Call number
Collection
Genres
Publication
Description
Fiction. Mystery. Suspense. Thriller. HTML: Thirty years ago two sisters disappeared from a shopping mall. Their bodies were never found and those familiar with the case have always been tortured by these questions: How do you kidnap two girls? Who'or what'could have lured the two sisters away from a busy mall on a Saturday afternoon without leaving behind a single clue or witness? Now a clearly disoriented woman involved in a rush-hour hit-and-run claims to be the younger of the long-gone Bethany sisters. But her involuntary admission and subsequent attempt to stonewall investigators only deepens the mystery. Where has she been, why has she waited so long to come forward? Could her abductor truly be a beloved Baltimore cop? There isn't a shred of evidence to support her story, and every lead she gives the police seems to be another dead-end'a dying, incoherent man, a razed house, a missing grave, and a family that disintegrated long ago, torn apart not only by the crime but by the fissures the tragedy revealed in what appeared to be the perfect household. In a story that moves back and forth across the decades, there is only one person who dares to be skeptical of a woman who wants to claim the identity of one Bethany sister without revealing the fate of the other. Will he be able to discover the truth?.… (more)
Subjects
User reviews
The victim is unsympathetic and underdeveloped. Her parents are more interesting, and the best part of the book is seeing the effect the loss of the girls has on the two of them (as in The Lovely Bones and The Memory Keeper’s Daughter). The author did do a good job evoking period details of the setting of the crime (Baltimore in 1975) and subsequent years and locations (especially Austin in 1983).
Thirty years before the Bethany girls aged eleven and fifteen had disappeared on the Easter weekend from the Mall. There had been few clues about what had happened to them, no ransom note, occasional false sightings, and then silence for thirty years. So if this woman was one of them, where had she been all that time? and what had happened to her sister?
Although the woman seems very familiar with the area and even the facts of the case, we are not sure whether this is information she has picked up from newspaper reports, or whether she really does know things that were never revealed in the papers. Kevin Infante, the detective assigned to the case, believes she is a fraud, but every now and again a niggling doubt creeps in. On the other hand Kay Sullivan, the social worker with whom "Jane Doe" stays while her circumstances are investigated, remembers the panic that gripped the city when the girls disappeared. Her lawyer believes she is one of the missing sisters.
We are all familiar with the scenario with the technique of cold case reviews where new eyes cast over the accumulated evidence draw new conclusions. That's not quite what happens in WHAT THE DEAD KNOW. The present day investigating team are not dealing with all the facts. Some details were deliberately removed from the case files by the former investigating detective. So the current team do not hold all the cards they need. But we learn also that the investigating team of thirty years ago did not have all the information either.
I don't think I've ever changed my mind so often. The plot is cleverly woven, but when all is finally revealed, it is hard to understand why you didn't see the answer right from the very beginning.
Laura Lippman patiently spins the story, doling out pieces a little at a time. Reading it was a bit like working a jigsaw puzzle -- you keep finding and connecting pieces that match, until eventually they all join in a complete picture. I had plenty of time to think about what might have happened leading up to the disappearance of the Bethany sisters, and to wonder why the victim of a crime might remain silent for so many years. The story was compelling. For me, the primary drawback was the amount of bad language. The speakers (primarily policemen) seemed to know and use variations of only one word. I think that even readers who aren't bothered by bad language per se might find the vocabulary excessively repetitive.
In her latest novel, Laura Lippman uses flashbacks and multiple points of view to untangle the mystery of the missing girls. Her character development is excellent. Along with Miriam (the girls’ mother) and the young woman who calls herself Heather, Lippman engages the reader with a playboy cop named Kevin Infante (who is the lead detective in the case), a flashy lawyer named Gloria, Chet Willoughby (the retired detective still haunted by the case), and an book obsessed social worker named Kay. But it is the mystery itself which drives the story, and the plot weaves and twists and keeps the reader unbalanced. Lippman knows her way through a police investigation, and she knows how to turn up the heat on a cold case. What The Dead Know keeps the reader guessing until the end.
What The Dead Know is as much an exploration of the psyche of its characters as it is an unraveling of a mystery. Lippman reaches into the minds and motivations of every character and in doing so engages the reader in a psychological study of human behavior under extreme situations. This novel reminds me of Patricia Cornwell’s early work – sharply imagined, expertly written, and gripping. This is the first book I’ve read by Lippman, but I have added her to my must-read authors list. If you are looking for a superb mystery, look no further than What The Dead Know.
