahead. What caused this long divergence? And why does the Middle East remain drastically underdeveloped compared to the West? In The Long Divergence, one of the world's leading experts on Islamic economic institutions and the economy of the Middle East provides a new answer to these long-debated questions. Timur Kuran argues that what slowed the economic development of the Middle East was not colonialism or geography, still less Muslim attitudes or some incompatibility between Islam and capitalism. Rather, starting around the tenth century, Islamic legal institutions, which had benefitted the Middle Eastern economy in the early centuries of Islam, began to act as a drag on development by slowing or blocking the emergence of central features of modern economic life--including private capital accumulation, corporations, large-scale production, and impersonal exchange. By the nineteenth century, modern economic institutions began to be transplanted to the Middle East, but its economy has not caught up. And there is no quick fix today. Low trust, rampant corruption, and weak civil societies--all characteristic of the region's economies today and all legacies of its economic history--will take generations to overcome. The Long Divergence opens up a frank and honest debate on a crucial issue that even some of the most ardent secularists in the Muslim world have hesitated to discuss.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member thcson
This is a great historical comparison of Islamic and European legal institutions and the way they influenced economic development. The author focuses on selected European institutions that revolved around the impersonal and non-familial corporation. The legal recognition of corporations allowed
Show More
coordination and cooperation on a scale far superior to what earlier European and Islamic arrangements could manage. The author then explains why certain peculiarities in Islamic law hindered the emergence of corporate entities in the Middle East. He is careful to point out that institutional innovation was by no means made impossible by Islamic law. Islam's institutional rigidity was a matter of unfortunate circumstance rather than deliberate resistance.

I'm sure this book has aroused debate among experts in the field. I'm obviously not competent to judge the details of the argument, but I liked the way it was set up. I was also very impressed by the author's ability to discuss fairly complex Islamic institutions with clarity and broad scope. I didn't know anything about these institutions before reading this book, but I could still follow and understand the argument. I learnt a lot from this book, not only about institutional differences between Islamic and European law, but also about economic history in general and the reasons why economic cooperation sometimes works and sometimes fails to work. The book requires some focused work from the general reader, but I still highly recommend it to anyone interested in world history, economic history or comparative history.
Show Less

Language

Page: 0.2143 seconds