Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences

I don't think this book lives up to its subtitle ("mathematical illiteracy and its consequences"). It's mostly a long series of little calculations, estimates, and examples. It may serve as an introduction to probability theory and its common pitfalls (I can't judge that), and some of the examples

Show More

are instructive, but I was hoping for more insight into the phenomenon, its causes and effects, and possible remedies.

Show Less

Innumeracy is a worthy little book, but I'm not really part of its target audience.

Paulos does not see lack of facility in basic arithmetic operations as a major problem. Rather, people fail to understand how numbers behave and how they connect to the real world — to many people, millions,

Show More

billions and trillions seem much the same. But most important for Paulos is the widespread total lack of understanding of probability, chance and statistics. He gives lots of realistic examples to illustrate the problems he sees, showing what's wrong with bad arguments and how to correct them.

He makes an interesting point, that fear of mathematics can lead college students to avoid intellectually fulfilling and socially useful fields of study, leading to less happiness as well as loss of earning power.

Speaking of the victims of poor education, Paulos says: "They're afraid. They've been intimidated by officious and sometimes sexist teachers and others who may themselves suffer from math anxiety." True, but mathematics is not the only subject in which this happens, for example, Professor Pullum mentions (here) "the promotion of nervous cluelessness that seems to be the main strand in English language instruction in the USA".

While Paulos generally advises subjecting claims to plausibility checks (using the statistical methods he teaches) and fact checking, he sometimes unnecessarily weakens his case. For example, after mentioning faith healers, homoeopathic physicians and TV evangelists as strong arguments for "an infusion of healthy skepticism into our schools", he continues: "By this dismissive attitude towards these charlatans, however, I don't mean to advocate a rigid and dogmatic scientism or some kind of simpleminded atheism.".

Why should anyone read this book? If you never learned how to calculate or estimate simple probabilities, or have forgotten, it might be a more enjoyable way of getting into the subject than a standard textbook. If you find yourself tempted by quack medicine or religious parasites, it might help to build up resistance. Parents might find the author's thoughts on making education more enjoyable interesting.

Show Less

An interesting parallel between illiteracy and innumeracy, their respective importance and consequences in daily life. Recommended read.

Just as an individual or a culture can be weak at literacy, so can an individual or a culture be weak at numeracy. Paulos does a generally strong job at delineating how our lack of facility with numbers affects the decisions we make.

Innumeracy was a wonderful book! Short, to the point, a great read, and a solid point. While there were a few ideas that pushed the envelope a bit far concerning where innumeracy can lead to; it was for the most part a solid idea. The current state of rampant innumeracy is something that should be

Show More

fought against.

Show Less

A short but highly entertaining book on numeracy. However it is presented in such a way that you want to read more. I suggest it is mandatory reading for all as I am well aware that most people are hazy when statistics are quoted - and in an era where dubious figures are used to gain sales or

Show More

electoral success it becomes a necessity to recognise statistical lies.

Whilst I am reasonably numerate it is easy to believe that people are generally very much the same and as numerate as I. This however is not the case. Being able to manage numbers used on a day to day basis is not much use when very large numbers are concerned. This is an eye-opening start to the book and provides a glimpse of how complex life is. As an example Paulos gives the example of a human squatting down is roughly a metre in diameter. A cell is the human body is as a human body to the State of Rhode Island*. A virus within a human is as a human is to the Earth!!.

I may not have understood all the fine detail however I was not trying to learn "maths" but to get an impression of what numbers can and cannot do and on that basis it is beautifully ptiched.

*And as a reviewer I looked it up - it is 1,214 sq miles (3,140 km2)

Show Less

Innumeracy is not the inability to count, but rather a lack of a general grasp of numbers and how they work. Its dangers, and they are many, are generally outlined in this book, though it is not nearly as alarmist as it could have been. The target audience is mostly the innumerate and those

Show More

numerates who are curious or concerned about innumeracy. Though I was familiar with all the mathematical concepts covered, I did learn some new things and discovered some new ways of looking at information. Though far from dense, the writing style is not quite as accessible as I'd hoped, and I suspect most innumerates and math-phobes will pass it by. Which is a shame.

Show Less

Short, easy to read and packed with examples, this is a book that the Maths-phobic need not be scared of. There is very little number crunching, just a romp through the world of the use and misuse of statistics. For those with a good level of mathematical knowledge, this book contains nothing new;

Show More

it is a book for the interested layman with a recollection of school maths. I am in agreeement with Paulos' stance on the state of the nation's numeracy- read this book and soon you will see innumeracy everywhere.

