Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
Health & Fitness. Sociology. Women's Studies. Nonfiction. HTML:An essential exploration of why and how women's sexuality worksâ??based on groundbreaking research and brain scienceâ??that will radically transform your sex life into one filled with confidence and joy. Researchers have spent the last decade trying to develop a "pink pill" for women to function like Viagra does for men. So where is it? Well, for reasons this book makes crystal clear, that pill will never be the answerâ??but as a result of the research that's gone into it, scientists in the last few years have learned more about how women's sexuality works than we ever thought possible, and Come as You Are explains it all. The first lesson in this essential, transformative book by Dr. Emily Nagoski is that every woman has her own unique sexuality, like a fingerprint, and that women vary more than men in our anatomy, our sexual response mechanisms, and the way our bodies respond to the sexual world. So we never need to judge ourselves based on others' experiences. Because women vary, and that's normal. Second lesson: sex happens in a context. And all the complications of everyday life influence the context surrounding a woman's arousal, desire, and orgasm. Cutting-edge research across multiple disciplines tells us that the most important factor for women in creating and sustaining a fulfilling sex life, is not what you do in bed or how you do it, but how you feel about it. Which means that stress, mood, trust, and body image are not peripheral factors in a woman's sexual wellbeing; they are central to it. Once you understand these factors, and how to influence them, you can create for yourself better sex and more profound pleasure than you ever thought possible. And Emily Nagoski can… (more)
User reviews
-interesting research on the social construction of desire (e.g., the rat into lemons)
-the tl;dr: you are normal
-after a brief disclaimer, she uses "woman" to mean female—what a relief; there's no
-I feel Emily Nagoski has lots of good intentions, and I really appreciate her stance against pathologizing women, but it's hard to get on board with someone who ultimately sees (hetero)sexuality as such a positive, life-changing force (and men can "help" their female partners by occasionally doing the dishes, 'cause, you know, that's the woman's job)
I found it very good food for thought.
If I had read this as a younger man - my relationships and my masculinity would have all been enriched.
Normal
The first thing I was struck by in the book was Nagoski’s extensive and creative use of the term “normal,” and the gender-stereotypical insecurity its usage implies. “Normal”
Mechanistic Analogies
The second thing I’m struck by in the book is the author’s use of mechanical analogies. Women are living organisms with a high degree of complexity. Often in the book I feel as though Nagoski oversimplifies women, turning them into machines. An example: her most frequently used analogy is that of accelerator and brake. When you think of these two terms, what image comes to mind? For me, it is a car. Regardless of the utility of this analogy, there are some significant hazards of thinking of a woman as a car, not least of which is that it then has a driver that is necessarily not the car. The one analogy in the book that I enjoy is that of a woman’s sexuality as a garden. Nagoski looks at different biomes and explores diversity through this analogy. Like women, gardens are living systems.
Understanding Women Through Men
The third striking aspect of the book is that Nagoski begins with indictment of the way that female sexual education is taught through a male lens—and then goes to explain everything by the analogies to male anatomy and response. In other words, the presentation of this books appears to reinforce (rather than counteract) this narrative. That said, I did learn some fascinating things. For example, that there are “homologues” for every aspect of male and female genitalia.
Female Orgasm as Non-Evolutionary
The fourth surprising aspect of this book is that Nagoski states that the female orgasm is evolutionarily unnecessary (as opposed to the male orgasm, which is associated with sperm). She notes that her students don’t like this story—and I can understand why!
Science and Values
The fifth oddity is that the book ultimately aims to change the way that women feel about their sexuality, but attempts to do so through science. There is incongruity to this approach; good science is unbiased. On the other hand—values, by their nature, are biased. So the reader is left wondering—what happens if the science veers off in another direction, and if, in a generation, we’ll realize that women should feel poorly about their sexuality? By fastidiously citing the science, Nagoski undermines her aim of reassuring women of their own worth and own experience. Both sexual science and sexual values are important, but to try to further one with the other denigrates both.
Context
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from this book, it is about the importance of female context. Eighty-five percent of women have responsive desire, meaning that becoming turned on is a phenomenon emergent from their context (psychological environment, physical environment, relational environment, etc.). There is an aspect of hazard that Nagoski overlooks in her exploration of this topic (possibly because the book was written before the #MeToo era). Responsive desire is a contributing factor to why we have stereotypes surrounding that men initiate sexual advances, and also a contributing factor to the ways in which men persist even after receiving no for an answer.
In conclusion, there were a number of aspects of this book that I found distracting, but ultimately it was an interesting read and I did learn more about female sexuality.
If you're struggling to understand your sex drive, whether it be high or low, I think you'll find this book useful. In fact, you'll learn that sex isn't even a drive! I'm not one of those people to ever feel like a book is life-changing, but this one comes pretty close. I don't read much in the way of self-help, but this book was so helpful that it makes me wonder what else is out there. Nagoski explains the science she's studied in a very relatable way. I would especially recommend this if you've ever felt "broken" when it comes to desire, drive, etc. It was incredibly important to me to be able to understand not only the way I feel, but that the way I feel isn't broken or wrong. It's normal and understandable.
I'm not yet sure how I'll apply all I've learned, but I'm so glad I read this book.
A young woman boards an airplane and sits in a row with a woman about 10 years her senior. As the plane takes off, the older women sneezes about 8 times in rapid succession. After a 5 minute interval, this happens again, and then again. The young woman asks the older woman if she
NB: And women who say size doesn't matter are so shallow.....
Backed by close to 50 pages of footnotes and references.
The book is good if a bit underwhelming. It all pretty much boils down to accept yourself as you are, although that in itself is hard and takes a lot of work.
Special P.S. to the author: Thanks & Wow.
Nagoski structures her advice around the idea of a sexual accelerator and brakes. The accelerator leads to desire for sex and the brakes lead to non-desire or even revulsion. Stepping hard on the accelerator won’t help unless you’ve let up on the brakes. Thus, she suggests that people identify where their perceived problems come from—is it stress and other barriers braking a level of desire, or is it that it’s hard to get started? Relatedly, she argues that having responsive desire is normal: if you only want or enjoy sex after it’s been initiated, and don’t “naturally” desire it yourself, that’s fine.
The meh: the language is colloquial, extremely so. You have to be comfortable with reading about your “feels,” not your feelings.
The not so good: despite the broad, accepting language, the advice all assumes that the reader has previously had satisfying sex with a partner and is trying to get back to that. Thus, the exercises center around figuring out what worked before and what elements need to be restored.
So many of the lessons have remained with me and helped me re-examine so many of the assumptions I'd had before reading it. Highly recommended.