Status
Collection
Genres
Publication
Description
'I am sister to the day and night. I am sister to the woods.' Sister Clarisse, a nun in the House of St Mary at Clerkenwell, experiences visions. She dreams of the English King. Are her prophecies the babblings of the crazed? Or can she 'see' a future in which Henry Bolingbroke overthrows Richard II? This clever and colourful novel begins with The Nun's Tale, and continues with The Friar's Tale, The Merchant's Tale and The Clerk's Tale-. Thus, story by story, Peter Ackroyd builds his portrait of medieval London. The people are disenchanted by the Church, with its wealth and corruption, its Pope in Rome and its Pope in Avignon. But heresy is dangerous- almost as dangerous as rebellion. This is a novel about spies and counter-spies, radicals and idealists, murderers and arsonists, sects and secret societies...… (more)
Subjects
Language
Original publication date
Physical description
Media reviews
User reviews
Lollardy (or Lollardry) was the political and religious movement of the Lollards from the late 14th century to early in the time of the English Reformation . Lollardy followed from the teaching of John Wyclif, a prominent theologian at Oxford, beginning in the 1350s. Its demands were primarily for reform of the Catholic Church. It taught that piety was a requirement for a priest to be a "true" priest or to perform the sacraments, and that a pious layman had power to perform those same rites, believing that religious power and authority came through piety and not through the Church hierarchy;. Similarly, Lollardy emphasized the authority of the Scriptures over the authority of priests. It taught the concept of the "Church of the Saved", meaning that Christ's true church was the community of the faithful, which overlapped with but was not the same as the official Church of Rome. It taught a form of predestination. It advocated apostolic poverty and taxation of Church properties. It also denied transubstantiation in favour of consubstantiation. It is not difficult to see why the official Church would take umbrage and fight against such "heretical" beliefs.
The Lollard philosophy also echoes that of the Gospel of Thomas. In the novel, Ackroyd has one of the characters refer to "the good doctor Thomas", who, "tells us that the soul has a faculty of its own for apprehending the true and that it may reach towards God with will and understanding". (See Elaine Pagels, Beyond Belief, on the Gospel of Thomas.)
The story is well told with a wide cast of characters. Ackroyd knows London well in all of its periods (he wrote a book on the Biography of London), and he captures the sights and sounds and smells (particularly the smells) of medieval London, plus the intrigues, the superstitions, and the mores of a community and a time when lives were nasty, brutish, and short. And he does it with the vocabulary of the day! I also learned that ancient London was riven with various streams and rivers that fed into the Thames, the courses of which today follow a number of streets. The river Fleet, for example, figures prominently in the story.
"The Clerkenwell Tales" is a relatively short work, some 205 pages and a few pages of explanatory notes, but it manages to pack a lot of action in
One novel (ahem) factor is Ackroyd's shameless hijacking of many, if not most, of the characters familiar as the pilgrims of Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" who here are fleshed out and given specific identities as the players in the action and on whom, chapter by chapter, the story focuses in turn.
This book was almost worth 4 but was reluctantly marked down a notch due to several moments in which Ackroyd's hand is clumsy and intrusive in commenting on the action or implications for the plot of some development or other. It remains an easy and pleasing read however and whiles away a few hours.
The story imho wasn't exactly gripping, but still fun to read: the plot started furioso and con-tinued to be quite fast-paced, enhanced by a twist or a surprising revelation of the persons' past every now and then. I also enjoyed the explanations about art, religion and medical treatment: they were interesting and short enough not to interrupt the flow of the story, albeit a little wooden sometimes. Another flaw is due to its particular composition: None of the characters really emerged as protagonist, in this respect it is again similar to some of Brueghel's paintings. The persons were portrayed too briefly for me to understand them or even sympathise with them. But otherwise it was a very entertaining read.
I chose this novel to represent England in my Reading along the Prime Meridian challenge. It's set in the heart of London in 1399 which was a tumultuous year in English history. King Richard II, a staunch advocate of the divine right of kings to rule, has his throne threatened by a revolutionary army led by Henry Bolingbroke. Bolingbroke is not the only one who wants to overthrow the King. Dominus, a clandestine group of high-powered officials that seems to be in league with an apocalyptic religious sect is similarly intent on causing mayhem. The atmosphere of fear and anxiety is exacerbated by a nun whose prophesies of Richard's demise are unleashed on a superstitious public.
Murder, arson, conspiracy. With a plot like that, how can a book fail especially when written by an author with a tremendous skill with period detail? Ackroyd doesn't disappoint in that respect. His descriptions of daily life, of meals and mystery plays, of footwear and headwear, of tooth sellers and medical potions turn the past into a fascinating though smelly present. Next time I'm feeling ill, I won't bother my local GP, I'll just follow one of the cures from the leech featured in Ackroyd's book:
'he was much discomforted by her heaviness of stomach and suggested she mix the grease of a boar and the grease of a rat, the grease of a horse and the grease of a badger's, souse the concoction in vinegar, add sage and then put it upon her belly."
The problem with this book is the way Ackroyd chooses to tell his story. Each of his chapters is named after a character from Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. Each of these characters has only partial knowledge of the plots and intrigues so what the reader experiences is a gradual revelation of the story. It's a clever idea, almost akin to the way witnesses in a trial contribute to the jury's understanding of the whole picture, but since none of the characters enters the story for more than a few pages it's difficult to get know them in anything more than a superficial way. It's such a shame because some of them have a lot of promise that is just bursting to be fully realised. But it never does.
Really not sure how to assess this. Peter Ackroyd picks such interesting subjects, but somehow I find him hard to read. Hawksmoor almost defeated me. This one was easier, but still not a quick read.
This is London at the turn of the century - 1399. Henry
Ackroyd tells the tale of these times in the style of Chaucer (although thankfully not in his language!) - each chapter told from someone else's perspective.
All very clever but it's not a period of history I know very well and I did find myself getting a bit confused.