Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
A brilliant and courageous doctor reveals, in gripping accounts of true cases, the power and limits of modern medicine. Sometimes in medicine the only way to know what is truly going on in a patient is to operate, to look inside with one's own eyes. This book is exploratory surgery on medicine itself, laying bare a science not in its idealized form but as it actually is -- complicated, perplexing, and profoundly human. Atul Gawande offers an unflinching view from the scalpel's edge, where science is ambiguous, information is limited, the stakes are high, yet decisions must be made. In dramatic and revealing stories of patients and doctors, he explores how deadly mistakes occur and why good surgeons go bad. He also shows us what happens when medicine comes up against the inexplicable: an architect with incapacitating back pain for which there is no physical cause a young woman with nausea that won't go away a television newscaster whose blushing is so severe that she cannot do her job. Gawande offers a richly detailed portrait of the people and the science, even as he tackles the paradoxes and imperfections inherent in caring for human lives. At once tough-minded and humane, Complications is a new kind of medical writing, nuanced and lucid, unafraid to confront the conflicts and uncertainties that lie at the heart of modern medicine, yet always alive to the possibilities of wisdom in this extraordinary endeavor.… (more)
User reviews
The book is divided into three parts, each dealing
I think a book such as this one is important for a variety of reasons. It is a way for patients to understand a different side of medicine. It “humanizes” medical practitioners who often no longer have the time to “really” get to know their patients. However, the most important reason for an individual to read this book would be to see how important it is for each person to be an advocate for his or her own health care. Patients and doctors should be full partners in medical care with both sides bringing honesty and thoughtful consideration into the course of any medical treatment.
After reading this one, you should go out and read Better. It's geared toward more of a medical audience than Complications, but both are eminently readable by an educated lay public.
Highly recommended, especially for those who enjoy things like Oliver Sacks and medical mysteries.
Some of my favorite points were:
That every patient wants an experienced doctor, but the only way a young doctor becomes an experienced doctor is by performing procedures (very much like a teacher).
The evolutionary purpose of morning sickness
The role of intuition in medicine
How some doctor's go "bad"
The ways doctors try to police themselves
How much doctors and medical researchers still don't know -- the amount of uncertainty and subjectivity.
Other doctors have much to learn from palliative doctors, who take the patient's suffering as seriously as the symptoms.
I also liked reading Gawande's descriptions of his role as a surgical resident -- although how he managed to juggle writing this book with his work and family life (he has a wife and 3 kids) boggles my mind.
Gawande's book also might give some readers a new perspective on their own bodies. While we tend to think that we know our own bodies pretty well, it's fair to say that surgeons have seen more of more human bodies than most people have, or care to. His descriptions of surgical procedures are clear and straightforward and free of unnecessarily technical language The author deserves some credit for not going in for shock value, even when he describes operations that would amaze doctors that practiced just a few decades ago. The human body, which is, perhaps, the real main character of "Complications" is made to look both eminently functional and endlessly strange, sometimes too delicate and sometimes surprisingly resilient, Gawande succeeds, I think, in convincing his readers that its thanks to the surgeons like him that we know as much about it as we do.
Complications is also the hardest book I've ever read - all
Brilliant. But not for hypochondriacs or those who don't take too well to honest medical writing.
This made it a perfect book for both Erin and I to read.
Erin tore through it faster than I did (I was reading a few other books simultaneously),
I enjoyed when the author made suggestions on how to get better outcomes... Particularly the "If we can multiply the success here by every doctor, then we'll save X number of lives" advice.
The essays actually had the "feel" of a weblog post that a doctor would make.
Because I work in medicine and understand the issues, the complexity and the "art" besides the science I found the book somewhat a review of my day-to-day work. It is a truer view than many such books I have read. I would recommend this book, if only for the different scenes and how decisions are made in medicine.
Gawande engages the reader using frequent case studies of patients he and his colleagues have encountered. These serve to draw the reader in and also as great jumping off points for Gawande to tackle the struggles and questions that plague both doctors and patients about the state of medicine today. In Complications, Gawande contemplates the mystery of pain, questions how we do and essentially must entrust patient care to doctors in training, the improbable victory of a surgeon's instinct over facts and logic, and many more fascinating topics.
Complications is an important book. It's a book that asks us to consider the fact that even the doctors who are treating us are merely fallible human beings who know a lot but are often forced to rely on gut instinct in a crunch which may work to the benefit of the patient but may also work to their detriment. It's a book that reminds the rest of us, as patients, that we have an important role to play in our own healthcare. All this, and it also features the sort of compelling, easy to understand writing that makes Complications almost impossible to put down.
Does anyone else think he should disclose the costs of these surgeries, whether patients have medical insurance, and his own income? (Don't forget, he's also a staff writer for the New Yorker; all it takes is to be friends with the editor of Slate and with Malcolm Gladwell). I guess I have long been sensitive about this but the omission of financial factors was more in the forefront of my mind because I had just read Head Cases by Michael Paul Mason, where a thread throughout is the financial impact of brain injury on families and whether insurance will cover therapies.
Most ridiculous examples ... a super-obese working-class man who gets gastric bypass surgery. This might be the only profile in which we're told the surgery at the time cost $20,000. But the man is on the brink of bankruptcy, can't get out of his house and had sold off large equipment. Surely insurance can't be covering this? What is the financial impact on his family.
There's all this posturing about the Oh Great Doctors' ethical dilemmas: what should he recommend? Surgery or not? Some mention of the weight of pain and suffering. But *never* a mention of what must loom in the patient's and p's families' minds: "how much will this cost? We can spend up to here but not up to here. How many years to pay this off?"
Then there's the case of an elderly Mr. Lazaroff with a tumor around his spine. Already partially paralyzed, he is at risk for more paralysis and ending up on a ventilator until his death. He wants the surgery.
We're told that the few weeks of intensive care (what about the hours-long surgery?) incur "enormous" financial costs before his death. I guess the man must have been on Medicare, so no or few worries. But $100,000 on up is a safe guess.
Shouldn't that provoke a mite bit of musing of how the money might be better distributed. Breast screening for the working poor? A year of intensive therapy for a young brain-damaged man who might be able to support or take care of himself at the end of it? It would be interesting to see how a doctor under a state-run universal health service would weigh the choices. There is always *rationing* in such systems and the age of a patient is a large factor.
Also irritated by the young woman who wanted to be "on TV" but had a blushing issue. Now there are many jobs in broadcast journalism--responsible, well-paying jobs--where blushing wouldn't be a hindrance. But this woman wants to be "on TV" and her dream must be fulfilled, not matter what the cost (not that it's mentioned). How could a young person, perhaps making $20,000 in the late 1990s on a small station afford it? Couldn't have student loans, so must be rich parents. Insurance wouldn't cover this, right?
Once upon a time, when the circumstances and the medical care were in reach of most of the middle-class, even the working lower US middle-class, maybe these little pieces could stand alone but nowadays, I think not. And, no, I couldn't afford any of these illnesses,
Some good insights into what medicine is doing, and what its limits are.