Status
Publication
Description
"Nestled in the Appalachian mountains, Owsley County is the poorest county in Kentucky and the second poorest in the country. Buildings are crumbling and fields sit vacant, as tobacco farming and coal mining decline. But strong women are finding creative ways to subsist in their hollers in the hills. Cassie Chambers grew up amidst these hollers, and through the women who raised her, she traces her own path out of and back into the Kentucky mountains. Cassie's Granny was a child bride who rose before dawn every morning to raise seven children. Despite her poverty, she wouldn't hesitate to give the last bite of pie or vegetables from her garden to a struggling neighbor. Her two daughters took very different paths: strong-willed Ruth--the hardest-working tobacco farmer in the county--stayed on the family farm, while spirited Wilma--the sixth child--became the first in the family to graduate high school, then moved an hour away for college. Married at nineteen and pregnant with Cassie a few months later, Wilma beat the odds to finish school. She raised her daughter to think she could move mountains, like the ones that kept her safe but also isolated from the larger world. Cassie would spend much of her childhood with Granny and Ruth in the hills of Owsley County, both while Wilma was a student and after. With her "hill women" values guiding her, Cassie went on to graduate from Harvard Law. But while the Ivy League gave her knowledge and opportunities, its privileged world felt far from her reality, and she moved back home to help her fellow rural Kentucky women by providing free legal services. Appalachian women face issues that are all too common: domestic violence, the opioid crisis, a world that seems more divided by the day. But they are also community leaders, keeping their towns together in the face of a system that continually fails them. With nuance and heart, Cassie uses these women's stories paired with her own journey to break down the myth of the "hillbilly" and illuminate a region whose poor communities, especially women, can lead it into the future"--… (more)
Similar in this library
User reviews
Cassie Chambers grew up in the second poorest county in the entire United States, Owsley County, Kentucky. And she did it when the county was suffering the worst of times because of the duel decline of the two industries that had sustained life in Owsley County
Cassie’s story begins with her grandmother, a woman whose belief in hard work and family was passed down to her children (four boys and two girls), including Cassie’s mother, Wilma, and her mother’s older sister, Ruth. Wilma, certainly no stranger to hard work, would go on to become the first in her family to graduate from high school, as well as from college, something she achieved when Cassie was five years old. The women in Cassie’s family led by example, and Wilma’s acquisition of a college degree despite the tremendous odds against her made it plain to Cassie that her mother placed great value on education. As Cassie put it, by “graduating with her degree, my mother changed both of our lives.”
The most remarkable thing about Cassie Chambers is not what she achieved academically and after graduation - it is that she so willingly gives back to the community and culture from which she came. But even that did not come easy for her because of the difficulties she faced while trying to live in two cultures at the same time. The more she fit in at Yale and Harvard, the more comfortable she felt in those worlds, the less she fit in back in the Kentucky mountains she had left behind. Ultimately, the author came to understand that not everyone can or even should leave the mountains, that the people there are “connected to the land and to each other in a deep and meaningful way.” The mountain communities are worth saving, and she is doing her best to make sure that those who do stay in them are getting all the help they need and deserve.
Perhaps the biggest compliment ever paid to Cassie Chambers came from her Aunt Ruth one day after Cassie asked if her aunt still considered her to be a hillbilly. “You’re not anymore,” her aunt replied, “but you still got a piece of hillbilly in your heart.” The author says that she felt herself “swell with pride.”
Bottom Line: Hill Women is a tribute to the part of the country where Chambers was born, those Kentucky Appalachian communities that spawned generation after generation of tough men and women like those in her own family. The women, though, in the author’s family were different from the men in one significant way: they valued education much more than the men valued it. And even if they could not manage to get an education for themselves, they badly wanted it for the rest of the family, especially their daughters, sisters, and nieces. Education was the ticket to a better life for the women of Appalachian Kentucky - men could own farms and head families of their own; women, if not for education, were doomed to living the confined roles that mountain culture expected of them. This is their story.
Hill Women speaks to the strength and resiliency of women and mothers in even the most oppressive of circumstances and the darkest depths of despair. As I’ve gotten older I’ve found myself more inclined to choose women’s stories and stories written by women, making Chambers’ memoir and tribute to women of her childhood holler a read I immediately gravitated towards. The experiences of the women in her family and their lives in one of the poorest counties in the United States is stark, powerful, and compelling. The thread of the story unraveled a bit for me as Chambers delved into her professional journey to become an Ivy League graduate and an attorney advocating for impoverished women in Appalachia, but she circles back in the final chapters, tying her personal development and hard-won triumphs to the sustained tenacity and perseverance of the long line of hill women she hails from. Hill Women touches on the opioid crisis, the deeply flawed justice system, the devastating effects of the decimation of the coal and tobacco industries, and rampant domestic violence, among other heavy hitting topics. The discussion of the rigid legal roadblocks and prohibitive court fees that prevent countless women from escaping their abusers and establishing agency and impoverished people from turning corners in their lives are particularly shocking and disheartening. Chambers provides nuance to these issues and their impact on a group of people largely misunderstood and blatantly misrepresented by American society at large. Her unique perspective on Appalachia and Owsley County, Kentucky offers an analysis that is respectful and understanding of her subject matter without overly romanticizing the challenges they face. Highly recommended.
The book is divided into three sections: (1) Cassie's childhood years which describes the lives of her grandparents and parents with particular attention to the women, (2) Cassie's education which occurred outside of Kentucky including New Mexico, Wellesley, Yale, London, and Harvard Law School, and (3) her return to Kentucky to work as a lawyer helping very poor people, especially women.
