Slaughter-House Five

by Kurt Vonnegut

Paperback, 1984

Call number




Dell (1984), Edition: First Paperback Printing


Billy Pilgrim returns home from the Second World War only to be kidnapped by aliens from the planet Tralfamadore, who teach him that time is an eternal present.

User reviews

LibraryThing member edgeworth
Listen: Billy Pilgrim has become unstuck in time.

He's in World War II in the snow, frightened and alone and behind enemy lines. He's a child in the chlorine stink of the pool at the YMCA. He's an ageing optometrist, staring out the window of his office at a suburban shopping mall carpark. He flails back and forth from birth to death, waking up in different stages of his life, and he has no idea why.

Vonnegut based this book on his own experiences as a prisoner of war in Germany. He was one of only a very small handful of people who survived the firebombing of Dresden, one of the greatest war crimes in history. While Billy may be exploring space and time, the book revolves around his days in the war - which, as with any veteran, are simultaneously the best and worst times of his life, the saddest and the most exciting, the most interesting and the most horrific. The rest of his life is one long, mundane slide into tedium.

This is an anti-war book. As Vonnegut points out, it's similar to an anti-glacier book. But it doesn't matter if it's utterly useless. It has to be written.

There is no glory or glamour in war, despite the fantasies of Billy's comrades. It is messy and brutal and violent and stupid. The Germans are not evil - they bid goodnight to their prisoners, hunt them down with a tracking dog named Princess, and are bemused by how vicious and cruel some of the Americans are to each other.

Vonnegut has a simple style of writing, but every word has a melancholy depth to it. It's a sadder book than the Sirens of Titan, but still filled with that fundamental moral statement on the human condition: not sad, not happy, not hopeful or pessimistic or disapproving, but just accepting. We are what we are, and we can't change it. So it goes.
… (more)
LibraryThing member poplin
When I was in high school, I read several of Kurt Vonnegut’s books, yet somehow managed to avoid this, his most famous novel. Unfortunately, although I began reading with great eagerness, disappointment was soon to follow.

Slaughterhouse-Five tells the story of Billy Pilgrim, a man who has become “unstuck in time.” In non-linear fashion, we are presented with the events of Billy’s life as he experiences them, most notably his service in World War II and the firebombing of Dresden.

As entertaining as Slaughterhouse-Five is, and as much as Vonnegut is a master of dark comedy, I was left with a sense of deep frustration, a desire for something more. Vonnegut’s points about the absurdity of war and the illusion of free well inspired little emotional or intellectual response in me.

Of course, I am unable to judge Slaughterhouse-Five as it would have appeared to a 1969 reader; through modern eyes, where the absurdity and inevitability of war have become constant themes, the anti-war aspects of this book—though eloquent—fell flat. Numerous variations on the solider-who-was-executed-for-stealing-a-teapot have appeared in books and movies worth less than Slaughterhouse-Five, but the pervasiveness of this image has deprived it of its beautiful insanity.

Admittedly, my disinterest in this theme is partially my own bias; I am more interested in the personal than the political. But even Slaughterhouse-Five’s reflections on the illusion of free will struck me as insignificant. Whether we are able to make free choices or simply have the illusion of making them, the effects are no less real. The potentially interesting question that the discussion of free will raises—namely, how can a person who lacks free will find meaning and a sense of identity?—was pushed to the background.

And so, while infinitely clever and entertaining, Slaughterhouse-Five disappointed me. I believe that a great book must be equal parts entertaining and enlightening, and—perhaps as a result of my own preferences and biases—I failed to find much enlightenment here. So it goes.
… (more)
LibraryThing member SamuelW
When your English teacher hands you a classic novel about the Second World War, the last thing you expect is a science fiction adventure involving time travel and a philosophical basis in determinism. This, however, is precisely what Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five is – a quirky, enjoyable and decidedly unexpected perspective on a very solemn subject. Even readers with little enough interest in history should find this book quite easy to enjoy – it is characterised not so much by its historical basis, but by its amusing and incisive comments about human behaviour. Its style is concise, witty and fluid, making it very easy to read. (It's good to see that not all classics have to be uphill slogs!)

