Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER * The classic work that predicted the anxieties of a world upended by rapidly emerging technologies--and now provides a road map to solving many of our most pressing crises. "Explosive . . . brilliantly formulated." --The Wall Street Journal Future Shock is the classic that changed our view of tomorrow. Its startling insights into accelerating change led a president to ask his advisers for a special report, inspired composers to write symphonies and rock music, gave a powerful new concept to social science, and added a phrase to our language. Published in over fifty countries, Future Shock is the most important study of change and adaptation in our time. In many ways, Future Shock is about the present. It is about what is happening today to people and groups who are overwhelmed by change. Change affects our products, communities, organizations--even our patterns of friendship and love. But Future Shock also illuminates the world of tomorrow by exploding countless clichés about today. It vividly describes the emerging global civilization: the rise of new businesses, subcultures, lifestyles, and human relationships--all of them temporary. Future Shock will intrigue, provoke, frighten, encourage, and, above all, change everyone who reads it.… (more)
User reviews
I first read this book when I was in 8th grade, one year after it was published. I originally found it a tad outrageous but quite intriguing. I bought the major premise at
It IS dated, but Mr. Toffler is one of the few thinkers of his era who had an inkling of what was going to happen in the info-verse. Bruce Springsteen wrote a song called "57 Channels and Nothin's On" which was meant to express the huge number of TV stations in a modern, technological world, and how vapid their content could be. Vapid content aside, the idea of "57 channels" was considered an absurd exaggeration. Now we have almost infinite channels (of information) and Springsteen's song seems quaint.
My career as a librarian spans 1989 to the present and I feel as if I've been straddling that part of Mr. Toffler's exponential curve where it turned upward and went frighteningly off the scale.
Welcome to 2009, and thanks for giving me fair warning Mr. Toffler.
Toffler begins by giving us a broad overview of the state of contemporary society as it stood just as the USA’s golden age was coming to a close. Much of the initial chapters provide overviews of the sociological and psychosocial viewpoints of an uprooted and hyperactive tech-enabled “technosociety” (one of a few dated terms). Touching on the subjects of alienation, grounding, values and belief systems, a la carte lifestyles, political representation and knowledge, Toffler leaves no stone unturned as he exposes to us to the stark realities of the social dysfunction already well underway at the time of publication. Though it paints a rather bleak image of the future, much of what he speaks to remains entirely relevant today.
Following the bleak evaluation of the foreseeable future insofar as he sees it, Toffler then speaks to the positive benefits and revelations that change is capable of producing. His case for the essential nature of change is well put though, at best, merely levels the scale between the pros and cons of our collective future.
The final bit Toffler falls to a slightly more speculative but entirely theoretical tone in which he discusses some of his own potential solutions to mitigating the worst case social scenarios first presented and to the essential tasks he deemed necessary for our successful, albeit inevitable, march forward in time.
However, he wrote this book in 1970, and many of the things that he describes have come to pass.
It is scary to note that this book was so prescient. It was a book that created shock waves at the time that it was published. It is a book to read even now, for its timely warning of what can happen to us if we are not on our guard.
50 years on, it is still relevant.
I read Revolutionary Wealth a while ago and it was good... but this is a beautiful time capsule.
Very secular, but he doesn't pretend to be theological (though Harvey Cox does have a cameo!)