Publication
Description
Fantasy. Fiction. Literature. HTML:"STARTLING . . . FIENDISH . . . MEMNOCH'S TALE IS COMPELLING." �??New York Daily News "Like Interview with the Vampire, Memnoch has a half-maddened, fever-pitch intensity. . . . Narrated by Rice's most cherished character, the vampire Lestat, Memnoch tells a tale as old as Scripture's legends and as modern as today's religious strife." �??Rolling Stone "SENSUAL . . . BOLD, FAST-PACED." �??USA Today "Rice has penned an ambitious close to this long-running series. . . . Fans will no doubt devour this." �??The Washington Post Book World "MEMNOCH THE DEVIL OFFERS PASSAGES OF POETIC BRILLIANCE." �??Playboy "[MEMNOCH] is one of Rice's most intriguing and sympathetic characters to date. . . . Rice ups the ante, taking Lestat where few writers have ventured: into heaven and hell itself. She carries it off in top form." �??… (more)
User reviews
Characters: Lestat is rather subdued in this one and it's
Style: This book is a religious rant of enormous proportions. Almost all of it is about catholicism and the philosophy connected to it, spread out in epic detail. The usal overabundance of description, but this time not offset by dialogue or plot. There are several hundred pages when the book is at a complete standstill and does not go anywhere.
Plus: It's the last book with the old Lestat, before Anne Rice turned him entirely strange.
Minus: Far too much religion and general weirdness.
Summary: Read it for completeness' sake only. There's no need to read this for comprehension of the later volumes in the series - the relevant facts are being summed up in each and every one of them.
Those who are fans of the campy suspense of Queen of the Damned or Tale of the Body Thief: this is not the book for you. Those who are fans of the historical backstory and scholarly interests of The Mayfair Witches and The Vampire Lestat: this book is not for you. Those who actually like the broody, questioning Louis of Interview with the Vampire, and the introspective Taltos: you might enjoy this book. Those who obsessively read everything Ann Rice has ever written (including her pseudonymous works): this book is for you (and me).
Why?
The writing is vain, self-centred, annoying, focused more on clothing descriptions than on actual plot. Either that or it seems to be a lecture on religion. I like the ideas, I
Yes, I realize that Lestat is vain and self-centred, that the writing reflects his personality. This doesn't make it any less annoying.
The Victim and his daughter, Dora, a televangelist, are both wonderfully over-the-top and well imagined, and Lestat himself manages to be engaging in spite of the horror of his acts. But it’s the wondrously imagined and worked out central section of the book – Lestat’s guided tour of Heaven and Hell by Memnoch (a contemporary Divine Comedy) – that kept me turning the pages, and I had the feeling that this was the heart of the novel and could almost have stood alone, that the beginning and end of the story were there merely to serve it, and might even have been written quite separately at a later date.
Memnoch himself is wonderfully seductive, far more so than God, but both are ambiguous; this is an incredibly clever novel that actually offers answers to those persistent questions and contradictions about the nature and existence of God himself – no mean feat.
This is the point in Anne Rice’s writing of her Vampire Chronicles that she starts to lose her way. Her previous novels were gripping and intriguing. This one really falls flats. The novel is overwritten. She could tell the same story with far fewer words and it would be much tighter. Lestat, normally entertaining and intriguing loses his luster. Not one of Anne Rice’s better novels.
Carl Alves – author of Blood Street