Filosofins tröst

by Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius

Other authorsBertil Cavallin
Paper Book, 1987

Status

Available

Call number

100

Tags

Publication

Stockholm : Atlantis, 1987 ;

Description

Composed while its author was imprisoned, this book remains one of Western literature's most eloquent meditations on the transitory nature of earthly belongings, and the superiority of things of the mind. Slavitt's translation captures the energy and passion of the original. And in an introduction intended for the general reader, Seth Lerer places Boethius's life and achievement in context.

Media reviews

"'The Consolation of Philosophy', composed in jail, here inspires a former prisoner [in Lebanon] to write a moving preface [to the Folio edition].

User reviews

LibraryThing member jclemence
The Consolation of Philosophy is Boethius' attempt to wrap his mind and soul around the problem of theodicy. Specifically, Boethius, a philosopher in the 4th-5th cent. AD, is coming to grips with his own unjust suffering and impending death. As he languishes in a prison cell, he writes Consolation,
Show More
in which Philosophy herself descends to talk with him specifically about his own plight, as well as the problem of evil generally in this world. Boethius divides his conversation with Philosophy into five books, each of which tackles a specific issue, question, or argument.

Book I: Philosophy descends from heaven to meet Boethius in his cell. Boethius airs his complaints to her, culminating his argument by stating, "And now you see the outcome of my innocence--instead of reward for true goodness, punishment for a crime I did not commit." Philosophy lays out the thesis of her response: "Your defenses have been breached and your mind has been infiltrated by the fever of emotional distraction…You have forgotten your true nature."

Book II: Philosophy argues that money, power and fame (collectively called Fortune) are destined to go away, and one's fortune can be reversed at any moment. Therefore, these things cannot bring true happiness--so why worry if they are taken away?

Book III: Philosophy sketches out the true cause of happiness. Namely, true happiness can be found in God alone, because only He completely embodies what it means to be happy. The closer one draws to God, the happier one will be.

Book IV: Philosophy turns to a discussion of good and evil. Today, we might say she is answering the questions, "Why do good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people?" Her answer is that ultimately all things that happen to a good person are good (because they are either reward or discipline), and all things that happen to a bad person are bad (because they are either punishment or correction).

Book V: Philosophy wraps up her conversation with Boethius by examining the relationship of free will to God's foreknowledge. She argues that because God sees all things as an eternal present, he necessarily knows the future, though from our vantage point as travelers through time, the choices we make are genuinely free.

Like many people out there, last year (2011) was a rough one for my family and me. We went through a lot of trials, and my faith was stretched to the limit. Admittedly, things in my life were not nearly as bad off as they were for Boethius, but nevertheless I found myself making many of the same complaints and observations that he did. For this reason, I really appreciated The Consolation. As the book progressed, I was able to identify with and internalize Philosophy's overarching argument, which is summarized well by Romans 8:28, "All things work together for good for those who love God." While some of Philosophy's logic is suspect (e.g., the idea that evil is nothing, which unfortunately is just a clever equivocation of terms), there are many, many more nuggets of wisdom that still ring true some 1500 years later.

I highly recommend this book for anyone who needs reassurance in time of suffering.
Show Less
LibraryThing member baswood
Boethius was the adopted son of Symmachus a highly committed christian and consul at Rome in the late 5th century AD. Boethius in his turn also became consul and the was then appointed by Theodric (King of Italy) to a high ranking position at his court at Ravenna. After a year in post Boethius fell
Show More
foul of court intrigue and was imprisoned on charges of treason. Whilst in prison and hopeful of reprieve he wrote the Consolation of philosophy. His reprieve never came and he was executed around 525 AD.

The Consolation is not a religious tract, it is more a philosophical argument for the existence of God and its aim is to provide comfort to all unfortunate souls who find themselves like Boethius in extreme distress. There are five short books: Book 1: introduces the persona of philosophy and Boethius pours out to her his woes. She promises to provide medicine to cure his moral sickness. Book 2: is a condemnation of the material advantages that Boethius has already enjoyed and looks forward to a time when these will no longer be needed. Book 3: examines the nature of true happiness and the search for true good and puts forward the idea that the perfect good in which lies true happiness is God. Book 4: examines whether God apportions appropriate justice to good and evil men in the world and attempts to explain the apparent irrationality in which the widespread operation of chance seems to be at odds with Gods wise governance. Book 5: asks the question; how can man's free will be reconciled with divine providence. a summary of the arguments then lead the prisoner to spiritual freedom, to shake off the shackles of earthly serfdom and rise to be at one with God.

