Status
Call number
Genres
Publication
Description
A powerful contemporary novel set in London from a master of literary fiction. London, the week before Christmas, 2007. Over seven days we follow the lives of seven major characters: a hedge fund manager trying to bring off the biggest trade of his career; a professional footballer recently arrived from Poland; a young lawyer with little work and too much time to speculate; a student who has been led astray by Islamist theory; a hack book-reviewer; a schoolboy hooked on skunk and reality TV; and a Tube train driver whose Circle Line train joins these and countless other lives together in a daily loop. With daring skill, the novel pieces together the complex patterns and crossings of modern urban life. Greed, the dehumanising effects of the electronic age and the fragmentation of society are some of the themes dealt with in this savagely humorous book. The writing on the wall appears in letters ten feet high, but the characters refuse to see it -- and party on as though tomorrow is a dream. Sebastian Faulks probes not only the self-deceptions of this intensely realised group of people, but their hopes and loves as well. As the novel moves to its gripping climax, they are forced, one by one, to confront the true nature of the world they inhabit.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
Inevitably, some elements of such a complex novel work better than others. The description of the infrastructure of sub-prime lending, hedge funds, and financial speculation is described lucidly and generates an engaging plot but John Veals, the banker who engineers all this is too thinly portrayed to have much reality. Conversely, Hassan al Rashid is drawn sympathetically with depth but the contradictions inherent in Islam are flatly unconvincing. For all its flaws, however, this is a thoroughly enjoyable novel filled with easter eggs. For me the defining moment in my reading was the point when the recurrent motif of the selfish cyclist becomes Chekov's gun. That kind of referential detail tells me enough about Faulks' commitment to this project to know that even if the reader realises only part of the work's richness that reader is enjoying a feast.
At a different level the enormous amount of detail in the novel works like a kind of source code. The seven characters in the novel become like characters in a virtual reality quest, in which the reader becomes an auctor, an actor and author at the same time. In an attempt to make sense of it all, the reader is persuaded to create a plot which brings the seven characters together. The most likely event would be a cataclysmic horror scenario, which might involve the terrorist, the tube train driver, and any combination of the other characters, perhaps even the Queen. Everything seems possible, except when Olya appears "in the flesh," almost at the end of the novel (p. 501). It is a little teaser. All connections are possible.
However, most characters live very disconnected lives. There are some connections, but they are work relations, such as between Jenni and Gabriel (legal), and Tranter and 'Rocker' (consultation). The most meaningful connections, family, friends are hollowed out. Only love can bring redemption, as in the end it does.
"Yeah, I do."
"Why?"
"Dunno. I s'pose it's an escape from the real world."
"But surely it's just the opposite," said Gabriel. "Books explain the real world. They bring you close to it in a way you could never manage in the course of the day."
"How do you mean?"
"People
It took me awhile to get through this book, but I think the fault was mostly my own. I was in the mood for something emotionally resonant, like Birdsong, Charlotte Gray or On Green Dolphin Street, but A Week in December is a much colder book. It's a satire of modern life, well done, but it does carry more than a whiff of old man crankiness. Is it possible to write a social satire with heart? Faulks does give a half-hearted try at the end; he's too good a writer to make every single one of his numerous story-arcs end in despair. And he writes fantastically well, so that his biting jabs at what is presented as the emptiness of modern life all hit their targets with wit and accuracy.
Set in London in 2007, the book follows a large cast of characters through their daily lives. There's a soulless investment banker plotting a big trade and a hopeful Jihadist. Would you like to guess which is the bad guy? There's also a bitter book critic, a disaffected young person, and an up and coming Polish football player, among many others, allowing Faulks to lampoon pretty much every facet of modern British society. The book warms up a bit in the final third, as though Faulks had, in the end, found it impossible to avoid all sympathy for his characters and the plot does heat up, but writing about an entirely irredeemable character in a three dimensional way does ultimately prove beyond even Sebastian Faulks's considerable skills.
There seem to be two main plot lines. The first, which Faulks really seems most interested in, is a financial trade that, if successful, would net billions. Reading the details abut that, I kind of felt that I was reading the script of a Planet Money podcast. Lots about credit default swaps and chaos in the global banking system. It went on a little much. The second plot line is about a group of extremists plotting a terrorist attack. That plot line ends in a more realistic way, at least for me. Though I can see that others might find that ended a little too neatly.
