Status
Call number
Collections
Publication
Description
"A SCIENTIST'S CASE FOR THE AFTERLIFE Near-death experiences, or NDEs, are controversial. Thousands of people have had them, but many in the scientific community have argued that they are impossible. Dr. Eben Alexander was one of those people. A highly trained neurosurgeon who had operated on thousands of brains in the course of his career, Alexander knew that what people of faith call the "soul" is really a product of brain chemistry. NDEs, he would have been the first to explain, might feel real to the people having them, but in truth they are simply fantasies produced by brains under extreme stress. Then came the day when Dr. Alexander's own brain was attacked by an extremely rare illness. The part of the brain that controls thought and emotion--and in essence makes us human-- shut down completely. For seven days Alexander lay in a hospital bed in a deep coma. Then, as his doctors weighed the possibility of stopping treatment, Alexander's eyes popped open. He had come back. Alexander's recovery is by all accounts a medical miracle. But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere. While his body lay in coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical existence. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine source of the universe itself. This story sounds like the wild and wonderful imaginings of a skilled fantasy writer. But it is not fantasy. Before Alexander underwent his journey, he could not reconcile his knowledge of neuroscience with any belief in heaven, God, or the soul. That difficulty with belief created an empty space that no professional triumph could erase. Today he is a doctor who believes that true health can be achieved only when we realize that God and the soul are real and that death is not the end of personal existence but only a transition. This story would be remarkable no matter who it happened to. That it happened to Dr. Alexander makes it revolutionary. No scientist or person of faith will be able to ignore it. Reading it will change your life"-- "Near-death experiences are controversial. Thousands of people have had them, but many in the scientific community have argued that they are impossible. Dr. Eben Alexander was one of those people. A highly trained neurosurgeon, Alexander knew that what people of faith call the "soul" is really a product of brain chemistry. NDEs, he would have been the first to explain, might feel real, but they are fantasies produced by brains under extreme stress. Then came the day when Dr. Alexander's own brain was attacked by a rare illness. The part of the brain that controls thought and emotion--and in essence makes us human--shut down completely. For seven days Alexander lay in a hospital bed in a deep coma. Then, as his doctors weighed the possibility of stopping treatment, Alexander's eyes popped open. He had come back. Alexander's recovery is a medical miracle. But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere. While his body lay in coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical existence. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine source of the universe itself. This story sounds like the wild imaginings of a skilled fantasy writer. But it is not fantasy. Before Alexander underwent his journey, he could not reconcile his knowledge of neuroscience with any belief in heaven, God, or the soul. That difficulty with belief created an empty space that no professional triumph could erase. Today he is a doctor who believes that true health can be achieved only when we realize that God and the soul are real and that death is not the end of personal existence but only a transition. This story would be remarkable no matter who it happened to. That it happened to Dr. Alexander makes it revolutionary"--… (more)
Media reviews
Eben Alexander assure avoir vécu malgré lui, en 2008, une expérience de mort imminente, un récit controversé que ce neurochirurgien a décidé de raconter dans un livre.
User reviews
I'm happy for Eben Alexander that he's joined the many people who have had a near-death experience (NDE) that changed their lives for the
In any case, how does Alexander know when his NDE occurred? Well, he doesn't. He never tells us how he knows that his NDE didn't occur when he was going into a coma or coming out of it.
Early in the book, Alexander describes a time when he was doing a group skydive and someone made the mistake of opening his parachute when he was below Alexander. Alexander relates that in a matter of microseconds, he reacted with a maneuver that avoided catastrophe. He says that his brain had become, for a moment, super-powered, and that this experience shows that the brain is more extraordinary than we can imagine. Alexander never makes the connection between this experience and his NDE; in other words, it doesn't seem to occur to him that his NDE might have occurred in microseconds in a brain in crisis, or that his brain created the NDE in a way he doesn't imagine. If it did occur to him, he simply rejects that logical possibility.