When philosophy first visits Boethius he is surrounded by the muses of poetry, which she drives away calling them "these harlots". A question the reader might ask is whether Boethius would have been better off sticking with the muses of poetry. I think the logical arguments that are easily followed would convince many people that philosophy is the better bet. There are of course gaps in the logic to the modern mind but overall I thought that much of what is said seemed to speak to me down the ages. The one big issue that is not examined satisfactorily is why there is evil in the world If God is omnipotent, A knotty question I know but the consolation seems to shy away from this.

I read the Oxford world's classics edition translated and introduced by P G Walsh, which I found to be excellent. Each chapter of text is either introduced or followed by a poem and these are worth the price of the book alone. They either sum up the text or give additional information. I loved them. Walsh provides plenty of background information and his notes are easy to follow and precise. The only advice I would give to readers before starting the book would be to make sure that they are familiar with the basic tenets of Neoplatonism. Walsh has a short chapter on it but to get the most out of the consolation which is based on neoplatonism do a bit of background reading.

I will return to this marvellous little book, especially those poems
Show Less
LibraryThing member meandmybooks
Brilliant! Going in, I expected this to be difficult, like Plotinus, but it was actually very readable. It reminded me in places of The Republic, although the character of Boethius is much more lovable than that of Socrates. Also, I was fuzzy going in on whether Boethius was writing as a Christian
Show More
or a Platonist. As it turns out, he has a foot in each camp. Christian-ish Neoplatonism, with a dash of Stoicism added in. Or maybe he was a Christian but decided to write his defense of philosophy without reference to divine revelation, just because? It is hard to tell. Anyway, this was just marvelous!

Boethius tackles the big questions of monotheism: theodicy, providence vs free will (which he does a particularly nice job with, btw); eternity vs infinity (this isn't one of the Big Questions, or has never been for me, but I found it fascinating anyway!), etc. Not that his answers, particularly to that of suffering, are fully satisfactory, but whose are? He doesn't tie himself in knots, the way Aristotle and Plotinus do, and the poems in between the prose sections are lovely.

The notes in this edition (Ignatius Critical Editions) are fantastic. Not only do they tell you everything you want to know (and maybe a little more), but they are on the Bottoms of the Relevant Pages, where notes Belong! I Love not having to flip to the back of the book to read the notes. Plus, the binding is a nice sturdy one, which makes a nice change (hint, hint, Oxford World's Classics!). The notes explain all the people, events, and stories a reader might not know, and also the works that Boethius is (or may be) referencing – the Bible, Hesiod, Homer, Horace, Virgil, Juvenal, Lucretius, Aristotle, Plato, Cicero, Augustine, etc. They also point to later authors who drew on Boethius, particularly Aquinas, Chaucer, Dante, Shakespeare, Milton (and not forgetting John Kennedy Toole!). Great book, great notes.

*The Contemporary Criticism, at the end, was less impressive. This was a collection of six essays on Boethius & the Consolation, by various authors (all college professors, with schools noted), none of which I found indispensable. Out of the six, I read the second, third, and fourth, and found them mildly interesting. The first, fifth, and sixth I tried but gave up on. I think it says something good about Boethius and his translators/footnoters that I didn't feel much Need for explanatory essays!
Show Less
LibraryThing member jwhenderson
This is a new translation of Boethius Consolation of Philosophy. I found the book to be a fascinating approach to philosophy with the author sometimes using a sort of Socratic approach to question his own beliefs and those of the persona of philosophy herself. The five books within this relatively
Show More
short tome provide a breadth of philosophical discussion that belies the size of the book. Written at the end of his life when he was in prison this thoughtfully raises questions about the use of philosophy for life and how one can pursue happiness as a human being. His discussion of "what is true happiness'' was one of the high points in my reading, while he touched on many other issues like the nature of perfection. There were moments that his approach suggested a touch of stoicism, which is not surprising given the environment in which he wrote this text. Overall this is one of the best short works of philosophy that I have read and I expect that I will reread it in the not too distant future.
Show Less
LibraryThing member FemmeBibliophile37
Again, the soul has not only a chance to grow but to realize that all the Soul has and needs is God.
LibraryThing member Tullius22
Stoic poetry was an interesting experiment, and I'll admit that there's some creativity here. But while the performance was often adequate, there are also many times when something is lacking, or else when it is simply boring and belabored.

