Publication
SIMON & SCHUSTER (2001)
Original publication date
2014
Collections
Description
Biography & Autobiography. History. Nonfiction. In The Greatest Knight, renowned historian Thomas Asbridge draws upon the thirteenth-century biography and an array of other contemporary evidence to present a compelling account of William Marshal's life and times. Asbridge charts the unparalleled rise to prominence of a man bound to a code of honor yet driven by unquenchable ambition. Marshal was the true Lancelot of his era-a peerless warrior and paragon of chivalry. As a five-year-old boy, William was sentenced to execution and led to the gallows, yet this landless younger son survived his brush with death, and went on to train as a medieval knight. Against all odds, Marshal rose through the ranks-serving at the right hand of five English monarchs-to become a celebrated tournament champion, a baron and politician, and, ultimately, regent of the realm. This knight's tale lays bare the brutish realities of medieval warfare and the machinations of royal court, and draws us into the heart of a formative period of our history. It is the story of one remarkable man, the birth of the knightly class to which he belonged, and the forging of the English nation.… (more)
User reviews
LibraryThing member Keith.G.Richie
Being a typical American, I don't know nearly as much English history as I should. I admit I had never heard of William Marshal before picking this book up.
Marshal was a knight in service to Henry II, Henry The Younger, Richard I (the Lionhearted), King John, and finally to Henry III. He rose from
Toward the end of his life, he played a major part in the negotiation and acceptance of The Great Charter, or Magna Carta.
Thomas Asbridge writes a very readable history of Marshal's life, including a large amount of history of England, Wales, Ireland, and the lands then held in what is now France (Brittany, Normandy, Aquataine, etc). Asbridge draws heavily on the only surviving copy of a contemporary biography of Marshal that was commissioned shortly after his death by his son William The Younger. Using this and many other sources, Asbridge is able to make the period come alive. In the years before full plate armor, when knights wore mainly chain mail and when tournament fighting had not yet developed into the more refined jousting contests of later, we learn these kinds of facts that help visualize what life was like for these men and women, as apart from our current popular ideas of "knights in shining armor" and pretty maidens cheering for their champions.
I don't believe I've read one of Asbridge's book before, but he's on my shopping list now.
Marshal was a knight in service to Henry II, Henry The Younger, Richard I (the Lionhearted), King John, and finally to Henry III. He rose from
Show More
being a second son in a quite minor family to not only being one of the most prominent magnates of his day, serving as close advisor to the above named kings, but eventually serving as Guardian of the Realm (essentially regent and de facto ruler of the kingdom for the boy King Henry III).Toward the end of his life, he played a major part in the negotiation and acceptance of The Great Charter, or Magna Carta.
Thomas Asbridge writes a very readable history of Marshal's life, including a large amount of history of England, Wales, Ireland, and the lands then held in what is now France (Brittany, Normandy, Aquataine, etc). Asbridge draws heavily on the only surviving copy of a contemporary biography of Marshal that was commissioned shortly after his death by his son William The Younger. Using this and many other sources, Asbridge is able to make the period come alive. In the years before full plate armor, when knights wore mainly chain mail and when tournament fighting had not yet developed into the more refined jousting contests of later, we learn these kinds of facts that help visualize what life was like for these men and women, as apart from our current popular ideas of "knights in shining armor" and pretty maidens cheering for their champions.
I don't believe I've read one of Asbridge's book before, but he's on my shopping list now.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jcbrunner
This is a good account of the life of William Marshal that suffers from the common defect of most biographies of the era. The source material just isn't sufficient to produce a full biography of persons who are not kings themselves. At times, therefore, the main protagonist almost disappears and a
While Asbridge is not as guilty as some of his colleagues, he still presents the 1217 conflict as a French vs. English one whereas in reality it was between Capetian French and Norman-Angevin French. The English proper were mere spectators of the fights between French-speaking knights. Prince Louis was already in charge of London. Had he prevailed, his forces would now be described as "the English". Instead, William Marshal turned the table by winning the skirmish/ambush of Lincoln against the unorganized besiegers.
