The selfish gene

by Richard Dawkins

Paperback, 1989




Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 1989.


The million copy international bestseller, critically acclaimed and translated into over 25 languages.As influential today as when it was first published, The Selfish Gene has become a classic exposition of evolutionary thought. Professor Dawkins articulates a gene's eye view of evolution - a view giving centre stage to these persistent units of information, and in which organisms can be seen as vehicles for their replication. This imaginative, powerful, and stylistically brilliant work not only brought the insights of Neo-Darwinism to a wide audience, but galvanized the biologycommunity, generating much debate and stimulating whole new areas of research. Forty years later, its insights remain as relevant today as on the day it was published.This 40th anniversary edition includes a new epilogue from the author discussing the continuing relevance of these ideas in evolutionary biology today, as well as the original prefaces and foreword, and extracts from early reviews.Oxford Landmark Science books are 'must-read' classics of modern science writing which have crystallized big ideas, and shaped the way we think.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member princemuchao
This classic science text personifies the gene in order to look at evolution/natural selection in a new way. Game theory and its effects on natural selection play a key role, and Dawkins' biological examples throughout are interesting and informative - did you know that male bees do not have
Show More

This is also the book that introduced Dawkins' concept of memes - all the more important a concept to those internet-savvy individuals who may be using this "web 2.0" site.

Written in 1976, the text is a bit dated, but the 30th anniversary edition has 50 pages of endnotes that elucidate the text and deal with some of the controversy and counter-responses generated after its publication.
Show Less
LibraryThing member iayork
Careful when you choose the "red pill": "Why are people?" This is the title of the first chapter of Selfish Gene. In the first paragraph of the book the author states that Charles Darwin made ii possible for us to answer this question sensibly. The book promises to help the reader answer this
Show More
question and such others as "Is there meaning to life?" It delivers on the promise.

Dawkins has a unique gift for communication. As you read a paragraph densely packed with concepts and assimilate them, inevitably your mind goes "hmm... that's sounds good, but.." Invariably Dawkins has anticipated these objections and he deals with them one by one. There are many other good books out there which explain the theory of Charles Darwin but I would be surprised if any of them is as good as the Selfish Gene.

A word of caution. Starting to look at the world through Darwinian glasses is very similar to Neo's taking the "red pill" in matrix. These glasses make you question a lot of "facts" assumptions and even your sense of right and wrong, which can be disturbing.
Show Less
LibraryThing member imnotsatan
Dawkins is a pompous, overblown windbag, and his writing is exactly what you'd expect from a person like him. There's nothing wrong with the ideas; the ideas are fine. However, Dawkins's "listen at me because I am so very, very smart and therefore better than you" attitude ruined any enjoyment I
Show More
could have drawn from them.
Show Less
LibraryThing member johnxlibris
The basic premise of this foundational work states that genes will act "selfishly" in order to ensure further self-replication. This does not imply that they do this consciously, but as Dawkins carefully lays out, the selfishness is behavioral, not subjective. To put it differently, genes that
Show More
behave selfishly (they benefit at the expense of others) tend the survive and replicate themselves into the next generation. That behavior is then repeated. Even apparently altruistic behavior in the organisms, the genes' vehicle, can be shown to ultimately benefit the genes of the altruistic host.

My explanation is far too simplified to give justice to Dawkin's work. In his mouth, the workings of creation take on a glorious simplicity even if the explanation for them is laboriously worked out. He discusses how genetic "selfishness" plays out between species, families, sexes, within individuals and even extends beyond the individual into the material world.

Dawkin's book is the answer to the ultimate "how" and a partial response to the "why." It reminds me of the narrator's quote from the latest film adaptation of War of the Worlds (2005): "By the toll of a billion deaths, man had earned his immunity, his right to survive among this planet's infinite organisms. And that right is ours against all challenges." We exist because we can. Sure it's a tautology, but a wonderfully assuring one.
Show Less
LibraryThing member bragan
Richard Dawkins is probably best known these days for his writings about atheism and religion. No matter what you think of his take on that particular topic -- and I have rather complicated mixed feelings about it, myself -- it's a bit of a shame that this has come to overshadow his career as a
Show More
writer of books on evolution so much. Because the man really does have a marvelous talent for explaining even the most complicated aspects of evolutionary biology in clear and comprehensible terms through the use of apt analogies and the careful construction of simple examples. This gene's-eye view of evolution, which pays particular attention to issues of self-interest and altruism, is certainly no exception. It's by no means the last word on the subject -- Dawkins doesn't for a second pretend that it is -- and since it was written in 1976, some of the details are doubtless a little dated now. (Dawkins' attempt to use a computer-based metaphor at one point is amusingly quaint now, if nothing else.) But there are good reasons why this has remained in print for three decades plus.

