The Silk Roads: A New History of the World

by Peter Frankopan

Paperback, 2001

Status

Available

Call number

909

Collections

Publication

Bloomsbury Publishing PLC (2001)

Description

"Our world was made on and by the Silk Roads. For millennia it was here that East and West encountered each other through trade and conquest, leading to the spread of ideas and cultures, the birth of the world's great religions, the appetites for foreign goods that drove economies and the growth of nations. From the first cities in Mesopotamia to the growth of Greece and Rome to the depredations by the Mongols and the Black Death to the Great Game and the fall of Communism, the fate of the West has always been inextricably linked to the East. The Silk Roads vividly captures the importance of the networks that crisscrossed the spine of Asia and linked the Atlantic with the Pacific, the Mediterranean with India, America with the Persian Gulf. By way of events as disparate as the American Revolution and the horrific world wars of the twentieth century, Peter Frankopan realigns the world, orientating us eastwards, and illuminating how even the rise of the West 500 years ago resulted from its efforts to gain access to and control these Eurasian trading networks. In an increasingly globalized planet, where current events in Asia and the Middle East dominate the world's attention, this magnificent work of history is very much a work of our times"--… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member LamSon
This is a really good book. Most of the history I read is about specific period of time or a specific event. This book is a broad sweep of history. It is about seeing the forest and not just the trees.
LibraryThing member wyvernfriend
This is an interesting encouragement to look more eastern-wards for a greater appreciation of what happened during history. During my degree I did study Classical Civilization and often wondered why we only studied Roman and Greek History and not Persian, Indian, Chinese and Egyptian history more
Show More
during the course, and I commented during my History lectures on the Crusades that it was more about money and trade than religion, which got laughs from my fellow students and correction from the lecturer on their assumptions (I felt very vindicated); so in ways this isn't my book (singing to the choir comes to mind), this is a book for people who don't seem to think that there is anything that has come out of the middle east except terrorists, but unfortunately people who believe these things don't tend to believe that this is a book for them.

This is a book that looks at how influential parts of the world dismissed by people were on actual history, not only of their own countries but on the world and how ignoring those influences is toxic, a reducio ad absurdam of reality.

However it also dismisses certain other almost insignificant moments that became significant, like the influence Irish Nationalism had on nationalism in other colonies and how other colonies avoided the shambles of a rising like our 1916 one. But in ways I'm nitpicking, I'm from a western country, with western history at the fore and I grew up with a fairly insular view of history from textbooks that was very Ireland centric and tended to blame England for most of what happened to us but I had a cynical view of that idea.

Yes, we need a more holistic view of history, but it's a hard task for anyone, history will always be filtered by experience, knowledge, access to information and upbringing, bias can be acknowledged but will always creep in, the trick is to understand that it will always be there.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Steve38
A good but flawed effort. Subtitled 'A New History of the World' it is an attempt by a British author to tell the history of the world not from the usual standpoint of Britain and Europe but from that of 'the centre of the world'. Those countries of central Asia that were linked by the Silk
Show More
Road.

The author starts well in pre and early history by emphasising the richness, cultural superiority and innovation of the region compared with the backward, poverty stricken, remote Europe. He maintains his focus as Europe comes more onto the seen in the early middle ages. But he loses sight of what he set out to achieve once Columbus and the American continent arrive on the scene and the British begin to build an empire in Asia. The book then becomes a more standard history from a European, transatlantic point of view and their interests in the region. The long section towars the end on the Iran/Iraq war and western interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq are interesting but overdone.

The author almost completely ignores China. It is mentioned of course but only incidentally as a source of goods transitting central Asia on their way to European markets. As a historian he should have included more geography. Information about populations, climates and transport systems are cursory.

