Call number
Collection
Genres
Publication
Description
Fiction. Mystery. HTML: Instant #1 New York Times Bestseller AARP The Magazine �?? Recommended Summer Reading CNN �?? A Most Anticipated Book of August Bustle �?? A Most Anticipated Book of August Chief Inspector Armand Gamache returns to Three Pines in #1 New York Times bestseller Louise Penny's latest spellbinding novel You're a coward. Time and again, as the New Year approaches, that charge is leveled against Armand Gamache. It starts innocently enough. While the residents of the Québec village of Three Pines take advantage of the deep snow to ski and toboggan, to drink hot chocolate in the bistro and share meals together, the Chief Inspector finds his holiday with his family interrupted by a simple request. He's asked to provide security for what promises to be a non-event. A visiting Professor of Statistics will be giving a lecture at the nearby university. While he is perplexed as to why the head of homicide for the Sûreté du Québec would be assigned this task, it sounds easy enough. That is until Gamache starts looking into Professor Abigail Robinson and discovers an agenda so repulsive he begs the university to cancel the lecture. They refuse, citing academic freedom, and accuse Gamache of censorship and intellectual cowardice. Before long, Professor Robinson's views start seeping into conversations. Spreading and infecting. So that truth and fact, reality and delusion are so confused it's near impossible to tell them apart. Discussions become debates, debates become arguments, which turn into fights. As sides are declared, a madness takes hold. Abigail Robinson promises that, if they follow her, ça va bien aller. All will be well. But not, Gamache and his team know, for everyone. When a murder is committed it falls to Armand Gamache, his second-in-command Jean-Guy Beauvoir, and their team to investigate the crime as well as this extraordinary popular delusion. And the madn… (more)
User reviews
When a scientist is booked to speak at a nearby college, at the last moment, right before the New Year, Inspector Gamache is assigned to protect the venue and the attendees. He is at a loss as to why he has been called up to do this,
The speaker is a scientist who uses statistics to ignite interest, positive and negative, on the subject of Euthanasia. Her lectures are increasingly followed by anger, demonstrations and violence. The novel takes you to the lecture as the statistician attempts to prove that there is a moral obligation to care for the well, over the needs of the disabled, sick and aged who are draining the system of finances and resources, she believes unfairly. She says there is simply not enough to go around. The morality and ethical sides of the argument are explored but without really reaching a conclusion.
Euthanasia has been a controversial subject for my entire lifetime, and I expect will continue to be for many more lifetimes. Mercy killing for animals has long been an accepted practice, but not for human beings. The fact that assisted suicide has become acceptable, when once thought heinous, is spurring the conversation along. As the book explores the value of life and death, it explores the idea of who is truly valuable and who can be discarded. Who deserves life, and who deserves death? The discussion of Euthanasia grows emotional and intense. The issue of abortion rears its head as well as mercy killing. As the moral obligation of caring for the disabled, sick and aged is explored, so are the ethical concerns about having enough services to go around.
During the lecture, there appears to be an attempt on the scientist’s life, followed by audience panic which Gamache quells. An investigation follows which results in an immediate arrest, but shortly after, there is another victim. The scientist’s assistant and best friend is murdered. Are the two incidents related? Inspector Gamache will find out. He is still the calm and very considerate “lawman” .
Louise Penny seems to have gotten a bit lost in the weeds here. As she tries to be politically correct, presenting the issues from all sides, for and against, it grows confusing and tedious. As the Secrets are uncovered, an abundance of misdirection leads the reader in circles trying to figure out if the murder victim was killed because of mistaken identity or intentionally. Why would anyone want to murder the assistant of the statistician who was advocating euthanasia? The scientist’s past yields secrets that uncover possible suspects until they are actively investigating several.….the school chancellor, the asshole saint, Abigail, the speaker, Ruth, the poet, Steven, The Sudanese heroine nominated for a Nobel Prize, and even Jean Guy Beauvois, the inspector’s son-in-law and the Inspector himself. Each appears to have a possible motive. Everyone appears to be a suspect since everyone appears to have some involvement. It gets a bit silly. There are just too many tangents.
As this is all taking place, Reine Marie is investigating the drawings of monkeys which leads to an explanation of the theory of one hundred monkeys. It is the idea that eventually a tipping point is reached which brings about a certain reaction. Somehow, it involves a rogue scientist, an actual Canadian researcher, who had tortured his patients in order to study them, rather than cure them. He seems to have connections to “Three Pines”. Many of the characters were also strange bedfellows. All of them had secrets.