Technically, I found the novel to be well-written. Though, with the multiplicity of characters, it's hard to feel that the story is fully formed and focused. Also, some of the characters are largely interchangeable. But the characters that Faulks tells in some detail - the barrister, the disgruntled literary critic - are memorable ones and ones that I wanted to see what happened too. I think the average rating of 3.5 stars is right on target. The book is better than average, but does have some weaknesses that kept it from getting a top mark in my estimation.
As others have mentioned, two potentially disaster-creating characters--hedge fund owner John Veals and would-be terrorist Hassan al-Rashid--take center stage, and while their stories are indeed fascinating, they push the others' (some of which I found much more interesting) into the background. If the novel has one fault, it may be that there are a few too many threads in the plot, and, as a result, some characters get shorted. I wanted to know more about Jenni Fortune, the book-loving tube conductor who is addicted to an online role-playing game, and her blooming romance with barrister Gabriel Northwood; I wanted to learn more about Gabriel's schizophrenic brother Adam; about the senior al-Rashids; about Spike, the Polish soccer player, and his girlfriend, Olya, who poses for online porn.
The novel also runs the reader through the full emotional gamut. Perhaps the most satisfying moments for me were those that reflect on books, reading, academia, and the world of competitive literary prizes. Faulks is at his satirical best here. As an educator, I was particularly amused by a small incident, the book reviewer R. Tantor being hired (undercover, of course) by a school to write comments on students' papers, a way of appeasing the parents who complained that the teachers themselves couldn't even spell. And I was highly amused by Trantor's observation that technology has managed to make ignorance not only acceptable but an asset. He's a cranky old bird who gets his comeuppance in the end, but his perceptions are often right on target.
A Week in December is sharp, entertaining, and complex. It's one of those rare books that I will likely read again one day because I have the feeling that I might have missed something.
Veals has hatched a plan that will make his hedge fun billions of dollars but will, in the process, destroy banks, jobs, the financial security of thousands of pensioners, and a significant portion of Africa’s agricultural production. It would be impossible for him to care less about the people who will lose jobs or starve to death because of his market manipulation. Hassan al-Rashid is a key player in a bomb plot to blow up one of London’s hospitals. He, too, is unconcerned about the innocent people he will destroy in the process of furthering his delusional political goal. " A Week in December" follows the progress of the Veals and al-Rashid plots for the week ending just before Christmas 2007, but these are only two of the book’s main plotlines.
Faulks also offers the improbable romance between Gabriel Northwood, a usually-out-of-work barrister, and Jennie Fortune, a young, mix-raced woman who happens to drive a train on the Circle Line portion of London’s underground. And there is book reviewer R. Tantor, a vicious little man whose main purpose in life seems to be nipping in the bud the potential success of as many debut novelists as possible. Tantor, one learns, cannot stand to see others gain the kind of success and attention his own novel failed to generate.
But these are just a handful of the characters and subplots Faulks uses to describe goings-on in the London of late 2007. There are more than a dozen other support characters, largely, but not limited to, family members and friends of the main characters (including even one Eastern European footballer brought in to play in the English Premier League), that allow Faust to expose the worst aspects of contemporary life in the United Kingdom. Along the way, he gives the reader satirical, but harsh, looks at the out-of-control greed governing the financial industry, the insanity that drives Islamist extremism, the utter stupidity of “reality” T.V., the ruinous effects of internet addiction, the failure of schools to educate, and the overriding pretentiousness of the super-rich. Frankly, there is not much to like about this version of British big city life.
Faulks gradually brings his characters and plots closer and closer together, building the tension as readers begin to wonder how it will all end. That device worked, perhaps too well, on me and I found myself racing through the final chapter (day seven) to learn what happens when the main plotlines finally converge. I say it worked “too well” because I found the book’s ending to be somewhat flat when compared to its buildup. My other quibble with the book concerns the number of pages Faulks used to detail the inner workings of the financial strategy devised by the book’s chief villain, John Veals. Faulks fell victim to the temptation of giving his readers too much information – and, as a result, may have lost some of those readers long before they finished the book.
I do wonder whether "A Week in December" will appeal more to its British readers or to its American Anglophile ones. It is, though, absolutely well worth the attention of both groups.