In a way, it's an interesting mix between showing what (in
Show More
my correct opinion) philosophy is good for--consolation--as well as why there are better outlets for human creativity and intelligence than philosophy--speculation and snobbery must at some point stop shrewing against the Flux. It's one thing to draw water from the well (dry your tears, mother), and another thing to fall in (such earthly goods will only distract you from more eternal pursuits, woman!).

There's a point at which you want to take Philosophy by the arm and lead her away from this monk for to whisper in her ear: Think. I know that the Flux troubles you and that Fortune is your enemy, but did not Epictetus say something about not being troubled about what is not in your power? Or are you a warrior instead of a hermit? Have you forgotten already that what is not in your power is none of your concern?

And I might add that both philosophy and poetry can be quite short--compact, or condensed, (rather than condescended), like good music, and perhaps they should be...after all, if you're going to be abstract, you might as well *get thru it* since you don't need to deal with every detail, you need only pluck one detail out of a patch of ten thousand such to use as your example, and, if you look at it from the poet's platform, well, repetition might well be used if it delights the ear, but certainly heavy verbosity brings the poet little benefit and scant praise.

{He could have said, "years have passed between us, and some would say, that they have not been kind...and we remain, yet we stand, bloodied yet unbowed...to live, give me one thing, to live or die for...we are! we are bloodied, yet unbowed!"}

But he'd rather ape Plato, and that doesn't win many points in my book.

"Therefore black is white and grey is yellow."

"Certainly."

But is grey really like yellow?

And it's also as good of an example as any of this medieval scholastic philosopher's terribly unfair tendency to rest three-quarters of the argument on some old pagan philosopher or another they must have found, half-decayed, in some musty old tome in some decrepit old library somewhere, or some remote monastery, which they then proceeded to fawn over in servile, infantile adoration...and then, of course, they would proceed to casually insult and spit on it, gloating childishly in whatever real or imagined superiority they thought to find in their own conceptions of things. {~But I'm not a Stoic! I didn't sit on the Porch of Zeno! ~You're right...you're not much of a stoic.}

And, again, just because he quotes condescendingly from Cicero or somebody like that, doesn't mean that he has the slightest bloody idea what he's going on about.

Also, the talk about kings and judges and so on is so excessive, it almost starts to sound like lawyer's prattle: and it's all so unnecessary. After all, you need ethics for politics, *but not politics for ethics*.

And, of course, there are things that Boethius says (and which Plato says) which are true, and, yet, said in such strange speech, is practically obscured. ("If Chrysippus had not spoken obscurely, this man would have nothing to be proud of.") I can only take it on faith that Truth is never impeded, and that those who deceive themselves hurt themselves, but not others.

(7/10)
Show Less
LibraryThing member TrysB
This great classic was written while Boethius was in prison awaiting execution by Theodoric, the King of the Ostrogoths. The Consolation was destined to become one of the favorite books of the Middle Ages and has continued to be esteemed by thoughtful people down to the present day. Philosophy in
Show More
the form of a woman comes to his cell and tells him she will be his guardian and prove to him the existence of Providence. What follows is a series of dissertations in prose and verse presenting the philosophical underpinnings of the belief in free will, the existence of evil and the rewards of virtue.
Show Less
LibraryThing member AlCracka
Mentioned in Evening in the Palace of Reason, which reminded me that I've always had a weird sort of feeling about this book, similar to how I felt about Led Zeppelin when I was eight - that it was some sort of magical thing different than all other bands. I don't know where I picked up this
Show More
feeling about Boethius, but there it is: I have the impression that it's magic.