Alexander makes a big deal of the fact that he's a neurosurgeon to support his claim that his NDE is inexplicable by anything other than an actual experience of the divine. But again, he is undone by something else he says at the beginning of the book. He acknowledges that "surgically repairing the brain, while an extraordinarily complex undertaking, is actually no different than fixing any other, highly delicate, electrically charged machine." In other words, Alexander is like a mechanic of the brain. He doesn't have any special knowledge of neuroscience. Dr. Samuels of Brigham and Women's Hospital puts it more bluntly; saying that the fact that Eben Alexander is a neurosurgeon is no more relevant than if he were a plumber.
So we're left with the story of a guy with no particular expertise in neuroscience who had a subjective experience and decides that it is, somehow, an objective proof that heaven exists and not something that happened in his brain. Well, I have a problem with that.
My problem is NOT that Alexander had a spiritually transformative experience and that he is now a man of solid faith. I have absolutely no quarrel with faith; I have it myself. But don't confuse faith with fact; it's as simple as that.
Aside from my problem with the logical underpinnings of the book, my only other particular observation is that I got the feeling that Eben Alexander has a strong psychological need to feel special. He writes extensively about spending years emotionally and spiritually adrift for reasons relating to the fact that he is an adoptee. This seems to have instilled in him a drive to show that he is exceptional and, thus, worthy.
He's at pains to tell the reader that he's a skydiver, a top neurosurgeon, has a perfect wife and sons, and even was the most beautiful baby in the hospital when he was born. Everything that happens to him seems to be against lightning-strike odds. He claims his medical crisis was "unprecedented," as were the fact, speed and thoroughness of his recovery from a seven-day coma. As he tells it, even the weather during his week-long coma was extraordinary. So it was no surprise to read that, according to him, his NDE was exceptional. He describes its features as having been different from all other NDEs he's read about. For example, unlike pretty much everybody else, he didn't recognize himself in his NDE and he didn't meet anybody he knew. Of course, the capper in this string of long-odds experiences is that he claims that his experience is one that cannot be explained by biochemistry and will become the basis for breakthrough research in the nature of consciousness. Not surprisingly, he now has a website (which promises a store is coming!) and a foundation (which welcomes people to become members at any one of several pricey levels). His book ended up being more interesting to me as a psychological study than anything else.
Those who are interested in reading books about NDEs may find this a worthwhile read, but--with apologies to Dr. Alexander's psyche--there's nothing exceptional here.
This book will reenforce a person of faith's belief in the afterlife and show to skeptics that one can meld science and faith in compatibility, that it isn't all about 'us.' A quick, enjoyable read that leaves you with hope.
Amazing God-given insights into what life filled with God's love is truly all about. By God's grace, this neurosurgeon came to know the truth about much more the heaven, but of his very existence now and beyond.
He no longer practices medicine, did not write any articles in peer reviewed journals and spends his time on the lecture circuit. Whether the reader accepts the arguments as "truth" for the existence of an alternate spiritual reality, or simply enjoys the book as a faith testimonial, the latter is how I view it.
The impression I had going in was that
I didn't expect Proof of Heaven to change my worldview, beliefs, or lack thereof; but I was hoping to learn something. And if it was something significant that did change my mind, well, that would be quite a book and a damn valuable read.
Sadly, Dr. Alexander is a poor storyteller, but this doesn't preclude his experience from having value. Moving past this, his dismissal of nine possible scientific explanations for his NDE, listed in an appendix, seem to be disregarded out of hand. Basically, his experience was too vivid, too real, too amazing, to be anything but genuine. I didn't find this valid.
If you're going to claim that a little girl took you on the wings of a butterfly to meet god, you'd better have some damn could proof to back it up.
I went into this book with as open a mind as possible -- my atheist friends saw the book lying about and teased me about it good-naturedly. It turned out their dismissive skepticism was right on the money.
Dull story, poor science, laughable logic.
And I found it interesting that Dr. Alexander lives in Lynchburg, VA, home of Liberty University (founded by Jerry Falwell), even though he works 70 minutes away. I had to wonder if he wasn't such a skeptic to begin with after all.