The problem with this book is that it went too far as it tried to gently cover controversial and/or progressive issues, without taking an actual stand one way or another. Jean Guy has a child with Down’s Syndrome bringing up abortion. The school chancellor’s husband has Alzheimer’s bringing up mercy killing. The scientist had a disabled sister, again bringing up euthanasia. The rogue scientist developed America’s black ops methods that are considered torture by some. The Sudanese immigrant loves her country in spite of its flaws and doesn’t wish to stay. Immigration issues are brought to mind. Regardless of how the reader stands on any issue, the book will not provide satisfaction or a decision.
I wondered if Penny was setting up the forthcoming novel with the polarizing Hillary Clinton, that is being heavily promoted at this time because this book definitely veered from her other books that did not waste words or leave the reader wanting. Whatever it was that caused this book to be “overcooked” and overly political, even if presented subtly, it should be avoided in the future if she wants to maintain her readers. Adding the name of a celebrity that the author supports, doesn’t make for a good novel.
The voice of the narrator, Robert Bathurst, brings all of the characters to life. From book to book in the series, he remembers the tone and personality of each one, so much so, that any reader who follows the series will recognize them immediately when he speaks. With that said, this book was not one of my favorites because the plot had too many tangents and the book rambled on unnecessarily, often with redundancies.
And Donald Ewen Cameron (1901-1967) did indeed carry out experiments akin to torture on depressed and anxious patients who thought they were coming to him for help. More monsters among us...
The presentation of a visiting statistician at a local university seems an unlikely event needing the protection of the Sûreté, until Gamache learns about the speaker and her research. And another visitor is causing a stir in Three Pines as well. Nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, a 23-year-old woman who survived torture, escaped, and saved others in Sudan is not the heroic saint the admiring women of the village expected.
Of course, there's a murder (it wouldn't be Three Pines without one) and in her usual graceful style filled with red herrings and equally plausible suspects, Penny weaves seemingly disparate elements, some with historical basis, into a compelling tapestry. The intricate plot launches from the emotional roller coaster of the pandemic but evolves into an exploration of the power and threat of a horrific idea made reasonable by manipulating the fears of a vulnerable public. Even Gamache and his team must dig deep to ensure their secret fears do not interfere in finding the killer among them.
All of Penny's books have shades of light and dark and The Madness of Crowds is on the darker end. The humor of Three Pines' regulars is more subdued and the narrative touches on several sobering topics. While not my favorite of the series, Penny proves that her storytelling skills were only sharpened by months of shutdown.
As far as the mystery goes, this is one of her best, as far as I'm concerned, but much darker than normal. And timely. Ever since that time during the pandemic when the lieutenant governor of Texas was quoted as saying that the elderly people susceptible to COVID shouldn't be treated but just allowed to, well, die I've thought that's the scariest thing I've ever heard. Penny takes that idea one step further and sets Gamace in motion to try to protect the woman espousing this theory. And even though it goes against everything he stands for he's forced to carry out his job. Everyone gets involved, as usual, and Penny introduces a real life character whose history reveals he is one horrific Canadian. I didn't think there were any. I've only heard of really nice Canadians. Heh.
I loved that Penny embraced writing in a world where a pandemic is part of the conversation. I thought it might be exhausting to read that, but it was oddly cathartic and comforting to see the way we were all united in the shared experience.
With every book new we learn more about the lives of our beloved characters. The plot meandered a bit in the end, but I didn’t for one second wish the philosophical murder mystery had ended sooner. I read it as slowly as I could because I never get tired of Armand Gamache and his crew.
“The trick wasn’t necessarily having less fear it was having more courage.”
“ Louise Penny delivers with a perplexing murder mystery set in Three Pines that is also a nuanced look at conviction, delusion and the tipping point between
“ All shall be well. And all shall be well. And all manner of things shall be well.” A quote from one of Gamache’s favorite writers, the Christian mystic Julian of Norwich - who’d offered hope in a time of great suffering. But, unlike Julian of Norwich, Professor Robinson’s ‘brand’ had a dark core. When Robinson said “All will be well”, she did not, in fact, mean everything. Or everyone.
THE MADNESS OF CROWDS is a stunning introspection into one of society’s most controversial and urgent issues. The subject matter lends itself to the very deepest and often most uncomfortable and unsettling thoughts on ethics and morality.
The painting/picture at the beginning of the book is beautiful and captures the spirit of a Quebec winter.
A must read. *****
This
The lecture draws angry folk from across Canada and is disrupted by what appears to be an attempted assassination of the professor Robinson. This followed a day later by the murder of Robinson's friend and assistant, Deborah. So many suspects that Gamache and his team spends a lot of time analyzing suspects which made this book seem much longer than it had to be.
