Genres
Publication
Description
Business. Management. Nonfiction. Economics. HTML:The New York Times bestseller that gives readers a paradigm-shattering new way to think about motivation from the author of When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing Most people believe that the best way to motivate is with rewards like money�??the carrot-and-stick approach. That's a mistake, says Daniel H. Pink (author of To Sell Is Human: The Surprising Truth About Motivating Others). In this provocative and persuasive new book, he asserts that the secret to high performance and satisfaction-at work, at school, and at home�??is the deeply human need to direct our own lives, to learn and create new things, and to do better by ourselves and our world. Drawing on four decades of scientific research on human motivation, Pink exposes the mismatch between what science knows and what business does�??and how that affects every aspect of life. He examines the three elements of true motivation�??autonomy, mastery, and purpose-and offers smart and surprising techniques for putting these into action in a unique book that will change how we think and transform… (more)
Similar in this library
User reviews
Autonomy: People want to have control over their work.
Mastery: People want to get better at what they do.
Purpose: People
He outlines 3 additional powerful motivating principles that could be and should be considered by managers, namely; autonomy, mastery and purpose. Let's take autonomy as an example. Individuals, he believes, can be motivated by having more control over what they do, and he provides good examples of companies who have implemented certain practices that allowed the employees to go off and work on projects that they plan on their own, and how some of the most popular products today have emerged from these very projects.
He makes a good case for each one of these principles and substantiates his claim with a number of good case studies.
Whether you work in a company in a management capacity or not, this is an interesting book that will outline some points that could help you motivate yourself and others to improved performance. He provides some good tips on compensation and strategies for individuals and companies.
A bonus to this book is that he writes in a very entertaining fashion.
In our discussion, I took the position that teachers needed financial incentives instead of the static salary schedule model we have in place right now. My boss said that he thinks that internal/intrinsic motivation may be
Turns out that we're both right.
Before I explain, I'd like to say something about the author. When I was about halfway through the book, I had a few questions and observations. On the book jacket, the author encourages emails - so I emailed him. I got a thoughtful response THE NEXT DAY. Not bad!
There's a lot to say about this book and I'm just going to make a few quick points. For those of you who, like me, just want a quick "Should I read this and why?" here it is: If you are interested in understanding motivation, in learning better management techniques, and getting more personal satisfaction out of your work (and ultimately your life), read this book. It will only take you 3-5 days.
Now on to my observations...
As far as my being "right" about better teacher financial incentives, Mr. Pink doesn't say that offering bonuses, raises, or other financial rewards for performance will increase motivation. What he says is that people in ALL fields need to have a baseline of fair compensation to START with. Without that baseline, he argues, there is going to be dissatisfaction. My friends and colleagues who are teachers understand this. If you were to ask them if they honestly felt that hard-working,dedicated teachers are fairly compensated, the answer would be a passionate "No!" And over time, I would argue, that is why burn-out, mediocrity, and bitterness kick in. It's why so many leave after 5 years or so.
As far as the internal motivation angle goes, Mr. Pink argues (and demonstrated with examples) that giving autonomy and respect to employees (or students!) along with clear goals and expectations is what gets people excited about their vocations.
There were a few examples that really intrigued me - companies where supervisor's said "We need you to do X. We don't care if you come in to work all day, every day, some days, once a week, once a month...whatever. As long as you accomplish X, we don't care how you do it." There were other examples where companies gave employees time to pursue ideas that weren't related to their normal tasks independently or with colleagues. Oftentimes this lead to breakthroughs and innovation.
Now how I could use this as an educator is still buzzing around in my head - but I've definitely got a few ideas this book inspired me to try.
My name is David Marquet, from Practicum, Inc and we help our customers structure their organizations to maximize the potential of their people. We call this leadership. When we talk with our clients one of the things we ask them is “do you need
Pink’s book is very helpful because it clearly illuminates and explains what we’ve observed – that external motivation ends up feeling like manipulation and that people will do better in a structure that allows them to find their own intrinsic sources of motivation.
What are the characteristics of those structures? Pink tells us they are structures that enable individual autonomy, mastery, and purpose. In our practice, we had been emphasizing control, competence, and connection as being important. While control parallels autonomy and mastery parallels autonomy, purpose is an element we had not singled out.
We think Pink is right, though. Connecting your activity to a higher purpose does give people a reason beyond the immediate that seems necessary to sustain enduring loyalty to the mission. This was particularly true aboard submarines, where crews that understood how their tasks, however difficult, supported a greater goal (defending the Constitution, for example), performed better.
Drive is a quick read and we recommend it.
Science has
The first part of the book discusses the carrot and stick analogy and how we typically use it. He shows its shortcomings with plenty of examples that we are well familiar with. He divides tasks into two categories, then shows how traditional motivational techniques affect people in each. Then describes how an updated technique can improve the outcomes.
The book continues to develop the new motivational techniques into different circumstances, discusses how to motivate people in a work environment, motivate children, and self motivation.
The book ends with plenty of suggestions for further reading, websites, suggested schools, exercises, step-by-step improvement suggestions, and more.
Although much of the information was not new to me, I found it stimulating, thought provoking, and encouraging me to study more.
In a nutshell, the central point of the book is: there are three types of drive: basic urges, respose to incentives/disincentives, and intrinsic motivation. The latter is the type of motivation which would really improve our lives and the lives of those around us, as well as the efficiency of the organisations which employ us, and this is what should really be at the centre of all incentives schemes. Indeed, in most cases carrot and stick approaches won't work and actually produce the opposite effects, as once you get used to a reward, you'll put less effort if no reward is forthcoming.
In fairness to the author, I did find the book informative on various levels, and did point me to a number of (hopefully better :-) ) books that I now consider reading; what irked me was the almost complete lack of critical assessment of the various theories that are put forward as those we should be paying attention to. For instance, there is no counterpoint to the theories presented in terms of criticism which must exist in academia (or if it does not, it would be good to know); for the experiments that are presented in support of the theories, there is no mention of alternative explanations (and if they do not exist, then again it would be good to know). The evindence goes all in one direction, which cannot be right.
I also find the book quite patronising in tone, as the reader is expected to have the attention span of a goldfish, with all concepts broken down into easily manageable chunks. Shoujld this bee too much for the overburdened reader, don't worry as there is a chapter by chapter summary: which may be helpful for a textbook, say, but really Mr. Pink I think you should give more credit to the cognitive abilities of your readers!
The target readership also seems pretty well defined, to the "aspirational" middle classes, or anyhow those who can take a break without worrying too much about vile money. Just to give an example, in the "tips and tricks" third part of the book the author recommends to take a year off for your personal development. He states [it] requires a fair bit of planning and saving. But doesn't forgoing that big screen TV seem a small price to pay for an unforgettable - and an un get-backable - year of personal exploration. The truth is, this idea is more realistic than many of us realize. Well, on my book that must be a hell of a tv...