Gay marriage : for better or for worse? : what we've learned from the evidence

by William N. Eskridge

Other authorsDarren R. Spedale
Paper Book, 2006

LCC

K699.E85 2007

Status

Available

Call number

K699.E85 2007

Publication

Oxford [England] ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2007, c2006.

Description

Opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States often claim that allowing gays and lesbians to marry will lead to the downfall of the institution of marriage and will harm children. Drawing from 16 years of data and experience with same-sex unions in Scandinavia, Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse? is the first book to present empirical evidence about the results of same-sex marriage (in the form of registered partnerships) from the Nordic countries. Spedale and Eskridge demonstrate that conservative defense-of-marriage arguments that predict negative effects from gay marriage are invalid, and the Scandinavian experience suggests that the institution of marriage may indeed benefit from the enactment of gay marriage. If we look at the proof from abroad, the authors argue, we must conclude that the sanctioning of gay marriage in the United States would neither undermine marriage as an institution, nor harm the wellbeing of our nation's children.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member jklugman
This is a very thoughtful and measured examination of the arguments against allowing gay marriage. It tests these arguments in the Scandinavian context (where gay partnerships have been legal since as early as 1989) and finds that predictions that gay marriage would thoroughly undermine the family
Show More
unit are incorrect--if anything, the trend towards lower marriage rates, higher divorce rates, and higher rates of non-marital births have slowed down (and in some cases reversed) in the Scandinavian countries since gay partnerships were allowed.

In the concluding chapter Eskridge and Spedale offer advice to the advocates and opponents of gay marriage. To the advocates, they advise focusing on influencing public opinion and states legislatures and not placing all their eggs in the judicial route. They also suggest that advocates should be prepared for a long wait until most states are ready to recognize gay relationships, even in a "civil-union" type format. To opponents, Eskridge and Spedale suggest that scapegoating gay people for the decline of the family will eventually backfire on them, and urge traditionalists to look at deeper sources for the decline of the family unit.
Show Less

Language

Physical description

ix, 336 p.; 24 inches

ISBN

0195326970 / 9780195326970
Page: 0.4027 seconds