A good effort but Mr Frankopan lost sight of his objectives as he progressed through the ages.
Show Less
LibraryThing member charlie68
A good if wordy history of the silk road region, roughly the Middle East, Near East and Central Asia covering 3000 years. Easy enough for the non-scholar to digest.
LibraryThing member Paul_S
The author bears some strange grudge against the European civilisation but even with his critical approach he can't deny its historical record. The way he portrays the Mongol invasion as some enlightened state building is sharply contrasted with the awful empire building perpetrated by European
Show More
states. Not convinced this is a fair description.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Lady_Lazarus
Some interesting facts, but unfortunately without a context. The book was often quite dragging to read, because it felt I was reading a list of people and dates with no idea who was who and how they were connected. There was some attempt to that, I admit, but in the end too much was included and in
Show More
the end I remembered nothing of what I just read. There should have been an overarching, and more specific, theme to build a story around. Now the book was too big and too general, at least for a reader like me.
Show Less
LibraryThing member sriram_shankar
A very Middle East centric view of the world.
Short on details of the ancient world. Very heavy on details of events whose sources are more easily available - from the 1900s onwards.
LibraryThing member JHemlock
This is a tough book. Some brilliant information and assumptions. The author puts together a system of describing the way trade and religion from the Ancient world shaped history. At times is surely seems like he has a deep disdain for the western culture. But just when you think that, he turns
Show More
around and puts the peoples of Persia, the Middle East and India on the stand. History is violent and that is just the way it is. No ancient culture on our radar of the past got where they were going without slaughter, slavery and greed. Violence is in our DNA....we as humans will never escape it. Luckily for us as people, we have shed some of those facets. The desire to have more than the person next to us. That is just the way it is. Mr. Frankopan brilliantly puts that out there. This is a hard read though.. many times I have wanted to just close it and grab something else. But it has some great info in it. Of course one should not take it for gospel. Just like any good history book it should be cross referenced. I can't help but wonder though. Did the writer even attempt to consider the US Civil War. Since he wanted to tote on slavery, that event should have received way more attention lots of interesting things could have been said about the fur trade in North America. The paragraph on Russia's attempt to colonize Alaska a was way too brief. There are a ton of facets the author could have explored if he were not to busy vilifying everyone in the world with the exception of the Middle East. Many things have linked the world together. The Middle East is not the be all end all of everything. I see his point. But the book apparently has an agenda. For a writer of history that puts one in a bad place.
Show Less
LibraryThing member breic
This is a completely bland world history focused as usual on Western Europe. It skims along the surface from Christopher Columbus to modern American politics, missing China and the Middle East. I cannot understand how it was ever published. The book has very little to do with the shoehorned title,
Show More
"Silk Roads," except the chapters are awkwardly named "Road of X, Y or Z". The author is nearly economically illiterate. Wildly digressive, there's little insight, lots of footnotes, zero editing.
Show Less
LibraryThing member elimatta
A specialist in Western Asia history argues that western Asia was and is the centre of the world. Oddly balanced too in that China is only a part-player in this book until the final chapter. Also odd that in the last chapter there is so much emphasis on fossil fuel wealth in western Asia and its
Show More
future, when fossil fuel is so obviously of declining importance due to its impact on climate change. And after rushing through the human rights and other horrors of the various Stan states, he describes such criticisms as being just the sort of thing the west says.
Synthetic histories like this (those based in syntheses of the works of others as well as the author’s own) require a special skill, particularly when they carry a strong thesis. This is a wonderful book with strengths in both breadth and depth, yet the balance seems a bit off.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Eyejaybee
Peter Frankopan has produced an extraordinary work that presents a new perspective on world history. Not only does he weave a compelling account of the history of the Middle East and Central Asia over several centuries, but by doing so he changes, or at least expand, our understanding of current
Show More
day events.

Each chapter focuses on a different aspect of the routes that traversed ‘the Stans’, those vast tracts that were formerly part of the Soviet Union, allowing the exchange of trade, news and religious views over the centuries.

A comprehensively researched and clearly written account of an area of the world and aspect of history that has too often been neglected.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mbmackay
This is interesting book, but the basic structure - linking a large part of the world's history to the concept of the Silk Road is overblown and misleading.
It was the Silk Road that sucked me in - the very idea of ancient trade links across Asia linking China to Europe is full of exotic potential,
Show More
but in the end it was the artificiality of trying to link disparate episodes in history to the "Silk Roads" that left me disappointed. As one example - the actions of the British and the Americans in the first part of the 20th century in Iraq and Iran to assure oil supplies. Frankopan tells this, and other episodes very well, with vigour and strong opinions, but the link to Silk Roads is tenuous.
So, good writing, good history, full of interesting insights, but ultimately a little disappointing because the book does not fulfil its stated purpose.
As an aside, the publication of this ebook is poor. The font used in the e-text is unable to deal with the diacritical marks used in the original text, and some jury-rigged fix has been attempted by inserted what seem to be small images of the accented letters. Besides being hard to see and harder to read, this means that you cannot use word search for words with an accent.
As a second aside, the book lacks maps. There are a few maps, but these are too small and lack the information needed to help the reader. The author says in the introduction that he wants to improve general knowledge of the history of this fascinating region. As a first step he should get his publisher on board and improve the range and detail of the maps.
Read ebook Feb 2016
Show Less
LibraryThing member malexmave
An excellent history book that retells world history as seen from the east, and understood over the connections between cities and countries (i.e., mostly trade). The first three quarters were highly interesting. The last quarter, once it reached world war 2 and especially the aftermath, were still
Show More
interesting but fell off a bit, because it became more familiar, but all in all, I still highly recommend this book (and am actually giving it as a gift for christmas).
Show Less
LibraryThing member booktsunami
Commenting on the events after 9/11/2001 (When the world Trade Centre was brought down) Frankopan comments: The determination to take controls overwhelming. Deposing existing regimes deemed destabilising and dangerous became paramount in the strategic thinking of the US and its allies. Priority was
Show More
given to getting rid of clear and present dangers, with little thought to what would, could or should happen next. Fixing short term problems was more important than the long term scenario. This was explicit in the plans made against Afghanistan in the autumn of 2001.
.....The same short terms was evident in the case of Iraq, where the sharp focus on removing Saddam Hussain from power was set against a lack of planning on how the country would look in the future......
Show Less
LibraryThing member BrokenTune
This book. It's been such a disappointment: Not only is the title an exercise in how to cram several misrepresentations in less than ten words, but the writing style left me rather unimpressed, too.