To me, Slaughterhouse-Five is an example of everything science fiction should be. It presents an original and absorbing premise. It challenges the way we think about life. It pushes the philosophical boundaries of what we consider possible. It asks questions with answers too complex to comprehend. Through its exploration of the strange and unknown, it holds the mirror up to humanity, and makes us notice the things we take for granted. And perhaps most importantly, it does it all with skill, wit and creativity. Its attitude seems to resemble Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series, but with a little more meaning and a little less absurdity.

Although Slaughterhouse-Five may read with a veneer of light humour and contentment, however, the core message that Vonnegut presents is a bleak and passive one which I found quite unsatisfying. To his credit, he manages to portray it in a convincingly positive light, but when I stepped back and analysed it dispassionately, I began to dislike it for its fatalism. It might not alter the quality of the novel, but it may well compromise the enjoyment that some readers are able to extract from it.

Slaughterhouse-Five is the kind of novel that you can read in a few days, and then think about for a few months. Apart from younger readers, who may be put off by the sexual references, I would recommend this book to just about anyone. At only 157 pages, why not give it a go? The experience will be well worth your short while.
… (more)
LibraryThing member SamSattler
I first read Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five as a very young man. At the time, I was an avid fan of science fiction, especially those books featuring time travel, and that is what drew me to Slaughterhouse-Five. As a science fiction novel, I thought it was pretty good, especially considering the amount of random time travel its main character, Billy Pilgrim, experiences in this relatively short novel. The problem with my early assessment of Slaughterhouse-Five, however, is that this is not simply a science fiction novel – and it should not be judged by the standards of that genre. Even worse, I managed to ignore the novel’s message.

Vonnegut’s deceptively simple masterpiece is about life itself; it is about the futility and utter waste of warfare; it is about time, and the way that we perceive it; it is about fate and whether any of us really has any control over what happens to us next. Poor Billy Pilgrim certainly had little to say about the course of his own life. Swept up into World War II, where he is captured by the Germans almost as soon as he arrives, Billy will be held prisoner in Dresden’s Slaughterhouse-Five, from where he will survive the Allied firebombing that destroys the entire city. He will be abducted by a crew of aliens from the planet Tralfamador and displayed in a zoo there along with the former porn star chosen as his mate. He will become a successful optometrist, popular and respected in his community. The only problem is that it all happens at the same time.

Billy Pilgrim has become “unstuck in time” and he never knows, from one instant to the next, when he will flash forward or backward to a different part of his lifetime. It is all real, and it is always happening – all of it at the same time.

Slaughterhouse-Five is generally considered to be a classic anti-war novel. Even with that reputation, its message is subtle enough that it is possible to get so caught up in the rest of the story and its mechanics that the novel’s serious theme is only recognized some time after turning its final page. This book is funny, even to the point of being absurd, but it is a serious piece of writing by an author with something serious to say about the foolishness of killing “enemies” by the thousands/millions at the behest of politicians who have failed at their own jobs.

The effectiveness of Slaughterhouse-Five is compounded by the ease with which it can be read; Vonnegut has disguised a complex novel, one filled with thoughtful points, as some kind of comedic science fiction piece. And, he makes it all look so easy.

Rated at: 5.0
… (more)
LibraryThing member ferebend
It was short enough to read during a few bathroom breaks and in bed before sleeping. It was interesting enough to make me want to get through to the end rather quickly. Unfortunately, I didn't particularly love it.

Nice concept - although, nothing I haven't seen before - but there were a lot of plot elements that just seemed spliced in and unnecessary. Like Montana Wildhack, Kilgore Trout, the whole Tralfamadore affair and the meta-story with the narrator and his old war buddy. If you remove all of that stuff, there's still a very interesting, viable, short story to be told about the horrors of war as seen by a time-travelling average joe.

Can I recommend this one? I'm not sure. It's extremely short, so why not?
… (more)
LibraryThing member RidgewayGirl
Sometime in my early teens, I tried to read Catch-22 and gave up partway through. Somehow, I've had the idea that Slaughterhouse Five was even odder and more difficult to understand, leading me to ignore it until now. Slaughterhouse Five is an odd book, to be sure, but also entirely readable and one that brings the horrors of war in general, and of the bombing of Dresden specifically, to life in an oblique, almost humorous way.

The protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, endures much in his life, from being a prisoner of war to being abducted by aliens, he experiences his life in a non-linear fashion, switching back and forth between the different events in his life, but always he's taken back to those dying days of the war. It's an unusual structure and one that works in a way a more straight forward accounting would not.

