Oregon law review

Oregon law review volume 68 number 1 1989 contents: Page 1 - Two faces, two ethics: labor union lawyers and the emerging doctrine of entity ethics by James Gray Pope. Page 57 - Rule 37 discovery sanctions in the Ninth Circuit: the collapse of the deterrence goal by John W. Heiderscheit III. Page 87 - Some reflections on Mackay's application to legal economic strikes in the public sector: an analysis of state collective bargaining statutes by Rona Pietrzak. Page 161 - The intercorporate dividends - received deduction: an area of increasing complexity by John M. Pearce. Page 197 - Oregon's hostility to policy arguments: Heino v. Harper and the abolition of interspousal immunity by Patricia K. Fenske. Page 217 - Recent developments. State ex rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. Hargreaves: welcome to the twilight zone by David Schuman. Page 227 - Prince v. Brydon: liability of attorneys participating or materially aiding in securities sales revisited by Brian J. Broderick. Page 235 - Krause v. American Aerolights: remedial measures evidence barred from strict liability cases by Peter M.K. Frost. Page 241 - Moore v. Willis: pleading foreseeability in Oregon by Caroline A. Johnson. Page 249 - Burton and Burton: extending marital property rights to premarital cohabitants by Stephen Koteff. Page 255 - State v. Woodley: defining "intimate parts" under the Oregon Criminal Code by Sean B. Murphy. Page 261 - State v. Bridewell: the warrant requirement and the "community caretaking" exception by Lucille Marie Seibert. Page 296 - Hunter v. State: availability of post-conviction hearing act remedies by Patricia M. Stuart. Includes table of contents.