Status
Available
Publication
William Morrow Paperbacks (2006), Edition: 1, 288 pages
Description
When Elizabeth Bennet first met Mr. Darcy, she found him proud, distant, and rude-despite the other ladies' admiration of his estate in Derbyshire and ten thousand pounds a year. But what was Mr. Darcy thinking? Jane Austen's classic Pride and Prejudice has long stood among the most beloved novels of all time. The story of Elizabeth Bennet's blossoming romance with "haughty, reserved, and fastidious" Fitzwilliam Darcy has enchanted readers for nearly two centuries. Yet, Mr. Darcy has always remained an intriguing enigma-his thoughts, feelings, and motivations hidden behind a cold, impenetrable exterior . . . until now. With the utmost respect for Austen's original masterwork, author Janet Aylmer loving retells Pride and Prejudice from a bold new perspective: seeing events as they transpire through the eyes of Darcy himself. One of world's great love stories takes on breathtaking new life, and one of fiction's greatest romantic heroes becomes even more sympathetic, compelling, attractive, and accessible, all through the imagination and artistry of a truly gifted storyteller.… (more)
Similar in this library
User reviews
LibraryThing member atimco
Darcy's Story by Janet Aylmer purports to tell the story of Jane Austen's inimitable classic Pride & Prejudice from the perspective of its hero, Fitzwilliam Darcy. I did not find it successful and only reached page 30 before I set it down. I was ready to enjoy it, despite being a purist who looks
And I was so proud of myself for being broadminded and giving it a chance. Ah well. Guess I will just have to reread Pride & Prejudice once again.
Show More
askance at fanfiction, but you cannot attempt to work in Jane Austen's world if you are not committed to artistic precision in your language. Aylmer unfortunately lacks Austen's ability to forge perfect phrases (don't we all?), and when she used "hopefully" incorrectly, I knew I couldn't stomach the rest. If the writing had been more skilled, perhaps the first 30 pages would have read less like a dry recital of characters' motivations and actions utterly lacking in narrative interest. And I was so proud of myself for being broadminded and giving it a chance. Ah well. Guess I will just have to reread Pride & Prejudice once again.
Show Less
LibraryThing member wealhtheowwylfing
Stiff and unoriginally written. Supposedly Pride and Prejudice told from Mr. Darcy’s point of view, it is instead a bland recital of Austen’s scenes. Absolutely nothing new is added to what we already know of Darcy or any of the other characters. It is a very, very disappointing book.
LibraryThing member mccalab
Is it possible to love the famous Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy any more than we do? Thanks to Janet Aylmer's "Darcy's Story: Pride & Prejudice told from a whole new perspective" - it is. An excellent companion piece to Miss Austen's masterpiece, this book does exactly what the title conveys. The reader
Show More
gets to see Darcy's side of the events from P&P. Suddenly, it's harder to blame him for his pride, and it is easier to love him as a friend and as a big brother. Watching his relationship with Georgiana grow from siblings to friends & confidants is definitely a different and a heartwarming theme. Otherwise, Miss Aylmer's book was very true to the original work's mood, facts, and timing. I've only been able to credit Carrie Bebris with capturing the true spirit of Darcy & Elizabeth ... UNTIL NOW! Thank you, Miss Janet Alymer, for this book! Show Less
LibraryThing member FionaCat
A very good retelling of Pride and Prejudice from Mr. Darcy's point of view. I liked it better than the 3 volume Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman series.
LibraryThing member K.Binkley
I was so pleasantly surprised with this book. The author is able to keep the feel of Jane Austen's story.
LibraryThing member AsYouKnow_Bob
Who would pick this up except someone who knew P&P cold? The opening has a large amount of "As you know, Bob"-ing going on, which does not bode well: what reader of Regency fiction needs to have one character turn to another to explain primogeniture?
