Blake

by Peter Ackroyd

Hardcover, 1996

Status

Checked out
Due May 30, 2023

Publication

New York : Knopf, 1996.

Description

"Born in 1757, the son of a London hosier, William Blake - poet, painter, and engraver - possessed one of the most original and fertile creative geniuses of his age. Yet his strange aloofness and claims of supernatural visions caused many in his own time and since to doubt his sanity, and much of his astonishing poetry and visual art remains unfamiliar. Now, Peter Ackroyd gives us a biography of the enigmatic eighteenth-century master, clarifying at last the true nature of Blake's extraordinary life and art." "Ackroyd's narrative traces Blake's progression from his childhood in a Dissenting household, through his apprenticeship as an engraver and his studies at the newly formed Royal Academy Schools, to his full maturity, during which he produced his great masterpieces - Songs of Innocence and of Experience, Jerusalem, and Milton, to name only a few - works that were as neglected during his lifetime as they are celebrated today." "Re-creating time and place as only he can, Ackroyd locates Blake in the complex context of his external world - a cross section of eighteenth-century London inflamed by various forms of radicalism, mysticism, and sexual magic, squarely opposed to the age's prevailing faith in rationalism. But he also shows us the cockney visionary as the creator of his own lavish interior world, a universe filled with angels and spirits. It is in Blake's utterly unique art that these two worlds meet, as Ackroyd reveals in his dazzling interpretations of Blake's poetry and the many paintings and engravings beautifully reproduced in this volume."--Jacket.… (more)

Media reviews

Dem Novizen allerdings ist Blakes Werk zuerst einmal weitgehend verschlossen, und das aus einem ganz pragmatischen Grund: in der deutschen Ausgabe der Biographie existiert es nur in Übersetzung. Die ist zum größten Teil der Neuübersetzung von Thomas Eichhorn entnommen, die 1996 erschienen ist.
Show More
Dies ist sicherlich eine gute Wahl, da Eichhorn, der auch die Biographie selbst übertragen hat, sich behutsam bemüht hat, Blakes Sprache unserem heutigen Sprachverständnis anzupassen, um so ein Gefühl von seiner zeitlosen Modernität zu vermitteln. Allerdings war Eichhorn sich sehr wohl bewusst, dass eine Übersetzung der Verse Blakes, wie gut sie auch sein mag, nur ein Hilfsmittel sein kann, aber kein Ersatz, weshalb er die Texte zweisprachig herausgab. In der deutschen Ausgabe von Ackroyds Blake-Biographie ist es dem Leser dagegen kein einziges Mal vergönnt, der unvergleichlichen Melodie und Gewalt dieser visionären Worte zu lauschen. Doch dies ist ein leicht zu behebender Mangel in einem ansonsten so informativen wie unterhaltsamen Buch.
Show Less

User reviews

LibraryThing member JollyContrarian
I have really enjoyed Ackroyd's writing in the past. His London Biography, in particular, is an outstanding book.
I had, therefore, high hopes for his life of Blake, the 18th century visionary being a famous Londoner and a fascinating man.
I was a little disappointed. It's certainly learned and well
Show More
researched (though it eggregiously overuses the word "vouchsafe"), but seems to skip over a number of important points: for one thing, Ackroyd hints darkly the Blake may have had misogynistic tendencies, but then declares "this isn't the place for a discussion of such things". Well, if a balanced biography isn't, I don't know what is.