The version I have, by the way, is a 2004 reprint of the 1989 edition, which included two new chapters and a large number of excellent new endnotes correcting, clarifying, and expanding on the original text. Apparently there was also a new 30th anniversary edition in 2006, but other than a new introduction, I'm not sure what, if anything, was done to update it then.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Gazgnu
This is the book that kickstarted it all for me. I had the wrong attitude to truth before I read this. Dawkins acheived so much in this work. A new (and logical and true) perspective on our evolutionary origins was presented (mainly using the work of William Hamilton, I think, to put group
Show More
selection theories in their place). It was presented in a readable way, thus a coming-of-age for the Pop Science genre. It established him as the prime-mover in modern British culture for rational discourse (he's amazingly rigorous in his thoughts, his famous letter to his ten-year-old daughter on the subject of Truth & good criteria for believing in things should be read in school assemblies every thursday, fo' sho'). And he set out a rough theory of memes (cultural darwinism), which also paved the way for much edifying discourse on Universal Darwinism. He's the man.
Show Less
LibraryThing member ashishg
Evolution theory with gene as center of survival competitions, and how animal social behaviours can be interpreted as result of this process. Introduces to "Evolutionary Stable Strategy" concept. Some novel ideas but poorly written or explained, and leaves many questions unanswered.
LibraryThing member vegetarian
This is the book that so many want us to read, and actually, it's quite a fascinating read. I encourage indulging that advice.
LibraryThing member lewallen
The book that popularized the 'selfish gene' movement in biology, which is the idea that all behavior can be explained in terms of genes replicating themselves in the most effective possible manner. The argument is convincingly demonstrated with many examples and excellent reasoning, and for the
Show More
one apparent exception, humans, Dawkins postulates the existance of a second replator, coining the word "meme" to name it.
Show Less
LibraryThing member daschaich
A Classic of Popular Science: More than a quarter-century after its first publication, Richard Dawkins's "The Selfish Gene" remains a classic of popular science writing. This edition includes two new chapters as well as extensive endnotes that do much to perfect the original text and correct the
Show More
few mistakes that were found in it. "The Selfish Gene" is explicitly directed at the layman, and absolutely no knowledge of biology is assumed. While this presents a danger of boring readers (such as myself) who are already familiar with DNA and meiosis, the colorful metaphors Dawkins uses throughout the book do much to keep the reading engrossing and entertaining.

After a lengthy exploration of basic biology, covering topics such as DNA and the origin of life, Dawkins introduces the gene-centered view of evolution that has long been textbook orthodoxy. Dawkins uses the remainder of the book to look at various types of animal behavior in an effort to convey some general conclusions and tools to help the reader understand evolution and natural selection. Much of his effort is devoted to explaining behavior in terms of the 'selfish gene' - especially social behavior that has long been held to have evolved 'for the good of the species.' Dawkins shows that how fundamental axiom of natural selection (that the genes best at surviving and reproducing will eventually spread through the gene pool) leads directly to the selfish gene and the behavior exhibited by nearly all animals (humans being the prime exception).

Many of Dawkins's metaphors have caused raised eyebrows - one outstanding example is his characterization of living things as "lumbering robots" built to protect the genes that hide in them - but the metaphors are always (eventually) brought under control. The title is one such metaphor that has often been misunderstood by superficial analysis. The 'selfish gene' is simply a gene that does not aid others at its own expense. Such genes would be better able to reproduce and spread through the gene pool than those that did sacrifice themselves for others, and therefore completely dominate the gene pools of all species as a result of billions of years of evolutionary pressure.