During the time Ms. Chambers was going to school away from Eastern Kentucky, she was living a life with generally more wealthy people. She was trying to find herself; she worked hard on her studies but also had a social life. When she got to law school, initially she thought she was not cut out to be a lawyer until she started working at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, a student run law firm which aided low income people; then she realized she could do that kind of law. After law school she returned to Kentucky to work with the very poor, primarily victims of domestic violence, mostly women but also a few men. She tells stories of her experience doing this work, and describes concrete ways the legal system is injurious to the poor. She mentions extra challenges working for the poor in rural areas which are not present helping the poor in more urban areas with more resources. However, she describes small victories where she and her clients were able to get something improved. She is hopeful, but also realistic. Following Trump's election, she became involved in Democratic Party politics in Kentucky.
Although Ms. Chambers considers Owsley County her real home, and uses it as an illustration, she also describes the poverty and living conditions in Appalachian Eastern Kentucky. She covers the collapse of the tobacco and coal industries which in the past employed many people, and mentions the opioid crisis. Occasionally, I feel that she used too many statistics which will quickly go out of date.
Highly recommended.
It’s admirable that Cassie wanted to better herself
I did expect more from this book. Once I got about halfway through, I felt like I had learned all she had to tell and I was right. I wish I had not wasted my time finishing the second half. It’s not a bad book, but I just felt like she had nothing new to say.
Thank you, NetGalley and Random House Publishing Group-Ballantine for allowing me to read an advance copy and give my honest review.
My thanks to the publisher and to LibraryThing for the opportunity to read this as an ARC.
Reading this memoir, I wished that the author had chosen to focus on either the lawyering aspects of her career or dive further into the personal/familial reminiscences. As it stands, the work doesn't feel like it gives either story line its full justice. What is there is interesting; it just doesn't feel complete.
The book is very much autobiographical. Chambers tells her story of living in Appalachia and how she succeeded despite the hardships. It also tells how she experienced a privileged life at college and beyond. What impressed me was her story of how she turned back to Kentucky and used her success too help others.
Chambers supported her views with facts and was balanced and fair in her opinions. While describing and criticizing the male culture at Yale she also pointed out efforts made by Yale to improve. In addition, when she describes her activities in the Democratic Party she does it without heaping disdain on opposite views. While I have a few different views I always felt that her views where worth hearing.
This is a book worthy of a wide readership and was entertaining as well as informative.
As a result, Cassie ended up having better opportunities than her one cousin. Cassie has an impressive educational background. But what is even more impressive is that she has returned home and is using her education to help those in need in rural Kentucky.
I am glad Cassie shared her story and opened my eyes to the hardship and unfairness these "hill people" endure.
We get to experience the path
Inspired by the example of these strong women, Cassie attends a unique preparatory high school in New Mexico and from there attends Ivy League schools and eventually earns her law degree. At the time of writing the book, she is back in Kentucky, working to help women have equal access to the courts in family law
issues.
This book is an encouraging counterpoint to the existential pessimism put forth in J. D. Vance's book about a community in Kentucky just two counties over from the Owsley County.
I received this book as part of the Early Reviewers Program, but this review is not influenced by that fact.
As another reviewer mentioned, the book changed tone at the end and became a partisan political piece that attempted to persuade the reader of the flaws of conservatives, Republicans, or Donald Trump, rather than maintaining a focus on the stories of the women of the region. Chambers reveals in the last pages of the book her move into the Democratic Party's leadership structure in her state. Instead of simply saying that she works in politics in order to persuade people of the efficacy of a certain policy approach over another, she relates numerous examples that serve only to promote division, though decrying the political divisiveness of the times. For example, she says that some churches in the rural regions of Kentucky tell people they will go to Hell if they vote for Democrats, or that (Republican) parents won't let their children play with the children of Democrats. A nun persuades people to vote for Democrats because, apparently, she explains that Republicans are simply "pro-birth," not pro-life, seemingly arguing that once a child is born Republicans only want to cut children's health insurance and make life hard for working families. My own belief is that Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, independents, or anyone who is not a Democrat, would want much the same as a Democrat for children and working families. There can be a difference in opinion about the best policies or approach to a problem without it meaning that one side is basically evil and unfeeling while the other only wants the best for people. She devotes several pages to wondering why people in Kentucky like Donald Trump, and then spends time discussing why he is not as popular as he was and that he has "done nothing" and "made women mad." She then says that Owsley County, the focus of the book, elected a Democrat in the 2018 elections. However, this result does not seem to have followed from any direct connection to Trump, but rather to the Republican candidate's position in favor of merging the county with another, something the majority of residents in Owsley County opposed. She also throws in an assessment that supposedly came from her Aunt Ruth that Brett Kavanaugh was guilty of what he was accused, she could just tell. This seems awfully irresponsible coming from an author who is herself an attorney and should now be aware of the very serious credibility issues of Kavanaugh's accusers, problems that came fully to light once the hearings ended and highlighted, or should have done, for the country of the dangers of a rush to judgment and a willingness to convict someone based solely on an accusation with no evidence. Again, this seemed out of place in her memoir and once again promotes a divisiveness that she claims to abhor. (Sigh). It's an unfortunate chapter that is clearly an attempt to sway people to adopt her political affiliation, and which damages the story she was otherwise trying to convey.
Overall, there are some things to admire in the book, and other things that would have been better left out, or which should have received less attention so that the focus could stay on the "hill women" of Kentucky.