Status
Available
Call number
Collection
Publication
Arrow (1979), Paperback, 192 pages
Description
In 2203 anyone can become the ruler of the solar system. There are no elections, no interviews, no prerequisites whatsoever -- it all comes down to the random turns of a giant wheel. But when a new Quizmaster takes over, the old one still keeps some rights, namely the right to hire an unending stream of assassins to attempt to kill the new leader. In the wake of the most recent change in leadership, employees of the former ruler scurry to find an assassin who can get past telepathic guards. But when one employee switches sides, troubling facts about the lottery system come to light, and it just might not be possible for anyone to win.
User reviews
LibraryThing member RandyStafford
My reactions on reading this novel in 1989 -- spoilers are definitely here.
Given all of Dick's own statements and complaints about the supposed bad quality of this novel, I was expecting a bad read. I was pleasantly surprised. Dick creates an intriguing society ruled by lottery, social Darwinism,
Even at this state of his career, Dick's ear for dialogue was good though his characterization was not quite as developed as it was to become but it's still good. The book's plot whizzes along enough to qualify for Dick's term of "potboiler". The characters are every bit as mercurial and illrational as ever in Dick's work, a trait that accounts for his very believeable characters. The book's big fault, though, is in the details of his society. There's really only about two pages of social exposition, and Dick leaves many questions unanswered: How do quizzes fit in to the order? Why is the chief official the Quizmaster? How are classifications changed? What is the relation between the classified and unclassified? Under what conditions does the bottle twitch and slect a new leader? How do the p-cards work? Dick leaves a lot unexplained.
I was intrigued by the idea of publically sanctioned assassination as an answer to tyranny and incompotence -- though I wouldn't want to live in such a society. I also liked Dick's use of Heisenberg's Uncertainity Principle in political and philosophical terms. The figure of Moore and his contradictary, scheming, pontifical nature reminded me of Joseph Goebbels. And Dick, with the Pellig machine, introduces, in a muted form, his concern with reality's nature and appearance in novel form.
Read enough Dick work and material about him and you begin to notice possible personally relevant things in his fiction. Here it is one remark by Ted Benteley, "And I hate fathers.". A possible clue to Dick's own feelings about his father and genesis of his distrust for authority figures. And even in this first published novel, the deceitful neurotic female (of course, there are plenty of neurotic males in Dick's works) -- as characterized by Eleanor Stevens -- makes an appearance. She is a pathetic, startling, always interesting. Her death is poignant.
Given all of Dick's own statements and complaints about the supposed bad quality of this novel, I was expecting a bad read. I was pleasantly surprised. Dick creates an intriguing society ruled by lottery, social Darwinism,
Show More
and the economics of conspicous consumption. Dick postulates economic depression eroding people's faith in natural law and a political system based entirely on chance emerging. People also become absurdly superstitious (the omens at the novel's beginning are very Roman-like as is the social feature of patronage mentioned in passing. The application of von Neumann's game theory to society was interesting. Dick's political order is randomness and survival of the fittest incarnate. Even at this state of his career, Dick's ear for dialogue was good though his characterization was not quite as developed as it was to become but it's still good. The book's plot whizzes along enough to qualify for Dick's term of "potboiler". The characters are every bit as mercurial and illrational as ever in Dick's work, a trait that accounts for his very believeable characters. The book's big fault, though, is in the details of his society. There's really only about two pages of social exposition, and Dick leaves many questions unanswered: How do quizzes fit in to the order? Why is the chief official the Quizmaster? How are classifications changed? What is the relation between the classified and unclassified? Under what conditions does the bottle twitch and slect a new leader? How do the p-cards work? Dick leaves a lot unexplained.
I was intrigued by the idea of publically sanctioned assassination as an answer to tyranny and incompotence -- though I wouldn't want to live in such a society. I also liked Dick's use of Heisenberg's Uncertainity Principle in political and philosophical terms. The figure of Moore and his contradictary, scheming, pontifical nature reminded me of Joseph Goebbels. And Dick, with the Pellig machine, introduces, in a muted form, his concern with reality's nature and appearance in novel form.
Read enough Dick work and material about him and you begin to notice possible personally relevant things in his fiction. Here it is one remark by Ted Benteley, "And I hate fathers.". A possible clue to Dick's own feelings about his father and genesis of his distrust for authority figures. And even in this first published novel, the deceitful neurotic female (of course, there are plenty of neurotic males in Dick's works) -- as characterized by Eleanor Stevens -- makes an appearance. She is a pathetic, startling, always interesting. Her death is poignant.
Show Less
LibraryThing member kalyka
It's 2203, and the world ruler is chosen at random, according to the rules of a game under the control of the Quizmaster. Currently, the Quizmaster is Reese Verrick, and has been such for the past ten years. However, this story isn't about the Quizmaster. It's about Ted Benteley, who, on a fateful
This novella, at just 200 pages long, was quite enjoyable. Despite the brevity of the book, the main characters are quite developed. And perhaps because the story is short, it's fast-paced, except for a few scenes concerning the Prestonian subplot, where Cartwright's fellow 'cultists' go out into the farthest reaches of the solar system, seeking the Flaming Disc, which is said to be the tenth planet of the solar system.