There's a lot to think about regarding this book, from the nature of war, to the nature of time to how Billy's personality and life experiences were shaped by the war. Also, Kurt Vonnegut makes a funny comment about Norman Mailer.
… (more)
LibraryThing member ramesses
Slaughter House Five by Kurt Vonnegut was the type of book that gets you thinking. So far I have enjoyed books like this because they leave a lot to think about even after reading. It has entered my list of favorite books, it was a great read. The title threw me off a little bit; I thought the book was going to have more action. However the first chapter was more like a preface for the rest of the book. At first it was kind of hard to get into this book. It was like reading a book about someone trying to write a book so it was the most enthralling, however once it focused more on the actual story the action picked up.
This book starts out slow and then goes one million miles an hour. The protagonist of the book is named Billy Pilgrim. We are shown a quick overview of his life up until an interview he has on a radio station in 1968 about his abduction by aliens in 1967. This really threw me off when reading because I did not believe this to be part of this book. From what I had heard about this book I thought it was going for a less sporadic storyline however this kept the book fresh and interesting. I love the way the information was given in small little tidbits and you get to piece it all together like a puzzle. This could be confusing for some and in fact I reread more than a few parts to fully understand what was going on, however for me this did not take away from the story. The character development is interesting because you see Billy in different time periods of his life. I love how Kurt Vonnegut did this; he slowly showed us Billy’s traits in a very unique and interesting way.

Slaughter House Five is for people who like reading books that make you think. Kurt Vonnegut’s anti-war message is subtly woven into the novel and it appears throughout the story. I do not recommend this to those who like a more linear story line because this book focuses on skipping around to different time periods in his life making it hard to understand at times. Vonnegut did a wonderful of combining his ideas and then projecting them through the eyes of Billy Pilgrim which is something a great author and can do without making it seem obvious. Although I have never read any of his other books, if the others are as well constructed as this novel then they would be great reads. I can honestly say this is one of my favorite books, and this surprised me because usually I do not become enthralled with this style of book.
… (more)
LibraryThing member fothpaul
This was a cracking book. Both bizarre, funny and moving, all at once.

I felt the first and last chapter were extremely useful in placing this book as a mixture of mad cap fiction and the authors own experience of war. The most moving moments of the story came when the auhtor broke from the narrative to inform the reader that 'I was there'. This really brought things home and helped me to realise the purpose of this book.

To me it seems to be both a book about the nature of warfare and it's combatants, and also a cathartic exercise for the author, a way to release his stories of WW2 via a vessel. The vessel being BIlly Pilgrim, the hero of this tale.

This book made me think a lot, which is something I appreciate when books make me do this. I think that the humour and the zany events of the book worked extremely well alongside the more sobering elements, and that altogether it was an excellent read. I really wasn't expecting it to move me and captivate me as much as it did.
… (more)
LibraryThing member jacketscoversread
Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. tells the story of a man named Billy Pilgrim who time-travels frequently. During the Second World War he was captured and sent to Dresden to work in a malt syrup factory before the city was bombed.

“There was a big number over the door of the building. The number was five. Before the Americans could go inside, their only English-speaking guard told them to memorize their simple address, in case they got lost in the big city. There address was this: “Schlachthof-fünf.” Schlachtof meant slaughterhouse. Fünf was good old five.” (pg 194-195)

After the war, he studied optometry, married the daughter of a rich optometrist, whom with he had a daughter, Barbara, and a son, Robert, with, became rich himself, and, later, has a nervous breakdown. A plane crash that kills everyone except him and the co-pilot. Rushing to the hospital in frantic worry, his wife, Valencia, dies in a car accident. Some where along the way, he gets to meet his favorite author, an unsuccessful sci-fi writer named Kilgore Trout. He is abducted by aliens called Tralfamadorians, who put him in a zoo on their home planet, Tralfamadore, with a young porn actress, Montana Wildhack, whom they also abducted. The summary alone brings on a sense of randomness and the novel never loses this overall frustration.

