Status
Call number
Collections
Publication
Description
Business. Psychology. Sports & Recreations. Nonfiction. HTML:The #1 New York Times bestseller that has all America talking: as seen/heard on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS, Morning Joe, CBS This Morning, The Bill Simmons Podcast, Rich Roll, and more. â??The most important businessâ??and parentingâ??book of the year.â?ť â??Forbes â??Urgent and important. . . an essential read for bosses, parents, coaches, and anyone who cares about improving performance.â?ť â??Daniel H. Pink Shortlisted for the Financial Times/McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award Plenty of experts argue that anyone who wants to develop a skill, play an instrument, or lead their field should start early, focus intensely, and rack up as many hours of deliberate practice as possible. If you dabble or delay, youâ??ll never catch up to the people who got a head start. But a closer look at research on the worldâ??s top performers, from professional athletes to Nobel laureates, shows that early specialization is the exception, not the rule. David Epstein examined the worldâ??s most successful athletes, artists, musicians, inventors, forecasters and scientists. He discovered that in most fieldsâ??especially those that are complex and unpredictableâ??generalists, not specialists, are primed to excel. Generalists often find their path late, and they juggle many interests rather than focusing on one. Theyâ??re also more creative, more agile, and able to make connections their more specialized peers canâ??t see. Provocative, rigorous, and engrossing, Range makes a compelling case for actively cultivating inefficiency. Failing a test is the best way to learn. Frequent quitters end up with the most fulfilling careers. The most impactful inventors cross domains rather than deepening their knowledge in a single area. As experts silo themselves further while computers master more of the skills once reserved for highly focused humans, people who think broadly and embrace diverse experienc… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
Anyway, Range is packed with information. I found myself stopping a lot just to ponder what I had just read. I loved all the stories that were referenced as examples and food for thought.
The "Learning to Drop Your Familiar
And specialization is not a bad thing. In many areas it's not just valuable, but essential. If you need surgery, you want not just a doctor, but
But not every field is surgery. Not even any medical field; a doctor with a more varied background and a CV that shows some flitting among different medical areas is a lot more likely to be a good diagnostician. Why? Because that doctor with the varied background has a much broader background to draw on when considering the patient's symptoms and comments. David Epstein looks at why this is so, in areas as different as athletes, musicians, inventors, and scientists.
Generalists see connections specialists can't, because the specialists have never encountered the information from fields outside their own--even, sometimes, when the fields are seemingly very close and both could benefit from more interaction. Epstein gives us interesting and absorbing stories of Nintendo growing from a playing card company to a major videogame company due to the playing around in his spare time of an electrical engineer years out of date on his skills and with no computer programming background at all. Also all the things Vincent van Gogh failed at before more or less stumbling into the painting, and the style, that made him one of the greatest of artists.
Or, contrariwise, the top-down, procedure-oriented, data above all culture at NASA that made it impossible for the engineers to who saw a serious problem with launching the Challenger on the cold day in January, but who couldn't quantify the risk, to be heard by the decision-makers they were talking to.
Some of our most cherished, or at least most drilled into us, ideas about how to succeed are not so much wrong, as inadequate and incomplete. We need specialists. We also need generalists and polymaths. Specialists alone, without generalists, are more likely to result in stagnation.
This book is both enjoyable, and enlightening. Recommended.
I listened to this audiobook via Scribd, and am reviewing it voluntarily.
This book takes on the cult of the specialist, as Epstein puts it. He is specifically targeting the
Epstein structures the book simply: he lays out the problem and with each chapter he makes his case by telling stories that are collected together thematically in each chapter. The first few chapters lay out the premise of his argument and each succeeding chapter presents a new theme which supports Epstein’s argument. He is meticulous in presenting anecdotes as well as research results. He does an excellent job of presenting the supporting stories with great story telling skills and allows the reader to become absorbed in the narrative. He also delves into other ideas which are quite recent to bolster his point: he goes into enough details about the Daniel Kahneman book Thinking: Fast and Slow, Angela Duckworth’s Grit, as well as Carole Dweck’s Mindset, delving into the gist of those books and using those concepts to argue his own theme.
He also takes on the popular but misrepresented 10,000-hour rule popularized by Malcolm Gladwell, in fact he has convinced Gladwell of his own argument.
