Reports of cases decided in the Oregon Tax Court

Reports of cases decided in the Oregon Tax Court volume 9 contents: Pages 1 through 3: Martin et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1412). Pages 4 through 10: Bylund. v. Department of Revenue. Valley River Center, Taxpayer - Intervenor (TC 1292). Pages 11 through 19: Johnson v. Department of Revenue. Foster, Intervenor (TC 1334). Pages 20 through 24: Mendelson v. Department of Revenue (TC 1439). Pages 25 through 31: Hahn v. Department of Revenue (TC 1464). Pages 32 through 44: Bain v. Department of Revenue. Oregon Aqua - Foods, Inc., Intervenor (TC 1393). Pages 45 through 66: Stutchell et al, v. Department of Revenue (TC 1370). Pages 67 through 75: Keller v. Department of Revenue (TC 1394). Pages 76 through 84: Bylund v. Department of Revenue, Teleprompter Corporation, Intervenor (TC 1297). Pages 85 through 91: Lewis v. Department of Revenue (TC 1413). Pages 92 through 99: Craske et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1432). Pages 100 through 111: Martin et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1505). Pages 112 through 115: Mullenaux et al v. State of Oregon, by and through the Oregon Department of Revenue (TC 1591). Pages 116 through 121: First National Bank of Oregon v. Department of Revenue (TC 1457). Pages 122 through 128: Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Baker v. Department of Revenue (TC 1448). Pages 129 through 135: Benson et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1403). Pages 136 through 140: Gain et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1640). Pages 141 through 146: Stevens et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1308). Pages 147 through 156: United Amusement Company, Inc. et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1473). Pages 157 through 161: Vandevert v. Department of Revenue (TC1596). Pages 162 through 165: Capsey v. Department of Revenue (TC 1492). Pages 166 through 175: Williamson et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1693). Pages 176 through 182: Gibbons et al v. Umatilla County People's Utility District (TC 1657). Pages 183 through 189: Multnoham Kennel Club v. Department of Revenue (TC 1467). Pages 190 through 196: Woman's Convalescent Home Association Foundation v. Department of Revenue (TC 1438). Pages 197 through 199: Bernstein Bros, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (TC 1698). Pages 200 through 204: Brenner v. Department of Revenue (TC 1809). Pages 205 through 209: Disabled American Veterans, Portland Chapter No. 1, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (TC 1431). Pages 210 through 226: Gilmore Steel Corporation v. Department of Revenue (TC 1447). Pages 227 through 245: Cole et al v. State of Oregon by and through the Oregon Department of Revenue (TC 1435). Pages 246 through 250: Taunton v. Department of Revenue (TC 1821). Pages 251 through 255: Sandahl v. Department of Revenue (TC 1812). Pages 256 through 259: Leitch et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1557). Pages 260 through 264: Allied Timber Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 1594). Pages 265 through 271: Salem Non-Profit Housing, Inc., v. Department of Revenue (TC 1706). Pages 272 through 280: Multistate Tax Commission et al, v. The Dow Chemical Company, (TC 1835). Pages 281 through 284: Tualitan Rural Fire Protection District et al, v. State by and through its agency Portland Metropolitan Are Local Government Boundary Commission (TC 1795). Pages 285 through 288: Gibbons et al, v. Department of Revenue (TC 1543). Pages 289 through 298: U.S. Bancorp et al, v. Department of Revenue (TC 1597). Pages 299 through 307: Brenner v. Department of Revenue (TC 1809). Pages 308 through 310: Vanlandingham et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1899). Pages 311 through 316: Johnson et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1790). Pages 317 through 324: Marchel et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1789). Pages 325 through 334: General Services Administration v. Department of Revenue (TC 1830). Pages 335 through 338: Jones et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1876). Pages 339 through 343: Port of Coos Bay v. Department of Revenue (TC 1624). Pages 344 through 350: Estate of Collins v. Department of Revenue (TC 1935). Pages 351 through 355: Alsea Veneer, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (TC 1773). Pages 365 through 361: Kent et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 1894). Pages 362 through 370: School District No. 1 v. Multnomah County et al (TC 1762). Pages 371 through 377: School District No. 1 v. Multnomah County et al (TC 1762). Pages 378 through 380: Wynne v. Department of Revenue (TC 1893). Pages 381 through 398: Mid Oil Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 1607). Pages 399 through 406: Stan Wiley, Inc. v. Department of Revenue Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District (TC 1949) Realty Group, Inc. v. Department of Revenue Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District (TC 1950). Pages 407 through 416: Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. Department of Revenue (TC 1987). Pages 417 through 428: Reynolds Metals Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 1895). Pages 429 through 437: Foundation of Human Understanding v. Department of Revenue (TC 1916). Pages 438 through 446: Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Department of Revenue (TC 1828). Pages 447 through 450: Lee et al, deceased v. Department of Revenue (TC 1794). Pages 451 through 456: Atlantic Richfield Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 2001). Pages 457 through 461: Gilmore Steel Corporation v. Department of Revenue (TC 1584). Pages 462 through 464: Fournier et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 2064). Pages 465 through 468: Davis et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 2028). Sahli et al v. Department of Revenue (TC 2029). Pages 469 through 474: Burns v. Department of Revenue (TC 2069). Pages 475 through 480: The Golden Writ of God v. Department of Revenue (TC 1897). Pages 481 through 500: Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 1093, 1189, 1282, 1362). Pages 501 through 505: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Department of Revenue (TC 1279 and 1361). Includes table of cases, Statutes of Oregon and subject index.