The Boer War

Excellent book, Very rich in detail. This makes the battles sometimes incomprehensible, but this could be because english is not my mothertongue or because the exact manouevres are not of particular interest to me.

I am dutch, and therefore have a natural sympathy for the boers. I found Pakenham

Show More

unbiased although he does focus primarily on the english side of the war which is too bad. This is probably because the availabe sources are primarily of english origins.

Nevertheless, good book, could recommend it to anyoen interested in (british)military history or the boers.

Show Less

I am happy to own this book. The conflict itself is covered in sufficient detail, and the military and political machinations are covered very well. the work appears to be relatively unbiased, and the covering of the effect of the war on racial relations is quite good. The prose moves well, and the

Show More

characters of the principal players explores their motivations wisely. It is a fit companion to the author's other book, "the Scramble for Africa, completed twelve years later. The maps are disappointing, as the publisher went for the type of map that plonks down the principal towns and a few rivers, and leaves the rest of the map a flat wasteland, removing the terrain features that direct so much of military planning. It is cheaper, I suppose....but it reduces the amount of real information the purchaser, and hopefully reader, could obtain. But well worth the perusal.

Show Less

Fascinating book about a fascinating subject, probably not terribly well-know these days. Pakenham to some extent is telling a wider story about the British Empire, colonialism in Africa, the specific history of South Africa, using this war as a way to structure his story. It's very well told and

Show More

and well-written, and I found it quite absorbing.

For those who care about such things, Pakenham quite obviously has his own opinions, and he is very much pro-Buller, anti-"Bobs" and anti-Kitchener. As I said, if you care about such things you'll know what I mean.

Not academic history, so if you're predisposed to dislike traditional narrative "popular" history you won't like this For the rest of us normal humans it's a great read.

Show Less

If someone wants to read a single volume about the Boer War, this would be it. Pakenham has an incredible economy of style where he crams loads of information in a short space. Each page feels like 5, and not in a bad way. At the same time, the reading is enjoyable.

A point he repeatedly asserts is

Show More

that the war was started partially for the rich gold miners to pay their black workers less. I can see the evidence that they encouraged the war. Maybe they wanted to be under British Dominion for other reasons. The Boers had a much lower opinion of black labor thank the Brits. They literally broke away so they could maintain slaves after the Brits declared slavery illegal. Why would the mines be able to pay less under British rulership? That point was never made clearly.

In 2014 I did a stuff on WW1. As a read through this book, many names were eerily familiar - French, Haig, Hamilton, Allenby, Rawlinson, and of course Kitchener, among others. What's amazing is how the Brits had no ability to properly evaluate their generals. Kitchener was generally great strategically, but absolutely incompetent tactically and as a staff officer. It was all evident in the Boer War and even Sudan. All the other generals generally lacked imagination. Everything in WW1 was present here in a smaller scale. The Brits should never have been surprised that any of these incompetents would lose 40000 or 50000 men on a single day in a suicidal charge against entrenched positions. They did it on a smaller scale here. Repeatedly. These were the 1st generation of Sandhurst that actually earned their commissions. I guess the entitled, inbred classes had set the bar so low any moron qualified. After reading this, I can't help but feel the Brits for everything they deserved in WW1.

Show Less