Additionally, Ackroyd is somewhat credulous in his desire to portray Blake as a misunderstood genius, rather than a somewhat troubled individual. Serious credence is given to statements that certain people in Blake's circle (including, to an extent, Blake himself) were clairvoyant, whilst on the other hand short shrift is given to far more credible notions: such as that Blake - a man given to regular visions of angels and saints, after all - might have been mentally ill. Blake's behaviour may have been that of a genius, but is equally explainable as that of a flat-out nutcase, which appears to have been the general consensus of the time (and might partly explain Blake's lack of success during his own life).
Show Less
LibraryThing member riverwillow
This is an interesting and informative biography of Blake. A man whose talents were largely unrecognised in his own lifetime, but who is now perceived as a visionary and a great talent. As a biographer Ackroyd really tries to get to the man behind the myth and the Blake who comes across is
Show More
immensely likeable - I particularly liked his criticism of Wordsworth's 'The Excursion', which 'had provoked in him a bowel complaint' - as well as driven by his art and his spiritual adventures. As Blake himself said, 'I should be sorry if I had any earthly fame for whatever nature glory a man has is so much detracted from his spiritual glory. I wish to do nothing for profit. I wish to live for art. I want nothing whatever. I am quite happy.'
Show Less
LibraryThing member piemouth
I like Blake's art a lot, and don't know much about his writings except that they were "visionary" (translation: nutty). This is a dense, serious, but very interesting biography that tries to explain his writings, art, and thought processes, while acknowledging that much of it will always be
Show More
mysterious. I liked Blake the person a lot, too.
Show Less
LibraryThing member the.ken.petersen
A hundred pages into this book, I was questioning my total acceptance that anything written by Peter Ackroyd would be superb. By the time that I reached the end, I was sad to be leaving an old friend. The reason for this sharp change of attitude to the book is caused, I believe, by the strange
Show More
nature of Blake's life. He was not considered a great artist by most of the intelligentsia of his age and he wasn't always the most pleasant towards those who tried to help him. It took me a good one hundred pages to bend my mindset to that of Blake (at least Peter Ackroyd's Blake).

The work is lavishly illustrated with Blake's engravings and they still have an unworldly feel: it is not surprising that people were bemused. Add to this the fact that Blake insisted that his images were divine presentiments and that he 'saw spirits', and one begins to see the oddity of the man.

Ackroyd's admiration of the man shines through every page and, eventually, won me over, as Blake seems to have been able to gain forgiveness for his rudeness and quick temper towards his friends. He sold very few engravings and books during his life, but there always seemed to be a sponsor handing money to Blake. He was never rich,but he did keep the wolf from the door and in his last years, gained a glimpse of the fame that was to come posthumously.

This is another Peter Ackroyd winner: if like me, you struggle at the start, please keep going; you'll be sorry should you miss out on this fantastic biography.
Show Less
LibraryThing member john.cooper
I've been reading Blake for close to thirty years (in Geoffrey Keynes' "Complete Writings"), but haven't found a satisfying and sympathetic biography until now. As one of the blurbers on the back cover points out, Ackroyd is a native Londoner—he has written authoritatively on its history—and
Show More
this gives him a particularly fine vantage point from which to examine the life of a man who never lived or traveled more than 20 miles from the city. Ackroyd also is a student and admirer of Blake's epic poems, which are generally considered his most difficult work, and is able to explain them to me in a way no one else ever has. If he gives short shrift to Blake's epigrams and pithier poetic output, such as "Auguries of Innocence," that's fine with me, although I have always found them the most personally meaningful. They're easiest to grasp.

For an author, Ackroyd also displays a deep knowledge of engraving and coloring, and gives wonderful context to Blake's eccentric illustrations. Blake would have been appalled at the idea of someone reading his poems without the art that accompanied them.

But the best thing about this biography is that Ackroyd takes Blake's supernatural worldview seriously. Blake was a man who insisted all his life on the truth of his visions; he readily admitted that they were the works of his imagination, but he considered them no less real than the natural world for all that. He reported conversations with his dead brother, with Milton, with Michaelangelo, as matter-of-factly as he would a conversation with his living friends and family. To understand Blake, it's critical to accept his way of being in the world without dismissing him as a lunatic, much less a simpleton. He was neither; he got along in the world of his contemporaries just fine (which is not to say he didn't suffer for his eccentricities). A biographer who does not understand this has no chance of understanding Blake. Fortunately, Ackroyd is suited to this difficult task, and so his book is perceptive and convincing.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mbmackay
It must be tough to write a biography of William Blake. There is the usual problem of limited first-hand material on which to base the narrative, but in Blake's case this is hugely compounded by the fact that much of his written and visual output is incomprehensible to modern readers and
Show More
viewers.
But Ackroyd has done a sound job. I now know the outline of Blakes life, his feisty relationships, and know more about his creative life.
But I would have loved to have seen a modern psychiatric analysis of Blake. I know diagnosis from a distance would probably be unprofessional, but I would really like to know if it is only me that thinks he was seriously mentally unstable. Was it just religious mania? Was he paranoid? Both?
But among the craziness, he was a man living his life, and Ackroyd brings that to life. Blake was an artist, but he had to live. Commissions had to be sought and earned. Not easily, with Blake's personality.
I'm glad to have read this volume.
Show Less

Language

Barcode

5077
Page: 0.4943 seconds