I cannot hope to adequately summarize Dawkins's arguments in a mere review, so I sincerely urge you to read "The Selfish Gene" for yourself. I should warn that conservatives would probably not enjoy the book nearly as much as I did. Dawkins is an open secular humanist with socialist leanings, and is not worried about offending the delicate sensibilities of creationists and fundamentalists. This book should only be read by those willing to 'accept' the validity of natural selection and evolution; others would only waste their time. I would direct readers seeking a more scientific discussion of these issues to G. C. Williams's "Adaptation and Natural Selection." All others will most likely enjoy "The Selfish Gene" a great deal and finish the book with a new appreciation for and understanding of evolution and biology.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jrcchicago
This is an intriguing book, filled with ideas to challenge the lay reader. Towards the end of the book, for example, Dawkins describes the concept of "memes," ideas that act as viruses, transmitting themselves more or less successfully from person to person, mutating over time and competing with
Show More
other ideas. It's the first time I had ever encountered that concept -- he may be the person who originated it -- but I have read about it in different contexts several times since, and I don't think anyone else has explained it as simply and cogently as Dawkins does here.
Show Less
LibraryThing member woollymammoth
You have read this book haven't you? You must, you simply must. It's essential for explaining the world, even if you are a creationist you should read it and see what you think. No, you can't have my copy.
LibraryThing member lorin
This is one of those landmark science books written for the general public. Dawkins makes a convincing case for a gene's-eye view of evolution. He introduces concepts like evolutionary stable sets (ESS), survival machines, and memes. Since this isn't my area of research, I do not know whether or
Show More
not Dawkins represents mainstream views in the biology community.
Show Less
LibraryThing member P_S_Patrick
I finally got round to reading this book, around a year after having gone through quite a number of his other scientific books which were on the university library (This one was always out, and several copies had been lost). I found this book a good read, but on the whole learned nothing
Show More
particularly new. This is mostly due to the fact that a lot of the ideas in the book are to be found in The Blind Watchmaker, and that I am a cell biology undergraduate.
If you haven't read any similar books, then you should get more out of this book than I did. It is well written. The arguments are well thought out and put in a way that a non biologist could easily follow. The style of the writing is good, with interesting examples. For a biologist, there will be a few explanations that you could skip over, or just skim, though they are generally short and don't detract, and are really quite necessary for the wider audience, and this is a popular science book afterall.
I would recommend this book to those who take an interest in the natural world, as there is a lot more to evolution than many people realise. This book reveals a different perspective on it, which explains a lot, using genes as the fundamental unit of selection, as opposed to the individual organism. This doesn't go against traditional evolutionary theory, but is just an evolution of the theory really, which explains a lot of quirks found in various species, which would not be explained by more old fashioned versions of the theory.
For more knowledgable readers, I would reccommend the Extended Phenotype, which is more technical in content, and lends yet another way of thinking about the influence of genes.
If you want a general overview of evolution, The Blind Watchmaker may be a better bet, as it covers evolution more comprehensively, including arguments to convince those who are inclined to question the validity of the theory. For those who have a good grasp of basic evolution theory, then this book would make an interesting next read, as it isn't hard going or too long, and should be enjoyable.
Show Less
LibraryThing member gopfolk
Interesting to say the least. I added this book to my reading list because of the impact the author has had on society…including the word ‘meme’!! The concepts that Dawkin’s lays out are so simple that anyone can follow but that is why he is blasted by many on the political right. He takes
Show More
out all of the conscious decisions out of what ‘the body’ does and breaks it down to the base action/reaction.
It takes all of what we, animal and plant, are and determines that we are nothing but ‘vehicles’ for genes. Let’s be honest if we take out all consciousness out of the situation…he is right!
Amazing insight and creative way of making his points by looking to nature, game strategy, and the pure logic to demonstrate how and why altruistic and selfishness can, at times, be one in the same.
I’ll be reading more of Dawkin’s soon.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Qshio
You don't really understand evolution until you read this book. Probably the best thing I can say about it is that it makes the thing we call "life" -- usually described as this ethereal force or spark -- far more concrete than one thought possible. Read this, then read The Beak of the Finch by
Show More
Jonathan Weiner, and then this whole thing we call evolution will make sense on the micro and macro level.
Show Less
LibraryThing member _Greg
This classic book expands understanding of the evolution and nature of life by looking at it all from the "viewpoint" of genes. This is also the book where Dawkins proposes the idea of memes, the gene-like elements of culture. A must read.
LibraryThing member Lapsus16
Bestseller by a fairly egomaniac scientist. This is his best work, then he decided he was God and lost touch with reality. His anti-higher power belief is OK and expected in a modern scientist, but he is too much absorbed by his own success that started to become more a liability than an asset for
Show More
the atheist-rational world.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jwhenderson
I have finally (after several recommendations of friends over the years) read The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins. Some of my immediate thoughts: I enjoyed his discussion of the importance of the gene through a dissection and diminution of the human being.
I will, no doubt have to read it again to
Show More
understand all the nuances of the work. Some of Dawkins' metaphors, while mellifluous, are potentially problematical, e.g. "We are machines created by our genes." They roll off the tongue well, and I will no doubt use them in conversation but I am still trying to understand the subtleties of his scientific utterances. I have not yet wrapped my mind around a “purpose-intent” set of genes. The answer is probably hiding there the cloud of new ideas and I missed it, but they have lasted for more than a quarter century and Dawkins has established the concept of "meme" which has become ubiquitous. The book was fun, educational, and thought-provoking to read. I hope my genes will allow me to learn more about this area of science.
Also, I wonder why the idea of selfishness, whether it exists as a gene, or as a learned philosophy is not given a fair shake as a possible remedy for some agreed upon social ills. Is it not possible that Ayn Rand had it right in her concept of selfishness as a virtue?
Show Less
LibraryThing member yakov.perelman
This book should be mandatory for any serious science education program for young people. I wish I had read it when it was published and not just the 30th anniversary edition, I never seemed to find the time. Simply delicious
LibraryThing member Dianejones59
A classic book on gene theory written in Dawkins beautiful prose.
LibraryThing member kaipakartik
Richard Dawkins considers the gene to be the basic unit of evolution in this book. It is a quick read for such a dense subject and Dawkins does a brilliant job explaining.
One of the best popular science books that I have read.
LibraryThing member RajivC
I could not focus on this book at all. Probably, genetics is not my thing. However, on the whole, I thought that the book was rather well written. The language is, in itself, fairly simple and therefore the book can reach out to a relatively large audience. However, it is not an easy book to read,
Show More
and you need to concentrate and read it well.

I am not sure why people are disturbed by the idea of a selfish gene. To me, it is a natural consequence of living, and of being
Show Less
LibraryThing member comfypants
He repeats himself a lot, but on the other hand it's extremely clear and easy to understand. I've never had any particular interest in biology or zoology, but Dawkins managed to have me fascinated by the subject.
LibraryThing member red.yardbird
Great book. Love Dawkins style and explanations.



Page: 0.8753 seconds