Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science: An Astronomer Among the American Romantics

by Renée Bergland

Hardcover, 2008

Status

Available

Call number

520.92

Collection

Publication

Beacon Press (2008), 320 pages

Description

New England blossomed in the nineteenth century, producing a crop of distinctively American writers along with distinguished philosophers and jurists, abolitionists and scholars. A few of the female stars of this era-Emily Dickinson, Margaret Fuller, and Susan B. Anthony, for instance-are still appreciated, but there are a number of intellectual women whose crucial roles in the philosophical, social, and scientific debates that roiled the era have not been fully examined. Among them is the astronomer Maria Mitchell. She was raised in isolated but cosmopolitan Nantucket, a place brimming with enthusiasm for intellectual culture and hosting the luminaries of the day, from Ralph Waldo Emerson to Sojourner Truth. Like many island girls, she was encouraged to study the stars. Given the relative dearth of women scientists today, most of us assume that science has always been a masculine domain. But as Renee Bergland reminds us, science and humanities were not seen as separate spheres in the nineteenth century; indeed, before the Civil War, women flourished in science and mathematics, disciplines that were considered less politically threatening and less profitable than the humanities. Mitchell apprenticed with her father, an amateur astronomer; taught herself the higher math of the day; and for years regularly "swept" the clear Nantucket night sky with the telescope in her rooftop observatory. In 1847, thanks to these diligent sweeps, Mitchell discovered a comet and was catapulted to international fame. Within a few years she was one of America's first professional astronomers; as "computer of Venus"-a sort of human calculator-for the U.S. Navy's Nautical Almanac, she calculated the planet's changing position. After an intellectual tour of Europe that included a winter in Rome with Sophia and Nathaniel Hawthorne, Mitchell was invited to join the founding faculty at Vassar College, where she spent her later years mentoring the next generation of women astronomers. Tragically, opportunities for her students dried up over the next few decades as the increasingly male scientific establishment began to close ranks. Mitchell protested this cultural shift in vain. "The woman who has peculiar gifts has a definite line marked out for her," she wrote, "and the call from God to do his work in the field of scientific investigation may be as imperative as that which calls the missionary into the moral field or the mother into the family . . . The question whether women have the capacity for original investigation in science is simply idle until equal opportunity is given them." In this compulsively readable biography, Renee Bergland chronicles the ideological, academic, and economic changes that led to the original sexing of science-now so familiar that most of us have never known it any other way.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member Devil_llama
A biography of a little known female astronomer who was widely known in her day. Why we hear so little about these women is actually a topic taken up in this work. The author discusses the change in attitudes from the time of Mitchell's birth (1818), when science was considered an appropriate field
Show More
of study for women, and in fact, was considered feminine, while humanities and classics were fields women should not be part of; they were for men only, and the late nineteenth century, when science became professionalized, masculinized, and off limits to most women. Lest the reader should think that the early nineteenth century was some paragon of feminist ideals, the author details the reasons why women were pushed toward science, and it has a lot to do with maintaining the hierarchical order that was seen as appropriate and ordained by God, with men on top (white men, of course). Mitchell was an early mover in the push to gain rights for women, but even in her push, she felt that women needed to remain "feminine", and not become "like men". Well written, and well researched, but with a few minor errors that a good editor could have excised quite quickly (such as one place where she has Mitchell writing a letter to a student in 1960, who was part of her 1859 class - a letter that would have to have been written many decades after both were dead). Not a lot of mistakes, but annoying just the same, and with a tendency to interfere with the narrative.
Show Less
LibraryThing member JBD1
A very good biography of astronomer Maria Mitchell; my only quibble with it is that it gets rather repetitive at various points, something that could have been edited away very easily. That aside, Mitchell's biography more than makes up for any minor editorial infelicities.
LibraryThing member asukamaxwell
Maria Mitchell is a wonderful and brilliant woman to read about. She is incredibly intelligent, talented, humble to a fault, sarcastic in her humor, and even wrote poetry! After reading this, I must revisit her telescope at the Smithsonian.

The book begins by exploring Maria's childhood. Maria's
Show More
father was an astronomer and a pillar of the Nantucket community and promoted gender equality in the classroom. On her Grand Tour of Europe, Maria met the top astronomers of her day, and even befriended the Hawthornes. The author does an excellent job of describing the interconnection of science and gender, poetry and astronomy. Science used to be considered a feminine subject. It was only post-Civil War that the sciences became "masculine" and professionalized. The author explains exactly when, how and why this gender inequality in the professional sciences began.

However, this book does have one flaw. Earlier in the book, the author points out that "some of Mitchell's chroniclers have tried to defend her from the charges of lesbianism..." As if being gay were a "charge?" It is known that Maria Mitchell did not marry or take any known male lovers, but preferred the company of women. Later the author writes "Mitchell's affections... will never be clearly limned for the historian" and yet on the very next page, firmly states "I don't think she was a secret lesbian." The author is keen to bring it up but immediately dismiss the possibility, rather than make any attempt to explore it. You can be sure I will pursue this point on my own.
Show Less

Awards

Massachusetts Book Award (Must-Read (Longlist) — Nonfiction — 2009)

Original language

English

Physical description

320 p.; 6.23 inches

ISBN

0807021423 / 9780807021422

Similar in this library

Page: 0.4944 seconds