If it's not, don't tell me.
Show Less
LibraryThing member duranain
Quite entertaining. Too short to be a great book, but contains some very useful ideas nonetheless.
LibraryThing member P_S_Patrick
This book is a dialogue between the female personification of Philosophy, and the author Boethius, in the sixth century A.D. He is in a bit of a fix, and is considering profound philosophical questions. The topics include free will and determinism, the nature of God, human nature, goodness,
Show More
justice, and they are discussed between the two characters who present arguments and make decisions. There are also numerous verses relating to the topics throughout the book, which act in a way as summaries.
The arguments and topics are very much of Platonic and Aristotlean origin, often with a Neoplatonic interpretation. Though the book is religious in purpose, it is a philosophical work that aims to support the tenets of religion without reference to scripture, using only reason. Boethius has a great literary style, which makes this book very nice to read, though the book is just as valuable for how it deals with the big questions. In many aspects it is more satisfying that some of Plato's lesser dialogues, which often reach no conclusion, and in which it is not immediately obvious what we are being taught. Boethius gets to the point, gets the arguments out, and makes decisions. On some things I do not believe he is correct, but a lot of the thought is incisive, and the philosophy on the whole is just as good, if not better, than Augustine's Confessions. These books have a fair amount in common, but are also very different. This book ought to be part of the education of anyone studying philosophy, and happily it has the value of being effortless to read, unlike many other important works.
Show Less
LibraryThing member GaryPatella
Boethius tried to show why good is always the better choice and evil always the worse choice. He tried doing this purely with philosophy and eliminating religion. Unfortunately, pretty much every argument used stems from the premise that God definitely exists. This is stated at the beginning, and
Show More
every argument following builds upon that premise.

So Boethius' attempt, in this regard, is a complete and utter failure. Despite his efforts to make it otherwise, this winds up being The Consolation of Religion.

That being said, the thought process was still very good at certain points. Some of the arguments are very logical, once you understand that he is building on the premise that God exists. His argument in favor of free will was very good for its time. He demonstrates that even if there were such a thing as an omniscient being (e.g. God), free will would still be very possible.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Tendulkar01
boethius's masterpiece, written in prison in the shadow of death, is a beacon of light for us all
LibraryThing member gottfried_leibniz
I enjoyed first half of the Book, especially the poetic part.

However, In the later part of his book, he dabbles in theological knots. I would recommend this to someone who enjoys Aurelius, or thinks highly of Stoic philosophy.

To my Surprise, Boethius doesn't talk about the person of Christ, maybe
Show More
because he just wanted to write philosophy for consolation.


--Deus Vult
Gottfried
Show Less
LibraryThing member Lonsing
Philosophy in the figure of a woman is calling Boethius to his better self having him realise that what he has lost - his honour, his freedom, his library, his fame & wealth - are inconsequential, they do not matter. Philosophy is bringing him to a true understanding. We need to abstract from time,
Show More
from the process of life, to see things as how they would appear to an eternal being and we can rise to this perspective through philosophy. The consolation in regards to death is realising that when you die what you lose is the present moment as the past has ceased to be and the future has not yet to come. What you think you're losing is insufficiently important. Philosophy an take you into a world of higher understanding intellectual and moral.
Show Less
LibraryThing member JBreedlove
Boethius discusses philosophy and the meaning of life with philosophy herself on the eve of his death in the 500's. There were some gems in here but most of it was rhetoric concerning classical philosophers and there positions on what is worth while in life and how God influences human life.
LibraryThing member cjrecordvt
An English rendering of the classic.
LibraryThing member gottfried_leibniz
I enjoyed first half of the Book, especially the poetic part.

However, In the later part of his book, he dabbles in theological knots. I would recommend this to someone who enjoys Aurelius, or thinks highly of Stoic philosophy.

To my Surprise, Boethius doesn't talk about the person of Christ, maybe
Show More
because he just wanted to write philosophy for consolation.


--Deus Vult
Gottfried
Show Less
LibraryThing member encephalical
The Penguin Classics translation by Victor Watts has a very helpful introduction and footnotes. Books I and II held my interest, but by the time I got to Book V and the arguments about divine perception of time it was a struggle to keep my mind from wandering.
LibraryThing member DanielSTJ
This was a great philosophy book by an extremely keen and agile mind that explores many topics. The format is good, the wisdom is plentiful, and the overall writing is strong. This is a great book for those interested in classics and those who are intrigued by philosophy.

4 stars!
LibraryThing member Sandydog1
I had received not 1 but 3, fine recommendations for this book. First, was from Ignatius J. Reilly c/o [John Kennedy Toole], of course. Second, was from my sister, who obtained her BA in Philosophy many years ago. Third was from the late great Professor Rufus Fears, via a Teaching Company lecture
Show More
dealing with life-changing books.

It is not well known today but was an extremely popular treatise from the early Medieval times onward and it greatly influenced western thought. I particularly enjoyed the lyrical sections interspersed between the dialogues between Philosophy and her student, the imprisoned Boethius.
Show Less

Subjects

Language

Original language

Latin

Original publication date

circa 525 CE

Physical description

193 p.; 22 cm

ISBN

9174864947 / 9789174864946
Page: 0.2557 seconds