Status
Available
Genres
Publication
New York : C.N. Potter : Distributed by Crown Publishers, 1986, c1967.
Description
Here, in two volumes, is every word that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) ever wrote about the adventures of the detective and the doctor... fifty-six short stories and four complete novels, arranged chronologically from Holmes's first case, in 1874, when he was a university student, to his signal service to the British Empire in the opening days of the First World War.
User reviews
LibraryThing member emfink
A treasure. Holmes was my first literary hero and obsession as a young reader. All these years later, I still derive endless pleasure from these stories. Perfect for curling up in front of a crackling fire on a chilly evening.
LibraryThing member datrappert
I have very mixed feelings about this 2-volume book. If you're reading the Holmes stories for the umpteenth time, it is a great resource. But if you are reading them the first time around, all the notes just get in the way. Given Doyle's distaste for the character he created, he would probably be
Show More
appalled at the amount of time some people have spent mythologizing him and pretending he was real. Also, these books are way too heavy to read for enjoyment! Show Less
LibraryThing member jmeisen
Quirky work, but the definitive annotated Holmes until Leslie S. Klinger's version came along. Mixes historical explanations with Baring-Gould's own chronology and inventive explanations. He was one of the best at playing the Game, though his chronology in particular can be (and has been)
Show More
challenged. I took away a half star for the lack of an index for easily finding an individual story, since they are arranged not in Canonical publication order but according to the editor's imaginative chronology. If you are interested in arguing over how many wives Dr. Watson had, you need this set. If you have not read the Holmes stories before, do not start here. Either the Oxford editions or the New Annotated would be better choices for new reader. Show Less
LibraryThing member jhevelin
I have been an avid Sherlock Holmes enthusiast since I started reading the stories at the age of nine. Ten years ago, I had the opportunity to acquire a used copy of "The Annotated Sherlock Holmes." What a disappointment! The editor chose to arrange the individual works in a chronology of his own
Show More
devising, and by deviating from the established arrangement of the works, makes it very difficult to find a given story. And most of the "annotations" detract from the stories -- there is very little of significance added. I have awarded this enormous book a single star and am donating my boxed set to the public library. Show Less
LibraryThing member K.Nichols
I got these as a gift from my mother many years ago and have read and re-read them many a time. A nice trip into Victorian England with terrific plots and Holmes' wierd genius for crime scenes and quirky personal behavior.
LibraryThing member MoonlightSilver
I got this book as a child and loved it! All my favorite stories with explanations to the little references that didn't make sense to me at the time. Nearly 40 years later, I still treasure it.
LibraryThing member murderbydeath
I pulled this out intending to do my annual Christmas read of The Blue Carbuncle, but made the mistake of glancing at the introduction. 12 chapters of introduction later, I finally read The Blue Carbuncle yesterday.
Baring-Gould didn't so much as introduce the annotated volumes and write a short
I'm sort of kidding, but sort of not - reading the annotations is fascinating. These men treat Holmes as though he were not only a real life historical figure, but a static one. The dichotomy is surreal. For example, Baring-Gould discusses the furniture in the flat, and the it seems that if Holmes had been a real person, these men (and yes, they're all almost without exception, men) expected him to have never, ever changed or moved any of the furniture.
Anyway, I thoroughly enjoyed reading The Blue Carbuncle, as I always do, though the annotations included quite a few snide comments by one Magistrate S. Tupper Bigelow, who impressed me as a complete prat, who needed to be reminded it's a story and even Conan Doyle was allowed to take creative liberties. There was also a whole discussion on whether or not Doyle intended to use the word commute and whether or not it implied Holmes had royal blood. That made me roll my eyes and cry 'oh, horse sh*t' loud enough to make MT laugh. Overall though, the rest of the annotations were thoroughly interesting, if not always informative, and they gave me a deeper context for enjoying a story that's already a firm favorite of mine.
Baring-Gould didn't so much as introduce the annotated volumes and write a short
Show More
but thorough biography of not only Conan Doyle, but Sherlock, Watson (to a lesser extent) and several chapters of pure out-and-out speculation of exactly where 221B Baker Street was, the layout of the rooms (was Watson on the third floor, or the second?; did Sherlock have 2 doors out of his bedroom?), and what kinds of furniture might or might not have been there. His cited sources include all the great 'scholars' of Sherlock Holmes: Morely, Starr, etc. and I have to say, these men needed more fresh air.I'm sort of kidding, but sort of not - reading the annotations is fascinating. These men treat Holmes as though he were not only a real life historical figure, but a static one. The dichotomy is surreal. For example, Baring-Gould discusses the furniture in the flat, and the it seems that if Holmes had been a real person, these men (and yes, they're all almost without exception, men) expected him to have never, ever changed or moved any of the furniture.
Anyway, I thoroughly enjoyed reading The Blue Carbuncle, as I always do, though the annotations included quite a few snide comments by one Magistrate S. Tupper Bigelow, who impressed me as a complete prat, who needed to be reminded it's a story and even Conan Doyle was allowed to take creative liberties. There was also a whole discussion on whether or not Doyle intended to use the word commute and whether or not it implied Holmes had royal blood. That made me roll my eyes and cry 'oh, horse sh*t' loud enough to make MT laugh. Overall though, the rest of the annotations were thoroughly interesting, if not always informative, and they gave me a deeper context for enjoying a story that's already a firm favorite of mine.
Show Less