Publication
Harmony Books, c2009.
Status
Available
Description
Science. Nonfiction. HTML: Is it really human nature to stab one another in the back in our climb up the corporate ladder? Competitive, selfish behavior is often explained away as instinctive, thanks to evolution and "survival of the fittest," but, in fact, humans are equally hard-wired for empathy. Using research from the fields of anthropology, psychology, animal behavior, and neuroscience, Frans de Waal brilliantly argues that humans are group animals---highly cooperative, sensitive to injustice, and mostly peace-loving---just like other primates, elephants, and dolphins. This revelation has profound implications for everything from politics to office culture..
Media reviews
User reviews
LibraryThing member Narboink
This is the first book I’ve read by Frans de Waal. It is written in simple, accessible language and is positively stuffed with provocative ideas and anecdotal stories. The premise, that empathetic behaviors and tendencies predate our evolutionary pedigree, directly addresses underrepresented
Show More
views in both evolutionary biology as well as popular conceptions of our own animal nature. I found his unapologetic attitude about the political implications of his work to be personally refreshing and scientifically defensible. However, here’s what really sells the book: in casual conversation I found myself repeatedly (and indirectly) referencing “The Age of Empathy” as a touchstone for an astonishing array of tangential interdisciplinary topics. My only complaint is that I would have preferred a longer, more complex book on the subject. Show Less
LibraryThing member Citizenjoyce
This is a clearly written, easily read report of animal studies that show empathy to be an evolutionary necessary, and basic attribute of humanity. Written after the current financial collapse, DeWall shows that following the Milton Friedman, Alan Greenspan, Gordon Gekko assumption that greed is
I also like the fact that he debunks the behavorist idea that animals don't have emotions by giving clear examples of those emotions. The fact that the book is so easy to read makes it easier for me to recommend it to people who might be reluctant to read more complicated animal studies.
Show More
good and a natural underpinning to a self-sustaining economic system is what lead to the collapse of that system. He shows that humans are social creatures, and that society cannot exist unless its members take the well-being of others into account. These are provocative ideas that are well worth pondering at this point in our history.I also like the fact that he debunks the behavorist idea that animals don't have emotions by giving clear examples of those emotions. The fact that the book is so easy to read makes it easier for me to recommend it to people who might be reluctant to read more complicated animal studies.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jensenmk82
De Waal shows that empathy in animals is well-established and is chiefly interested in exploring how it functions. From the average reader's point of view, Chapter 7 is the most interesting, where the author addresses the role of empathy in human society.
De Waal is strongly committed to the view
Frans de Waal writes in an offhand casual style that belies his immense learning.
De Waal is strongly committed to the view
Show More
that both empathy and gender differences related to it are deeply grounded in evolutionary biology. This makes him optimistic, on the one hand, but also hesitant to endorse any re-engineering of human nature; he does, however, believe our species is capable of more "fellow feeling." But he stops short of proposing "how to achieve this goal"—perhaps reserving it for a future book? Frans de Waal writes in an offhand casual style that belies his immense learning.
Show Less
LibraryThing member dono421846
de Waal's primary talent is as a popularizer of the subtle findings of primatology, of which he is a major figure. So unlike similar summaries from science writers who may not fully command the literature, here we have the benefit of an insider's deep knowledge, phrased in a casual tone unflinching
In this book, for me the most startling new discovery: "about seventy thousand years ago, our lineage was at the edge of extinction, living in scattered small bands with a global population of just a couple of thousand." I had no idea the human race came so close to extinction.
Show More
in its directness. His books are always enjoyable, but for various reasons I would recommend picking up his latest, and only reading the earlier titles if there is a specific need.In this book, for me the most startling new discovery: "about seventy thousand years ago, our lineage was at the edge of extinction, living in scattered small bands with a global population of just a couple of thousand." I had no idea the human race came so close to extinction.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Cheryl_in_CC_NV
Important if the reader is new to the ideas - but in my case de Waal was 'preaching to the choir.' ?�So I only read about 1/3 (beginning and end).
Yes, it's political. ?áBut the author's views are based on good science. ?áAdam Smith, Mencius, even Darwin, knew that 'survival of the fittest'
[Adam] Smith saw society as a huge machine, the wheels of which are polished by virtue, whereas vice causes them to grate." ?áIn other words, ppl who revere him as the founder of cut-throat capitalism have not read their economic 'bible' carefully. ?á
FYI, De Waal isn't a communist, and knows well the pitfalls of Europe's caretaker governments. ?áHe criticizes the attitudes of the citizens who have, in many countries there, developed an attitude of entitlement. ?áIow, he presents a more balanced view than many, and does so credibly as he has spent decades living on both continents. ?áAlso FYI, I'm making it sound even more political than it is - there's a lot of interesting stuff about animals, and about ppl as simply a more cognitively complex (again my paraphrase) animal."
Yes, it's political. ?áBut the author's views are based on good science. ?áAdam Smith, Mencius, even Darwin, knew that 'survival of the fittest'
Show More
doesn't mean we all ought to become Machiavellian. ?áGordon Gekko is wrong. ?á1. Apes and other animals show us that empathy, cooperation, and even altruism is wired into us, and 2. even though competition is, also, we can use our intelligence to avoid becoming so competitive we are ruthless. 3. Compassion & cooperation are Christian virtues, and it's terribly hypocritical for righteous Republicans to cut funding for social programs. ?áIt is ?áIn the (not very) long run, win-win for everyone to play on the same team (my paraphrase, not de Waal's).[Adam] Smith saw society as a huge machine, the wheels of which are polished by virtue, whereas vice causes them to grate." ?áIn other words, ppl who revere him as the founder of cut-throat capitalism have not read their economic 'bible' carefully. ?á
FYI, De Waal isn't a communist, and knows well the pitfalls of Europe's caretaker governments. ?áHe criticizes the attitudes of the citizens who have, in many countries there, developed an attitude of entitlement. ?áIow, he presents a more balanced view than many, and does so credibly as he has spent decades living on both continents. ?áAlso FYI, I'm making it sound even more political than it is - there's a lot of interesting stuff about animals, and about ppl as simply a more cognitively complex (again my paraphrase) animal."
Show Less
Language
Original language
English
ISBN
9780285639652
Original publication date
2009