Written during the Covid Pandemic, the story takes place after the Pandemic is over but its repercussions still influence the characters. The least satisfying novel in the series for this reader.
I did not consider the take in this novel on our current world to be particularly left or right leaning, mostly just a (one of many possible) views on how we are or might respond to our changing normal. Yet it seems that some people I know who lean right were bothered by this book. Not sure why, other than what I already think of their tenuous relationship with reality.
I have not read all of the books in the series, but have read most, and by far this is my favorite. Admittedly I do enjoy novels that make me think beyond just the events in the story. I like to think about what I would do, what I think others would do, and what I think is "right" or "wrong" to do. Even children's picture books demand from the reader, though certainly much younger, some engagement beyond mindless word after word after word reading. It really doesn't hurt to engage the brain beyond the basic events in a novel.
Okay, I'm finished. Some of the asinine reviews I saw irked me so I got a bit off track. But if you like good detective stories that have the usual twists and turns you will find a lot to enjoy here. I think this could be read as a standalone if you aren't familiar with the series.
Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via Goodreads.
I enjoy this series because only half of the story is the mystery. The other half is the lives of people I am fond of. So, it's kind of a twofer.
Unable to prevent the lecture, Gamache does his duty, even throwing himself in the path of bullets aimed at Prof. Robinson. During the investigation of the uprising at the lecture, Armand and Jean Guy have issues. Figuring out the ensuing murder, motive and perpetrator is classic Gamache. However, the story seemed to swing back and forth between the mystery and the political angst of many of the regular characters. It didn't flow smoothly at all times. But it was still great to see and visit Three Pines again.
In every place those who did not survive Covid were overwhelmingly the elderly or less healthy. That premise leads a charismatic statistician to present a plan for the future. The plan is seen as either necessary or immoral and unethical. As a result the statistician is threatened and Chief Inspector Ganache and his team are brought in. Their investigation expands. As always I appreciate the process of the team working together to resolve a case.
But...that it fell short of my expectations, and wasn't as well written as her previous books. At times it felt disjointed, scattered and didn't flow naturally. Its possible that choosing the current and continuing pandemic as the background restricted her
But as always her messaging on humanity, kindness and love was right on target.
It will be interesting to see how other writers use the pandemic in their books.
This episode is set post-pandemic back in Three Pines. It’s so interesting to read about the world after when we’re still not out of the woods quite yet.
It’s also wonderful to be back in the Village with Clara, Myrna, Ruth and
Gamache is at home with his family and extended family when he gets a call to work security for a statistics professor scheduled to give a talk at a local college during the week between Christmas and New Years. The professor studies pandemic statistics and proposes an immoral solution for a path forward. “Professor Robinson was revealing, not creating the anger.” Her appearance brings trouble and eventually another murder to Three Pines.
Once again Gamache proves “It isn’t what you look at but what you see.” Gamache, Beauvoir and Lacoste connect past crimes and shames to reveal present truth.
The Madness of Crowds warmly celebrates community, holidays, family, the snow and the Canadian cold. Hot chocolate is a recurring theme.
It’s good to spend time in the company of friends again.
It's the week between Christmas and New Year's Eve. All
So the body doesn't show up until page 165 which is rather unusual in a mystery. But then, Louise Penny is a rather unusual mystery writer. Although she covers the investigation and the eventual zeroing in on the culprit there is so much more going on in this book. One of the subplots involves a Somali woman who is probably going to be the next Nobel Peace Prize winner. She is in Three Pines at the invitaion of Myrna Landers who had helped support her crusade for social justice in her country. Her experience of torture and rape while a young girl cause her to be doubtful about almost any other human being. Meanwhile, Inspector Gamache's wife, Reine-Marie, has turned her archival skills to combing through the papers of a recently deceased woman at the request of the woman's children. She finds that the woman seemed obsessed with monkeys, drawing them on unconnected pieces of paper throughout her life. As Reine-Marie discovers this woman was one of the victims of Dr. Ewan Cameron at the McGill University's infamous Allan Memorial Institute. Dr. Cameron carried out experiments on people suffering from mental health problems such as post-partum depression using sleep deprivation, shock treatment, and drugs such as LSD at the request of the CIA. Since writers don't usually throw in unrelated people and events it doesn't take a genius to figure out that torture will figure in the motive for the murder. But it does take a dedicated team of detectives to find the murderer so keep reading to follow all the twists and turns.
Her craft pulls the novel through but it could definitely
Nonetheless, I enjoyed it and read it in a few days, engrossed by the plot and the well defined characters.