This is a very nice read and causes one to think about each of the chapters separately while never losing track of the overarching theme that Epstein had presented to us. Indeed, this is one of the major reasons that I recommend this book: it never loses track of the main argument, returning to it regularly enough to encourage thought but is never overzealous in reiterating the main theme. The reader feels like they are on a journey through many different topics while also assured that there is a purpose to this journey. It is a very quick read; the writing moves along nicely while it also allows for slower and deeper contemplation of each chapter.
The book is very wide ranging, and sometimes hard to follow when it delves into science and academia, but the case is very well made- consider me convinced.
As a bit of a polymath myself, I know all too well how specialization can stifle thinking and close down possibilities, especially in complex fields like my own (education). My only concern with the thesis is that it is overstated and does not address how very ineffective and unoriginal “outsiders” can be when trying to solve field-specific issues. That kind of limited analogic thinking by people from outside my field, for instance, has produced an endless series of bad solutions to public education, starting with Taylorism a century ago and continuing with all the other various “business” models that are applied to schooling even today.
However, overall it’s a very good book with much food for thought.
Quotes:
"Those who did not make a creative contribution to their field lacked aesthetic interests outside their narrow area. Creative achievers tend to have broad interest."
"for learning that is both durable (it sticks) and flexible (it can be applied broadly), fast and easy is precisely the problem."
"Being fired to generate answers improves subsequent learning even if the generated answer is wrong."
"Dropping familiar tools is particularly difficult for experience professionals who rely on what Wieck called over learned behavior. That is, they have done the same thing in response to the same challenges over and over until the behavior has become so automatic that they no longer even recognize it as a situation-specific tool. research on aviation accidents, for example, found that "A common pattern was the crew's decision to continue with their original plan", even when conditions changed dramatically."
Great book for late starters or people concerned that they haven't "got it figured" yet.
"Knowledge is a double-edged sword. It allows you to do some things, but it also makes you blind to other things that you could do."
The book's premise is about developing a range of skills than going deep into a few of them. It shows how specialization
Concepts like grit, 10000 hours and deliberate practice are challenged and the advice given is to try a plethora of things early on. It was nice reading about how T- and I-people differ in their contributions to the world.
Personally, I've been benefitted by reading a variety of subjects and hence gaining breadth. But then, being in a technology field, I need to go deep in my field as well.
I skimmed through much of the book. The author provided plenty of examples of a variety of people with different career paths who experimented with different jobs before they settled into a job they felt was rewarding and used their past experiences to contribute to their success.
Notes from the book:
I encountered remarkable individuals who succeeded not in spite of their range of experiences interests but because of it…
Do specialists get better with experience, or not?
The ability to apply knowledge broadly comes from broad training.
Even the best universities aren't developing critical intelligence…They aren't giving students the tools to analyze the modern world, except in their area of specialization. Their education is too narrow.
Three quarters of college graduates go on to careers unrelated to their majors.
Sunk cost fallacy-having invested time or money in something, one is loath to leave it.
Seth Godin, author of some of the most popular career writing in the world, wrote a book disparaging the idea that "quitters never win."Godin argued that winners--he generally meant individuals who reach the apex of their domain––quit fast and often when they detect when a plan is not the best fit, and do not feel bad about it. We fail, he wrote, "when we stick with tasks we don't have the guts to quit."
Research suggests mental meandering and personal experimentation are sources of power and “head-starts” are overrated. Epstein provides many examples, such as analysis of the space shuttle Challenger disaster, the 2008 global financial crisis, Vincent Van Gogh’s artistic development, and a woman who is leading corporations at age 100. I found these examples extremely engaging. I believe businesses, in particular, could benefit from the messages presented in this book. Consultants are taught to value “subject matter experts,” but Epstein’s research suggests they should supplement expertise with those who have been exposed to a wider range of disciplines. It may take a while to get through this book if you are not already familiar with some of the principles on which it is based.
The next time some coach or trainer tells you how imperative early specialization is, this is the book that will help you feel more comfortable at dealing with a culture hellbent on being first rather than growing into skill and talent.
Great book for late starters or people concerned that they haven't "got it figured" yet.