Philip K. Dick describes, in this novella, a world which is completely different, yet familiar to our own only by the vocabulary used. This was written in 1955; will humans still be using televisions in two centuries from now? Will cigarette still exist? Who knows?
One aspect I also enjoyed was the use of telepaths, although this ability isn't widespread; only a few individuals have this gift, and all of them are in the police service, thus serving the Quizmaster. And when Cartwright's assassin arrives in Batavia to kill him, he manages to completely confuse the Corps, which relies only on telepathy to track him down. So not everything is perfect.
Solar Lottery is a good and fun piece of science-fiction, the kind of science-fiction that one could imagine coming to fruition one day. Old and new get combined to create a realistic world which could mirror our own, and evokes familiarity with our own society.
4/5
Show More
morning, when he signs up to work for Verrick, has no idea that a new Quizmaster is to be chosen; a certain Leon Cartwright. He also has no idea that he's about to become a big player in a scheme to assassinate Leon Cartwright so that Verrick can resume his leadership as Quizmaster. However, nothing is ever as it seems, and the Universe isn't quite as random as it appears.This novella, at just 200 pages long, was quite enjoyable. Despite the brevity of the book, the main characters are quite developed. And perhaps because the story is short, it's fast-paced, except for a few scenes concerning the Prestonian subplot, where Cartwright's fellow 'cultists' go out into the farthest reaches of the solar system, seeking the Flaming Disc, which is said to be the tenth planet of the solar system.
Philip K. Dick describes, in this novella, a world which is completely different, yet familiar to our own only by the vocabulary used. This was written in 1955; will humans still be using televisions in two centuries from now? Will cigarette still exist? Who knows?
One aspect I also enjoyed was the use of telepaths, although this ability isn't widespread; only a few individuals have this gift, and all of them are in the police service, thus serving the Quizmaster. And when Cartwright's assassin arrives in Batavia to kill him, he manages to completely confuse the Corps, which relies only on telepathy to track him down. So not everything is perfect.
Solar Lottery is a good and fun piece of science-fiction, the kind of science-fiction that one could imagine coming to fruition one day. Old and new get combined to create a realistic world which could mirror our own, and evokes familiarity with our own society.
4/5
Show Less
LibraryThing member KristiBernard
A dying economy and a world population dependent on a lottery is what you will find in the year 2023. The economy is so bad, quizzes helped the many people struggling. But if you had the right p-card and your number came up you could win cars, refrigerators, toys for the kids and any other type of
Show More
merchandise you wouldn't be able to afford otherwise. The “Bottle” which pumps out numbers randomly, supposedly, could even help a lucky winner gain power and prestige. And if you could get either of those you could possibly become a Quizmaster. This system was created as a method of surviving the Minimax, a way of surviving the 20th century, by a group of mathematicians including John Preston, the creator of this system. This system was put in place instead of having government. Ted Bentley who is now released from his contract with Oiseau-Lyre, sets out to become an 8-8 biochemist for the current Quizmaster, Reese Verrick. As he gets deeper in and his facts are skewed about how the operation is run it's too late to back out. He has already pledged to serve Verrick even after he finds out that Verrick is no longer the Quizmaster. Verrick implements a plan to assassinate the newest Quizmaster Leon Cartwright. As the new Quizmaster, Cartwright is protected by the Corp, a group of telepaths no assassin could get past. In order to achieve his goal, Verrick plans to use Keith Pellig, his species is unique, in that his body is a vessel that can house many minds, in order to manipulate the Corp. The action starts when Ted and Leon cross paths. Together they share an idea to change the current system that could give people a better chance of winning. But with Verrick and his crew on their trail they face the biggest challenge of their lives. Dick has created a riveting futuristic tale that has lots of twists and turns. The cities and system are a brilliant idea. Young readers will love the characters and the adventure. A great fast read for anyone. Show Less
LibraryThing member greeniezona
I cast about quite a while for a book to fill the "first book by a favourite author" square. I kept thinking of authors whose first works I'd already read, before finally settling on Philip K. Dick. Then it was a matter of finding a copy. I visited several bookstores (in multiple states) before
This is very recognizably a Dick novel, most notably for the giant, all-encompassing system of governance designed to outsmart human failings (most specifically, our grasping for power), but which, in reality, mostly inspires cheating and superstition and does absolutely nothing for the vast majority of humanity. Also, something which may or may not be the presence of a non-human intelligence at the fringes of the solar system, but could also just be the ravings of one deluded crackpot. Perhaps a little bit less "What is reality? What is human?" than the normal Dickian novel.
The female characters are pretty standard 1950s sci-fi fare, but what can you do?