This is just my humble opinion: I am not a doctor, and more power to anyone who has undergone a positive life change due to an NDE. There is so much we don't know about the brain, and that goes both ways -- this fact could credit or discredit a story like Alexander's. Unfortunately the way he dismissed what he did know served to discredit him.
While the pathogen causing Dr. Alexander’s illness was discovered- it was the common E. coli- they never did figure out how it managed to get into his brain and spinal cord fluid. Nor did they figure out how he survived it when his neocortex was shut down for days- or how he felt himself to be conscious through out the seven days and had memories of being in heaven during that time. He is convinced that his survival and his memories of heaven are proof that God exists, that the soul exists after death, and that his survival was a miracle. There is also the fact that he knew a couple of things that went on while he was in a coma that he shouldn’t have been able to know. He states that God loves us all, and his illness was for a reason.
I’m not automatically against the possible reality of near death experiences – NDEs- but I don’t automatically believe them, either. Alexander’s recovery from his illness was unlikely but there are other cases of people recovering from illness that should have killed them. And we certainly don’t know everything about the brain; neuroscience learns surprising things every day. What happened to the author was remarkable and some aspects are unexplainable at this time, but there is a chance his interpretation is colored by his religious training.
Then there is the problem that some of the things in his book just aren’t true; he took some liberties with the truth here and there. Alexander did not lapse into a coma on his own; because he was delirious and thrashing around to the point he couldn’t be treated, the emergency room doctor put him into a medically induced coma which necessitated putting him on a ventilator. He was kept in that coma, and the doctors periodically tried to bring him out of it, only to find him still delirious; he was never ‘brain dead’. He states that as he was about to be transferred from the emergency room to the ICU, the rallied for a moment and shouted “God help me!”, but the emergency room doctor, a friend and co-worker of the author, says that is impossible because he was already intubated, and with that hose down your throat, you can’t speak. There are a few other examples of dramatic license here and there, but most of them aren’t serious. Do these lapses of verity invalidate the author’s message? I don’t know.
Was the author’s recovery near miraculous? Pretty much. Does his NDE prove life after death? No. Does the fact that he apparently had mental contact with other people, learning things he couldn’t have known prove that *something* science can’t explain yet happened? Possibly; but because I now cannot trust his version of events, I don’t know. I wish he’d put forth the true version of events rather than try and make them more dramatic; his story would have been a lot more convincing then.
loving embrace and prayers was very engaging. Eben says that what many NDE survivors
say is that it is very hard to put into words what happened to them. Many parts of this book
were a bit above me in
describe rather than understanding his vocabulary in his deep analysis of the entire experience.
This account of an NDE was by far a thousand times more credible than the book by the child who in part had been
so obviously fed the literal,bible as divine dictation story and the other part influenced like most little boys by
tales of super heroes.
I wish the book had gone more into what he learned while "there" but I'm well aware that that is a far bigger topic and not easily
Great read to go along with studies that are documented in such books as Lynne McTaggart's The Intention Experiment.
Thousands of people have had near-death experiences, but scientists have argued that
Librarian's notes: This book includes two appendices, has an extensive reading list and is well-indexed.
As a chaplain who attended patients in comas and had the fortune/blessing to hear their
The writing is clear, concise and without empurpled prose to make it more dramatic or more than it should be. Dr. Alexander tells his story, and the stories he was told by those who witnessed his illness and sat by his side, in a straightforward manner. This is a testimony of belief. Honestly, I would feel secure if I was receiving treatment from someone with his faith, rather than a practitioner who viewed life from only a scientific, analytical mindset - that once you draw your last breath the lights go out, end of story, game over. That's it. Like Francis Collins' work, "The Language of God," "Proof of Heaven" shows that science and faith are compatible. They need each other. People who hold religious beliefs will be encouraged to embrace both science and faith after reading this account. I must say, however, that Dr. Alexander's description of his illness and what he went through made me squeamish at times, and I actually had a nightmare about it. It did not diminish my own Christian beliefs.
My recommendation - read this book.