Status
Available
Call number
Collection
Description
A novel based on the life of St. Paul.
User reviews
LibraryThing member Bruce_Deming
Interesting viewpoint on this ancient time and person. Interesting. Entertaining.
Whether or not definitive I don't know. Writing is good. Character lives in extremes.
Whether or not definitive I don't know. Writing is good. Character lives in extremes.
LibraryThing member kylekatz
This book, like most hagiographies, was extremely pro Paul. It shows him struggling, but he always ends up sacrificing everything for his vision of Christ, which came out to be the Church's accepted version. That the force of his personality is felt down through the centuries so strongly that it
Asch's story deals minutely with the struggle between the Jews and Christians to decide if Christ was the expected Messiah, and whether, in ministering to the gentiles, the law of Torah should be enforced upon them, or abrogated to some extent (and if abrogated, to what extent?).
Paul believed that the gentiles should be given the salvation of Christ just by faith and left uncircumsized and eating pork if they so chose.
Most of the book flowed like a novel should, but it had some longueurs, when Asch discoursed on the finer points of the Torah or you could tell he was just reiterated the letters of Saint Paul from the New Testament itself.
Nero burns Rome and sacrificies Christians in the arena and Seneca and Petronius are also portrayed here, as well as a good deal about Saint Peter. It definitely has its exciting moments. Many are martyred and St. Peter is famously nailed to the cross upsidedown.
Most interesting to me, while reading this 754 page tome, was wondering what happened to Asch to make him write the trilogy of Christian-themed books and alienate most of his Yiddish readers. Did he convert?
In the book they recommend that Jews accept Jesus and hold to the laws of the Torah as well. I think he must have been like that, but this is mere speculation, of course.
Show More
crushed all the "heresies" of his time is pretty amazing.Asch's story deals minutely with the struggle between the Jews and Christians to decide if Christ was the expected Messiah, and whether, in ministering to the gentiles, the law of Torah should be enforced upon them, or abrogated to some extent (and if abrogated, to what extent?).
Paul believed that the gentiles should be given the salvation of Christ just by faith and left uncircumsized and eating pork if they so chose.
Most of the book flowed like a novel should, but it had some longueurs, when Asch discoursed on the finer points of the Torah or you could tell he was just reiterated the letters of Saint Paul from the New Testament itself.
Nero burns Rome and sacrificies Christians in the arena and Seneca and Petronius are also portrayed here, as well as a good deal about Saint Peter. It definitely has its exciting moments. Many are martyred and St. Peter is famously nailed to the cross upsidedown.
Most interesting to me, while reading this 754 page tome, was wondering what happened to Asch to make him write the trilogy of Christian-themed books and alienate most of his Yiddish readers. Did he convert?
In the book they recommend that Jews accept Jesus and hold to the laws of the Torah as well. I think he must have been like that, but this is mere speculation, of course.
Show Less
LibraryThing member rocketjk
Sholem Asch was a Yiddish writer, a Polish Jew who wrote about shtetl life in Europe and became very well known, with his work being translated into many languages. He moved to America in his 30s and began writing about the Jewish immigrant experience here. Late in his career, however, he wrote
Once he is converted and begins preaching about the Messiah, Paul schlepps back and forth across the Middle East, founding congregations and converting Jew and Gentile alike to the new faith. Being Jewish myself, I never knew the details of Paul's life nor much about the turning point where Paul stopped preaching only to Jews that their Messiah had arrived and instead insisted on preaching to everyone, thus taking the new religion out of the realm of Judaism. (And that is, of course, to whatever extent this book is faithful to what is know of those events.) So that was interesting. Unfortunately about 95% of the storytelling is done in flat, expository prose. There's almost nothing to draw us into the narrative for its own sake.
Show More
three books in what became known as his "Founders of Christianity" series: The Nazarene, The Apostle, and Mary. This did not go over well in the Jewish community of the time (The Apostle was published in 1942), and he lost readership and his job. This despite that fact that Asch maintained that the novels were meant to bridge the gap between Jews and Christians by demonstrating in fiction that Christianity was in fact a deeply Jewish phenomenon at its core. As my old man would have said, however, "Lotsa luck." And so I was curious about The Apostle. It is the fictional story of early Christianity as seen through the eyes of Saul, who become the Apostle Paul.Once he is converted and begins preaching about the Messiah, Paul schlepps back and forth across the Middle East, founding congregations and converting Jew and Gentile alike to the new faith. Being Jewish myself, I never knew the details of Paul's life nor much about the turning point where Paul stopped preaching only to Jews that their Messiah had arrived and instead insisted on preaching to everyone, thus taking the new religion out of the realm of Judaism. (And that is, of course, to whatever extent this book is faithful to what is know of those events.) So that was interesting. Unfortunately about 95% of the storytelling is done in flat, expository prose. There's almost nothing to draw us into the narrative for its own sake.
Show Less
Subjects
Original publication date
1943