The narration jumps around as frequently as Billy does and I found myself learning everything I needed to know early on and then simply revisiting it all as the book came to a close. Worse than watching television during commercial break, especially the Head On commercial , the fractured narrative gives you a headache. It’s extremely boring, hollow, and unsatisfying.
The broken structure and time traveling element must have been quite original back in 1969, when Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five, but after reading The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger, I can’t help but think that Slaughterhouse-Five left nothing to be desired or excited about. I’m not a huge science-fiction fan but I enjoyed Niffenegger’s portryal of time traveling more than that of Vonnegut. The novel is less about time travel than it really is about reliving the past, present and future of your life, all at once, because it’s Billy’s consciousness that does the traveling. What isn’t clear, at all, is which is the real Billy? Is the real Billy the one in the zoo on Tralfamadore? Or did Billy really die at Dresden? Or did Billy die as he said he “will die, have died, and always will die on February thirteenth, 1967”? (pg. 180)
The time traveling aspect predates the abduction by the Tralfamadorians but the aliens see into the past, present and future simultaneously, and teach Billy to“simply shrug and say what the Tralfamadorians say about dead people, which is ‘So it goes.’”

According to Wikipedia, Vonnegut’s seemingly endless repetition of the phrase ‘so it goes.’ stands at a staggering 106 times. It felt more like it numbered in the thousands to me. About twenty pages into the book, I was so fed up with the words ’so it goes’ and the dismissal of important facts with this phrase, I felt like the only rightful place for this book was the fireplace.

By the way, I can’t help but wonder why Vonnegut’s editor didn’t do something about the monotonous quality of Vonnegut’s prose. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying all authors should cram as many words into a sentence as possible. Yet, Vonnegut’s prose is sparse and simplistic making it tedious and droning, to the point where frequently I wished for a few longer sentences here and there, or for an actual in-depth description of something that was happening. Anything at all would have been fine by me.

I hardly ever got one.

The only part I truly enjoyed was the part about Billy’s time in the zoo on Tralfamadore. And if you ask me, Vonnegut’s novel would have been a lot better if he had focused on that part of Billy’s life or even the one hundred American prisoners of war being welcomed by the British POWs in the German prison camp . I did, in fact, love the excerpts from the work on American soldiers and prisoners-of-war by the American-turned-Nazi, Howard W. Campbell Jr.

All in all, parts of the small, short book could easily have been skipped and you never would have known the difference. In short, Slaughterhouse-Five is impractical, incoherent, tries too hard, and, at the end of the day, utterly useless to my generation. Vonnegut bangs you on the head with his message. The experience doesn’t inspire me to read more of Vonnegut’s work, which means Breakfast of Champions and Cat’s Cradle will be going back to Barnes & Noble this afternoon.

I guess he’s a love or hate kind of story-teller
… (more)
LibraryThing member agnesmack
In honor of Banned Books week, I read Slaughterhouse-Five for the third time. I was in high school the first time I read it, and I really didn't care for it. I found it confusing and much of the anti-war message was lost on me.

I read it a second time about 6 years ago, and while I did enjoy it more then, it's clear after my third reading that I enjoy it more and more every time. I've read probably around a dozen of Vonnegut's books by now and there is just something so unique about his writing. I don't know how to describe it, but I do know that if I picked up one of his books and started reading it, I would immediately know it was his. His voice is just that dynamic.

You all know that I adore Philip Roth and that I do believe him to be the best living American author. However, one complaint I've always had is that he doesn't do soundbites well. Meaning, there aren't sentences he's written that can be taken out of the context in which they're written and still be impactful. On the other hand, Vonnegut has a way of writing completely gut-punch sentences that just make you nod your head and wish you could drink some whiskey with the guy.

“I have this disease late at night sometimes, involving alcohol and the telephone.”

In summation, I love this book and look forward to taking even more from it the next time I read it.
… (more)
LibraryThing member jeniwren
This is a bizarre story of time travel featuring Billy Pilgrim a German American who serves in the Second world war and is abducted by aliens. This is in part autobiographical as Vonnegut a POW witnessed the fire bombing of Dresden and many of the descriptions are directly from his experiences. I enjoyed the book and parts are very funny if not weird when it shifts to his abduction to Planet Tralfamadore but highlights the effects that war experiences have on memory and a persons state of mind. It works on several levels with great writing and interesting subject matter. This was my introduction to Vonnegut and I will be interested to read more of his work. (Recommendations anyone ??)… (more)
LibraryThing member gillis.sarah
This is such a great book. It's very much a Vonnegut book, though, so if you don't like his writing or his subject matter, you probably won't like this book. It's an awesome anti-war book, with a protagonist named Billy Pilgrim who becomes 'unstuck in time', switching back and forth from his time in the U.S. Army during World War II, when he was present at the firebombing of Dresden, to his present life, to a time he spent on exhibit in a zoo on the planet Tralfalmadore with the adult movie star Montana Wildhack.… (more)
LibraryThing member Max-Tyrone
Jacob's Ladder with jokes.