Highly recommended.
Now, thirty years later an adult woman involved in a car accident claims to be one of the Bethany sisters who were abducted.
373 long, slow, arduous pages later we discover if the
The characters are well developed, the story is intriguing and the book held my interest enough to finish. But, the writing was labored.
I simply don't like the hide the pea under the shell flip flop of switching characters and stories wherein the reader never really knows if the author is challenging, or trying to fool.
The plot unfolds in a non-linear manner that many will find distracting, relying extensively on flashbacks and multiple point-of-view characters. The strength of this narrative structure is that is allows the reader to experience the tragic events from different perspectives and come to know all of the important characters on a very personal level. The weakness of this approach is that the novel lacks a real center or protagonist, forcing the reader to reorient at the start of each chapter to figure out who happens to be narrating.
This was my first Laura Lippman novel but likely will not be my last. The strength of her characterization, skill at building and maintaining suspense, and willingness to stray from the linear format of the usual police procedural impressed me, notwithstanding the noted shortcomings.
I was drawn to this novel by being a Baltimorean by upbringing and knowing that the author both lives in and writes about Baltimore. I had been hoping for fun entertainment, but the story became tedious after a while. I didn’t feel particularly attracted to any of the characters. I also was disappointed that the end of the story seemed like a rush job to simply relay the details of what happened. That part of the story was what was interesting to me and should have been developed a bit more. As a result of this novel, I don’t think I’ll be seeking out any more books by this author any time soon.
The woman who now claims to be
Two things kept me from rating this otherwise imaginative and well-written book higher. The machination that Lippman employs to avoid having the identity secret solved too soon seems unlikely in the extreme, and the ultimate reveal that seemed fairly obvious to me as a reader (which is fine) seemed to never occur to the professional investigators (not so fine). I get that Lippman wanted to maintain the element of shocking surprise as long as possible, but it just made her otherwise savvy characters seem stupid.
This is the first book I've read by Lippman, and I found it rewarding enough to want to read more. I'm a little embarrassed to admit that for a long time I had conflated [[Laura Lippman]] and [[Elinor Lipman]] into the same person, which would confuse me whenever I saw Laura Lippman referenced as a writer of mysteries or suspense novels since the books by Elinor Lippman that I have read could not at all be described that way. I like them both, but they are quite different writers. The more you know ...
Although the story had a fair level of entertainment value, my biggest issues with the story is how it was told—in a manner that would drag this out to novel length even though the amount of material is pretty thin and the story could have easily been told in half the length without missing a beat—and believability. Without going into spoilers, the story’s protagonist behaved in a manner that just didn’t make sense. The result is a novel that felt very convoluted and not something that resembles reality. From the woman’s claim of identity to how her life unfolded, I just wasn’t buying into any of it. The end result was an okay novel that still felt a bit dissatisfying. It could have been written and presented better.
Carl Alves - author of Conjesero
After
Personally, I did not enjoy reading this book. In fact, I found that it was quite a chore, trudging through the storyline. I found the characters to be completely without depth and self-absorbed, making it extremely difficult to get to know and like them. It was curiosity rather than empathy that made me even finish the book. I really wanted it to be good - the subject was interesting - but in the end, it didn't hold my attention. I can't really recommend it to anyone.
Nicely told with just enough flashback to give us the time and place before the crime. Mom and dad are more than just parents. The girls are sisters, but as different as strangers. Lippman tantalizes us with details that satisfy our prurience, but doesn’t allow it to spill over into repugnance. She gives us various voices, perspectives and points in time (the detail of the purse was especially effective since I think I had one just like it). Is this grown woman really the missing child from decades earlier? Does her personality match up or is she too damaged by her ordeal? The case has been open for so long it’s on its 3rd or 4th lead investigator. The latest has no emotional ties to things and eyes everyone in the light of suspicion instead of going for the easy clear. He thinks he’ll have ultimate proof when he locates the mother; DNA has come a long way in the last 30 years. The fact that the Behtany girls are adopted takes the wheels off the bus though and other proof has to come to the fore.