Status
Available
Collection
Publication
Aurum Press (2001), 512 pages
Description
Stephen Bungay's magisterial history is acclaimed as the account of the Battle of Britain. Unrivalled for its synthesis of all previous historical accounts, for the quality of its strategic analysis and its truly compulsive narrative, this is a book ultimately distinguished by its conclusions - that it was the British in the Battle who displayed all the virtues of efficiency, organisation and even ruthlessness we habitually attribute to the Germans, and they who fell short in their amateurism, ill-preparedness, poor engineering and even in their old-fashioned notions of gallantry. An engrossing read for the military scholar and the general reader alike, this is a classic of military history that looks beyond the mythology, to explore all the tragedy and comedy; the brutality and compassion of war.… (more)
User reviews
LibraryThing member lamour
This has is the most complete history of the Battle that I have read. It contains complete histories of the development of all aircraft which took part in the Battle including the Boulton-Paul Defiant and the Fairey Battle. Brief biographies of key men from both sides help understand how they
He concludes that this was the most important battle of the war and if the Germans had won, it would have probably led to a Russian overall victory in the end and a very different world.
Show More
arrived at their positions of control. Bungay explains how the Germans lost the Battle and what key plans enabled the British Royal Air Force to win. He lists the ten men who he felt were the reason the British won with the most important individual being Air Vic-Marshall Keith Park, the man who daily made many decisive decisions of when & where the Air Force's resources were deployed.He concludes that this was the most important battle of the war and if the Germans had won, it would have probably led to a Russian overall victory in the end and a very different world.
Show Less
LibraryThing member JesperCFS2
A good place to start if you want in-depth info about The Battle of Britain. But be warned, many details but in the good way
LibraryThing member MacDad
The Battle of Britain stands out among the long list of military clashes for a number of reasons. A struggle for air superiority over the skies of southern England, it was the first battle ever waged entirely in the skies. By successfully holding off the Luftwaffe’s aerial onslaught, the British
Many accounts of the battle have been written, from memoirs by the pilots to narratives from academic historians. In this respect Stephen Bungay’s qualifications stand out; a former business consultant and insurance executive, he brings a different approach to examining the conflict. Taking the fall of France as his starting point, he intersperses his narrative of the battle (which is largely free of the management jargon that might be expected given his background) with chapters examining various factors in the struggle, from the performances of the planes deployed to the command structures of the two sides. Here he draws upon both his training and his command of German to provide a more balanced assessment of the two sides. What emerges is a provocative argument that the German effort was hopeless, requiring exhausted pilots to achieve statistically unrealistic ratios of combat victories in conditions that favored their opponents.
Such an unusual conclusion might fly in the face of the mythology surrounding the famous “Few”, yet Bungay’s analysis is persuasive in marshaling the numbers to prove its point. Combined with a thorough summary of the campaign, it makes this book the best overview of the Battle of Britain. If there is a flaw, it lies in Bungay’s rather narrow scope of study, as he only takes into account events from the 1930s onward and largely overlooks the many studies of the “first Battle of Britain” that could have shed light on many of the attitudes participants brought to the campaign. Yet this is a minor flaw in what is otherwise an excellent study of a pivotal struggle of the Second World War.
Show More
forestalled an invasion in 1940, guaranteeing that the Germans would face a two-front war when Hitler focused the Nazi war machine on the Soviet Union the following year.Many accounts of the battle have been written, from memoirs by the pilots to narratives from academic historians. In this respect Stephen Bungay’s qualifications stand out; a former business consultant and insurance executive, he brings a different approach to examining the conflict. Taking the fall of France as his starting point, he intersperses his narrative of the battle (which is largely free of the management jargon that might be expected given his background) with chapters examining various factors in the struggle, from the performances of the planes deployed to the command structures of the two sides. Here he draws upon both his training and his command of German to provide a more balanced assessment of the two sides. What emerges is a provocative argument that the German effort was hopeless, requiring exhausted pilots to achieve statistically unrealistic ratios of combat victories in conditions that favored their opponents.
Such an unusual conclusion might fly in the face of the mythology surrounding the famous “Few”, yet Bungay’s analysis is persuasive in marshaling the numbers to prove its point. Combined with a thorough summary of the campaign, it makes this book the best overview of the Battle of Britain. If there is a flaw, it lies in Bungay’s rather narrow scope of study, as he only takes into account events from the 1930s onward and largely overlooks the many studies of the “first Battle of Britain” that could have shed light on many of the attitudes participants brought to the campaign. Yet this is a minor flaw in what is otherwise an excellent study of a pivotal struggle of the Second World War.
Show Less
Language
Original language
English