For the most part, I enjoyed reading this novel. I enjoyed its humor, its readability, the stances that it takes. It said to me, "Horrific acts, like war, are futile. They matter when you're there; but as a person in the future, you have to ultimately realize its pointlessness and laugh at it."

Some will dismiss it for its impracticality, because fiction exists on multiple levels. Others will have a hard time following the plot or Pilgrim through the time travelling. I say that Vonnegut does a wonderful job transitioning between moments; one just has to be willing to pay attention (since the transitions are pretty obvious) and understand that the novel is a trip, a ride.

Although I do find this novel fascinating, something prevented me from loving it. I really don't know what it is. It has a lot of qualities I find attractive in a person, but I felt that there's something lacking. Either way, this read was worthwhile.

Four-and-a-half poo-tee's out of five tweets.
… (more)
LibraryThing member arsmith
i get it. i totally get it. it's funny how having just a slightly altered perspective can change your life. people call this a anti-war book, and maybe that's what it was when it was published, but to me it's about life. living your life and being somewhere toward the end and being able to see all that you have done and how you have treated people and being able to be comfortable with that and to forgive. everything is connected. we all impact each other. we need to be nicer to each other.
to all those who have the courage to continuously "open the window and make love to the world."
… (more)
LibraryThing member Eric_J._Guignard
I really loved this book. I have friends who are rabid fans of Vonnegut, but the ideas and style he was said to write in just “turned me off,” and I never had much interest in trying him out. But I finally did, and am pleased at that. This is a satirical novel, written in a series of looping flashbacks, of the life of Billy Pilgrim, a man traumatized by WWII and life in general, who is abducted by space aliens, and learns that we live our lives over-and-over, and he transports to scenes of his past at seeming random. Vonnegut’s “voice” is rich, sarcastic, funny at times, and, more often, tragic. He explores many themes still relevant today, such as humanism, free will and choice, war, family, wealth, and fate. Nominated for several industry awards when written in 1970, and still powerful and fascinating today.… (more)
LibraryThing member christinegrabowski
You will either love this book or hate it. I actually hated it last month when I began. Listening to it on audio didn't help (it had nothing to do with Ethan Hawkes wonderful voice). I found I was completely lost. Of course stopping and starting and paying attention to traffic didn't help. But when I switched over to the printed edition, it started to make some sense. Just knowing that nearly every page was a separate scene was helpful and there was time travel in-between, going back and forth between multiple time periods of Billy Pilgrim's life. (It all ran together on audio so I was literally time traveling from one scene to the next without knowing there had been a scene break and a change in time. But still, the book seemed very weird. (And I read a lot of books.)

But then I went to book club. Three others were with me and didn't really care for it or understand it. But two people loved it. Somehow that propelled me to start over and reread the book and then re-listen to it. Believe me, I never re-read books. I don't have time. But there was something elusive about this book ,and I wanted to try again. And the second time through (and maybe third time as I was also listening to bits and pieces in the car), I got the message and understood the humor.

So end of story. It was a great read if you spend the time to actually focus. And perhaps read it twice after having a better understanding of each of the various periods in Billy's life.
… (more)
LibraryThing member godardd
This book promised to provide an actual account of the Dresden bombing in 1944 where 120,000 civillians lost their lives. The authour suggests the whole book is a memoir and spend many years trying to make it perfect. The result, however, was less about Dresden and more about the fleeting nature of life.
This book is probably best described as a cross between Catch-22 and Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. Very funny at parts, mostly at the expense of the main character. He's a pathetic chaplain's assistant in the army that the authour probably started using to epitomize the ridiculousness of their story together. As he goes on, I think the authour gains more respect for his hero and gives him honour with a life that makes sense, however irreverent and philisophical it becomes.
Very amusing book, very short too.
… (more)
LibraryThing member PilgrimJess
“The umpire had comical news. The congregation had been theoretically spotted from the air by a theoretical enemy. They were all theoretically dead now. The theoretical corpses laughed and ate a hearty noontime meal.”