There is little that is new about the history contained in the book. It certainly is not a history of
Show More
the world (Europe, perhaps, but the focus on the power struggles between Christianity and Islam, and later on the West v. the East, and the US against Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan does not make this a book about the history of world). It is even less a book about the Silk Roads.

If you picked this up in the hope of learning about the trade routes and the people who live or travel along them, you've picked the wrong book.

Sure there were a few interesting snippets of history in this, but the authors choice of not going into a lot of detail and preferring to follow up events with other events without providing a lot of deliberations about the possible connections or effects, does not make for inspiring reading. Unless, that is, we are talking about the inspiration to look for other books.

Maybe the premise of the book was a little too ambitious? Maybe some editor should have pointed out some of the gaps ... or at least that the title does not reflect the content of the book?

Whatever the cause of its failings, I was hoping for a thoughtful insight into the history of the Silk Roads, but all I got from the books was what read like the work of a self-congratulatory academic who couldn't make up his mind what to write about and looked at history mostly through Union-Jack-striped goggles.
Show Less
LibraryThing member le.vert.galant
This is narrative world history as viewed from the center of Asia rather than from Europe. There are a number of interesting connections made, such as the effect of the Mongol invasion on the European balance of power, but several of the pre-twentieth century portions of the book are unbalanced and
Show More
whole centuries are glossed over (much of the period covered in S. Frederick Starr's Lost Enlightenment is woefully underrepresented).

The thesis of the book, if it can be said to have one, is the impact of history on recent events in "that part of Asia which lies between the Mediterranean and the Himalayas." Here the book comes into its own, showing how the Europe and the United States have maneuvered themselves into losing influence and trust in the region.
Show Less
LibraryThing member revliz
What if we re-centered our world history? All kinds of new things open up.
LibraryThing member PDCRead
The Silk Road. Just the very name conjures up images of travellers carrying expensive bolts of cloth, exotic spices and fine ceramics from the Far East to Europe. This road was more than that though, it was how the two separate domains of East and West first encountered each other, was the backdrop
Show More
to countless wars, as power ebbed and flowed back and forth across the continent. The road has been responsible for the spread of numerous religions over millennia, not just the Abrahamic ones, but Buddhism and Zoroastrianism spread along the route. Great cities grew along the road, which spawned even greater cultures.

Western countries have dominated the planet for the last 500 years but in this book he argues that most of these turning points in history have had some greater or lesser influence from the Silk Road in world history. Not sure I agree with all of the inferences, but I think that he is right in that the fulcrum is tilting world power away from the West and back to the East once again. It is a very detailed, huge, broad-brush view of world history seen through the prism of this ancient route from Europe to the Far East. I had hoped there would be more on the ancient history of place and people that trekked and made their lives from the Silk Road network; there wasn’t sadly, but it was still a good history of the world seen from this perspective. 3.5 Stars overall.
Show Less
LibraryThing member datrappert
The author's antidote to history that has been too Euro-centric is convincing. He argues that the Middle East and the Silk Road were the true center of the world, and indeed, as they were the crossroads between East and West, this is hard to argue. For centuries, places like Britain were a
Show More
backwater. This began to change with the discovery of the New World and in particular Spain's exploitation of it. The Middle East reassumed its centrality, however, with the discovery of oil, and it has remained central to world politics ever since. Now China is re-creating the Silk Road for its own benefit.