Show Less

Quick and worthwhile read with some excellent commentary on mathematical education. He delivers a very powerful message that what is lacking in all mathematical education (including mine) is an understanding of statistics. In the book he introduces in a very engaging manner some lovely uses and

Show More

misuses of probablity.

Show Less

A friend of mine, Brion Kidder, let me borrow this book for my trip to Germany, Feb 2005. I thoroughly enjoyed it! It is about the innumeracy (like "illiteracy") in America. The subtitle of the book is "Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences."

I particularly enjoyed the illiustrations of the

Show More

misapplications of the terms 'averages', 'means', and the ideas of chance. For example, if a coin it flipped six times and it comes up heads each time, what are the odds of it comming up heads a seventh time?

50% of course. The first six flips have no bearing on the seventh. But one's common sense dictates that they do.

Fun book, thanks for recommending it Brion!

Show Less

Great little book. Everybody should read this. Makes you think more clearly about the nonsense we read in the newspapers or see on TV each day - especially with respect to risk.

Excellent primer and piece of propaganda for all the people who really ought to do some math in their work and falsely believe that somebody else can do it.

It's one thing to continue educating myself with book such as these, and make headway towards being fooled less and less by ridiculous statistics and pseudoscience in general. It's another to have it delivered by a clever, snarky individual to make the reading pleasure even more profound. I

Show More

seriously enjoyed this one.

Show Less

An incredibly fun read, especially considering the subject and my own mathematical deficiencies. This was on my "to read" list for far too long; many less deserving books made it to the top of the pile, probably because I was uncomfortable facing my own shortcomings. I really had only one problem

Show More

with it, a nitpick, I suppose, but enough of one to rob it of a full fifth star. It was just one passage in the course of dismissing charlatanism of one sort or another where Paulos off-handedly dismisses "simpleminded atheism." He does so in the context of advocating agnosticism as the more reasonable position. It was the kind of dismissal made by the smug and self-righteous. Perhaps he meant something specific by "simpleminded atheism"? Since he doesn't distinguish it from perfectly reasonable simple atheism, it's hard to know. A predilection for agnosticism, insufficiently justified, indicates a kind of insidious, mush-brained tolerance for magical bullshit that is particularly out of place in this book.

That one passage aside, I was bucked up and more than a little inspired to hone those limited mathematical chops I do possess.

Show Less

Brilliant book. Should be mandatory for all high schools and any group that has to deal with numbers in any way, especially media personnel. Well written and amusing but full of excellent points.

My reactions to reading this book in 1993.

An entertaining, funny, and very informative book.

There were some things I did know like the difference between correlation and causality, the filtering effect of pseudosciences (only remembering your seemingly pre-cognitive feelings and dreams – not all

Show More

the ones that didn’t come true), and a lot of things I didn’t know (mainly all sorts of mathematical paradoxes which are demonstrably true but go against common sense), and some things I always wondered about (like just how many “precognitive” dreams you’d get in the U.S. if only 1 dream in 10,000 came “true”?).

Paulos is straightforward and full of witty, relevant examples which show the relevance of law to politics (the non-transistive situations of voting such as A>B>C but C beats A in the election), the law (probability in polygraphs, drug tests, and trials), medicine, and psychology (for instance, should you get discouraged when the doctor says you test positive for a fatal disease). Paulos exposes innumeracy in a wide variety of areas, highlights misuse of statistics and shows how vital a seemingly dry subject can be. I also think he’s right on in denouncing the way math is taught (with elementary school teachers being particularly bad). I also think he’s right to scoff at people who want to be called educated but can’t reason even a little bit mathematically.

My only quibble with this book is oddly, even though I’m only seminummerate, I would have liked some equations formally showing a principle. I can understand, given his audience, why he didn’t put any in though.

Show Less

Similar to Charles Seife's Proofiness, John Paulos discuss the devasting consequences of how innumeracy - people's inability to comprehend very large numbers - could be. Innumeracy could lead to susceptibility to pseudoscience. Unlike Seife's book, the quality of this book is severely lacking.

Show More

Other than the short about the author section indicating that the author is a professor of mathematics, this book does not have a bibliography or an index.

As someone who has background knowledge of mathematics, I was able to understand and appreciate the complexities of the issues discussed. This book could not be assigned to high school students as the language is very technical and heavy with statistics. It is difficult to follow the amount of data given. To a high school student with insufficient math background, this book may as well be written in a foreign language.

