Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
What is the role of the writer? Prophet? High Priest of Art? Court Jester? Or witness to the real world? Looking back on her own childhood and writing career, Margaret Atwood examines the metaphors which writers of fiction and poetry have used to explain - or excuse! - their activities, looking at what costumes they have assumed, what roles they have chosen to play. In her final chapter she takes up the challenge of the title: if a writer is to be seen as 'gifted', who is doing the giving and what are the terms of the gift? Margaret Atwood's wide reference to other writers is balanced by anecdotes from her own experiences, both in Canada and on the international scene. The lightness of her touch is underlined by a seriousness about the purpose and the pleasures of writing, and by a deep familiarity with the myths and traditions of Western literature.… (more)
User reviews
Each essay examined a different aspect of the writing process, such as dealing with fame, mingling with the dead and the conversation between the writer and his/her reader. Atwood added many stories from her past, which I found the most fascinating. She also included lots of references to other writers and poets, including Dante, Shakespeare, Alice Munro and Adrienne Rich – to help strengthen her many thoughts about writing.
This book reminded me Joyce Carol Oates’ The Faith of a Writer. Both books require concentration and offer provocative questions about the art of writing. Fans of Atwood may be turned off by her academic tone in Negotiating With The Dead, but if you can follow along and love to read about writers, then this collection by Atwood is a must-read.
To each of these questions, Margaret Atwood applies her prodigious thoughtfulness, knowledge and wit. And, while not entirely useless for another creative soul looking for company, there is far too much navel gazing going on.
I usually enjoy reading/talking to other artists about their creative processes and their thoughts on creativity. Stephen King's On Writing is an excellent example of discussing the craft. Negotiating With the Dead, on the other hand, is LitCrit theory, vague and ethereal with only questions to circle around.
The biggest question I walked away with is, "Does it really matter?" If the muse calls, one answers regardless of theories about why. I'm much more interested in knowing Atwood's process and her thoughts on craftsmanship.
And it's so impressive to see how many poets and writers Atwood quotes. She provides the reader with plenty of examples to illustrate her questions.
While the lectures are intended for a broad audience, rather than specialists, and while Atwood claims to have followed that mandate in preparing them, I found the book turgid and nearly impossible to read. I appreciated Atwood's choice of themes, but found little consonance in her explorations. I am sure that I missed much of the literary symbolism in her essays; more often, though, I was simply too bored to care. Perhaps longtime novelists or long-ago college English majors will appreciate this book.
Review written January 2015
Atwood opens quite innocuously with a memoir and description of the literary scene in mid-20th C Canada. There’s an interesting discussion of the relationship between the author and
So a book about the art of writing is also itself a work of art. Bloody typical of Atwood to do something like that.
Alternate or Subtitle: A Writer on Writing
Atwood was asked to give the Empson lectures at Cambridge University in 2000. The series of six presentations were intended for scholars, students and the general public. This book is the result of that experience.
Somehow, I’ve found myself reading
Atwood clearly gave a lot of thought into the lecture series and she references many writers and books in a range of genres, though she does tend to rely most on classics / literary fiction and poetry. She does have some very interesting points to make, and questions to ask. For example, this excerpt:
In what ways, if any, does talent set you apart? Does it exempt you from the duties and responsibilities expected of others? Or does it load you up with even more duties and responsibilities, but of a different kind? Are you to be a detached observer…? Or ought you to be a dedicated spokesperson for the downtrodden of this earth…?
However, the style seemed stilted and detached. Dryly academic. I found myself anxious for her to get her point made and move on.
Subjects
Awards
Language
Original language
Original publication date
Physical description
ISBN
Similar in this library
DDC/MDS
808.3 |