Overall, the biography would have benefited from tighter editing but is quite readable. If you have a chance, read also Duby's great account of Marshal's last days.
Show More
general history of the era is produced. It is interesting to learn about the activities of the different kings William Marshal served but it would be even more so to learn about Marshal's own activities. Perhaps the thematic approach chosen by Georges Duby is a more valid one. Duby is also not constrained by upholding English national myth and decorum. The bombastic subtitle "William Marshal, the Power Behind Five English Thrones" just is not a fair rendering of actual history. Only in case of the minor Henry III does William Marshal play the crucial role in adapting Magna Carta into a workable compromise document and preserving Henry's throne against challengers.While Asbridge is not as guilty as some of his colleagues, he still presents the 1217 conflict as a French vs. English one whereas in reality it was between Capetian French and Norman-Angevin French. The English proper were mere spectators of the fights between French-speaking knights. Prince Louis was already in charge of London. Had he prevailed, his forces would now be described as "the English". Instead, William Marshal turned the table by winning the skirmish/ambush of Lincoln against the unorganized besiegers.
Overall, the biography would have benefited from tighter editing but is quite readable. If you have a chance, read also Duby's great account of Marshal's last days.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Stbalbach
The greatest Medieval knight of the High Middle Ages (1000-1300), what is not to love. Asbridge does a yeoman's job filling in the story of Marshal, and the broader context of the period in France and England. Marshal lived through the death of 5 kings so there is a lot of famous history of the
Show More
second half of the 12th century and first few decades of the 13th. Barons Wars and rebellions, Magna Carta, Second and Third Crusades, Richard the Lionheart, King Henry II and III. King Stephen and John. Rise and fall of the Angevin Empire. Tournaments. This was the high of the High, a golden age that later generations would try to recapture and emulate, even to this day. I usually find Medieval political history to be a series of dry contingencies, but when told through the eyes of a single individual main character, and with proper context and writing skill, it's possible to appreciate in a way that is understandable and immediate. Recommended even for the non-Medievalist. Show Less
LibraryThing member Medievalgirl
William Marshall is a popular subject for biography. I know of at least four such titles- mostly with a different focus or perspective.
Richard Brooks 'The Knight Who Saved England' (2013), had an emphasis on battles and military history. David Crouch's 'Knighhood, War and Chivalry' is a more
Thomas Asbridge's offering is a timely and accesible work, revealing much about Marshall's 'life and times', as well as his famous role in the events surrounding the creation of the Magna Carta, and the aftermath.
I also liked the information about Knighthood and the role of a retainer in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. In some ways, there seemed to be more focus on this than William's later career as a major Magnate, the Earl of Pembroke and Lord of Striguil.
In the course of the narrative, something was revealed of what it meant to try to adhere to the code of Chivalry, which Marshall was hailed as a paragon of, but tends to be disparaged today.
Marshall was perhaps not the most Romantic or Charismatic of heroes- indeed sometimes he comes across as a rather plain and ordinary chap, who life was coloured by his involvement with the major events and figures of the age, and his tendency to ride the tide of politics and intruige, but generally come out on top.
More than once on the wrong side and embroiled in rebellion, sometimes reckless, and not always making good choices, the flawed man comes through- and also the virtues (that he seems to have believed in) such as loyalty to his Lord- even if that Lord's cause seemed to have been hopeless.
Some have drawn attention to a few translation and technical errors (is it more correct to say hearing mass, or going to mass?), but this was still an informative, useful work and a good read. I want more than evern to read some Transcription of the 'The Life of William Marshall' (what a shame the only surviving copy is owned by America).
Some may accuse the author of having fallen into what some regard as the age-old biogaphers trap of growing to love and admire his subject to an undue degree, and so losing objectivity. Yet, perhaps, that admiration is not wholly undeserved.
Marshall may not have been the best warrior, or the most astute politican, but the contemporary adage of 'The Greatest Knight' seems well deserved.
Richard Brooks 'The Knight Who Saved England' (2013), had an emphasis on battles and military history. David Crouch's 'Knighhood, War and Chivalry' is a more
Show More
academic work. Thomas Asbridge's offering is a timely and accesible work, revealing much about Marshall's 'life and times', as well as his famous role in the events surrounding the creation of the Magna Carta, and the aftermath.