Show Less

This book has sat on my shelves for some time; I see that it was copyrighted in 1988 and I think I may have started it once but did not complete it. I have done so now and quite enjoyed it, probably because I count myself among the innumerate and was interested to read more about this affliction.

Show More

Paulos argues that many educated people who might be aghast at literary or grammatical solecisms, will ignore and not be aware of mathematical gaffes and ignorance, and that this is not healthy from various points of view, not the least of which is the ability to interpret and understand our own world. He has a good point. He explores basic principles and applications of probability and coincidence, applications of simple mathematical processes, statistical analyses, and pseudoscience that proliferates in the absence of better understandings.
He describes his objective as that of arousing a sense of numerical proportioin and an appreciation of the irreducibly probablistic nature of life. As he notes:

In an increasingly complex world full of senseless coincidence, what's required in many situations is not more facts...but a better command of known facts, and for this a course in probability is invaluable. Statistical tests and confidence intervals, the difference between cause and correlation, conditional probablility, independence, and the multiplication principle, the art of estimating and the design of experiments, the notion of expected value and of a probability distribution, as well as the most common examples and counter-examples of all of the above, would be much more widely known. Probability, like logic, is not just mathematicians anymore. It permeates our lives.

There are a number of interesting facts and perspectives to be had through this book.

For instance, in making the point about the relative size of large numbers, Paulos notes that a million seconds equals 11 and one-half days, while a billion seconds equals almost 32 years. Comparing sizes, Paulos notes:

Taking a human being to be spherical and about a meter in diameter (assuming a person is squatting), we end end up with some biologically revealing comparisons that are somewhat easier to visualize. The size of the human cell is to that of a person as a person's size is to that of Rhode Island. Likewise, a virus is to a person as a person is to the earth; an atom is to a person as a person is the earth's orbit around the sun; and a proton is to a person as a person is to the distance to Alpha Centauri.

Looking at the G8 leaders, how many different ways could they be arranged for a photograph? A very simple calculation (8 x 7 x 6x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1) gives the answer of 40,320!

Paulos addresses the question of coincidence which has given rise to no end of charlatans and pseudosciences, and as he notes: "A tendency to drastically underestimate the frequency of coincidence is a prime characteristic of innumerates, who generally accord great significance to correspondences of all sorts while attributing too little significance to quite conclusive but less flashy statistical evidence." Paulos notes that some unlikely event is likely to occur, whereas it's much less likely that a particular one will. The paradoxical conclusion is that it would be very unlikely for unlikely events not to occur. If you don't specify a predicted event precisely, there are an indeterminate number of ways for an event of that general kind to take place. Hence the "power" of prediction of all sorts of charlatans.

Paulos notes that improbabilities are to be expected and should not be invested with any particular significance. For example, the probability of being dealt any particular bridge hand of 13 cards is one in six billion, but it would be absurd to conclude, therefore, that any one hand is impossible to have because it is so very improbable. Also, disproving a claim that something exists is often quite difficult, and this difficulty is often mistaken for evidence that the claim is true (another source of "legitimization" for charlatans).

Further on coincidence, Paulos notes:

...in recent years, the plethora of names and dates and addresses and organizations in a complicated world appears to have triggered many people's inborn tendency to note coincidence and improbability, leading them to postulate connections and forces where there are none, where there is only coincidence.
Our innate desire for meaning and pattern can lead us astray if we don't remind ourselves of the ubiquity of coincidence, an ubiquity which is the consequence of our tendency to filter out the banal and impersonal, of our increasingly convoluted world, and ...of the unexpected frequency of many kinds of coincidence. Belief in the necessary or even probable significance of coincidences is a psychological remnant of our simpler past. It constitutes a kind of psychological illusion to which innumerate people are particularly prone.
(July/00)

Show Less

On one hand, everybody should be made to read this book. It gives nice examples about how statistics work and what numbers actually mean. This is especially important in this day and age where statistics are so misused as to mean something completely different than what is actually shown

Show More

(Republican claims vs Democrats claims using the same statistics!) I have a good understanding of how numbers work, but there were a few eye-opening discussions here (See Effective Results of a Cancer drug or 50% off of 50% is not 100 %).

One thing, this book uses a lot of math to make the its case. While the math is very valid and essential in statistics, it can bog down the reading. Luckily, the author is able to sum up what the math means in word form.

This book is definitely dated. But all the points made are still valid today, maybe even more so where media sensationalized most stories, without very much content.

Show Less

Palos is hard to beat, when it comes to explaining both good and bad reasoning.