Status
Available
Call number
Genres
Collection
Publication
Penguin Books (1971), Mass Market Paperback, 265 pages
Description
Drama. Fiction. Humor (Fiction.) HTML: Fans of thought-provoking drama will relish George Bernard Shaw's classic take on gender roles and relations, Man and Superman. Packed with plenty of big ideas, this engaging work helped rank Bernard Shaw among the most significant and influential dramatists of his era..
User reviews
LibraryThing member Mromano
Man and Superman combines a dramatization of Neitsche's "ubermensch" or superman, that was believed to be the goal of creative evolution, with a romantic comedy. For that alone the play deserves five stars. That it does all of this and does it well is a remarkable achievement. The third act, Don
Show More
Juan in Hell, is often played by itself. A surreal episode in the play, it is in this act that we see the realization of the play's philosophy, with the other three acts framing it with romance. Characteristic of Shaw, we see in the other three acts the Shavian inversion, where he flips commonly held notions on their head: in this case, the tradition that it is the man who is the pursuer in love. Shaw shows that in sex, it is the man who is the hunted and it is the woman who is in control. Show Less
LibraryThing member blake.rosser
Very engaging for a long, dialogue-heavy play. Despite being sexist in his belief that women have nothing to offer outside of procreation, I generally love the ideas that Shaw puts forth, usually in Tanner's or Don Juan's words. He gives you frequent moments where you have to take a few seconds to
Ann: You hated to be treated as a boy any longer. Poor Jack!
Tanner: Yes, because to be treated as a boy was to be taken on the old footing. I had become a new person; and those who knew the old person laughed at me. The only man who behaved sensibly was my tailor: he took my measure anew every time he saw me, whilst all the rest went on with their old measurements and expected them to fit me.
Show More
think about the implications of a specific comment. And it's wonderful how Tanner turns societal convention and morality on its head by underlining the absurdity of his companions' reactions to various scandals. Probably my favorite line is quite an incidental comment but gives you an idea of Shaw's wit: Tanner: . . . A jealous sense of my new individuality arose in me -Ann: You hated to be treated as a boy any longer. Poor Jack!
Tanner: Yes, because to be treated as a boy was to be taken on the old footing. I had become a new person; and those who knew the old person laughed at me. The only man who behaved sensibly was my tailor: he took my measure anew every time he saw me, whilst all the rest went on with their old measurements and expected them to fit me.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Devil_llama
Shaw's tour de force, this is a work that combines realism with the supernatural to create a memorable piece of work. The section known as Don Juan in hell is justifiably renowned, and is a philosophical discussion that reminds me of Montesquieu and Machiavelli's Dialogue in Hell. The philosophy of
Show More
the work is pessimistic; while it still retains a flavor of the socialist ideals of the author, there is an undertone of disillusionment. The roles of the sexes are skewered, by the means of characters upholding them to the letter, showing them for how ridiculous they really are. The leisure class comes off poorly, and the institution of marriage is, as usual in works by Shaw, reduced down to a condition of bondage. An interesting read, probably much too long to stage in this day and age, and certainly the long speeches would make any modern director cringe. Well worth the extra effort for a reading. Show Less
LibraryThing member AliceAnna
If you remove the Don Juan in Hell sequence, this is actually an entertaining play, but GBS goes off on his tangents until you just want to slap him. Some very well-written, entertaining characters in an amusing situation.
LibraryThing member DanielSTJ
Man and Superman, the principle drama of this book, was the weakest part. I found that I did not enjoy Shaw's play-- which is off because I usually do garnish some sense of worth about it. Nevertheless, for me, it was a disappointing read. The other two documents in this text were interesting, but
Show More
not enough to bring up the book as a whole. Show Less
LibraryThing member jwhenderson
Man and Superman, which Shaw subtitled A Comedy and A Philosophy, demonstrates his belief in the conflict between man as spiritual creator and woman as guardian of the biological continuity of the human race. The play incorporates Shaw's concept of the “life force” and satirizes the
Show More
relationship between the sexes. As always his prose is a delight to read and reread. Show Less
LibraryThing member DinadansFriend
This work is a considerable production. the reader gets a preface, the play itself and a copy of "the Revolutionist's Handbook" written by a principal character in the play. But there is much matter to be mined, and the verbal fireworks are on full display. There is a simple plot or framing tale,
Show More
and an extensive dream sequence in the middle. It would be a great experience to see the play performed, but it is much cheaper to put on the central dream sequence as a stand alone performance. this is usually called "Don Juan in Hell", and stands up well. But performed or simply read, you will get a serious exploration of Shaw's theories on how western Life should be conducted....at least his 1903 conception of it. It will read more easily than you might expect. Show Less
Subjects
Language
Original language
English
Original publication date
1903 (printed)
1905-05-23 (performed)
Physical description
265 p.; 7.1 inches
ISBN
0140480080 / 9780140480085