Throughout the book, Frankopan provides fairly concise stories about the growth of Islam, the Mongol invasions of Europe, and a host of other topics. These are the clearest and most informative I have read. This book is not written in a simplistic manner, but neither is it burdened with incomprehensible academic speak. Highly, highly recommended.
Show Less
LibraryThing member johnwbeha
This is a very ambitious book, as it sets out to tell the whole history of the world from the perspective of the lands under "Silk Roads" that run through Asia. The subject itself is probably too broad for any historian to succeed. Of necessity he has to skim over many events and periods,
Show More
particularly when the West becomes involved after Vasco de Gama, because so much is going on.
The writing style makes it relatively easy to read, although a certain amount of hopping between times and places sometimes make it difficult to follow. One message that comes through very clearly is that the West [including Russia] should never have become involved in Afghanistan in the twntieth century and beyond, whatever the justification. We should have learned our lessons from the past! We all know that there is shift in economic power from West to East going on; this book helps us to understand it.
Show Less
LibraryThing member rivkat
World history from the perspective of Persia and environs being, largely, the axis around which everything turns. Most of the time, Western Europe was a weird backwater as power shifted. Another lesson: all empires die; the US is doing about as much flailing as others following the same pattern.
Show More
Because the story is so big, there are only broad strokes but that does give the impression of a wide stage for historical figures to play on.
Show Less
LibraryThing member pierthinker
Most modern narrative history focuses on the familiar tropes of Western civilisation - the early civilisations in the eastern Mediterranean leading to classical Greece, then Rome and then the expansion of Europe (and, by extension, the Americas) as the motor of global development and expansion.
Show More
There are some voices that offer different perspectives on world history and ‘The Silk Roads’ by Peter Frankopan is one such.

Frankopan centres his story on the swathe of geography running from the eastern shores of the Mediterranean through to India and China (south of the Caspian and Aral Seas, north of the Persian Gulf). He contends that is these societies and nations, interacting through trade and conquest, that drove the development of human civilisation and that it is only in the last few hundred years that Europe and Western civilisation have come to dominate. In closing, Frankopan believes that even now the focus is swinging away from the West and back to the East and Eurasian states as the fulcrum of world affairs.

This is a powerfully written narrative that drives the (Western) reader through a largely unknown set of geographies, peoples, cultures and historical events.

I remain unconvinced that the Eastern/Eurasian civilisations are the true heart of world history and human development, with the western, European focus tagged on at the end. I also found the final chapters describing the impact of European empires and politics on Eastern states in the 20th century a little too quick to blame the West and portray the East as unfortunate pawns in some game. I am sure to some extent this is true, but the nations of central Asia must take some responsibility for the calamities of the last 100 years.

Highly recommended as a different perspective on the development of human civilisation
Show Less
LibraryThing member thenumeraltwo
I was mildly upset with [Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks] not being the book I was expecting, but coming round to the idea that it was the right book for the story. It wouldn't be one that I would normally choose, but I enjoyed the journey.

Silk Roads also upset me for not being the book I was
Show More
expecting, but this time I feel more innocent in the misunderstanding. The story of the silk roads shouldn't feature significantly more chapters dealing with Britain than China.

It struck me that the intro to Gombrich's History of the World, whilst Euro-centric, felt the need to explain that he'd shoved a few extra chapters in the English version because, for the most part, Britain just hasn't been that interesting. A view not widely held amongst Etonians that go on to Oxbridge.

There is much to like about the book: I'd really quite like to go to the steppes now, but it's marred by uneven temporal and geographic focus. I'd happily trade the minutes of US official meetings leading to Iraq I in favour of more colour to the Eastern end of the road: the Indian spices and Chinese silks that got this political route opened and maintained.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jbennett
I thoroughly enjoyed this history, of the world really, focussed on the peoples, wars and trade along the Silk Route. The author broadens the perspective showing for instance how exploration of South America affected trade to the east. Whilst I probably didn't pay quite enough attention to the
Show More
earlier history and didn't quite keep track of who was who, I found the twentieth century history fascinating.
Show Less
LibraryThing member nova_mjohnson
An overview of the history of the areas that comprised the old Silk Roads - Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, former Soviet republics, and more. Very in-depth and does a good job of summarizing the history of a region that most do not learn about in school. Does not hesitate to speak truthfully about the
Show More
West’s imperial history, but also does not always criticize the region as it should be at times. Slightly repetitive at times and could have been edited down slightly. A good history on a not widely known subject.
Show Less

Awards

Books Are My Bag Readers Award (Shortlist — Non-Fiction — 2016)
PEN Hessell-Tiltman Prize (Shortlist — 2016)

Language

Original language

English

Original publication date

2015

Physical description

656 p.; 7.8 inches

ISBN

1408839997 / 9781408839997

Barcode

91100000179323

DDC/MDS

909
Page: 0.4049 seconds