Status
Collection
Publication
Description
Paper is one of the simplest and most essential pieces of human technology. For the past two millennia, the ability to produce it in ever more efficient ways has supported the proliferation of literacy, media, religion, education, commerce, and art; it has formed the foundation of civilizations, promoting revolutions and restoring stability. One has only to look at history's greatest press run, which produced 6.5 billion copies of Mao Zhuxi Yulu, Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Zedong) which doesn't include editions in 37 foreign languages and in braille to appreciate the range and influence of a single publication, in Paper. Or take the fact that one of history's most revered artists, Leonardo da Vinci, left behind only 15 paintings but 4,000 works on paper. And though the colonies were at the time calling for a boycott of all British goods, the one exception they made speaks to the essentiality of the material; they penned the Declaration of Independence on British paper. Now, amid discussion of "going paperless" and as speculation about the effects of a digitally dependent society grows rampant, we've come to a world-historic juncture. Thousands of years ago, Socrates and Plato warned that written language would be the end of "true knowledge," replacing the need to excise memory and think through complex questions. Similar arguments were made about the switch from handwritten to printed books, and today about the role of computer technology. By tracing Paper's evolution from antiquity to the present, with an emphasis on the contributions made in Asia and the Middle East, Mark Kurlansky challenges common assumptions about technology's influence, affirming that paper is here to stay. Paper will be the commodity history that guides us forward in the twenty-first century and illuminates our times.… (more)
User reviews
As a museum docent, I'm constantly looking for those little stories and facts that enrich newcomers' interest in artefacts and this volume left me with many -- for example the role that textile pattern blocks may have played in helping to develop woodblock prints and books, or how the compass, which was known to the Chinese by the 3rd century BCE is not mentioned in European sources until 1190. Or that the Arab ink developed for parchment had such a high acid content that it ate through paper initiating the use of a new type of ink (midad) based on lampblack, similar to that used by the Chinese. How handwriting changed paper. How paper changed art. How paper shortages in some countries were the source of laws forbidding the export of rags (cellulose being a key ingredient of paper). How an uprooted tree in Cumberland in 1565 was the discovery of graphite and the graphite pencil. Printing's impact on music. And how the best art and calligraphy paper during China's Tang Dynasty (618-907) came from the bark of blue sandalwood (Pteroceltis tatarinowii)--and remains so today. The list is almost endless and the read fascinating.
This book is another 'keeper'--a reference work readers will want to return to with "What did he say about European artists and Japanese paper again?" queries, and be able to find the right page as the Index, contrary to many contemporary works, is very well constructed (as is the Bibliography). Only one irony--after finishing this work, I was curious about the paper the book was printed on--its source for one (having read that much of the world's paper today comes from China making "China the largest importer of used paper and the largest maker of recycled paper in the world" (p. 294). Ironically, there was an End Note on the Type, but not the paper.
Still, as always, I learned a lot and this author makes me think. I liked his concept of the technological fallacy of invention changing culture...he's of the necessity is the mother of invention school. I think this may have been more true in the past. Today, we have planned obsolescence and constant small changes in technology...is each new software version or iPhone really necessary? He also made me realize that the things we worry about don't change....paper was going to displace the memory required of the oral tradition, and now we worry that voice dialing and google will replace memory.
So read it...and read his books about cod and about salt, too.
Since first writing this review I've read a few other reviews and must say that some of the reviewer's comments resonated with me. For example, one reviewer said that she thought the author had taken his notes on a bunch of 5x8 cards then just thrown them on the floor and put the book together as he's picked up the cards. A bit harsh...but it does have this feel about it. (Though, at least he's tried to put the cards in chronological order). The second reviewer made the observation that one section of the book was just a collection of data about mills in Europe that quickly became overwhelming ...just one mill after another. And I agree: it is overwhelming. Was it necessary to the story? I don't think so.
Personally, I would have liked to see a little more in the way of illustration of the paper making art. I've watched it at close quarters in Japan but I think the book would have benefited by more high quality illustrations.
And I'm not sure that his historical approach is necessarily the best way to proceed with a book like this. It inevitably has us jumping from China to Germany, to England, to France, to Holland, to The USA, then back to China, then Japan. ....It's the kind of "jumpiness" the I disliked so much with Moby Dick. What would be a better way to proceed? I'm not sure...but maybe focusing on some aspects of the technology...say the moulds....or the techniques used to make paper. Kurlansky...does have a view that he pushes fairly consistently and that is; inventions respond to changes in demand they do not lead to changes in demand. So the availability of printed books did not lead to increased literacy ....rather increased literacy led to increased demand for books. Well maybe he is right on this score ...I'm not sure. But, say, with the invention of the transistor....nobody quite knew what that was going to lead to. In the 1950's we thought it an absolute wonder that we could have a transistor radio (instead of a crystal set) ....but there was not too much talk at that time about personal computers or phones that could draw on a world wide web of data. My point being that the transistor was an invention the spawned new devices that hadn't even been thought about when it was invented. (I guess one could always argue that there was a pent up demand there for all those devices but really I think Kurlansky's claim is over-reach).
I also found it slightly annoying that in his discussion of the polluting effects of paper making the he never really asks the obvious question of why don't the paper mills recycle their own water instead of treating it and then feeding it back into the rivers? Clearly, they're not treating it well enough.
He has also obviously been to visit a few sites; the Glatfelter mill at Spring Grove, near Gettysburg; and the artisans producing hand made paper in the Basque country in Northern Spain.....because (I feel) he treats us to a slightly romanticised version of each....maybe a little too much detail because it highlights the fact that he hasn't really visited all the other places he writes about with such authority.
OK...it was a bit annoying in style (or construction) but there are still a lot of interesting facts and interesting information covered. I was a little mystified about the way he dismisses the Mexican manufacture of amate as "not paper". Personally, I don't agree.It's basically the same process that is used elsewhere in the world. You take fibrous material (bark) boil it down (with an alkali) ..soften and beat out the fibres then overlay the fibres into a flat sheet. They do this by beating it out with a pounder rather than by floating a suspension in water and using a mould... but the process is essentially the same and the end result more or less the same as paper. Also he says p154 that the Mexicans make a lye powder made from soaking maize. I think this is quite wrong. You don't get a lye powder from soaking maize. Rather, the Mexicans soak the hard maize seeds in a lime solution to soften the epicarp (the hard yellow casing of the maize seed) so that they can then make "masa" and from that make the corn tortillas. So, the same kind of lime solution (or similar) is used for treating the inner bark of the fig tree to produce the amate.
And, whilst on the subject of Mexico...maybe we get a little too much of the history of the conquistadores rather than keeping the focus on paper.
Overall. Yes it's interesting. Yes there is a lot of information there. But overall, I found it a bit of a jumble.....three stars from me.
Just as much a story of the history of writing, the paper industry, and the
While fun, the book does have some weak points, namely the latter third to half turns into a history of random things done on paper (and he particularly loves wood carvings), plus after the first section of the book Kurlansky abandons a focus on Asian papermaking in favor of the West, only coming back for one chapter at the end with no real explanation.
It's a fun read if you like microhistories, but it's by no means a must read. I'd like to give it 3.5 stars, but Goodreads restricts me to whole stars.