I recently read and enjoyed Vonnegut's 'Breakfast of Champions' so decided to try this book nextand to be brutally frank it took me a few chapters to get into it despite being used to the author's somewhat madcap writing style. The fact that Billy Pilgrim jumped around through time from past, present and future almost randomly was disconcerting but the more Iread the more I enjoyed it.

This book was written in 1969, at the height of the Vietnam War and it anti-war protests, so naturally there is a strong anti-war message, that war is largely fought by innocents on innocents and that it is almost always civilians who pay the highest price. Vonnegut and his cration Billy Pilgrim were POWs in Dresden during its infamous WWII bombing and both survived but it is obvious that both were deeply affected by the experience. However, it was also interesting to note that more people were killed 'instantly' in Dresden (130,000) than in atomic bombing of Hiroshima (75,000) certainly suggesting that conventional weapons were as deadly as nuclear ones. The whole absurdity of war seems well summed up in the quote at the top of this review from the book.

The ending of this book may to some be a bit of a letdown but I believe that this was Vonnegut's deliberate intention and a very clever ploy once again underlining the anti-war message.

I loved the way that Vonnegut mixed sci-fi, time travel, war, humour seemingly seamlessly and how he switches from the first to third person before reverting back but overall did not enjoy this as much as I did 'Breakfast of Champions'. (Not enough pictures for one).It is still a very interesting read and well worth persevering with through the first few sticky chapters.
… (more)
LibraryThing member sturlington
It took me this long to read Vonnegut’s classic time travel novel – about Billy Pilgrim, who has become unstuck in time – and of course I now wonder why I wated. I was inspired to finally pick up this novel by the episode of Lost in which Desmond similarly becomes unstuck in time, but I was surprised to find that this novel is not only an exploration of time travel but also a potent anti-war novel and even a fair piece of Zen Buddhist musing. After all, if every moment in your life happens simultaneously and no moment can be changed, living in the moment and accepting all states of life – including death – becomes the only option.… (more)
LibraryThing member lesliee
Slaughterhouse-five or the children’s crusade by Kurt Vonnegut is a creative fiction story. I had troubles reading it because it is not in chronological order. Starts introducing a character which wants to write a book about his experience in war. He starts to write about this peculiar character named Billy Pilgrim which started to say that he was kidnapped by aliens, called Trafamaldorians. He talks about his experience with the trafamaldorians and how they were sorry for humans because they can see through time and humans cant. How death was just an event in time but in some other place the beloved person was alive. The story goes on with Billy Pilgrim traveling through time and talking about his experience in war and trafamaldorians etc.
The story basically is an allusion of how soldiers in war are like children, because they don’t know what to do, or how to react, they are scared and they have to learn how to survive. I like it, but I would like to understand the whole story. Is a book I will recommend, the reader must pay attention to the chronological order and the characters.
… (more)
LibraryThing member varwenea
In Slaughterhouse-Five, the author delivers an anti-war message in a semi-lighthearted manner, involving time travel, abduction by the alien race of Tralfamadorians and becoming its zoo-like exhibit. Kind of odd, right? I think so. Yet, strangely, I liked the writing style where the author sounds like a grandpa telling stories of the past, some preposterous, some heartfelt, jumps all over the place in time and location, and you don’t know how much of it is true. You’ll never know the whole story, either – cuz he just can’t remember. (Well, I didn’t grow up with a grandpa but that’s how I imagine it.) Yet somewhere deep in those stories, you know he is trying to tell you something important. In this case, wars are horrible events that are fought by children. Hence the full name of this book includes “the Children’s Crusade”.

Billy Pilgrim is revealed to us as a bumbling, ill-trained soldier that got his entire gun crew killed. So it goes. Along the way, his anything goes positive attitude keeps him going through the hard times and simply survive, even if it means wearing silver painted boots and azure Cinderella material as a cap to keep warm. The author, who was a POW in Dresden and witnessed the firebombing, also reveals himself to us via comments of “That was I. That was me. That was the author of this book.” – pooping his brains out...