LibraryThing member Mooose
Short, fun read of what Jane might have written had she written from Darcy's POV. With all the fans of P & P, the author faces a tough crowd of critics and she did a fairly good job of exploring who Darcy was and how he changed. Don't go to it expecting Austen as we'll never know what she would
Show More
have written, but do go it in the spirit of reading one person's idea of what happened. Then enjoy being back at Pemberly and Longbourne with Elizabeth and Darcy. Show Less
LibraryThing member LeHack
This was a very pleasant visit with Elizabeth Bennett and Fitzwilliam Darcy. The author has retold much of Pride and Prejudice from Mr. Darcy's viewpoint.
Many quotations from Austen are used in context from Darcy's side of the relationship. The best thing about it was not having to read much about
It was obvious from the way the author treated the characters that she holds Jane Austen in high esteem.
Many quotations from Austen are used in context from Darcy's side of the relationship. The best thing about it was not having to read much about
Show More
Lydia and Mrs. Bennett, since Darcy found both of them distasteful and silly. It was obvious from the way the author treated the characters that she holds Jane Austen in high esteem.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Mandy2
I loved this book. I was happy that the author stuck to the real story so closely and made the scenes between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy they same as P&P. It is a quick read and makes me want to read it again and again as a kinda of quick fix for a P&P craving. My only problem with it was that it's
Show More
not P&P hence the 4 and a half stars instead of 5 full stars. I enjoyed "Mr. Darcy's" point of veiw. I have plans of reading this one over and over again. Show Less
LibraryThing member iammbb
Pride and Prejudice is largely told from Elizabeth's point of view. This novel attempts to tell Elizabeth and Darcy's story from Darcy's point of view and, to some extent, succeeds.
A conscious choice, the author, who writes under the pseudonym of Janet Aylmer, repeats much of Austen's original
To its credit and to my enjoyment, Darcy's Story fleshes out the character of Georgiana, Darcy's sister and allows her to play an integral role in Darcy's growth and ultimately successful courtship of Elizabeth. Aylmer also provides some insight into Darcy's motivations and rationale for the approach he takes when he first asks for Elizabeth's hand.
And yet, the novel is often just presenting Austen's work all over again. This repetition rather weighs down the few original insights which Aylmer offers.
A conscious choice, the author, who writes under the pseudonym of Janet Aylmer, repeats much of Austen's original
Show More
dialogue. While this works to allow the novel to stand on its own, having just finished the original, I found myself skimming over long passages.To its credit and to my enjoyment, Darcy's Story fleshes out the character of Georgiana, Darcy's sister and allows her to play an integral role in Darcy's growth and ultimately successful courtship of Elizabeth. Aylmer also provides some insight into Darcy's motivations and rationale for the approach he takes when he first asks for Elizabeth's hand.
And yet, the novel is often just presenting Austen's work all over again. This repetition rather weighs down the few original insights which Aylmer offers.
Show Less
LibraryThing member alpinegal
Easy read... I prefer the Pamela Aidan interpretation of Darcy, though. I think she gave Darcy a more well-rounded character and provided additional information to help me better understand him.
LibraryThing member SophieCale
A big part of Darcy's allure is his mystery. For a main character he's quite under-developed. Austen had a lot to say about society but not much about Darcy himself as a person. While he is the Progenitor of the coldly polite and handsome brooding hero, he still is a person and not just an
The first chapter did not impress me, and I was dismayed that the whole book would be more of the same. It's mostly the language and style: blocky, cramped and stilted. Aylmer tries to get out too much information too quickly and with none of the ease or charm of Austen's P&P style. To expect someone to write just like Austen IS ridiculous but it seemed like she was either trying too hard or not enough in her emulation. She improves though, thankfully, when there's more feeling and action. However, part of this is simply because she uses much of Austen's own writing and is frighteningly repetitive with some of it. Then I was dismayed yet again that the book would be a lame regurgitation. I was thinking that the mock-ish Zombie P&P had better characterization of Darcy than a book dedicated to him. But by Elizabeth's stay at Netherfield, Aylmer redeemed herself and I was rather impressed with the rest of her additions.
She did Darcy justice, though I have mixed feelings about the obvious fan-service towards the end. It was laced with the crazy liberties that other much less talented and less respectful writers take with this loved classic. I like the inclusion of her explanation at the end (as she should do, messing with a classic and all). In all, I was satisfied and sped through it like I do the original. There are far worse re-tellings out there.