Some praise this book for being less prone to the deluded paranoia of Dick's later years, but personally, I have always liked that about him. This book feels more consistent with sci-fi of the time and less uniquely PKD.
As I was thinking about what I wanted to write about this book, I realized this would be a great choice for a movie adaptation. We all know how much Hollywood loves Dick, and this one comes pre-loaded with action: a robot assassin, flights to the moon, high speed chases, people getting shot in the face, etc., etc. Of course, not I'm going to spend the rest of the day obsessing over who should play Leon Cartwright.
Show More
finally giving up and checking this out at the library,This is very recognizably a Dick novel, most notably for the giant, all-encompassing system of governance designed to outsmart human failings (most specifically, our grasping for power), but which, in reality, mostly inspires cheating and superstition and does absolutely nothing for the vast majority of humanity. Also, something which may or may not be the presence of a non-human intelligence at the fringes of the solar system, but could also just be the ravings of one deluded crackpot. Perhaps a little bit less "What is reality? What is human?" than the normal Dickian novel.
The female characters are pretty standard 1950s sci-fi fare, but what can you do?
Some praise this book for being less prone to the deluded paranoia of Dick's later years, but personally, I have always liked that about him. This book feels more consistent with sci-fi of the time and less uniquely PKD.
As I was thinking about what I wanted to write about this book, I realized this would be a great choice for a movie adaptation. We all know how much Hollywood loves Dick, and this one comes pre-loaded with action: a robot assassin, flights to the moon, high speed chases, people getting shot in the face, etc., etc. Of course, not I'm going to spend the rest of the day obsessing over who should play Leon Cartwright.
Show Less
LibraryThing member DanielSTJ
Another short, thrill-filled ride by Philip K. Dick. The prose is sharp and the action is quick and unpredictable. Everything that most readers like about Dick is here and he keeps the reader entertained throughout the duration of the ride. A good read.
LibraryThing member Lukerik
What a mess.
There’s rather an interesting publishing history detailed on Wikipedia which I will paraphrase for your edification. Dick wrote the novel and submitted it to publishers in the UK and US. The UK publisher edited out the adjectives and published it as World of Chance. The US publisher
Anyway, World of Chance has a problem with characterisation. There is none. You could switch out any name for another and it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference. And there are a lot of names so every time there’s a change of scene you need to try to remember the context you last heard that name in. It’s impossible to know who you’re supposed to be rooting for. It destroys any tension the action scenes might have had.
Another problem is that critical information is not given prior to plot changing moments happening. Suddenly something will happen and you first have to work out what it is that’s happened. There goes any remaining tension. There’s no question of wondering if this or that attempt by some name will be successful. It’s already worked or not by the time you’ve worked out what it is they were trying to do.
If I didn’t have the book right here I wouldn’t have believed that anyone would waste time taking the adjectives out of this. If I were a publisher and someone submitted this to me I’d block their number.
There’s rather an interesting publishing history detailed on Wikipedia which I will paraphrase for your edification. Dick wrote the novel and submitted it to publishers in the UK and US. The UK publisher edited out the adjectives and published it as World of Chance. The US publisher
Show More
asked for substantial re-writes. Thousands of words out and thousands new in. This was published as Star Lottery. Star Lottery seems to be the version that was used for translations and is now the only version in print in the UK too. I can only assume it’s better. It can’t be any worse. I just can’t believe that anyone could launch a writing career off World of Chance. What am I saying?! James Patterson.Anyway, World of Chance has a problem with characterisation. There is none. You could switch out any name for another and it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference. And there are a lot of names so every time there’s a change of scene you need to try to remember the context you last heard that name in. It’s impossible to know who you’re supposed to be rooting for. It destroys any tension the action scenes might have had.
Another problem is that critical information is not given prior to plot changing moments happening. Suddenly something will happen and you first have to work out what it is that’s happened. There goes any remaining tension. There’s no question of wondering if this or that attempt by some name will be successful. It’s already worked or not by the time you’ve worked out what it is they were trying to do.
If I didn’t have the book right here I wouldn’t have believed that anyone would waste time taking the adjectives out of this. If I were a publisher and someone submitted this to me I’d block their number.
Show Less
Subjects
Language
Original language
English
Original publication date
1955
Physical description
192 p.; 17.7 cm
ISBN
009905700X / 9780099057000
Local notes
Omslag: Peter Elson
Omslag ikke angivet i kolofonen, men der er et stort PE logo på bagsiden
Omslaget viser et stort rumskib af et usædvanligt design. Et klar stjerne titter frem bag ved en stor planet i baggrunden
Indskannet omslag - N650U - 150 dpi
Omslag ikke angivet i kolofonen, men der er et stort PE logo på bagsiden
Omslaget viser et stort rumskib af et usædvanligt design. Et klar stjerne titter frem bag ved en stor planet i baggrunden
Indskannet omslag - N650U - 150 dpi
Similar in this library
Pages
192
DDC/MDS
| 813.54 |