I thought this book was less impactful than it could have been with aliens and time traveling, but I concluded it doesn’t matter. The facts speak for themselves where the author conveniently inserted statistics of the deaths of the Dresden Fire at 130K which is far greater than other better known bombings. The fact that the firebombing of a city not involved with war time industries remained unannounced to the public also adds gravity to war activities and death. So it goes. Despite his benefit of time traveling, knowing his future, being financially comfortable, and having sex with a hot young movie star (I’ll let you read that yourself), the impacts of war nonetheless are unpredictable and consuming. The non-affecting Billy, who didn’t cry during the war except for the sad condition of horses, finds himself weeping in the dark and needs a special bed to sleep. Will darkness ever leave us?

Some Quotes:

On Souvenirs – damn, do I do this??
“… She (Billy’s mom) did develop a terrific hankering for a crucifix, though. And she bought one from a Santa Fe gift shop during a trip the little family made out West during the Great Depression. Like so many Americans, she was trying to construct a life that made sense from thing she found in gift shops”.

On Old Age – Billy’s mom:
“She swallowed hard, shed some tears. Then she gathered energy from all over her ruined body, even from her toes and fingertips. At last she had accumulated enough to whisper this complete sentence: ‘How did I get so old?’”

On War – this is kind of sickening for me:
“The Germans and the dog were engaged in a military operation which had an amusingly self-explanatory name, a human enterprise which is seldom described in detail, whose name alone, when reported as news or history, gives many war enthusiasts a sort of post-coital satisfaction. It is, in the imagination of combat’s fans, the divinely listless loveplay that follows the orgasm of victory. It is called ‘mopping up’.”

On War, in a hopeful view where the last sentence has a child-like quality to it:
With Billy unstuck in time, he is watching a movie backwards – “When the bombers got back to their base, the steel cylinders were taken from the racks and shipped back to the United States of America, where factories were operating night and day, dismantling the cylinders, separating the dangerous contents into minerals. Touchingly, it was mainly women who did this work. The minerals were then shipped to specialists in remote areas. It was their business to put them into the ground, to hide them cleverly, so they would never hurt anybody ever again.”

On Religion – Slam! :
“The visitor from outer space made a serious study of Christianity, to learn, if he could, why Christians found it so easy to be cruel. He concluded that at least part of the trouble was slipshod storytelling in the New Testament. He supposed that the intent of the Gospels was to teach people, among other things, to be merciful, even the lowest of the low. But the Gospels actually taught this: Before you kill somebody, make absolutely sure he isn’t well connected. So it goes.”

On the Poor vs. the Rich:
“Their most destructive untruth is that it is very easy for any American to make money. They will not acknowledge how in fact hard money is to come by, and therefore, those who have no money blame and blame and blame themselves. This inward blame has been a treasure for the rich and powerful, who have had to do less for their poor, publicly and privately, than any other ruling class since, say, Napoleonic times.”
… (more)
LibraryThing member missjoni
One of those I always meant to read but never got around to, and upon finally doing so, berated myself for living 29 years without it.
LibraryThing member Dreesie
I had actually never read this book! My high school sophomore was supposed to read it for summer reading and he made it halfway through. He hated it. And honestly, I can see why he did, I think the format and writing style is more than he can really understand. And he hasn't yet learned to just keep reading and see what you find out later. He did read enough to ace the summer reading test.

This book is the out-of-order story of Billy Pilgrim, who is drafted into World War II, is taken prisoner by the Germans, survives Dresden, returns to optometry school, marries the daughter of an optometrist, has kids, is an optometrist, is kidnapped by aliens and placed in their zoo, and so on and so forth.

I actually rather enjoyed this--which surprised me a little. I know a lot of people who love it, but they are all men. But I did rather enjoy it, though mostly I felt bad for Billy Pilgrim and his fellow soldiers.

I loved the convoluted storyline, which is typical for me. I like trying to piece together a timeline of sorts. And I do think that if I read this again, I would get more out of it that I missed the first time due to the way it is told. But I am not going to be reading it again right now.
… (more)
LibraryThing member stang50logan
ummm. I think that I expected more out of this book. So it goes!
LibraryThing member SandraBrower
I have wanted to read this book since the first time i watched the movie Footloose!
It interested me that Ren would call it a classic and the 2 adults that were so ridges would say it is sinful. So, i decide to finally get the book from the library. I found it interesting... It took til the middle of the book to figuare out why in the world it was listed as a banned book!

This book could be so confusing at times what with the time warping! But it left questions- was our story teller insane? Did he have PTSD? Only you can decide!

I recommend reading it atleast once.
… (more)


Page: 0.4255 seconds