Status
Available
Genres
Collection
Publication
London : Temple Smith, 1973.
Description
Rodney Hilton's account of the Peasant's Revolt of 1381 remains the classic authoritative text on the 'English Rising'. Hilton views the revolt in the context of a general European pattern of class conflict. He demonstrates that the peasant movements that disturbed the Middle Ages were not mere unrelated outbreaks of violence but had their roots in common economic and political conditions and in a recurring conflict of interest between peasants and landowners.Now with a new introduction by Christopher Dyer, this survey remains the leading source for students of medieval English peasantry.
User reviews
LibraryThing member baswood
conflict is part of existence and that nothing is gained without a struggle" and so ends the final sentence of this excellent book
The first part of the book looks at mass movements (revolts) of peasant societies in 14th century Europe. It does a good job of describing the organisation of peasant
The second part examines the 1381 uprising, initially by providing a brief narrative history and then going on to discuss the causes, organisation, aims and effects of the revolt. Hilton does a good job in dispelling some of the myths that have grown up around the retelling of this period of history. Myths that were perpetrated by the chroniclers of the period who were all aghast at the events taking place. After all leading members of the government were summarily executed by the rebels as were lawyers and many others connected with the judiciary. They perpetrated the myth of a peasant rabble out of control when it could more accurately be described as an uprising by the third estate against injustices caused by excessive taxation and erosion of hard won rights.
Hilton believes that rural societies in the late middle ages were characterised by conflict between Lords and peasants. These were exacerbated in England due to economic pressures caused by plague and an unsuccessful and expensive war in France. The rebel leaders Wat Tyler, John Ball, and Jack Straw demanded a complete social revolution and believed they had the support of the king. Their misunderstanding of the monarchy and the entrenched positions of the nobility, the clergy and the new merchant class were much too powerful to allow the uprising to have any chance of success.
Hilton's analysis of the uprising is considered and thoughtful. The writing is lively and he puts forward his ideas and theories with due reference to other historians.
The first part of the book looks at mass movements (revolts) of peasant societies in 14th century Europe. It does a good job of describing the organisation of peasant
Show More
societies before going on to examine similarities in the major peasant revolts: The Jacquerie in Northern France 1358, Maritime Flanders 1323-28, Tuchin bandits in the Auvergne 1363-84 and later the wars of Ramensas in catelonia in 1460-1480. These revolts were all unsuccessful, but serve to place in context the Great Uprising in South East England of 1381.The second part examines the 1381 uprising, initially by providing a brief narrative history and then going on to discuss the causes, organisation, aims and effects of the revolt. Hilton does a good job in dispelling some of the myths that have grown up around the retelling of this period of history. Myths that were perpetrated by the chroniclers of the period who were all aghast at the events taking place. After all leading members of the government were summarily executed by the rebels as were lawyers and many others connected with the judiciary. They perpetrated the myth of a peasant rabble out of control when it could more accurately be described as an uprising by the third estate against injustices caused by excessive taxation and erosion of hard won rights.
Hilton believes that rural societies in the late middle ages were characterised by conflict between Lords and peasants. These were exacerbated in England due to economic pressures caused by plague and an unsuccessful and expensive war in France. The rebel leaders Wat Tyler, John Ball, and Jack Straw demanded a complete social revolution and believed they had the support of the king. Their misunderstanding of the monarchy and the entrenched positions of the nobility, the clergy and the new merchant class were much too powerful to allow the uprising to have any chance of success.
Hilton's analysis of the uprising is considered and thoughtful. The writing is lively and he puts forward his ideas and theories with due reference to other historians.
Show Less
LibraryThing member antiquary
Competent though Marxist approach; rather a pioneer before the revolt began to get much scholarly attention
Language
Physical description
240 p.; 24 cm
ISBN
0851170390 / 9780851170398