I also liked the information about Knighthood and the role of a retainer in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. In some ways, there seemed to be more focus on this than William's later career as a major Magnate, the Earl of Pembroke and Lord of Striguil.
In the course of the narrative, something was revealed of what it meant to try to adhere to the code of Chivalry, which Marshall was hailed as a paragon of, but tends to be disparaged today.
Marshall was perhaps not the most Romantic or Charismatic of heroes- indeed sometimes he comes across as a rather plain and ordinary chap, who life was coloured by his involvement with the major events and figures of the age, and his tendency to ride the tide of politics and intruige, but generally come out on top.
More than once on the wrong side and embroiled in rebellion, sometimes reckless, and not always making good choices, the flawed man comes through- and also the virtues (that he seems to have believed in) such as loyalty to his Lord- even if that Lord's cause seemed to have been hopeless.
Some have drawn attention to a few translation and technical errors (is it more correct to say hearing mass, or going to mass?), but this was still an informative, useful work and a good read. I want more than evern to read some Transcription of the 'The Life of William Marshall' (what a shame the only surviving copy is owned by America).
Some may accuse the author of having fallen into what some regard as the age-old biogaphers trap of growing to love and admire his subject to an undue degree, and so losing objectivity. Yet, perhaps, that admiration is not wholly undeserved.
Marshall may not have been the best warrior, or the most astute politican, but the contemporary adage of 'The Greatest Knight' seems well deserved.
Show Less
LibraryThing member egrant5329
I have mixed feelings about this book and debated a 3 vs 4 star rating. The story of William Marshal is very interesting and I learned a lot about the history, development and evolutions of knights, but I found this a slow book to read. I am not sure, given the paucity of information, how the
Show More
author could have written it better, but I think someone like David McCullough would have done a better job. It was still an interesting that I would recommend to history buffs as it will most likely change your perception of knights and give you a lesson on the kings of that time. Show Less
LibraryThing member egrant5329
I have mixed feelings about this book and debated a 3 vs 4 star rating. The story of William Marshal is very interesting and I learned a lot about the history, development and evolutions of knights, but I found this a slow book to read. I am not sure, given the paucity of information, how the
Show More
author could have written it better, but I think someone like David McCullough would have done a better job. It was still an interesting that I would recommend to history buffs as it will most likely change your perception of knights and give you a lesson on the kings of that time. Show Less
LibraryThing member DinadansFriend
A biography of William Marshal, an influential member of the Plantagenet Court for the reigns of five kings. From the time of Henry II to his role as guardian to the enfant Henry III, William was steadily increasing his personal status, and that of his children. He is also noted in constitutional
Show More
history due to his editing and dissemination of two further editions of the Magna Carta, in 1216, and 1217. Asbridge has done well in producing a readable text. However, I found it necessary to add to the initial list of maps in the table of contents, a listing for 1) a map of the Angevin Empire on P.77, 2) of Ireland p.277, 3) of Lincoln p.355. Therefore the editing was not well done by the publisher. The rest of the book is well produced. I hope there may have been the necessary corrections in the later editions. Show Less
LibraryThing member zot79
This was pretty fun to listen to. I'm a little unhappy with the inaccuracies in this volume that have been pointed out by other, more knowledgeable, reviewers. But since I'm not a history scholar details like this don't really bother me. I just wanted something to give me an overall feel for the
Comparisons with Game of Thrones are inevitable. It's fascinating how similar and different GoT is to many aspects of medieval reality.
Once again, I had to play this at 1.25 speed to keep from being too frustrated with the reading.
Show More
era. Comparisons with Game of Thrones are inevitable. It's fascinating how similar and different GoT is to many aspects of medieval reality.
Once again, I had to play this at 1.25 speed to keep from being too frustrated with the reading.
Show Less
Language
Original language
English
ISBN
1847396410 / 9781847396419
Physical description
464 p.; 7.83 inches
Pages
464