Rated at: 4.0
From the blurb: London, the week before Christmas, 2007. Seven wintry days to
The characters in this are a real mix (as I imagine they are supposed to be). The younger characters (Gabriel and Jenny) are the much more sympathetic ones, just getting on with their lives as best they can while still being just generally nice people. John Veals is a piece of work - clever to make someone so inhuman and remorseless. The examination of Hassan's life, obsession with Islamic theory, and conflict between his modern London life and what he has been taught was interesting and sensitive. The other characters I had forgotten until I read the blurb, but I don't remember deliberately skipping through any sections of this book until it hit another character. Faulks does well to keep them all appropriately separated.
So this is the first of Sebastian Faulks' books that I've read - even though I have both Birdsong and Charlotte Grey on the shelves. Sometimes it got a bit fanciful and obtuse, but on the whole, eminently readable while obviously skilful. Plotwise this is so-so; it's really a character study, I think. There is a certain tension added by John and Hassan's deeds, and various glimmers of romance here and there, but it's only really there to give the characters something to do.
And as for the setting: this is so very London. And not just very London, but not tourist London, real, people-who-live-here-and-commute-to-work-here London. The far-flung suburbs with their spectrum of class, the postcode giveaway of household earnings. And it's London December too - no particularly exciting weather, but grey and cold and a bit dreary but nearly Christmas so people are quite cheery and pubs are overflowing.
Good, but I'm not sure I'll re-read it.
Structured like a thriller, A Week in December takes place over the course of a single week at the end of 2008. Set in London, it brings together an intriguing cast of characters whose lives seem to run on
At times hilarious, yet also strewn with undercurrents of melancholic resignation, this novel also offers some poignant insights. The most striking of these was Gabriel Northwood's passionate lament over the failure of the education system, and the sad descent from a halcyon age when children were taught from a belief that it was simply good to have a wide base of knowledge rather than to equip them to take on jobs that might no longer be there by the time they leave school.
I like to judge books based on whether, in my opinion, they succeed in being what they set out to be. I believe that Faulks set out to write an amusing satire about contemporary Britain, and that in doing so he fully intended to create a set of characters who could be regarded as representative of certain types. As such, I believe he has succeeded, in parts with brilliant effect. On the other hand, there were times when I got frustrated with the characters and with the book's lack of gravitas, and at those times I drifted towards the Craig view.
Ultimately, what rescued the book for me, was a dinner party outburst by a relatively minor character about the injustice of those who were largely responsible for our current economic woes escaping relatively unscaved, while the rest of us suffer the consequences of their actions. This ensured that the book ended in a way I found pleasing, although I did wonder why it is only under the influence of excessive alcohol that certain truths are allowed to emerge?
The whole book, for me, was about finding meaning in the emptiness of modern life. All the characters are either looking for meaning in a way, reacting to perceived meaninglessness, or reveling in the meaningless of it all. Reality TV, blogging, social networking sites like MySpace and Second Life, the ridiculously rich, and especially financial traders all take a hit in this book, or at least a swipe. The stock market and those who work in and around it come off the worst, and rightly so if there is any accuracy to Faulk's portrayal of hedge fund managers, banks, etc. From listening to NPR and reading Matt Taibbi's articles in Rolling Stone, I fear Faulks is right on about this stuff.
Thematically, Faulks pulls together a number of interesting contemporary ideas: the rise of home-grown terrorism, the pursuit of money as an end in itself, the increasing complication of trading commodities, and the idea of truth and faith in the contemporary world. As such, he has set a bold agenda for himself. While he does a good job in explaining some of the arcana of the financial world, the other areas are less well developed. It is probably for this reason that throughout the book, the character of Veals seems like the (anti-) hero in which Faulks is most interested.
Ultimately, Faulks is unable to pull all the threads together. While a Dickensian conclusion where all the strands are neatly tied together would have seemed forced, the book is left as feeling like it never quite came together. I applaud Faulks for taking on the big subjects, but I wish he had managed it a bit better.
It definately needs a second read to fully understand the true
I was impressed by the range of research Mr. Faulks gathered to craft his story. He handled deftly with humor the subjects of Islam, hedge fund management, general finance, terrorism, wealth, greed, and biographical criticism. Good job.