Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
True fear is a gift. Unwarranted fear is a curse. Learn how to tell the difference. A date won't take "no" for an answer. The new nanny gives a mother an uneasy feeling. A stranger in a deserted parking lot offers unsolicited help. The threat of violence surrounds us every day. But we can protect ourselves, by learning to trust--and act on--our gut instincts. In this empowering book, Gavin de Becker, the man Oprah Winfrey calls the nation's leading expert on violent behavior, shows you how to spot even subtle signs of danger--before it's too late. Shattering the myth that most violent acts are unpredictable, de Becker, whose clients include top Hollywood stars and government agencies, offers specific ways to protect yourself and those you love, including...how to act when approached by a stranger...when you should fear someone close to you...what to do if you are being stalked...how to uncover the source of anonymous threats or phone calls...the biggest mistake you can make with a threatening person...and more. Learn to spot the danger signals others miss. It might just save your life.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
I'm an ardent feminist and my approach to rape and violence against women is to highlight the societal causes. Rather than admonishing women to protect themselves better, I think it's more constructive to explore how society creates rapists.
I think my biggest
On the other hand, de Becker's book doesn't actually read like one of those annoying "How not to get raped" email lists. He doesn't suggest restrictions on women's freedom. Indeed, he argues for the exact opposite. He criticizes the baseless fear that women often feel and encourages them to let it go.
While this, I feel, is a good message, I don't think it can be fully presented without an acknowledgement of the rape culture we exist in wherein if a woman doesn't take "proper precautions", she's thereafter blamed for anything that may happen to her. De Becker neglects to address this angle, which plays a large role in complicating matters.
Feminist literature focuses on how the world needs to shift to make things safer. This book - as well as other mainstream sources - focus on how the individual needs to change to be safer within the world. I feel both are necessary to a degree, but I prefer to think in terms of the former.
That all being said, it's a good book for what it purports to do, and there is a lot more in there than just advice for women. It delves into criminal psychology, stalkers, assassins, and child murderers. I have a fascination with these topics, so I found it quite compelling. A couple sections gave me pause, his chapter on domestic violence, in particular.
Still, this guy knows his stuff, and he provides plenty of examples to illustrate his points. It's not a bad book in that regard, and it's surely worth a read if you're interested in the subject matter.
Partly, though, de Becker is simply just concerned with safety on an individual level, and doesn't consider any larger societal or political implications. For instance: in one story he points out a university's failure to examine a package delivered to a student from a gun company, which did contain a gun which the student later used to shoot several classmates. That is absolutely a warning sign of violence - but I'm on the side of the dean who said that the school can't be in the business of opening its students' mail.
He also never brought up one particular failure of intuition which I'm sure lots of people have been thinking about. De Becker puts a lot of weight on intuition, saying that if you're afraid, it's because you've noticed something that's a sign of danger. Well, look, I live in a racist society and my intuition jumps when I see a black guy just out and walking around. Granted I'm a pretty harmless white girl and the worst thing that will happen if I act on my "intuition" is that I'll make some guy's day a little more miserable, but we've all seen recently what happens with people who feel a little more entitled to act out based on their "intuition" of danger.
A substantial amount of content, however, focused on celebrities and celebrity lifestyles, and was big on anecdotes and short on actual advice. The author also constantly touted his security company, which after a while started to grate. I'm sure his company does great work, but in a book that's advertised as a way to empower people into taking their security into their own hands, it seems out of place. There's also a risk of confirmation bias in the stories the author tells, and I'm hesitant to take his word as 100% true--especially when certain parts of the book openly contradict each other, like when he pigeonholes certain traits as risk factors for violence while at the same time saying that people should trust their intuition above any arbitrary list of risk factors.
All things considered, this book is a good reference for those interested in personal safety, but I recommend reading it for general advice rather than as a how-to manual for safety.
While it has great pointers, the weakness of the book is that it is primarily prevention methods. I don't think it'll help
There are plenty of cases where things go badly and there is apparently abundant advance evidence; a boy who decapitates a neighbor’s dog ends up as a mass murderer; a boy who molests children in grade school ends up continuing to do it. We all remember reading about the Navy Yard shooting (too recent for this book) where there was all sorts of evidence that the perpetrator was at least a bubble off level. Still, I’d like to see more numbers. Worth reading for the shock value of some of the cases, and the advice about being careful in dangerous situations is well taken. A fairly long bibliography, but mostly consisting of similar “pop psychology” books.
Even then I can't shake the feeling that it was mostly just filler, and the author stroking his ego, and sensationalism, that
I don't think his logic is sound neither, he seems to be taking examples that validate his world view and ignoring all others, yeah, all those people had a gut feeling and they ended up being right, but what about all those times you aren't right? Even though he did approach this topic on the last chapters about worrying and anxiety vs real fear the fact is that is very difficult to make that distinction in reality while you are anxious, and he doesn't make any suggestions about how to help it.
I'm not going to analyze this book chapter by chapter but there are other things that didn't sit well with me, like his saying that "if it is in your head now it was in your head then", that's not really reliable, memory alone isn't reliable, people misremember things all the time, and if we are talking about a high-stakes situation (as he calls them) then it's a hundred times worse, you can't trust a witness to remember accurately the clothing of the assailant much less all the signals that may have been a red flag.
I didn't like this book at all.