Show More
archetype. SO, obviously I'm going to jump at the opportunity to get in his head and see through his eyes.The first chapter did not impress me, and I was dismayed that the whole book would be more of the same. It's mostly the language and style: blocky, cramped and stilted. Aylmer tries to get out too much information too quickly and with none of the ease or charm of Austen's P&P style. To expect someone to write just like Austen IS ridiculous but it seemed like she was either trying too hard or not enough in her emulation. She improves though, thankfully, when there's more feeling and action. However, part of this is simply because she uses much of Austen's own writing and is frighteningly repetitive with some of it. Then I was dismayed yet again that the book would be a lame regurgitation. I was thinking that the mock-ish Zombie P&P had better characterization of Darcy than a book dedicated to him. But by Elizabeth's stay at Netherfield, Aylmer redeemed herself and I was rather impressed with the rest of her additions.
She did Darcy justice, though I have mixed feelings about the obvious fan-service towards the end. It was laced with the crazy liberties that other much less talented and less respectful writers take with this loved classic. I like the inclusion of her explanation at the end (as she should do, messing with a classic and all). In all, I was satisfied and sped through it like I do the original. There are far worse re-tellings out there.
Show Less
LibraryThing member astrologerjenny
This is "Pride and Prejudice" told from Darcy's point of view, and it's very true to the original. The author was painstaking in making sure all the plot movement lined up. If you're a fan of the book, it will be a fun and undemanding read. If not, it would be a bore.
LibraryThing member mullgirl
Darcy’s Story is a Pride & Prejudice accompaniment novel, told from Darcy’s perspective.
The story opens with Darcy’s background and a few letters from his sister that give him enough warning to know that he should go to Ramsgate at once. Naturally, once there he stops the elopement with
Darcy’s Story has been criticized for bringing nothing new to the world of Pride & Prejudice, and I have to disagree. While this is certainly not the best* Darcy’s perspective story that I have ever read, I thought it was pretty good. The author’s goal was to bring to life the hero of Pride and Prejudice and tell the story through his eyes. She quotes a little too much from the book, but I can’t help walking away from this read seeing Darcy as more three-dimensional and understanding a little more than I had before.
It is not written in the style of Austen, which I know bothers many out in the fandom. But it was still reasonably well-written and I don’t expect casual writers (this is Ms. Aylmer’s first publication) to be able to channel Ms. Austen.
Bottom line, if you are looking for a sequel, back story, or what if to Pride and Prejudice, this is clearly not your book. But if you are looking for a fast read with the general flavor of Pride and Prejudice, and don’t have the time or inclination (perish the thought!) to read the original, this story fits the bill.
The story opens with Darcy’s background and a few letters from his sister that give him enough warning to know that he should go to Ramsgate at once. Naturally, once there he stops the elopement with
Show More
Wickham. I liked this beginning, indeed. I had always thought that was overly-fortuitous that Darcy should appear just in time to stop the elopement, and clearly Ms. Aylmer agrees with me.Darcy’s Story has been criticized for bringing nothing new to the world of Pride & Prejudice, and I have to disagree. While this is certainly not the best* Darcy’s perspective story that I have ever read, I thought it was pretty good. The author’s goal was to bring to life the hero of Pride and Prejudice and tell the story through his eyes. She quotes a little too much from the book, but I can’t help walking away from this read seeing Darcy as more three-dimensional and understanding a little more than I had before.
It is not written in the style of Austen, which I know bothers many out in the fandom. But it was still reasonably well-written and I don’t expect casual writers (this is Ms. Aylmer’s first publication) to be able to channel Ms. Austen.
Bottom line, if you are looking for a sequel, back story, or what if to Pride and Prejudice, this is clearly not your book. But if you are looking for a fast read with the general flavor of Pride and Prejudice, and don’t have the time or inclination (perish the thought!) to read the original, this story fits the bill.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mamashepp
This book was supposed to give the reader a different perspective of the events originally laid out by Jane Austen in Pride & Prejudice. Since so much of the story has to mirror Austen's work, a great deal of this book offers nothing new. In fact, it quotes heavily from P & P. Furthermore, I had
Show More
never really felt that I was unable to deduce Mr. Darcy's motives and thoughts. Nothing Aylmer writes in this book differs much from what I would have assumed had happened. It is always nice to revisit these characters, though! Show Less
LibraryThing member mamashepp
This book was supposed to give the reader a different perspective of the events originally laid out by Jane Austen in Pride & Prejudice. Since so much of the story has to mirror Austen's work, a great deal of this book offers nothing new. In fact, it quotes heavily from P & P. Furthermore, I had
Show More
never really felt that I was unable to deduce Mr. Darcy's motives and thoughts. Nothing Aylmer writes in this book differs much from what I would have assumed had happened. It is always nice to revisit these characters, though! Show Less
LibraryThing member Cyberlibrariannyc
I liked it, but didn't love it. Aylmer lifts far too many passages directly from Pride and Prejudice for this book to be very original. I much prefer Mary Street's "The Confession of Fitzwilliam Darcy."
LibraryThing member omniavanitas
I bought this before getting on a plane, figuring it would make for some good fluffy reading. It actually turned out to be mostly a collection of scenes from P&P that involve Mr. Darcy and not very much else. If I recall, some dialog is taken verbatim from Austen, which is probably necessary, but
Show More
results in this book feeling pretty superfluous. This is rather like very conservative fan-fiction, but it's a really quick read. It put me in the mood for a day-long P&P miniseries and movie viewing. Show Less
LibraryThing member Nickelini
The subtitle of Darcy's Story is "Pride and Prejudice told from a whole new perspective." As it says on the back cover, Mr Darcy is an "intriguing enigma," and promised to tell the story from his point of view. Sounds fun to me. Except, no. Aylmer quotes long passages directly from Pride and
Steadfastly, Aylmer does not waiver from the canonical version of P&P. In a few places, the story demands that she fills in gaps and is forced to make something up, but she then justifies it in the lengthy author notes at the end.
I'll give her a nod for writing in response to the novel and not one of the film versions. At least she did that. However, this is a poorly written shuffle of the original words from P&P and it adds absolutely no new insights into the characters or the story.
Janet Aylmer is the author's pseudonym. I wouldn't let my name anywhere near this dreck either.
Recommended for: I imagine that she kept those readers in mind who freak out at the smallest liberty taken in an Austen rewrite (those who always claim in their reviews that "Jane Austen is spinning in her grave."). Not sure this would even appeal to that crowd though, because I think they'd agree with me that this is entirely pointless. Those readers who want to have fun with their Austen pastiches, and don't mind liberties taken, can safely skip this.
Show More
Prejudice and in a clunky manner, attempts to make it Darcy's story. Except she doesn't add anything that a close reader of P&P wouldn't figure out on their own. Further clunkiness ensues when she writes things like Darcy explaining to his cousin Col. Fitzwilliam that Lady Catherine is their aunt. Ugh ugh ugh.Steadfastly, Aylmer does not waiver from the canonical version of P&P. In a few places, the story demands that she fills in gaps and is forced to make something up, but she then justifies it in the lengthy author notes at the end.
I'll give her a nod for writing in response to the novel and not one of the film versions. At least she did that. However, this is a poorly written shuffle of the original words from P&P and it adds absolutely no new insights into the characters or the story.
Janet Aylmer is the author's pseudonym. I wouldn't let my name anywhere near this dreck either.
Recommended for: I imagine that she kept those readers in mind who freak out at the smallest liberty taken in an Austen rewrite (those who always claim in their reviews that "Jane Austen is spinning in her grave."). Not sure this would even appeal to that crowd though, because I think they'd agree with me that this is entirely pointless. Those readers who want to have fun with their Austen pastiches, and don't mind liberties taken, can safely skip this.
Show Less
Language
Original language
English
Physical description
288 p.; 8 inches
ISBN
9780061148705